Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
Fiona Kumari Campbell Associate Professor , D/HOS (Learning & Teaching Scholarship) Griffith Law School
(Vice- President, Physical Disability Australia)
Fiona.Campbell@griffith.edu.au
* My views are entirely my own and do not necessarily reflect the organizations I am associated with.
Where am I going?
1987 resumed university study at La Trobe (no on campus assistance) and finished with a Bachelor of Legal Studies (Hons) in 1998. I have worked to pay the extra costs of disability and stay out of a nursing home all my life. I have been eligible for very few programs my journey has been a form of self funded freedom. (Last year I spent $15,000 of my own cash to purchase wheelchairs to remain in employment!) In 1999 I took up a PhD scholarship and graduated with a PhD in 2004. I have worked as a university disability studies teacher for 17 years. Its very lonely here I am one of the few pwds in senior management. I am a mentor but cannot find a peer mentor. I am aware that in even drawing a good salary my life is precarious, I only need one aspect of my life to come out of alignment then my carefully balanced system could come crashing. I am a mid-life woman with disability, sole parenting a nine year old . Life is good but always on notice.
My Focus
Discussion of NDIS but in the broader context of living with disability (especially issues related to poverty, employment and education) law reform & policy engagements. I start from the assumption that if we do not have a new vision of disability we cannot have a new vision of disability support.
Disabled people are not a discreet insular minority - We are not a State of Exception
Disability is an evolving concept and that disability results from the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. (Preamble, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 6 December 2006, at [e]).
Reject the evaluative ranking of disability and focus on disability in-context ~ the embodied experience
Language of Tragedy: The phrase catastrophic disability is not only offensive but distorts the complex lived experiences of disability across the spectrum. Goes against the sensibility underpinning the CRPD
Australias rate of workforce participation by disabled people is at the lower end of the scale (ranked 13 out of 19) of OECD countries In 2011 Australian disabled people experience a particularised form of vocational apartheid, we are in the words of a recent KPMG/Yooralla Report a missing population. Labour force participation rates for persons with disability were just 53.2% (compared to 81% for able-bodied people). People with disability that are working earn less than able-bodied workers: the gross medium income per week of $255 for a person with disability compares to $501 for those without disability. In contrast to other OECD countries, the personal income of disabled Australians is the lowest, being equal to 44% of that of a non-disabled person.
Questions
Is the corporation model the best?- how do we have skilled monitoring, management and planning without reducing pwds participation to a mere advisory role? Can the propose governance model really get disability e.g. superannuation boards act instrumentally on market issues and not so well of change of life/social policy concerns. Might a market based model be in collision with social protection agendas which maybe unprofitable? Check for this? Should the CRPD approach to disability be privileged and be the guiding conceptual approach to disability rather than the ICF? Can some corporation/governance strategy be introduced to train up pwds in the area. Corporation expertise already lags in the area of gender equity how can we ensure nothing about us without us without being reduced to some advisory capacity?