Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• This relationship is founded on the legal principle of “qui facit per alium facit per se”,
translated to mean he who acts through another is deemed to have acted himself.
WHO IS A PRINCIPAL?
• A principal is a party that empowers or authorizes another party to act on its behalf.
• The agent is required to act in good faith and in the best interest of the principal and not
his selfish interest.
• Insane persons.
• Intoxicated persons.
SCOPE OF AN AGENT’S AUTHORITY.
• This is the limit to which an agent may exercise his authority or capacity while
acting as an agent.
• In spite of the types of authority, a person who knows or ought to know that an
agent lacks authority to undertake a particular transaction and proceeds to deal
with that person cannot hold the agent’s principal responsible.
• Secondly, where an agent indicates to a third party that he has authority to
undertake a particular transaction with him and that third party relies on that
indication and proceeds to deal with the agent, the third party can hold the agent
responsible for breach of warranty
Conclusion
An agent is a person, persons or entity that contracts or transacts business on behalf of a principal.
The relationship they form is one of a fiduciary nature, with which the agent is to engage in business on
behalf of the principal with the principal’s best interests at heart.
This fiduciary relationship is what is termed as an agency.
An agent’s authority may be expressly given, implied, or apparent.
However, only persons with capacity to contract under the law of contract in Ghana can act as agents..
Legally, a principal is responsible for the acts of an agent (qui facit per alium facit per se). Unless the
agent has acted in excess of his authority.
A principal can be held accountable for the actions of the agent even if he acted ultra vires.
However, a person with knowledge that the agent is acting ultra vires cannot hold the principal responsible.
the third party can hold the agent responsible for breach of warranty, where the third party acted on a false
representation of the agent’s authority.