Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IIT Roorkee
QFD
IIT Roorkee
QFD
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) was developed to
bring the personal interface to modern manufacturing
and business alike.
It helps organizations seek out both spoken and
unspoken needs, translate these into actions and
designs, and focus various business functions toward
achieving this common goal.
QFD empowers organizations to exceed normal
expectations and provide a level of unanticipated
excitement that generates value.
IIT Roorkee
What is QFD?
IIT Roorkee
Definition
A methodology for building the “Voice of the
Customer” into product and service design.
The "voice of the customer" is the term used to
describe the stated and unstated customer needs or
requirements.
The way to assure the design quality while
the product is still in the design stage.
IIT Roorkee
Important points
Should be employed at the beginning of every
project (original or redesign)
Customer requirements should be translated into
measurable design targets
It can be applied to the entire problem or any sub-
problem
First worry about what needs to be designed then
how
It takes time to complete
IIT Roorkee
QFD Target
IIT Roorkee
Capturing the Voice of the
Customer
Quality Function Deployment requires that the basic
customer needs are identified.
Frequently, customers will try to express their needs in
terms of "how" the need can be satisfied and not in
terms of "what" the need is.
This limits consideration of development alternatives.
Development and marketing personnel should ask
"why" until they truly understand what the root need
is.
Breakdown general requirements into more specific
requirements by probing what is needed
IIT Roorkee
Voice of the Customer
The voice of the customer is captured in a
variety of ways:
direct discussion
interviews
surveys
focus groups
observation
warranty data
field reports, etc.
IIT Roorkee
Quality Function Deployment
IIT Roorkee
QFD Methodology
Four-phase model.
The most common approach found in the
literature.
It deploys costumer’s requirements into:
1. product planning.
2. parts planning.
3. process planning.
4. production planning.
IIT Roorkee
The Four-phase Model
IIT Roorkee
Phase I
• Analyze competitive
opportunities
• Plan a product to respond to
needs and opportunities
• Establish critical characteristic
target values
Phase II
IIT Roorkee
Phase II
characteristics
• Translate into critical
part/assembly characteristics
and target values
Phase III
IIT Roorkee
Phase III
Phase IV
IIT Roorkee
Phase IV
• Determine critical part and
Production requirements
process characteristics
• Establish process control
Key Process Optimization
Topic
Affinity Statement Affinity Statement Affinity Statement
Data Card Data Card Data Card Data Card Data Card Data Card
Data Card Data Card Data Card Data Card Data Card Data Card
Data Card
IIT Roorkee
Relations Diagrams
Relations Diagram, is a tool for finding solution to
problems that have complex causal relationship.
Resolves tangled issues by untying the logical
connection
Allows for “Multi-directional” thinking rather than
linear thinking
Also known as Interrelationship diagrams
IIT Roorkee
Relations Diagram
Tertiary Tertiary
Cause Secondary Cause
Primary Cause Cause
IIT Roorkee
Tree Diagrams
IIT Roorkee
Tree Diagrams
4th means
4th means
Primary means
3rd means 4th means
Constraints
Secondary means 3rd means 4th means
IIT Roorkee
Matrix Diagrams
The matrix diagram is designed to facilitate the identification of
relationships between two or more sets of factors.
Consists of a two-dimensional array to determine location and nature of
problem
Discovers key ideas by relationships represented by the cells in matrix.
Applied when:
interrelationship of the following need to be presented
Effects & causes
Objectives & methods
People & functions
interrelationship need to be characterized
Exists or does not exist
Strong, medium, weak
type
IIT Roorkee
Matrix Diagrams
O O =1 O =4 Principa l
O =2 O X =5 O Subsidia ry
QC circle supporter
=3 X =6
Site QC circle
Eva lua tion Re sponsibilitie s
Section/Plant
Section/Plant
Practicability
Manager
Member
Efficacy
Re ma rks
Leader
Rank
IIT Roorkee
The House of Quality
IIT Roorkee
Components of House of
Quality
HOWS vs. HOWS
Who Hows
HOW MUCH
IIT Roorkee
Step 1: Who are the
Hows vs
Hows
Customer
Evaluation
Who
Hows Now
This Product
customers?
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Muches
Targets
IIT Roorkee
Step 2: Determine the
customers’ requirements
Hows vs
Need to determine what is to Hows
Customer
be designed
Evaluation
Who
Hows Now
This Product
Consumer
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
product works as it should Units
Hows vs
is easy to maintain
looks attractive List all the
demanded qualities
incorporated latest technology
at the same level of
has many features abstraction
IIT Roorkee
Step 2: cont...
Manufacturing
easy to produce
uses available resources
uses standard components and methods
minimum waste
Marketing/Sales
Meets customer requirements
Easy to package, store, and transport
is suitable for display
IIT Roorkee
Quality Requirement
Basic Quality: These requirements are not usually mentioned by
customers. These are mentioned only when they are absent from
the product.
IIT Roorkee
How to determine the Hows vs
Whats?
Hows
Customer
Evaluation
Who
Hows Now
This Product
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Customer survey (have to formulate Targets
Muches
methods
Hows
Customer
Who
Evaluation
Hows
This Product
Now
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Muches
Targets
IIT Roorkee
Rank Ordering
Order the identified customer requirements
Assign “1” to the requirement with the lowest priority
and then increase as the requirements have higher
priority.
Sum all the numbers
The normalized weight
Rank/Sum
The percent weight is: Rank*100/Sum
IIT Roorkee
Step 4: Identify and Evaluate the Competition:
How satisfied is the customer now?
The goal is to determine how the customer perceives the
competition’s ability to meet each of the requirements
it creates an awareness of what already exists
it reveals opportunities to improve on what already exists
Hows vs
The design: Hows
Customer
Who
Evaluation
Hows
This Product
Now
2. meets the requirement slightly
3. meets the requirement somewhat
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
4. meets the requirement mostly Hows
Hows vs
Hows
Customer
Who
Evaluation
Hows
This Product
Each customer requirement
Now
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
engineering parameter. Hows
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Muches
Targets
IIT Roorkee
Step 6: Relate Customers’ requirements
to Engineering Specifications: Hows
measure Whats?
This is the center portion of the house. Each cell
represents how an engineering parameter relates to
a customers’ requirements.
Hows vs
Hows
9 = Strong Relationship Customer
Who
Evaluation
This Product
Now
1 = Weak Relationship
Who vs.
Whats
Blank = No Relationship at all Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Muches
Targets
IIT Roorkee
Step 7: Identify Relationships Between
Engineering Requirements: How are the
Hows Dependent on each other?
9 = Strong Relationship
3 = Medium Relationship Hows vs
Hows
1 = Weak Relationship Customer
Who
Evaluation
This Product
Now
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
Blank = No Relationship at all
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Muches
Targets
IIT Roorkee
Step 8: Set Engineering Targets:
How much is good enough?
Determine target value for each
engineering requirement.
Evaluate competition products to
engineering requirements
Look at set customer targets Hows vs
Hows
Use the above two information to Customer
Who
Evaluation
This Product
Now
Who vs.
Whats
Whats
Now vs
Whats vs
What
Hows
Units
This Product
Hows vs
How Muches How
Muches
Targets
Targets
IIT Roorkee
Guidelines for Successful QFD
Keep the amount of information in each matrix at
a manageable level.
An individual matrix should not address more than
twenty or thirty items on each dimension of the
matrix.
If doing QFD on a larger, more complex product
decompose its customers needs into hierarchical
levels.
IIT Roorkee
K e y to ro o f / c o rre la tio n
+ - Overall Wt=improvement*customer importance*sales point
m a trix s y m b o ls -
+ P o s itiv e / S u p p o rtin g
Tech. Prio. = overall wt. * type of rel (9,3,1)
-
- N e g a tiv e / Tra d e o ff
+ + Improvement factor = 1+.2*(planned rating – existing)
-
D IR E C T IO N O F IM P R O V E M E N T
P e rfo rm a n c e S iz e o f Te c h n ic a l
T E C H N IC A L P L A N N IN G M AT R IX
m e a s u re s ra n g e d e ta ils
R E Q U IR E M E N T S
C U S TO M E R
R E Q U IR E M E N T S
E a s y to p u t o n 2 3 3 4 4 1 .2 1 .1 2 .6 7
C o m fo rta b le w h e n h a n g in g 5 4 4 2 5 1 .2 1 .4 8 .4 22
F its o v e r d iffe re n t c lo th e s 1 1 1 5 2 1 .2 1 .0 1 .2 3
A c c e s s ib le g e a r lo o p s 3 3 4 1 3 1 .0 1 .0 3 .0 8
D o e s n o t re s tric t m o v e m e n t 5 2 2 3 5 1 .6 1 .4 11 .2 29
L ig h tw e ig h t 3 3 2 5 3 1 .0 1 .0 3 .0 8
S a fe 5 4 3 3 4 1 .0 1 .2 6 .0 16
A ttra c tiv e 2 2 2 5 3 1 .2 1 .1 2 .6 7
T E C H N IC A L P R IO R IT IE S 54 8 1 .2 63 2 3 .4 7 0 .2 1 9 1 .6 9 8 .6 30 612 To ta l (1 0 0 % ) 38
P E R C E N TA G E O F T O TA L 9 13 10 4 12 31 16 5
IIT Roorkee
Thanks !!
IIT Roorkee