• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 1
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
Senate committee on Child Protective Services, Sullivan VS DHS
I am very pleased to have the offer of help from the Senators and Representatives of my ownState. It’s been a long slow slog for me and my child. It does good things in my mind.The Court also recently ordered me not to have any thing published that would identify mycase. I told the Judge that it only served to make sure no one would look into my case. Thatway, I look like some lone anonymous nut-case. No one would ever know the truth. I would like to bring to your attention 3 things that should baffle you. First, remember my case is about my little girl, who was 10 years old. A Dr. at Children'sHospital made a mistake and thought she had Herpes simplex 2, which is almost alwayssexually transmitted. It turned out that it was Simplex 1 antigen, lab analysis showed 7 dayslater.My child is in foster care. She was on Principal's honor roll. Last card I saw this year she had acouple Ds. She is a virgin, with no psychological problems, till now. I have:Document from Dr. Jones that was given to DHS in the beginning that states two things.1. The antigen test given was not conclusive.2. Even if it had been conclusive, simplex 1 is only good enough to make one suspicious but isnot diagnostic of sexual abuse, I have:Document from North Little Rock Police Department, stating that detective Rose called ChildProtective Services 1 DAY BEFORE the hearing showing that they dropped their investigationas unfounded. One of the reasons was because Dr. Jones, UAMS said that 80% of people getthe fever blister kind SIMPLEX 1 and that it was easily transferred to the genital area by auto-inoculation. She actually talked to the counsel for the case, and the DHS chief attorney'soffice.Yet DHS lied to the court the next day, using the "on going investigation” of NLR police. TheJudge, refused to allow the evidence in court. Here are actual photo copies of UAMS statement on HSV-1 and possible child abuse attachedto this email. AND the actual results of investigations by the city police, the results of which investigationwas re-evaluated by the State Police, as mandated by law. They are actually contracted towork with DHS on this very kind of matter. The Document from North Little Rock Police actually proves that CPS lied to the court, in orderto hold on to my child initially, saying that there was an" On going " North Little Rock policeinvestigation, when they had been contacted directly by the NLR detective. She not only spoketo the DHS chief attorney's office, BUT spoke directly to the chief attorney. She then left amessage for the Case worker also. The investigations speak for themselves. Please note that the statement from UAMS spoke of the inadequacy of the test, but also notedthat even if it was correct, it should only be elevated to a suspicion and was not diagnostic of abuse. The much better culture test, failed to find hsv-1 virus.
 
 Note in the NLR police statement that they were dropping the case as unfounded, UAMS Dr.Jones made it plain that 80% of people get the fever blister (HSV-1) and that it is easily auto-transferred to other body parts. All my children have had fever blisters, I believe, if she had been tested 5 years ago theantigen would have been present. Anyone who has ever had a fever blister will test positive. My Child who was on principal's Honor Roll the last 2 years had two Ds on her card that I sawa couple weeks ago. She is being harmed by the State Agency. 
Here are the Names of everyone involved in my case:(Important ones, at least)court: Circuit; 10
th
juvenile divisionJudge Joyce Williams Warren
Who upon my taking the Stand, looked over at me and said, “Mr. Sullivan, this notgoing to be like that Child support case.” I had won a child support case 5 yearsprior to that, in her court. I was surprised.She also upon recommendation from DHS would not allow the Photo copies of theNLR police investigation or State police in court discussion. She also accepted theirnotion not to accept discussion of CDC and other scientific study documents thatare easy to access online.DHSChief attorney’s office for CPSLEE HONORABLEWhen detective Julie Rose of NLR police Department called the DHS chief attorney’s office, notifying them that the investigation was dropped as unfounded,she also spoke directly with Mr. Honorable. Yet, DHS showed up in court andargued that one of the reasons they should hold Shelby was because there was anongoing NLR police Department investigation, knowingly, lying to the Judge. Thenlater argued that the fact was not relevant and the documents should not beintroduced into court.TABITHA MCNULTYDHS office of Chief Attorney501-683-5327 cell: 501-773-7304
 
She is the NEW Attorney for DHS in place of Mr. Honorable. I first met her inFebruary 2006She looked across the table at a Staffing and told me that my Child was” beingtaken to the Dr. for repetitive herpetic breakouts.” I knew it was a yeast infectionand told her so. She kept asking me till I told her who told me. One of the socialworkers told me. She looked across the table and just lied to me!I told her that it was a continuation of what I had seen of the agency from thebeginning. I wonder what would have happened, if I had not known that fact. I amthinking they would have gone to court with it.She said that it was her job to prosecute me and my Attorney had to bring outsomehow exculpatory information. I told her that was not in the cps charter, Thather job was to find out what was the real facts so that she could argue what was bestfor children and that it was never best to remove a child unnecessarily.I found out that she had gone online found reliable answers dot com. She said thatshe was just browsing around and ran into it accidentally. I am aware of many otherpeople in DHS cases that have been chased off line.She brought this up in court and the Judge ordered me to remove any identifyinginformation. I told the Judge that my case was a farce and this way no one would beable to look into it and check to verify it. I would be just some nut-case whisperingin the wind.First case worker:L. WILLIAMS (Larene, I think)501-682-9367Seemed to be a nice person, asked early on thought my daughter should be back home as soon as possible. She unfortunately, according to my daughter, tried overand over along with others apparently, to get her to name someone as a perp. Shewas promised that she would come home. I say apparently with others because mydaughter said “they” were trying to get her to say that under much pressure. Mydaughter was not allowed to testify till months later. She wrote complaints, she toldher ad litem about the threats she was receiving at the Foster home. I mentioned itto the Judge. No one listened, till Shelby told them that she would say what theywanted. They rushed us out of the court room, obviously to catch her at a weak moment. I thought they had finally broken her. But she at 10 years old figured outthat was the only way she would see the Judge. She told the Judge everything, howshe lied to get to court, the abuse she was suffering in foster care and the promisesmade to her if she came up with a name. My daughter made these things part of therecord and she finally was moved to where she is now.I don’t know who those foster care people were.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
Professor Stephen D. Waner

for they shall come to be known as traders in the flesh of the innocent out of the greed and lust of the coin of the realm: from the book BANDED from the Bible. read ISAIAH 10:1-3

reply09 / 09 / 2009
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...