Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sameet Gambhir
Introduction
https://youtu.be/HrZDpDvxqJo
Offer / Proposal
when one person signifies to another
his willingness to do or
https://youtu.be/N2OfiK3PqfQ
Example
-This is a proposal.
Implied acceptance
contracting
Essential Elements of Contract
1. Offers and Acceptance
For an agreement there must be a lawful offer by one and lawful acceptance of
that offer from the other party.
The offer must be made with the intention of creating legal relations otherwise,
there will be no agreement.
Example: A say to B that he will sell his cycle to him for Rs.2000. This is an offer.
If B accepts this offer, there is an acceptance.
2. Legal Relationship
The parties to an agreement must create legal relationship.
It arises when parties know that if any one of them fails to fulfil his part of the
relations.
https://youtu.be/G6aY5tJjrbM
Example: A father promises to pay his son Rs.500 every month as pocket money.
Later, he refuses to pay. The son cannot recover as it is a social agreement and
does not create legal relations.
3. Lawful Consideration or object
Consideration is “something in return.”
Consideration has been defined as the price paid by one party for the promise of
the other.
An agreement is enforceable only when both the parties get something and give
something. The something given or obtained is the price of the promise and is
called consideration.
Example: A agrees to sell his house to B for Rs.10 Lac. A’s promise to sell the
house is the consideration for B’s promise to pay Rs.10 Lac. These are lawful
considerations.
It is also necessary that agreement should be made for a lawful object.
The object for which the agreement has been entered into must not be
fraudulent, illegal, immoral, or opposed to public policy or must not imply injury
to the person or property of another.
Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is illegal and
the therefore void.
The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless and until it is:
◦ Forbidden by law: If the object or the consideration of an agreement is for doing an act
forbidden by law, such agreement are void. for example, A, B and C enter into an
agreement for the division among them of gains acquired or to be acquired, by them by
fraud. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful
◦ If it involves injury to a person or property of another: For example, "A" borrowed
Rs.100/- from "B" and executed a bond to work for "B" without pay for a period of 2
years. In case of default, "A" owes to pay the principal sum at once and huge amount of
interest. This contract was held void as it involved injury to the person.
If courts regards it as immoral: An agreement in which consideration or object of
which is immoral is void. For example, An agreement between husband and wife
for future separation is void.
Is of such nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law:
Is fraudulent, or involves or implies injury to the person or property of another,
or
Is opposed to public policy. An agreement which tends to be injurious to the
public or against the public good is void. For example, agreements of trading
with foreign enemy, agreement to commit crime, agreements which interfere
with the administration of justice, agreements which interfere with the course of
justice.
Agreements in restrained of legal proceedings: This deals with two category.
One is, agreements restraining enforcement of rights and the other deals with
agreements curtailing period of limitation.
Trafficking in public offices and titles: agreements for sale or transfer of public
offices and title or for procurement of a public recognition like Padma
Vibhushan or Padma Shri etc. for monetary consideration is unlawful, being
opposed to public policy.
Agreements restricting personal liberty: agreements which unduly restricts the
personal liberty of parties to it are void as being opposed by public policy.
Marriage brokerage contact: Agreements to procure marriages for rewards are
void under the ground that marriage ought to proceed with free and voluntary
decisions of parties.
.
Agreements interfering marital duties: Any agreement which interfere with
performance of marital duty is void being opposed to public policy. An
agreement between husband and wife that the wife will never leave her parental
house
Contract Opposed to Public Policy can be repudiated by the Court of law even if
that contract is beneficial for all of the parties to the contract- What
considerations and objects are lawful and what not- Newar Marble Industries
Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur, 1993 Cr. L.J. 1191 at 1197,
1198 [Raj.]-
◦ Agreement of which object or consideration was opposed to public policy,
unlawful and void –
◦ What better and what more can be an admission of the fact that the
consideration or object of the compounding agreement was abstention by the
board from criminally prosecuting the petitioner-company from offense under
Section 39 of the act and that the Board has converted the crime into a source
of profit or benefit to itself.
◦ This consideration or object is clearly opposed to public policy and hence the
compounding agreement is unlawful and void under Section 23 of the Act. It
is unenforceable as against the Petitioner-Company
4. Capacity of Parties:
(e) Mistake of fact (Section 20): "Where both the parties to an agreement
are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the
agreement is void". A party cannot be allowed to get any relief on the
ground that he had done some particular act in ignorance of law.
Mistake may be bilateral mistake where both parties to an agreement are
under mistake as to the matter of fact. The mistake must relate to a
matter of fact essential to the agreement.
6. Writing and Registration:
a contract may be oral or in writing.
However, a verbal contract if proved in the court will not be
considered invalid merely on the ground that it not in writing.
It is essential for the validity of a contact that it must be in writing
signed and attested by witness and registered, if so required by the
law.
7. Certainty:
“Agreements the meaning of which are not certain or capable of
being made certain are void.”
the terms of the agreement, must not be vague or uncertain.
For example, you board a rickshaw and the driver starts to drive. You tell
the driver the address where he has to drop you. The driver stops and
you pay him
(1) it is expressed in writing and registered under the law and is made
on account of natural love and affection between parties standing in a
near relation to each other; or unless
Illustrations
(b) A, for natural love and affection, promise to give his son B,
Rs. 1,000 A puts his promise to B into writing and registers it.
This is a contract.
A Void Contract Once Valid But No Longer
Ceases to have a legal effect.
Laws change since the initial agreement, and the agreement now requires
breaking the law
1.Chit Fund
2.Commercial Transactions, i.e Transactions of the Share Market
3.Athletic Competition and Competitions involving Skills
4.Insurance Contracts
Frustration of Contracts: The Indian
Perspective
A contract may be frustrated where there exists a change in circumstances,
after the contract was made, which is not the fault of either of the parties,
which renders the contract either impossible to perform or deprives the
contract of its commercial purpose.
intervention
Effects of Frustration
Frustration should not be self-induced
Frustration operates automatically
Adjustment of Rights (Restitution)
When Frustration Does Not Happen
Difficulty in performance
Failure of third party
Essential Elements: -
There must be atleast two parties. (Bilateral Contracts) –
The subject matter of the contract must be goods. –
A price in money should be paid or promised. –
A transfer of property in goods from seller to the buyer
must take place. –
It must be absolute or conditional. –
All other essentials of a valid contract must be present.
Sale of goods Contract – Risks &
Damages
Section 26 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 states the goods are the
owner’s risk if the property in them has not been transferred to the
buyer. But if the property has been transferred to the buyer then the
goods are buyer’s risk.
This provision is applicable if no specific provision has been signed by
the parties to the contract in their contract regarding this. This rule is
applicable irrespective of the fact that delivery has been made or not.
It means that the risk is associated with ownership and not with mere
possession of the property.
To decide whether the risk has been passed or not, we first need to find
whether the property in goods i.e. the ownership has passed or not.
The passing of risk means the transfer of the liability for damage or loss
of the property from the seller of the immovable property to the buyer.
The risk in the property prima facie passes with the property, but if the
parties to the contract agree to pass the risk on the property at some
other level of transaction, then that is also possible, depending upon the
terms of their contract.
Sale of goods Contract – Risks &
Damages
Exceptions
There are two exceptions to the general law that the risk passes
with the transfer of property in the goods. These are:
If the delivery has been delayed due to the fault of either party,
then the liability of damage will lie on the party at fault. If the
seller has failed to deliver the goods as agreed by the parties and
the goods are damaged or lost due to that, then the seller will bear
the cost. If the buyer has failed to take delivery of goods despite
many reminders by the seller, then the buyer will bear the cost.
In Demby Hamilton & Co. Ltd. v. Barden, the sellers agreed to
supply 30 tons of apple juice by samples. The seller crushed 30
tons of apples at once to ensure that they are according to the
samples and filled them in the casks. After some installments had
been delivered, the buyer refused to take further deliveries. The
apple juice became putrid. It was held that the property in the
goods was still with the sellers, but the loss had to be borne by
the buyer.
“X, a seller of the goods, enters into a contract of sale of goods with Y, the
buyer, who visits X’s office to check the goods. Both the parties to the contract
agree that transfer of ownership will take place with the execution of the
contract, restricting X’s right to sell those goods to someone else. They both
agree X will bring the goods in the deliverable state in 2 days and after two
days, Y’s agent will collect the goods from X. Both the parties agree that X will
take care of Y’s goods for 5 days after the contract has been executed (if not
collected) and not beyond the period of 5 days. Hence, the agent of Y must turn
up within the stipulated time for collection of the goods. The contract regarding
payment was that Y’s bank would transfer the amount to X’s account within 3
days of execution of the contract.”
This type of contract is perfectly valid for the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. In this
type of contract, each transaction takes place according to the will of the
parties. In this case, the property in the goods or ownership is transferred at the
same time when the contract is concluded, while the possession of the goods
passes at a later stage. If the contract had been silent about the transfer of risk,
then it would have passed with the conclusion of the contract. But in the instant
case, it has been decided by the parties that the risk will transfer after five days
of execution of contract if not collected by the parties.
Now, as per the contract signed between the parties, if the goods are lost or
damaged within those five days after the conclusion of the contract, then the
seller will bear the cost. But if the goods are damaged after five days and the
buyer did not collect the goods, then the buyer will bear the loss. Also, if the
goods were lost after the 5th day (if not collected) but due to the negligence of
the seller, then the seller will bear the cost of damage or loss. In case the
buyer’s agent collects those goods before five days, then the risk will transfer
with it.
Drafting of a contract :
Definition clause: all the definitions to various words that are used throughout the
contract.
definition of such word which might describe the meaning of such word specifically
in relation to said contract.
In such cases no other meaning of the word will be accepted as the word has been
specifically stated and agreed upon by the parties to the contract and, as such, in
binding on them.
Term of contract:
generally made for definite period of time, no matter how long the time frame is
once the time period expires, the contract automatically dissolves.
In some cases, the term of the contract also depends on the achieving of a certain
goal for which the contract has been entered upon
For example: X and Y enter into a contract that will last for such time as it takes for
them to reach place ZZ, once they will reach the place ZZ the contract between them
will dissolve.
�
Renewal Clause
to ensure continual binding effect of the contract without incurring the
expenses of drafting and registering different contracts over and over
again.
Such clauses are often included in the clause describing the term of the
contract.
Cancellation:
circumstances under which the contract shall stand cancelled.
generally includes certain acts that the parties are barred from and in
violation of such a term, the cancellation clause will be invoked
rights and liabilities that parties will be entitled to when cancelled
�
Rights and duties of the parties: the crux of every contract and violation of
these clauses generally forms the core to the disputes
Each and every must be specifically stated with as much detail as possible
to avoid any ambiguity or vagueness whatsoever.
Force majeure:
all such unforeseeable and unpredictable scenarios which may stop one
from executing his duty, thereby leaving the contract unfulfilled.
various contingencies, conditions beyond control including but not limited
to Acts of God, Government restrictions, wars, insurrections, any other
cause beyond the reasonable control
the role of parties when such a situation may arise
often overlooked but as important as any other - it details the sharing of
expenses and costs that are incurred during the time of contingencies
Payments of expenses:
what proportion the parties may share the expenses -mode of payments
Profit sharing: the proportion - the profit will be shared –how to be used
for other purposes as agreed
Compensation:
the amount with which one must compensate another
for the actions/omissions/defaults done by the former
which has resulted in some sort of loss (financial, physical or mental) to
the latter.
Indemnification:
the allocation of liability in the event that all does not go as planned
Questions to be addressed in this portion of the contract include who will
be liable for what, and to what extent.
Breach and Cure - the possibility must be considered when drafting
What all constitute the breach
What opportunity will the parties have to “cure” the breach
Limitation of Liability:
disclaiming all warranties other than those expressly specified
can also limit liability by including clauses that provide:
◦ a monetary cap on damages;
◦ exclusion of certain kinds of damages (such as special, incidental, or
consequential);
◦ exclusion of certain harms (such as harms resulting from defects etc)
Termination :
under what circumstances the parties can terminate the agreement
the procedures for termination
Remedies - consequences in the event of termination
what the parties are entitled to in the event of breach or termination.
It may identify an amount, a formula, or simply a mechanism for
determining the appropriate remedy (such as arbitration)