Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Establishment of Schools & International Organization
Establishment of Schools & International Organization
Schools
e. Establishment of International Schools
f. Autonomy and Deregulations of Schools
g. Attainment of University Status
Presented by:
Earl Jan L. Santos
MAED-EM
E. Establishment of International Schools
2010 Revised Manual of Regulations For Private Schools in Basic Education
DepEd Order No. 88 s. 2010
Objectives:
1. Acknowledge the role of private higher
education institutions in the growth of
tertiary education.
2. Supervise and manage private higher
education institutions more effi ciently.
F. Autonomy and Deregulations of Schools
NEW POLICIES AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT OF AUTONOMOUS AND
DEREGULATED STATUS TO SELECTED PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
WITH BENEFITS ACCRUING THERETO
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 52, s. 2006"
Conditions of Grant:
• PHEIs must provide data to CHED, establish
affi liations, and comply with CHED policies.
• The authority to grant honorary degrees is
granted.
• Evaluation of status occurs six months before
the grant's expiration.
F. Autonomy and Deregulations of Schools
NEW POLICIES AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT OF AUTONOMOUS AND
DEREGULATED STATUS TO SELECTED PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
WITH BENEFITS ACCRUING THERETO
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 52, s. 2006"
Transitory Provisions:
• The transiti on period allows for evaluati on, retenti on, withdrawal,
upgrading, or downgrading of status for PHEIs.
• PHEIs listed in previous guidelines conti nue to enjoy benefi ts but
with some restricti ons.
G. Attainment of University Status
UPDATED STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT AND/OR RETENTION
OF UNIVERSITY STATUS VIS-À-VIS HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS)
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 48, s. 1996"
Policy:
• University status should be granted only to deserving
HEIs that have demonstrated excellence in
instruction, research, and extension.
G. Attainment of University Status
UPDATED STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT AND/OR RETENTION
OF UNIVERSITY STATUS VIS-À-VIS HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS)
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 48, s. 1996"
Application of Standards:
• The standards and guidelines from the Manual of
Regulations for Private Schools (8th Edition) are
applicable to all HEIs, including State Universities
and Colleges (SUCs), CHED-Supervised Higher
Education Institutions (CHEIs), Private HEIs, and
Community Colleges, with updates and revisions.
G. Attainment of University Status
UPDATED STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT AND/OR RETENTION
OF UNIVERSITY STATUS VIS-À-VIS HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS)
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 48, s. 1996"
Procedure:
• HEIs applying for university status must
submit a writt en applicati on with their
insti tuti onal profi le to the Chairman of CHED.
A top-level team evaluates the applicati on.
G. Attainment of University Status
UPDATED STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT AND/OR RETENTION
OF UNIVERSITY STATUS VIS-À-VIS HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS)
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 48, s. 1996"
Review:
• Compliance with the standards and
guidelines is reviewed every three
years after granting or retaining
university status
G. Attainment of University Status
UPDATED STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE GRANT AND/OR RETENTION
OF UNIVERSITY STATUS VIS-À-VIS HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS)
"CHED Memorandum Order No. 48, s. 1996"
Transitory Provision:
• Existing universities, except single-
track universities, have five years to
comply with the updated standards
and guidelines.
Internal
Organization of
Schools
Presented by:
Earl Jan L. Santos
MAED-EM
Internal Organization of Schools
Education Act of 1982
SEC. 30. Organization of Schools .
BATAS PAMBANSA BLG. 2 32 , Sep tem b e r 11 , 1 9 8 2
Issues:
1. Whether Manaois was aware of the academic qualifications required for
permanent employment at SSC, particularly the completion of a master's degree.
2. Whether SSC was justified in not renewing Manaois's contract based on her
failure to fulfill the academic qualifications.
3. Whether SSC was guilty of illegal dismissal.
Manaois vs St. Scholastica’s College, GR. No. 188914,
December 11, 2013
Rulings:
The Court of Appeals (CA) reversed the National Labor Relations Commission
(NLRC) judgment, dismissing Manaois's complaint, based on the finding that she was aware
of the requirement to possess a master's degree for permanent employment. The CA concluded
that SSC was not guilty of illegal dismissal.
The Supreme Court upheld the CA's decision and ruled in favor of SSC, affirming that
SSC was not guilty of illegal dismissal. The Court determined that Manaois was aware of the
academic qualifications required, including the need for a master's degree, for attaining
permanent status. Additionally, the Court clarified that those who failed to meet the minimum
academic qualifications could not legally acquire permanent status, even if they had
completed a probationary period. Manaois, therefore, could only be considered as a part-time
instructor and not eligible for permanent employment.
Internal Organization of Schools
Labor Code of the Philippines
Articles 83, 87 and 91 of Presidential Decree No, 442
D. Teaching Load
Teaching load requirements for the teacher education
program shall be as follows:
(1) A faculty should not be assigned more than four (4)
different courses/subjects within a semester/term;
(2) A faculty may be assigned an overload;
Internal Organization of Schools
Addendum to CMO 30, s. 2004 “Revised Policies and Standards for Undergraduate
Teacher Education Curriculum”
CHED Memorandum Order No. 52 s. 2007
D. Teaching Load
(3) In no instance should the aggregate teaching load of
faculty exceed 30 units (inclusive of overload and teaching
loads in other schools); and
(4) Teaching load per day should not exceed six (6) hours.
Internal Organization of Schools
2010 Revised Manual of Regulations
For Private Schools in Basic Education
DepEd Order No. 88 s. 2010
Section 1. Eligibility. - To qualify for the grant of maternity leave benefit, the female
worker must meet the following requirements:
a. She must have at least three (3) monthly contributions in the twelve-month period
immediately preceding the semester of childbirth, miscarriage, or emergency
termination of pregnancy. In determining the female member's entitlement to the
benefit, the SSS shall consider only those contributions paid prior to the semester of
contingency;
b. She shall have notified her employer of her pregnancy and the probable date of her
childbirth, which notice shall be transmitted to the SSS in accordance with the rules
and regulations it may provide.
Internal Organization of Schools
"Solo Parents' Welfare Act of 2000.“
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8972
SECTION 2. Coverage.
• Every married male employee in the private sector shall
be entitled to paternity leave benefits of seven (7)
working days with full pay for the first four (4)
deliveries by his lawful spouse under such terms and
conditions as hereinafter provided.
Internal Organization of Schools
The Paternity Leave Act of 1996
Republic Act No. 8187
Conditions:
• She has rendered continuous aggregate
employment service of at least 6 months
for the last 12 months;
• She has filed an application for special
leave;
Internal Organization of Schools
Magna Carta of Women
Republic Act 9710
Conditions:
• She has undergone surgery due to gynecological
disorders as certified by competent physician.
• Female employees who have taken a
leave of absence following surgery for
gynecological disorder or after 15 September
2009 are entitled to avail of the benefit.
Internal Organization of Schools
Other Statutory Benefits of Teachers
1. Private sector workers who are registered members of the Social Security
System (SSS) except self-employed or voluntary members.
Issues:
1. Whether the private respondents (teachers) were illegally
dismissed.
2. Whether reinstatement of the private respondents is proper in this
case.
Labajo vs Alejandro, GR No. L-80383,
September 26, 1988
Rulings: The court found that at the time of their separation, none of the private
respondents had attained permanent status in their employment. They were
either probationary employees or contractual employees, and their employment
contracts had specific terms.
Their contracts stipulated a term of ten months, typically from June to
March or April of the following year, excluding the summer holiday period.
The private respondents' contracts expired on March 31, 1985, and it was
not obligatory for the school to renew these contracts.
The letter informing them of the termination of their services was not a
termination but either a reminder that their contracts were expiring or notice
that the contracts would not be renewed. As their employment was contractual,
the termination was lawful.
Labajo vs Alejandro, GR No. L-80383,
September 26, 1988
Rulings: Therefore, the court held that their separation was not illegal.
Since they were not illegally dismissed, the remedies of reinstatement
and backwages were not applicable.
The court affirmed the decision that held petitioners liable to pay
P52,173.67 to the private respondents for unpaid benefits and dismissed
petitioners' counterclaim for moral and exemplary damages and litigation
expenses.
In summary, the court ruled in favor of the petitioners (Rev. Fr.
Emmanuel Labajo and San Andres High School) and found that the termination
of the teachers' contracts was lawful as their employment was contractual and
their contracts had expired. The court ordered the payment of unpaid benefits to
the teachers but dismissed the claim for reinstatement and backwages.
Regino vs Pangasinan College, GR No. 156109, November
18, 2004
Facts:
Khristine Rea M. Regino was a first-year computer science student at
Pangasinan Colleges of Science and Technology (PCST). During the second
semester of the 2001-2002 school year, she enrolled in logic and statistics
subjects taught by Rachelle A. Gamurot and Elissa Baladad, respectively.
In February 2002, PCST organized a fundraising event called the "Rave
Party and Dance Revolution," requiring each student to purchase two tickets
priced at P100 each. Those who bought tickets were promised additional points
in their test scores, while those who refused were denied the opportunity to take
their final exams. Regino, facing financial difficulties and constrained by her
religious beliefs, declined to purchase the tickets.
Regino vs Pangasinan College, GR No. 156109, November
18, 2004
Facts:
As a consequence of her refusal to pay for the tickets, Gamurot
and Baladad, Regino's teachers, allegedly prevented her from taking
the final exams. Regino filed a complaint on April 25, 2002, seeking
damages against PCST, Gamurot, and Baladad. She claimed P500,000
in nominal damages, P500,000 in moral damages, at least P1,000,000
in exemplary damages, P250,000 in actual damages, as well as
litigation costs and attorney's fees.
.
Regino vs Pangasinan College, GR No. 156109, November
18, 2004
Facts:
On May 30, 2002, PCST and the teachers filed a motion to
dismiss, arguing that Regino should have exhausted administrative
remedies by taking her case to the Commission on Higher Education
(CHED) due to the administrative policy involved. Regino countered
that her case was a claim for damages based on violations of the Civil
Code's human relations provisions, not an administrative matter.
.
Regino vs Pangasinan College, GR No. 156109, November
18, 2004
Facts:
On July 12, 2002, the RTC dismissed Regino's complaint for
lack of cause of action, asserting that the CHED, rather than the
courts, had jurisdiction over the dispute.
.
Regino vs Pangasinan College, GR No. 156109, November
18, 2004
Issues:
1. Whether the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is applicable
in a civil action for damages based on the violation of the Civil Code's human
relations provisions.
2. Whether the petitioner had sufficiently allege a cause of action; failure to do
so warrants its dismissal
3. Whether CHED has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for damages based on
violations of the Civil Code's provisions on human relations filed by a student
against the school.
.
Regino vs Pangasinan College, GR No. 156109, November
18, 2004
Rulings:
1. The court ruled out that the petitioner is ; that the doctrine of exhaustion of
administrative remedies has no bearing on the present case.
2. The Court holds that the Complaint alleges sufficient causes of action
against respondents, and that it should not have been summarily dismissed.
Needless to say, the Court is not holding respondents liable for the acts
complained of. That will have to be ruled upon in due course by the court a
quo.
3. The Petition is hereby GRANTED, and the assailed Orders REVERSED.
The trial court is DIRECTED to reinstate the Complaint and, with all
deliberate speed, to continue the proceedings in Civil Case No. U-7541. No
costs.
.
Manaois vs St. Scholastica’s College, GR. No. 188914,
December 11, 2013
Issues:
1. Whether Manaois was aware of the academic qualifications required for
permanent employment at SSC, particularly the completion of a master's degree.
2. Whether SSC was justified in not renewing Manaois's contract based on her
failure to fulfill the academic qualifications.
3. Whether SSC was guilty of illegal dismissal.
Manaois vs St. Scholastica’s College, GR. No. 188914,
December 11, 2013
Rulings:
The Court of Appeals (CA) reversed the National Labor Relations Commission
(NLRC) judgment, dismissing Manaois's complaint, based on the finding that she was aware
of the requirement to possess a master's degree for permanent employment. The CA concluded
that SSC was not guilty of illegal dismissal.
The Supreme Court upheld the CA's decision and ruled in favor of SSC, affirming that
SSC was not guilty of illegal dismissal. The Court determined that Manaois was aware of the
academic qualifications required, including the need for a master's degree, for attaining
permanent status. Additionally, the Court clarified that those who failed to meet the minimum
academic qualifications could not legally acquire permanent status, even if they had
completed a probationary period. Manaois, therefore, could only be considered as a part-time
instructor and not eligible for permanent employment.
Thank you