Professional Documents
Culture Documents
YEAR : 2020-2023
NAME : SATAKSHI NANDY
statistic composite index of life expectancy, by the UNDP in 2010 to measure human
development by accommodating inequality. IHDI is
education (mean years of schooling
the HDI adjusted for inequalities in the distribution
completed and expected years of schooling
of achievements in each of the three dimensions of
upon entering the education system), and per
the HDI (health, education and income). The IHDI
capita income indicators, which is used to
will be equal to the HDI value when there is no
rank countries into four tiers of human inequality, but falls below the HDI value as
development. inequality rises.
AIM OF THE ARTICLE
• The article aims to understand the variation in HDI and IHDI among various states of India ( Intra-
specific variation) as well as comparing HDI and IHDI of India with other countries (inter- specific
variation).
• The author proposed to measure HDI and IHDI on the basis if three major dimension –
I. Inequality in Income
II. Inequality in Education
III. Inequality in Health
• The article seeks to quantify the extent of loss of Human development due to inequality across its
dimension in different states as well as country as a whole.
• The article aims to use comprehensive framework to address various issues related to Human
development, inequity and inequality ever since UNDP introduced the concept of Human development
index in 1990.
• The Article seeks to overcome the state specific development inequality by studying the three dimensions
carefully and suggest some recovery and curative policies to reduce the inequality in HDI and IHDI of
the various states of India and improve the HDI and IHDI rank of India in the world ranking table.
METHODOLOGY
The three major dimensions used in the study of HDI and IHDI are income inequality, educational
inequality and health inequality.
Data on Life expectancy is used as the measure for “ Inequality in Health”.
Data on mean years of schooling and expected years of schooling is used as a measure for “Inequality
in Education”.
Data on Per capita Income (PPP$) is used as measure for “Inequality in Income”.
The sub-indices are calculated using the framework :
Ix = ( Actual Value – Min. value) / ( Max. value – Min. Value)
Aggregate of sub- indices gives HDI : HDI = ³√ Ilife * Ieducation * Iincome
The inequality adjusted estimates of the three dimensions are measured using : I 1 = ( I – Ax ) * Ix , where Ax is
the Atkinson inequality measure of the dimension.
IHDI is obtained by the formula : IHDI = ³√ I1life * I1education * I1income
DATA SOURCES
• INCOME
Per Capita Income estimates for states are obtained using the NSS (National Sample Survey)
estimates of Per capita personal consumption expenditure for the year 2004/2005 for studying both
the HDI and IHDI.
• EDUCATION
The mean Years of Schooling of the adult population ( aged 25years and above ) are estimated using
the NSS data on ‘ educational status and training of India’ for the year 2004/2005 to study both HDI
and IHDI.
• HEALTH
The estimates of life expectancy of 16 major states are obtained from the SRS ( sample Registration
System) from 2002- 2006 are used. The SRS data of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, and Uttar Pradesh are
not adequately provided in the SRS, so related data are used for studying both the HDI and IHDI.
OBSERVATIONS
• India with an HDI value of 0.504, falls in the category of countries with “ Medium
Human Development” because it falls short to the world average HDI index, which is
0.624 ( as per UNDP 2010).
• The loss due to inequality in the three major dimensions is around 32% in India which is
much higher than observed on an average in the world ( around 22%). This is a serious
cause for concern.
• Punjab, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujrat and
Uttarakhand are the major states in the ‘medium HDI’ category and all the other states of
India fall under the ‘Low HDI’ category.
• India’s rank on the HDI list of the world is 120th which clearly shows that the inequality
in distribution of Human development is distinctly pronounced in India in comparison
with the world scenario and it needs serious policy transformation for its improvement.
CRITICAL REMARKS
• The article was efficient in thoroughly pointing out the HDI and IHDI of Indian States and comparing
India’s HDI and IHDI with the average of the world but –
Health dimension is measured by life expectancy which is not very sensitive to difference in
health status and use of indicators reflecting morbidity and child mortality could have been used to
yield better insight to inequalities in this dimension.
The specific profitable policies to be adopted by the government in the educational sector and
health sector to improve HDI and IHDI are not stated by the authors.
Other subsidiary influencing factor like population and infrastructural investments which have a
significant impact on the HDI and IHDI values are not mentioned.
The schemes adopted after the year 2010 to improve HDI and IHDI are not stated in this article.
The performance of the schemes and planning programs adopted by the government would help
the reader to understand the progress made by the nation.
CONCLUSIVE REMARKS
The study provides estimates of HDI and IHDI for Indian states. The twin estimates permits
quantification of the potential lost due to inequality in the three dimensions of Human
development.
The author s provide an explanation for uneven human development attainments across Indian
states. The study shows that potential lost due inequalities in education is highest among all the
three dimensions. The article suggested that focus should be given in areas and social groups that
continue to have constraints in access to basic education..
There are staggering cases of inequalities in access to health facilities and which shows variation
with respect to income and social groups.
The article’s findings are helpful to strategize and promote policies of Human development to
reduce inequalities in major dimensions affecting HDI and IHDI and support the economic
Growth of the Nation.
THANK YOU