Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Breach of Contract
Breach of Contract
LAW 1
BREACH OF CONTRACT
QUESTION IS WHY ARE THE PARTIES IN CONFLICT
BREACH OF CONTRACT
• It usually happens if one of the parties refuses to perform or cannot perform.
• Parties entering the contract may also agree on remedies where one of the parties fails to perform.
• The injured party may either resile or cancel the contract = of the contract
• The creditor in this particular instance is at fault in that he/she fails to accept performance. Or fails to co-operate
• Requirement:
a) Performance is still possible
b) Creditor delays performance The creditor cannot be in mora if the debtor did not undertake to do something.
c) Performance due and enforceable ( creditor may refuse to accept the benefit if it would benefit creditor pro creditor or if the performance
was subject to a suspensive condition.
d) Proper performance offered by the debtor
e) Delay because of creditors’ fault
•Consequence of breach
• Debtor not excused from performing not unless the performance is impossible
• Mora debitoris cancelled
• The debtor’s duty to take care of the object diminished
• Obligation perpetuated
POSITIVE MAL PERFORMANCE
• THIS BREACH REFERS TO THE CONTENT OR
QUALITY OF THE PERFORMANCE THE
DEBTOR HAD TO DELIVER IN TERMS OF
THE CONTRACT. IT MAY EITHER BE
POSITIVE DUTY OR NEGATIVE DUTY.
• Positive duty entails a duty to perform at a certain
level, and, must not be defective or must pay a
certain amount.
• Negative duty is to refrain from doing some specific
manner or refrain from acting in a certain manner
• Fault is not a requirement the debtor may rely on vis
maiour as a defence or coincidence.
•Consequences = normal contractual remedies
REPUDIATION
• Repudiation is when one party communicate to the other that they do not want to
be part of the contract with reason or justification. (expressly and tacitly).
• Requirements:
• Action
• This can either be communicated or through non-verbal conduct this is different
from late delivery.
• Intention
• The test will be an objective, reasonable man test – would a reasonable man have
concluded that the debtor intends to repudiate his contractual duties? The
subjective intent of the debtor may not be taken into account.
• Consequence
• Does not terminate legal obligation = innocent party may accept or bring legal
action.
• The innocent party may obtain a right to cancel the contract, and, claim damages.
• The innocent part may also obtain specific performance
PREVENTION OF
PERFORMANCE by
Debtor