Continued… • Set out in section 193 of the LRA as follows: i. Reinstatement or Re-employment • Reinstatement - dismissed employee is put back into the same job or position he or she occupied before the dismissal, on the same terms and conditions. • Restores the contractual position between employer and employee as if it was never broken • Traditional or primary remedy for unfair dismissals. • Ordered where the dismissal is found to be substantively unfair. Continued…. • Must be granted unless one or more of the situation provided for in 193(2)a-d of the LRA exist. • See. Mzeku v VW SA (Pty) Ltd (2001) 2 ILJ 1575 (LAC) • Malelane Toyota v CCMA and Others (1999) 4 LLD 242 (LC) • Maepe v CCMA and Another (2008) 29 ILJ 2189 (LAC) a) employee does not wish to be reinstated or re-employed b) the circumstances surrounding the dismissal are such that continued employment relationship would be intolerable c) it is not reasonably practical for the employer to reinstate or re-employ the employee , or d) the dismissal is unfair only because the employer did not follow fair procedure. Continued…
• Reinstatement must be from a date not earlier than the date of
dismissal. • An order of reinstatement may not be conditional or coupled with any qualification. • There is no time limit on the length of time a reinstatement order may be made retrospectively. • See. Republican Press (Pty) Ltd v Chemical Energy Paper Printing Wood and Allied Workers Union and Others (2007) 28 ILJ 2503 (SCA). Continued… • No guidance on how far reinstatement should be backdated. • Factors such as: employer’s operational requirements, employees earnings since dismissal. • Order of reinstatement does not preclude the employer from later transferring the working arrangements of the employee in accordance its contractual rights. • See. Jeremiah v National Sorghum Breweries (1999) 20 ILJ 1055 (LC) Continued… ii. Compensation • Provided for in section 194 of LRA as amended. • Prior to amendment- s194 drew a distinction between compensation for procedurally and substantively unfair dismissals. • Procedurally unfair dismissals- compensation between date of dismissal and date of award. • S194 as amended – 24 months compensation for automatically unfair dismissals and 12 months compensation for other dismissals. • Must just and equitable Continued… Ferodo (Pty) Ltd v De Reuiter (1993) 14 ILJ 974 (LAC) • The LAC laid down factors to be taken into account when assessing the quantum of compensation as follows: i. Person claiming compensation must have suffered actual financial loss. ii. Proof that loss was caused by unfair labour practice. iii. Loss must be foreseeable. iv. Award must place applicant in a position in which he would have been had the unfair labour practice not been committed. v. Court must be guided by what is reasonable and fair vi. There is a duty on employee to mitigate his damages by taking all reasonable steps to acquire alternative employment. Continued… • Any benefit which applicant receives must be taken into account e.g. severance pay