• Many people have their own theories on what makes
a criminal • there are several Psychological theories of crim, most of which have been shown to have a sound scientific basis • Psychology of crim plays significant role in the criminal justice system • The conduct of psychological criminal profiling that aim to determine likely suspects through a mix of crime-scene are oftern made by the forensic psychologist or criminak anthropologist. Psychology Of Crimes? • Psychology of crimes is usually used to mean the study of people's mind or spirit, to reason out why an individual person become criminal
• Psychology of crime is the study of individual
characteristics or qualities such as personality, reasoning, thought, intelligence, learning, perception, imagination, memory and creativity. Cognitive theory places the study of psychology in the mind;
• They see human action as the result of driving or
compelling mental forces or to be the result of menta reasoning and beliefs. • They see that internal mental processes can be affected and even altered by certain factors in the environment which either reinforce or discourage the behavior. • Clearly there is no strong dividing line between these two.
A degree of overlap is likely, While some
psychological theoriess may not fit near into either school of thought. Psychoanalysis of Criminality • A number of different ideas are drawn together under psychoanalysis, but the general stand-point is that inner, dynamic forces are used to explain human behavior.
The Constituent of Personality
• Freud split the personality into three parts, that is, the "id" the "ego," and the "super-ego." • The "id" is an unconscious area of the mind; it is the most primitive portion of the personality,for example, to eat, drink, excrete, to be warm and comfortable, and to obtain sexual pleasure. • The "ego" does not exist at birth, but is something the individual learns. It tempers the desirous longings of the "id" with the reality of what might happen if it is not controlled,
• The super-ego" is largely a part of the unconscious
personality. It may contain conscious in its operation. It is the conscience which exists in the unconscious area of the mind. FORMATION OF THE SUPER EGO
* The super-ego is often seen as the internalized
rules and admonitions of the parents, and trough them,of society.
* The '' id " demands pleasures: the 'super-
ego ' demand control and repression.
* The ''super-ego' of many children were
underdeveloped and rendered them latent deliquents, psychologically prepared for a life of crime. * Parental neglect was not seen as the only reason for the super-ego to be underdeveloped.
* Onother variable which some argue and that has
a profound effect upon the development of the super-ego, and one the ideas most commonly associate with Sigmund Freud ( 1856 - 1939), is the " Oedipus complex " and the Electra complex . Who are Normal Criminals? * So fa, most of the criminal tendencies referred to on psychoanalysis have been those of "abnormal criminals" who behavioral problems arise from inner conflict. Psychoanalysis may also be used to explain some "normal criminals.
* The main trait of "normal criminals" are that the
whole personality, including the super-ego, is criminal. As there is no conflict between "super-ego" and the rest of personality, there is no personality problem and so they are "normal criminals." * This means that, presumably because of their environment and upbringing, these people regard crime as normal and acceptable and they suffer no qualms about their criminal conduct. Extroversion V.S Neuroticism
* Personality is then based upon a combination of these
biological and social factors. There are two main dimensions to each personality which affected the individual's learning ability; extroversion which runs from extroversion to introversion and is often referred to as the "E-Scale;" and neuroticism, which runs from neurotic or unstable to stable and is often referred to "N-Scale." These dimensions are continuous and most people fall in the middle range, but with some of the extremes of each of the personalities. Normal Criminal Personality
* The line between normality and abnormality is
impossible to dra exactly. It is usually negatively described as the state of mind o personality that cannot be classified as having mental abnormality, tha is, which cannot be classed as mentally defective, psychopathic neurotic, psychotic, or compulsive. The mere fact that something is numerically common does not make it normal, and similarly the bare facts that something is uncommon does not make it abnormal. • The activity is portrayed as something which may "normal" person would find abhorrent and would not commit. Since most studies are ested against what society considers acceptable and normal, this is in effect the reality of the situation, and it is clear that as values in society change, so too with ideas of normality. • This schism causes problems, i.e., it is confusing for the professional concerned; it may provide sentences with ambiguous information; and it may relieve the offender of any feeling of responsibility. Despite these problems, it has been the psychiatric and psychological field of criminal explanation which have generally carried more weight than the biological field. Assessments of Dangerousness • The criminal justice system includes some form of assessing the danger posed by individuals who have been convicted of violent or other serious crimes. Such assessments help to decide how long these people should be removed from society.
• In some societies, such removal is possible and
occurs without any crime having been committed in the form of civil committal to mental institutions. • This is only possible where the individual's mental stability has been questioned, and rather than just the dangerousness which is the deciding factor.
• the basic concept is that of the
protection of society rather than of dangerousness. Individuals have their own perceptions of danger and or unacceptable danger, often related to their sex, culture, social class, etc., and some are deeply personal. • are deeply personal. Therefore, certain frequently accepted boundaries are applied. For most people, any assessment of dangerousness such as to justify an individual having already committed a serious crime, one they regard as involving danger or the potential for danger.
• the powers being proposed seem to ignore this
element. Most would agree that crimes involving personal injury are the most serious and the most dangerous type of conduct, but other factors need to be taken into account in the assessment of danger. "APPROACHES TO PREDICT VIOLENT BEHAVIOR"
* For many years, theorists have been trying to
predict who will offend and reoffend. Psychoanalysts have, indeed, used a number of different approaches and theories to predict violent behavior. Several of these are briefly discussed here under: 1. INSTINCT THEORY-Instinct theory assumes there is an inner force which desired aggression and violence.Freud called it the "DEATH FORCE AND THANATOS" The life instinct, "Eros " or Greek God of Love and Thanatos or demon personification of death are in conflict and the aggression needs to be allowed to vent itself.
2. DRIVE THEORY -it is also assumes that there is an
inner force which desires and aggresion and violence, but in drive theory the inner force is acquired through experience and it is not innate. the basic assertion is that when individuals are prevented from getting what they want,they becime frustrated. 3. PERSONALITY AND VIOLENCE -there are a number of different ideas about personality and violence. The first claim is that people with psychopathic tendencies, sometimes known as sociopaths or anti- social personalities, are more likely than other to commit frequent acts of violence.
4. RISK and MENTAL DISORDER- It was concluded that
there were five central factors to an assessment of risk of dangerousness. The factors are that is ,the level and type of social support available to person; how impulsive the individual is; reactions, such as anger, to provocation; the level of ability to empathize with others ; and nature of any delusions and hallucination. 5. Q-SORT and MULTIPLE TESTS- The Q-Sort test was aimed to get round the subjective problems noted in the previous test. The clinician has to score a person on a scale of 1-7 for each 200 question on issues such as "tendency to act impulsively" however, it may prove promising in the future but there are still problems with the subjective and uncomplimentary assessments.
6. HARE PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIST- this tries to isolate
an anti-social personality disorder, or severe personality disorder, without reference to criminal behavior. It is this type of test that is most likely to be used in the assessment under the government new proposals if they ever become law. 7. MACHO PERSONALITY- The macho personality views violence as manly, danger as intrinsically exciting, callous sexual activity aimed at women as acceptable ,and interprets being tough as a form of self control. This personality is connected with inter-male violence, callousness, violence and sexual attacks on women ,gang violence and abuse of women and their children PERSPECTIVE ON PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMES
• -Most people would accept that every
individual has a personality which is special to them. What is far more difficult to accept is that certain personalities will always or usually be criminal. It is pressumed that one cannot predict criminal behavior by studying personality. • Accordingly, all human behavior, criminal or otherwise, is a product of psychological mechanisms combined with environmental input that activates them or inhibits their activation. Therefore, criminal behaviors such as robbery, assault, rape, and murder comprise a subset of human behavior.
• They occur at non- trivial rates in all known cultures
in predictable patterns. • In every culture, criminal behavior such as rape and homicide show cross-culturally predictable age and sex distribution, and increase dramatically when males enter reproductive competition. THANK YOU