Tourism Management THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE IN QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANTS THE RESEARCHERS Dizon, Kate Diane Medina, Angelica Manlutac, Herchie Mariano, John Jill Melendres, Thomas Joaquin Miranda, Razhakie
College of Hospitality and Tourism Management
Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management I. INTRODUCTIO N INTRODUCTION Restaurants under hospitality industry are increasingly turning to technological advancements to enhance their service quality and stay competitive in a rapidly changing market. The integration of technology into restaurant operations has become a pervasive trend, reshaping how customers interact with establishments and how businesses deliver their services (Kamble & Chandel, 2019).
A vast majority of operators, approximately 95%,
acknowledge that technology adoption has significantly enhanced overall operational efficiency (Abbas, n.d.). INTRODUCTION The symbiotic relationship between technological advancements and service quality in restaurants is a multifaceted area of study that warrants comprehensive exploration. As technology continues to fill various aspects of the dining experience, from ordering and payment systems to kitchen operations and customer engagement platforms, it is essential to assess how these advancements impact the overall quality of service provided to the customers and how it influences their experience (Bilgihan & Nejad, 2015). INTRODUCTION The same goes with the established relationship between technological advancements and customer experience. According to Kearl (2024), the landscape of customer experience management has experienced a revolutionary transformation through the integration of digital technologies. Such transformation touches all facets of business, not only reshaped organizational operations but also altered the manner in which companies engage with their customers. INTRODUCTION This study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay between technological advancements and service quality and customer experience in quick service restaurants by identifying their causal relationships. The study will focus on the context of quick service restaurants (QSRs) across San Fernando, Pampanga. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVES 1. How may the demographic profile of the respondents be described in terms of: 1.1 Gender 1.2 Age 1.3 Frequency of Dining in Quick Service Restaurants 2. How may technological advancement in QSRs be described in terms of: 2.1 Presence of Artificial Intelligence 2.2 Streamlined Systems 3. How may service quality in QSRs be described in terms of: 3.1 Tangibles 3.2 Reliability 3.3 Responsiveness 3.4 Assurance 3.5 Empathy STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVES 4. How may customer experience in QSRs be described in terms of: 4.1 Hedonic 4.2 Recognition
5. How may the effects of technological advancement on service quality
and customer experience be ascertained? SCOPE AND DELIMITATION • Focused in determining the effects of technological advancement on service quality and customer experience in quick service restaurants across San Fernando, Pampanga • The respondents are QSRs customers at least 18 years of age • Using G-Power analysis version 3.1.9.4 with an effect size of 0.30 based on 99% confidence level, the sample will comprise of 222 respondents • The respondents will be selected using purposive sampling • The instrument is an adopted survey questionnaire • No attempt will be made to find respondents from other municipalities or industry • The study will take place from February to June 2024 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY The findings of the study will be deemed significant to the following entities:
• Quick Service Restaurants (QSRs)
• Franchise Owners • Technology Industry • Marketing and Advertising Agencies • Future Researchers II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT IN FOOD INDUSTRY Technology and the food industry have developed a symbiotic relationship. As the industry evolves, technology adjusts and offers solutions for new and emerging challenges. Conversely, the food industry drives technological innovation. Technology has notable impacts on the food industry which include but not limited to increased efficiency and productivity in food production and greater focus on sustainability and health (Muscad, 2022).
The study of Martasari (2023) proved that industrial
technology has a significant effect on improving service quality and customer experience. SERVICE QUALITY Service quality is a measure of how well an organization provides service to meet customer demands and expectations (Indeed Blogsite, 2023).
Anchored to the SERVQUAL model of Parasuraman et al.
(1988), service quality has five dimensions; tangibles refer to the appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials; reliability is the ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately; responsiveness is the willingness to help customers and provide prompt service; assurance means the knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey trust and confidence; and empathy which is identified by the caring, individualized attention the firm provides its customers (Arlen, CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE Customer experience refers to the overall experience of the customers with a company or business based on all interactions they engage. Customer experience is measured through two major factors; hedonic and recognition (Sasmoko et al., 2019).
Hedonic nature of consumer experiences focusing on the
sensory, emotive, and fantasy aspects of consumption (Godovykh & Tasci, 2020).
The recognition aspect mentions qualities such as safety,
importance, relation, being welcome, and a sense of beauty (Tulcanaza-Prieto et al., 2023). THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Technology Acceptance Model of Davis (1989) is a widely used theoretical framework that explains how users come to accept and use new technologies.
Service Quality (SERVQUAL) Model. The SERVQUAL model
of Parasuraman et al. (1988) is commonly used to assess and measure service quality in various industries.
Customer Experience Management (CEM) Framework. The
CEM framework of Schmitt (2003) focuses on understanding and managing customers' holistic experiences with a brand or service. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
H1: Technology Advancement has a significant effect on Service Quality
H2: Technology Advancement has a significant effect on Customer Experience III. METHODOLOGY R The study will employ a quantitative causal E D research design to attain the research objectives.
S E A causal research design, also known as
explanatory research is conducted in order to E S identify the extent and nature of cause-and-effect A I relationship between variables (Oppewal, 2010; Zikmund et al., 2012). R G It will help to ascertain the effects of technological C N advancement on service quality and customer experience. H RESPONDENTS • 222 sample size (G-Power Analysis v. 3.1.9.4) • QSRs customers in San Fernando, Pampanga • At least 18 years of age • Purposive Sampling INSTRUMENT • Adopted questionnaire from Parasuraman et al. (1988) and Ameen et al. (2021) • Two sections: Demographic Profile and 5-point Likert scale • Service Quality consists of five dimensions with 22 items adopted from Parasuraman et al. (1988) • Customer Experience has two dimensions with 4 items each adopted from Ameen et al. (2021) DATA COLLECTION • Secure permission to conduct the study from involved QSRs • Secure informed consent from the 222 respondents • Seek permission for the utilization of the adopted questionnaire • Actual data gathering procedure thru survey questionnaires • Retrieval of data DATA ANALYSIS FREQUENCY AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION This descriptive statistics concept This inferential statistics tool will be utilized to graphically will aid the researchers to present the demographic profile of ascertain the effects of technological advancement on the respondents service quality and customer experience ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS • Permission and Informed Consent • Confidentiality and Privacy • Proper Attribution REFERENCES Abbas, S. (n.d.). Impact of Technology on the Restaurant Industry. Available online at: https://oakbusinessconsultant.com/ Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Reppel, A., & Anand, A. (2021). Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548 Arlen, C. (2022). The 5 Service Dimensions All Customers Care About. Available online: https://www.serviceperformance.com Bilgihan, A. and Nejad, M. (2015), Innovation in hospitality and tourism industries. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, Vol. 6, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-08-2015-0033 Business Research Methodology. (n.d.). Purposive sampling. Available online: https://research- methodology.net Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Indeed Blogsite. (2023). Service Quality: Definition, Importance, and Implementation. https://ca.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/service-quality ING Economics Department. (2019). Food tech: technology in the food industry. Robot arm offers the food industry a helping hand. Available online: https://think.ing.com/uploads/reports/ING_-_Food_tech_-_April_2019.pdf REFERENCES Kamble, G., & Chandel, S. (2019). Impact of Technology in Hospitality sector. JETIR Volume 6, Issue 5 Kearl, M. (2024). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Customer Experience. In Medallia. Available online: https://www.medallia.com Martasari, G. W. (2023). Impact of Industrial Technology 4.0 In Improving Service Quality and Customer Experience on E-Commerce Platforms: Literature Review. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(6), 1427-1435. DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v3i6.407 Muscad, O. (2022). How Technology Impacts the Food Industry. Available online: https://datamyte.com/blog/how-technology-impacts-the-food-industry/ Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. In Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/ Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40 Patrício, V., Leal, R. P., & Pereira, Z. L. (2006). Applicability of SERVQUAL in restaurants: an exploratory study in a Portuguese resort. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, No. 2 Oppewal, H. (2010). Causal Research. In WILEY Online Library, Marketing Research https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02001 REFERENCES Sasmoko, S., Mihardjo, L. W. W., Alamsjah, F., Elidjen, E., & Tarofder, A. K. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Digital Technologies, Energy Consumption and Climate Change on Customer’s Experience: A Study from Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8280 Schmitt, B. H. (2003), Customer Experience Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Tulcanaza-Prieto, A. B., Cortez-Ordoñez, A., & Lee, C. W. (2023). Influence of Customer Perception Factors on AI-Enabled Customer Experience in the Ecuadorian Banking Environment. Sustainability, 15(16), 12441. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612441 Zikmund, W.G., Babin, J., Carr, J., & Griffin, M. (2012). Business Research Methods: with Qualtrics Printed Access Card. Cengage Learning THANK YOU! Dizon, Kate Diane Medina, Angelica Manlutac, Herchie Mariano, John Jill Melendres, Thomas Joaquin Miranda, Razhakie College of Hospitality and Tourism Management Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management