Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ordinance,
order,
bye-law,
rule,
regulation,
notification,
custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law
Sources of Law (Fons Juris)
Necessity Convenience
In primitive societies, in the absence of Trusted material out of which
codes, local customs were the only
law can be extracted.
available guides.
Strong belief and acceptance Easier to secure reverence for
Supernatural and divine sanctions a code if it claims to be based
Society has already built up
on a custom
expectations and to ignore customs What has been followed in the
would be an injustice.
past is a safe guide for the
They're primarily common consciousness future.
of people and therefore they should be
accepted by the court as an comfortable
authoritative guide.
Kinds of Customs
Essentials of a valid custom.
Immemorial antiquity
Continuous
Reasonablity
Certainity
Consistency
Conformity with statute law
Peacable enjoyment
Must not be against Public Policy
Essentials of a valid custom
Not to be immoral
Must have an obligatory force
Must be followed as a matter of right
Therefore in simple words:
Ambiguity is never appreciated in the legal field and hence custom should have been
observed continuously and uninterruptedly with certainty and this needs to be proven
beyond a reasonable doubt.
The plaintiff claimed the customary right of easement for the shadow falling from the
branches of the tree hanging from the neighbor’s field.
It was held that there cannot be custom related to the shadow of trees since it is
ambiguous, uncertain, and transitory and therefore it cannot give right to any customary
right.
Few cases
In India, it just needs to be from ancient time and can be existing in the
memory of humans in the case of Baba Narayan v. Saboosa, it was observed
that though the customs need not be immemorial but it has to be continuous
to be valid.
Likewise, other cases that did shed light upon the essence of legal
enforceability of customs are Keshav Hargovan v. Bai
Gandi(morality),Muhammad Hussain Faroki v. Syed Mian Saheb
(Continuity), and Mohammad Baqar and Ors. v. Naim-Un-Nisa Bibi
(Compliance with existing statutes).
Sec.10 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956
which is as follows: –
Sec.1. Short title.—This Act may be called the Indian Contract Act, 1872. —This Act may
be called the Indian Contract Act, 1872.”
Extent, Commencement.—It extends to the whole of India 1 [except the State of Jammu
and Kashmir]; and it shall come into force on the first day of September, 1872.
Saving:- Nothing herein contained shall affect the provisions of any Statute, Act or
Regulation not hereby expressly repealed, nor any usage or custom of trade, nor any
incident of any contract, not inconsistent with the provisions of this act.