Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(a) Sieving
(b) Optical microscopy
(c) Electron microscopy
(d) Sedimentation
(e) Light scattering technique
(f) Adsorption study
(g) Electrolytic resistivity
(h) Permeametry
(i) Coulter counter
(j) Light blockage
SIEVING METHODS:
1. Mechanical Agitation/ Dry sieving- GT
75 micrometer particles (sieve shaker)
Air entrainment methods:
2. Air jet sieving- single sieving
3. Sonic sifter sieving- a nest of sieves
Sample Problem: Given the following date from sieve analysis of a 71.23 g sample of Vitamin C granules.
The angle of repose is the constant, three-dimensional angle (relative to the horizontal
base) assumed by a cone-like pile of material formed by any of several different methods.
The most common methods for determining the static angle of repose can be classified
based on 2 important experimental variables: – the height of the ‘funnel’ through which
the powder passes may be fixed relative to the base, or the height may be varied as the
pile forms;
1. If the height and the diameter of a powder cone are 3.0 cm and 11. 1 cm
respectively then the powder cone may be characterized as?
Hausner Ratio and Carr’s Index/ Compressibility Index- measure of a powder’s ability to
settle.
Method: Same with bulk and tapped density.
Formula:
Sample Problem:
Determine the HR, CI, and flow properties of the following batches of Cefepime powder.
GB- 0343 96 88
HK- 0577 90 74
Hausner Ratio and Carr’s Index/ Compressibility Index- measure of a powder’s ability to
settle.
Sample Problem:
Determine the HR, CI, and flow properties of the following batches of Cefepime powder.
Batch Number Initial Volume (mL) Tapped Volume (mL)
GB- 0343 96 88
HK- 0577 90 74
IPQC of TABLETS
Tablet hardness/ Breaking Force
-Measure of tablet’s resistance to mechanical stress
-Affects dissolution and disintegration
-“Rule of Thumb”
Hardness Testers:
1. Stokes Monsato- Barrel with a compressible spring held between 2 plungers
2. Strong Cobb- hydraulic pressure or air pump
3. Pfizer- operates like pliers
4. Erweka- suspended weight transmits pressure uniformly
5. Schleuniger- motorized and crushes the tablet in horizontal position. Most commonly
used.
IPQC of TABLETS
Criteria:
1. Compressed Uncoated Tablets: 4-10 Kgs (Ex. Advil and Diclofenac Potassium tablets)
2. Buccal Tablets: 7-10 Kgs (Ex. Acyclovir (Sitavig) and Hydrocortisone (Corlan)
3. Sublingual/ Chewable Tablets: 2-3 Kgs (Ex. Tylenol, Panadol)
Tablet Thickness
Reasons for Measuring:
Consumer acceptance
Affects packaging and operations
Apparatus: Vernier’s Caliper
Acceptance Criteria: +- 5% of the Specifications
1.0 mm Plus minus 5% of the average
Ex.
IPQC of TABLETS
Tablet Weight
Unofficial test based on USP XX
Sample size: 20 units (Get the average)
Weight Variation Tolerance
Average Tablet Weight (mg) % Variation
LT 130 10
130-324 7.5
GT 324 5
Acceptance Criteria:
1. NMT 2 tablets are outside the acceptable tablet weight variation.
2. No unit is outside twice % the acceptable weight variation.
Average Tablet Weight (mg) % Variation
IPQC of TABLETS
LT 130 10
Tablet Weight
130-324 7.5
GT 324 5
Sample Problem: Twenty units of Metformin tablets (306.65 mg) were weighed
individually and the following date were obtained.
Aspirin – 3.25 Kg
Starch- 0. 325 Kg
Cab-o-sil – 0.010 Kg
1. What is the acceptable tablet weight range?
IPQC of TABLETS
Tablet Weight
Sample Problem: Compute the acceptable tablet weight range of the given formulation
for a batch size of 10, 000 tablets.
Aspirin – 3.25 Kg
Starch- 0. 325 Kg
Cab-o-sil – 0.010 Kg
1. What is the acceptable tablet weight range?