Crime Prediction Using Machine Learning

and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review

and Future Directions
 Abstract
• Predicting crime using machine learning and deep learning techniques has gained considerable attention
from researchers in recent years, focus- ing on identifying patterns and trends in crime occurrences. This
review paper examines over 150 articles to explore the various machine learn- ing and deep learning
algorithms applied to predict crime. The study provides access to the datasets used for crime prediction by
researchers and analyzes prominent approaches applied in machine learning and deep learning algorithms
to predict crime, oering insights into dif- ferent trends and factors related to criminal activities. Additionally,
the paper highlights potential gaps and future directions that can enhance the accuracy of crime prediction.
Finally, the comprehensive overview of research discussed in this paper on crime prediction using machine
learning and deep learning approaches serves as a valuable ref- erence for researchers in this eld. By gaining
a deeper understanding of crime prediction techniques, law enforcement agencies can develop strategies to
prevent and respond to criminal activities more e
ectively.
 EXISTING WORK

• Despite the promise of machine learning and deep learning for crime pre- diction, several
challenges must be addressed. One of the biggest challenges is the availability of high-
quality crime data. Crime data can be dicult to obtain, and the available data may need to
be completed or reliable. Addi- tionally, collecting and using crime data is associated with
privacy and ethical concerns. These challenges must be addressed to fully realize the
potential of machine learning and deep learning for crime prediction. Another challenge is
the interpretability of machine learning and deep learning models. These mod- els can be
challenging to understand and interpret, limiting their usefulness in decision-making. To e
ectively apply these models to the problem of crime prediction, it is vital to develop
interpretable models that can provide clear explanations of their predictions.
DISADVANTAGES
1.Data Intensity: Training deep learning models requires substantial labeled
data, which might be a challenge in the context of crime prediction.
2.Complexity: CNNs are complex models that demand considerable
computational resources and expertise in model design and training.
3.Black Box Nature: CNNs are often considered black boxes due to their
complex architectures, making it difficult to interpret the rationale behind
their predictions.
4.Overfitting: Deep learning models can be prone to overfitting, especially
with limited data. Regularization techniques are necessary to mitigate this.
5.Data Augmentation: Preprocessing and augmenting crime data for CNN
training can be resource-intensive and require careful implementation.
PROPOSED SYSTEM
• Crime prediction is a crucial component of modern law enforcement strategies aimed at enhancing public safety and
resource allocation. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the application of two distinct but
complementary approaches, namely Machine Learning with Random Forest and Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNN), for the task of crime prediction. Leveraging advancements in data analysis and computational capabilities,
these techniques offer promising opportunities to identify crime patterns and enable more informed decision-making by
law enforcement agencies.
• The paper begins by introducing the concepts of crime prediction and the significance of accurate and timely predictions in
fostering safer communities. Subsequently, it delves into the detailed methodologies of using Machine Learning with
Random Forest and Deep Learning with CNN for crime prediction.
• For the Machine Learning aspect, the paper explores the utilization of Random Forest, a versatile ensemble learning
method known for its ability to handle structured data. It investigates how Random Forest models can effectively capture
complex relationships between various crime-related features and predict crime occurrences. Furthermore, the paper
discusses the interpretability of Random Forest models through feature importance analysis, enabling law enforcement
professionals to gain insights into contributing factors.
• On the other hand, the Deep Learning section focuses on employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for crime
prediction, particularly in scenarios involving image-based data, such as surveillance camera footage. It highlights the
capacity of CNNs to automatically learn hierarchical features from raw image data and capture spatial hierarchies crucial for
detecting anomalies or criminal activities. The paper emphasizes the role of transfer learning, where pre-trained CNNs are
adapted to crime prediction tasks, harnessing learned features and enhancing performance even with limited crime-specific
data.
•
• Advantages
1. Interpretability: Random Forest models can provide insights into feature importance, allowing analysts and law enforcement professionals to understand
which factors contribute most to crime prediction.
2. Handling Non-linearity: Random Forest can capture non-linear relationships between features and crime occurrences, making it suitable for complex
datasets.
3. Ensemble Learning: The ensemble nature of Random Forest, where multiple decision trees are combined, helps reduce overfitting and improves
generalization.
4. Robustness to Noise: Random Forest can handle noisy data and outliers, leading to more robust predictions.
5. Less Data Preprocessing: Random Forests are less sensitive to data preprocessing steps like feature scaling, making them more user-friendly.
6. Quick Training: Training a Random Forest model is generally faster than training complex deep learning models.
7. Limited Data: Random Forest can perform well even with a limited amount of data, which is beneficial in cases where crime data is scarce.
• Disadvantages of Using Random Forest (Machine Learning):
1. Limited Feature Learning: Random Forest might struggle to capture intricate patterns and dependencies in data compared to deep learning methods.
2. Limited Generalization: While ensembling helps, Random Forest might struggle to generalize to complex, unseen patterns as effectively as deep learning
models.
3. Hyperparameter Tuning: Random Forest models have hyperparameters that require tuning for optimal performance, which can be time-consuming.
4. Feature Engineering: Extracting relevant features for crime prediction might require domain expertise and manual effort.
Modules
• Data Preprocessing:
• Machine Learning with Random Forest:
• Deep Learning with CNN:
• Ensemble and Decision Making:
• Ethical and Interpretability Considerations:
• Visualization and Reporting:
• Deployment and Integration:
• Data Preprocessing:
1.Data Collection: Gather crime-related data including historical
crime records, geographical information, demographic data,
weather information, etc.
2.Data Cleaning: Clean and preprocess the data, handling missing
values, outliers, and inconsistencies.
3.Feature Engineering: Extract relevant features from the data,
such as crime types, time of day, geographical coordinates, and
any relevant contextual information.
• Machine Learning with Random Forest:
4.Data Partitioning: Split the dataset into training, validation, and testing
sets.
5.Model Training: Train the Random Forest model using the training
dataset and tune hyperparameters to optimize performance.
6.Model Evaluation: Evaluate the model using appropriate metrics like
accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score on the validation and test
datasets.
7.Feature Importance Analysis: Analyze feature importance scores
provided by the Random Forest model to understand which features
contribute most to crime predictions.
• Deep Learning with CNN:
8.Image Data Collection: Gather surveillance camera images or relevant visual data
related to crime scenes.
9.Data Preprocessing for Images: Resize, normalize, and augment images for training.
Convert images into a suitable format for CNN input.
10.CNN Architecture Design: Design a CNN architecture suitable for crime prediction
tasks, considering factors like layer configuration, activation functions, and pooling.
11.Transfer Learning: Utilize pre-trained CNN models (e.g., VGG, ResNet) on larger
datasets (e.g., ImageNet) as feature extractors for crime-related images.
12.Model Training: Fine-tune the pre-trained CNN or train a CNN from scratch using the
crime-related image dataset.
13.Model Evaluation: Evaluate the CNN model using metrics like accuracy, confusion
matrix, and ROC curves for image-based crime prediction.
• Ensemble and Decision Making:
14.Ensemble of Models: Combine predictions from Random Forest
and CNN models to create an ensemble prediction for crime
occurrence.
15.Voting Mechanisms: Implement voting strategies (e.g., majority
voting) to make final predictions based on the outputs of individual
models.
• Ethical and Interpretability Considerations:
16.Bias Assessment: Evaluate and mitigate potential biases in the
predictions and models.
17.Interpretability Techniques: Implement techniques to make the
predictions and decision-making process more interpretable and
explainable to law enforcement professionals.
• Visualization and Reporting:
18.Visualizing Predictions: Visualize crime predictions on maps or
other relevant visual representations.
19.Report Generation: Generate reports summarizing model
performance, feature importance insights, and actionable insights
for law enforcement.
• Deployment and Integration:
20.Model Deployment: Deploy the ensemble model or individual
models in a real-time or batch prediction system.
21.Integration with Decision-Making Tools: Integrate the
predictions into law enforcement decision-making tools or
dashboards for actionable insights.
• HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:
• System : Pentium i3 Processor.
• Hard Disk : 500 GB.
• Monitor : 15’’ LED
• Input Devices : Keyboard, Mouse
• Ram : 4 GB
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS:
• Operating system : Windows 10.
• Coding Language : Python
• Web Framework : Flask
Conclusion
• The complexity of crimes has increased along with technological development, creating dicult problems for

law enforcement. Researchers' interest in utiliz- ing machine learning and deep learning to predict crime has

increased recently, with an emphasis on nding patterns and trends in crime occurrences. In order to analyze

the various machine learning and deep learning algorithms used in predicting crime, this paper looks at more

than 150 articles. We have signicantly studied the selected 51 articles to extract the essence of utilized various

ML and DL techniques along with the publicly available datasets. The use of machine learning and deep

learning algorithms to anticipate or identify crim- inal activity has shown signicant promise in resolving the

crime detection problem. These advances may help to increase the precision and ecacy of crime prediction

models by leveraging large datasets and sophisticated algo- rithms. Although there is a lack of literary wisdom

on how these technologies can be used to solve the problem of crime prediction, despite the advance- ments

in this sector. Thus our ndings help to understand the implications of various ML and DL techniques. Also, our

mentioned datasets and future directions will help the existing research community to pursue their research in
 References
• [1] Shah, N., Bhagat, N. & Shah, M. Crime forecasting: a machine learning and computer vision approach to
crime prediction and prevention. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art 4, 1{14 (2021) .
• [2] Chun, S. A. et al. Crime prediction model using deep neural networks, 512{514 (2019). [3] Kshatri, S. S. et
al. An empirical analysis of machine learning algorithms for crime prediction using stacked generalization: An
ensemble approach. IEEE Access 9, 67488{67500 (2021) .
• [4] Janiesch, C., Zschech, P. & Heinrich, K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets 31 (3),
685{695 (2021) .
• [5] Raza, D. M. & Victor, D. B. Data mining and region prediction based on crime using random forest,
980{987 (IEEE, 2021). [6] Elluri, L., Mandalapu, V. & Roy, N. Developing machine learning based predictive
models for smart policing, 198{204 (IEEE, 2019).
• [7] Meijer, A. & Wessels, M. Predictive policing: Review of benets and drawbacks. International Journal of
Public Administration 42 (12), 1031{ 1039 (2019) .
• [8] Hossain, S., Abtahee, A., Kashem, I., Hoque, M. M. & Sarker, I. H. Crime prediction using spatio-temporal
data, 277{289 (Springer, 2020). [9] Saraiva, M., Matijosaitien_e, I., Mishra, S. & Amante, A. Crime prediction
and monitoring in porto, portugal, using machine learning, spatial and text analytics. ISPRS International
Journal of Geo-Information 11
• (7), 400 (2022) . [10] Kounadi, O., Ristea, A., Araujo, A. & Leitner, M. A systematic review on spatial crime
forecasting. Crime science 9, 1{22 (2020) .
 THANK YOU

• To get this project Visit www.nexgenproject.com

• Email: mailtonexgentech@gmail.com
• FOR IEEE PROJECTS AT LOW COST CONTACT +91
9791938249
• NEXGEN TECHNOLOGY, India