Professional Documents
Culture Documents
US as a percentage
of Total 69%
ERNST AND YOUNG’S PRE-2008
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: MOTHER-
DAUGHTER (FRANCHISING)
Questions
• Why did Ernst and Young (and other
auditors) have this company structure?
• What are the disadvantages of such a
structure?
ERNST AND YOUNG’S 2008 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE:
WORLDWIDE GEOGRAPHIC GROUPS
Intended Consequences of New
Structure
• Facilitate greater consistency in service quality
• Meet the demands of multi-national customers
better
• Streamline processes and programmes within
Ernst and Young
• Promote learning between partnerships
• Bring ‘smaller country practices together with
larger ones’ to allow for ‘greater sharing of
resources and knowledge.
First Solar
Quick Facts and Figures
• Formed in 1999
• Largest manufacturer of thin film solar modules
• Fastest energy payback time of any PV technology
• Common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market
• Number of employees: 5,500+
• Headquarters: Arizona, US
• Manufacturing facilities: Germany, Malaysia, and the US
• Sales and Marketing: Australia, France, Germany, Spain,
and the US
• Project development: Canada, China, and the US
• Government affairs: Belgium, Germany, and the US
Questions
• How might first Solar be structured?
• What are your reasons for thinking this?
First Solar – Executive Management
• Executive Chairman
• Chief Executive Officer
• President
• Executive Vice President, Human Resources
• Executive Vice President, General Counsel
Corporate Secretary
• Executive Vice President, Marketing and Product
Management
• Executive Vice President, Public Affairs
• President, Utility Systems and Chief Financial Officer
• Chief Accounting Officer
• Chief Technology Officer
• Vice President for Sales, Managing Director of First
Solar GmbH
FORMS OF INTERNATIONAL CO-ORDINATION IN
FOUR TYPES OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMS
Reciprocity-Based Collegially Co- Financially Hierarchically
International ordinated Controlled Controlled
Networks of Firms International Firm International Firm International Firm
Strength and Weak (social) Weak, (bureaucratic) Relatively strong, Relatively strong,
Type of Control financial bureaucratic
Mechanisms
Focus of Very limited training, Consistency Limited training Firm-specific technical
Training if any and behavioural
standards
Career systems Specific to individual Firm specific, ‘up or Industry specific, high Firm specific, ‘up or
firms in network out’ system mobility across firms out’ system