Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Right to Freedom
of Religion
Arts.25,26,27 and 28
1
Click to edit Master
Constitutional title style
Provisions
2
Click to edit Master
Constitutional title style
Provisions
• Freedom of conscience
and free profession,
practice and propagation
of religion.
3
Click
Art.25to edit Master title style
• (b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open
of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all
classes and sections of Hindus
4
Click
Right to
to edit Master
Freedom oftitle style
Religion
• 25. (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the
other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to
freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise
and propagate religion.
• (2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing
law or prevent the State from making any law—
5
Click
Art.25to edit Master title style
6
Click
Art.25to edit Master title style
7
Click to edit Master title style
CA Debate
• Some members were concerned that the right to propagate would facilitate forced conversions,
and proposed amendments that would either remove the right to propagate altogether or limited
the right to practice religion to the private domain. These amendments were rejected. Others
argued that forced conversions did not come within the ambit of this right; further, free propagation
would also lead to public awareness about different religions, thereby promoting understanding and
peace.
• Clause (2), which threw open Hindu religious institutions to any classes or sections of Hindus, was
the subject of heated debate. One member wanted the scope of the Draft Article to extend beyond
Hindus to Buddhists, Jains and Christians. He argued that this would promote religious harmony
among people following different belief systems. Although this amendment was initially rejected by
the Assembly, the Drafting Committee later extended the clause to Buddhists and Jains.
8 8
Click to edit on
Restrictions Master title style
Freedom of Religion – Art.25
9
Click to edit Master title style
“
What is Religion?
1010
Click
What to edit Master title style
is Religion?
11
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras... vs Sri
Click to edit
Lakshmindra Master
Thirtha title of
Swamiar style
Shirur Mutt : 1954 AIR 282,
12
Click to edit Master
The Durgah title style
Committee, Ajmer and Another v. Syed
Hussain Ali & Others [1962]
• (1) Religion means "a system of beliefs or doctrines which
are regarded by those who professthat religion as
conducive to their spiritual well being";
13
Click to edit Master
The Durgah title style
Committee, Ajmer and Another v. Syed
Hussain Ali & Others [1962]
• (3) Religion need not be theistic;
14
Click to edit
Defining Master
Religion title
- US style
Courts
15
Click
UnitedtoStates
edit Master title(1943)
v. Kauten style
16
Click
UnitedtoStates
edit Master title style
v. Ballard3 (1944)
17
ClickKesavananda Bharati
to edit Master Sripadagalvaru and Ors. Vs. State
title style
of Kerala and others
BENCH:
MISRA, R.B. (J)
CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. (CJ)
BHAGWATI, P.N. (j)
REDDY,O.CHINNAPPA J)
ERADI,V.BALAKRISHNA (J)
20
Click
Facts to edit Master title style
21
Click
Facts to edit Master title style
22
Click to edit Master title style
23
Click
Facts to edit Master title style
24
S.P. Mittal
Click Etc.
to edit vs Union
Master Of India And Others on 8
title style
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
• The word 'religion' does not occur in the
Preamble to the constitution, but the
Preamble does promise to secure to its
citizens
• "Liberty of thought, expression, belief faith
and worship".
• The freedom of conscience and the Right to
profess, propagate and practise religion
guaranteed in Article 25 flow out of the
idea so expressed in Preamble.
25
Click
S.P. to editEtc.
Mittal Master title style
vs Union Of India And Others on 8
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
26
Click to edit
S.P. Mittal Master
Etc. title style
vs Union Of India And Others on 8
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
• Reading Art.25 in the background of the proclamation
regarding Liberty in the Preamble to the constitution, it is clear
that
• (i) the constitution views religion as comprising thought,
expression, belief, faith or worship, as involving the conscience and
as something which may be professed, practised and propagated
and which is any man's attribute in the same manner as race, sex,
language, residence etc:
27
Click to edit
S.P. Mittal Master
Etc. title style
vs Union Of India And Others on 8
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
• (ii) economic, financial, political or other secular activity
may be associated with religious practice though such
activity is not covered by the guarantee of freedom of
conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and
propagate, religion; and so Religion is a matter of
thought, expression, belief, faith and worship, a
matter involving the conscience and a matter which may
be professed, practised and propagated by anyone and
which may even have some secular activity associated
with it
28
Click to edit
S.P. Mittal Master
Etc. title style
vs Union Of India And Others on 8
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
• Religion undefined by the constitution, is incapable of precise judicial
definition either.
• In the background of the provisions of the constitution and the light
shed by judicial precedent, it can at best be said that religion is
a matter of faith.
• It is a matter of belief and doctrine. It concerns the conscience i.e.
the spirit of man.
• It must be capable of overt expressions in work and deed, such as
worship or ritual.
• So religion is a matter of belief and doctrine concerning the
human spirit expressed overtly in the form of ritual and worship.
29
Click to edit
S.P. Mittal Master
Etc. title style
vs Union Of India And Others on 8
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
• Some religions are easily identifiable as religious; some are
easily identifiable as not religious. There are many in the
penumbral region which instinctively appear to some
as religion and to others as not religions. There is no formula of
general application. There is no knife-edge test.
• Primarily, it is a question of the consciousness of the community,
how does the fraternity or sodality (if it is permissible to use
the word without confining it to Roman Catholic Groups) regard
itself, how do others regard the fraternity or sodality.
30
Click to edit
S.P. Mittal Master
Etc. title style
vs Union Of India And Others on 8
November, 1982; Justice Chinnappa Reddy
31
Click
Bijoe to edit Master
Emmanuel title of
v State style
Kerala (1986) [National Anthem
Case]
• “ the question is not whether a particular
religious belief or practice appeals to our
reason or sentiments but whether the
belief is guinenly and conscientiously held
as part of the profession or practice of
religion. Our personal views and
reactions are irrelevant, if the belief is
genuinely and conscientiously held that it
attracts the protection of Art.25 but
subjects of course, to the inhibitions
contained therein.”
32
Click to edit
M.Ismail Master
Faruqui title style
v Union of India (1994)
33
Click to edit
Whether Master
making title style
‘prayer’ in Mosque is an essential and
integral part of Islam Religion?
34
Click to edit
M.Ismail Master
Faruqui title style
v Union of India (1994)
36
Click to edit
M.Ismail Master
Faruqui title style
v Union of India (1994)
37
Click toSIVACHARIYARGAL
ADI SAIVA edit Master title
NALAstyle
SANGAM & ORS. v. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL
NADU & ANR. (2015)
38
Click to edit Master title style
Art.25(2)(b)
• Deals with
• 1) laws providing for social welfare and social reform and
39
Click
State to
of edit Master
Bombay title style
v Narasu Appa Mali (1954)
40
throwing open of all “Hindu religious institutions of public
character
Click to edit” Master
to “all classes
titleand sections of Hindus”
style
41
Click
Art.26to- edit Master
Freedom totitle stylereligious affairs
manage
42
Click to edit Master title style
CA Debate
• The Chairman of the Drafting Committee proposed to make the right subject to ‘public
order, morality and health’. He stated that similar restrictions applied to other
fundamental rights and the State must have the ability to regulate religious institutions
and their affairs if necessary. This was accepted without debate.
• One member took issue with the word ‘charitable’ in clause (a). He argued that allowing
religious denominations to maintain charitable institutions solely to benefit their own
members violated the principles of fraternity and single nationality in the Constitution.
•
4343
Click to edit
Religious Master title style
Denomination
44
Click to edit
Puthota Master title
Chinnamma style
v/s Regional Deputy Director Of Public
Instruction, Guntur
• India is home of several religions, such as Islam, Christianity,
Zoroastrianism and Hinduism. The members belonging to each of
these religions would be a denomination;
45
Click to edit
“manage Master
its own title in
affairs style
matters of religion”
46
Click
Ghostto edit Master title style
Dance?
47
Click to edit
Tandava Master
Dance title style
– protected as rituals?
48
Click to edit Master title style
“
Art.27
4949
Click
Art.27to edit Master title style
50
Click to edit Master title style
CA Debate
5151
Click to edit Master title style
“
Art.28
5252
Click
Art.28to edit Master title style
• The Chairman of the Drafting Committee pointed out the text of the
Draft Article as it stood allowed non-state institutions funded by the
State to provide religious instruction. He moved an amendment to
remove ‘by the State’ from clause (1). This was accepted by the
Assembly.
5454
Click to edit Master title style
“
Secularism
5555
Click to edit Master title style
56
Click to edit
Religious Master title style
Freedom
58
Click to edit
Questions forMaster title style
Discussion
60
Click to edit
Invoked Master title style
Art.356
61
Click
Majorto edit Master
issues title style
Involved
62
Click to editunder
Secularism Master title
the style
Constitution- AHMADI, J;
64
Click to edit Master
S R Bommai’s case title style
• J Ahamadi on Secularism
65
Click
Majorto edit Master
issues title style
Involved
66
Click to edit Master
Constitutional title style
Provisions on Religion
• These fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 15, 16, and 25 to 30 leave no manner
of doubt that they form part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
• Besides, by the 42nd Amendment, Part IV-A entitled 'Fundamental Duties' was
introduced which inter alia casts a duty on every citizen to cherish and follow the
noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom, to uphold and protect
the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India, to promote harmony and the spirit of
common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious,
linguistic and regional or sectional diversities, and to value and preserve the rich
heritage of our composite culture.
• These provisions which I have recalled briefly clearly bring out the dual concept of
secularism and democracy, the principles of accommodation and tolerance as
advocated by Gandhiji and other national leaders.
•
68
Click to edit Master title style
42nd Amendment
69
Click to edit Master title style
Conclusion
7070