1.Problem Statement: 6.Recommendations for Practice:
High mortality rates due to heart disease in the Enhance nursing education on Orem's theory for UK despite advancements in medical care. heart disease management. 2.Clinical Question (PICO(T)): Encourage active patient participation in self- Population/Patient: Individuals in the UK care routines. diagnosed with heart disease Establish standardized guidelines for holistic Intervention: Improved nursing practice using heart disease management. Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory Further research to address the identified Comparison: Current standard nursing care limitations. Outcome: Reduced mortality rates and 7.References (APA Format): improved patient outcomes Hartweg, D. L., & Metcalfe, S. E. (2021). 3.Utilized Reviews: Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory: Quantitative: Examined interventions' efficacy Relevance and Need for Refinement. Journal of in reducing mortality. Nursing Scholarship, 53(1), 45-57. Qualitative: Explored patient experiences and Timmins, F., & Horan, P. (2007). Critical perspectives on nursing care. Analysis of the Potential Contribution of Orem’s Mixed Methods: Combined quantitative data (2001) Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory to on treatment outcomes with qualitative patient Contemporary Coronary Care Nursing Practice. experiences. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 13(5), 285-293. Systematic Reviews: Summarized multiple studies on nursing strategies in heart disease Khademian, Z., Erfanian, F., Afshani, S. A., management. Haghighizadeh, M. H., & Dehghan-Nayeri, N. (2020). The Effect of Self Care Education Based 4.Key Findings: on Orem’s Nursing Theory on Quality of Life Identified correlations between patient and Self-Efficacy in Patients with Hypertension: education, self-care, and reduced mortality A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of rates. Cardiovascular Nursing, 35(3), 212-220. Patient involvement in their care significantly improved health outcomes. 5.Limitations of Studies: Limited sample sizes in certain studies. Variability in methodologies across the reviewed literature.