Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ERE Presentation - Group 1
ERE Presentation - Group 1
Externalities
By –
Anil K Gupta and Aseem Prakash
PRESENTED BY – GROUP 15
•Harsh Tamboli (PGPSM09015)
•Rajat Kumar Dalai (PGPSM09030)
Introduction
1 2 3 4 5
Condition 1: An externality is present whenever any Condition 2: `A’ does not compensate (receive
individual’s (say ‘A’) utility or production function compensation from) `B’ with an amount equal in
includes a real variable (non-monetary) whose value value to the resultant benefit to (cost to) `A’.
is chosen by others (say ‘B’) without particular
attention to A’s welfare
Space, time, and creatures are all areas of certainty and doubt (will
it affect a particular set of human and other living beings).
Polluter: Spatial:
Time:
Identifiable / Non-Identifiable Regular/Sporadic
Localized/Non-Localized
• Can the source/s of • Is the pattern of occurrence
• Is the effect of the
pollution be identified regular (effluents discharged by
externality limited to a
(thermal plant in the a chemical factory at a fixed
specified geographical
hinterland causing air time every day) or sporadic
area or not?
pollution) or not identified (radiation leaks in a nuclear
(undifferentiated and large plant)?
number of emitters of a • The definition of `local’
If it is sporadic, is it catastrophic
pollutant) would depend on the
(Bhopal disaster), or is it within
perspective of the decision
maker e.g. a national the `tolerable permissible’ range
Single/Multiple Source externality becomes local (unexpected seepage from the
• If the source/s of pollution in a global perspective. water treatment tank of a
can be identified, how fertilizer factory)?
many are they
Attribute of an Externality
Technological:
• Preventable/ Non-Preventable -
1.Externality can/cannot be prevented partially/ totally from occurring by modifying input mix,
machine design, or process e.g. treating sewage before release in a water body can
substantially reduce its ill effect on aquatic life.
2.To prevent an externality at a certain stage, we may transfer it to another stage, area, or
constituent e.g. we may `wash’ coal, and reduce its ash content.
• Unidirectional/Reciprocal -
1.Unidirectional externality arises when the agent of externality imposes an externality on
others e.g. Prof. Coase’s confectioner generating noise with his mortars and pestles and
disturbing the doctor.
2.When each agent imposes an externality on all others, a reciprocal externality arises e.g.
several fishing trawlers polluting the same water body and decreasing catch for each other.
• Insulable/ Non Insulable -
1.Polluters may or may not be able to insulate themselves from the externality e.g. workers of
a nuclear power plant may completely insulate themselves from radiation leaks by using
special radiation-proof clothing.
Internalizing Externalities
• Internalizing externalities through
• State intervention - Pigou; State intervention is either through state-imposed taxes
or `command and control’
• Through a process of bargaining between the `polluter’ and the `victim’ – Coase
• Through the evolution of self-governing institutions; impose a code of conduct on
their members without necessarily requiring the support of the state of the market
How to Choose?
We propose that the criterion for identifying the right route should be the minimization of total cost to
the firm of internalizing externalities. The total cost has three components:
● Cost of Technology
● Transaction Costs
● Cost of Management/Organization
Cost of Technology
However in the long term, policies may not be the most efficient
(therefore fail on the basis of `total cost approach’).
Externality Attributes and Institutions
Communities and societies must decide how much externality will be internalised. The civilizations
may place different values on the same externalities because social utility functions vary.
The choice of the time frame and discount rate to identify the least cost option to internalize
externalities, is also society specific.
Time frame indicates the horizon of our costing and discount rate enables us to bring multi-phased
costs on a single base.
Cost of technology (specifically the cost of using as opposed to buying the technology) needs a
multi-period analysis since the technology will be in use for more than one time period.