Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Randall B. Dunham
November 5, 1996
Purpose
The purpose of the Delphi technique is to elicit information and judgments from
participants to facilitate problem-solving, planning, and decision-making. It does so
without physically assembling the contributors. Instead, information is exchanged
via mail, FAX, or email. This technique is designed to take advantage of participants’
creativity as well as the facilitating effects of group involvement and interaction. It is
structured to capitalize on the merits of group problem-solving and minimize the
liabilities of group problem-solving.
Requirements
Process
Prepare and send the first questionnaire, which asks each participant to engage in
individual brainstorming so as to generate as many ideas as possible for dealing
with the issue.
3. Create and send Questionnaire #2. The Coordinator prepares and sends a
second questionnaire to participants that contains all of the ideas sent in response
to the first questionnaire and provides space for participants to refine each idea, to
comment on each idea’s strengths and weaknesses for addressing the issue, and to
identify new ideas.
2
5. Create and send Questionnaire #3. The Coordinator creates and sends a third
questionnaire that summarizes the input from the previous step and asks for
additional clarifications, strengths, weaknesses, and new ideas.
A second approach for evaluating the ideas is that which is used in the
Nominal Group Technique for “voting.” With this approach, the Coordinator
asks each member to identify the top five ideas and assign five points to the
most promising idea, 4 points to the next most promising, and 3, 2, and 1 points
to the third, fourth, and fifth-best ideas. These votes are returned to the
Coordinator, who tallies the results and prepares a report. The report notes
the rank order of the ideas based on the total number of points received and
indicates the number of people who voted for each idea.
QUESTIONNAIRE #1
The purpose of this questionnaire is to elicit your ideas regarding the following issue:
Idea #1:
Idea #2:
Idea #3:
Idea #4:
Idea #5:
Idea #6:
Idea #7:
Idea #8:
Idea #9:
Idea #10:
QUESTIONNAIRE #2
The purpose of this questionnaire is to report all of the ideas sent in response to the
first questionnaire and to solicit new ideas for dealing with the issue:
Please refine ideas already received by clarifying them where desired and by listing
the strengths and weaknesses you associate with each. Please list any new ideas at
the bottom of the questionnaire and comment on each new idea’s strengths and
weaknesses for addressing the issue. Your ideas will be anonymously included in the
next questionnaire.
My new ideas:
#1. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
#2. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
#3. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
QUESTIONNAIRE #3 (alternative A)
Please further refine these ideas by providing additional clarification where desired
and by listing additional strengths and weaknesses you associate with each. Please
list any new ideas at the bottom of the questionnaire and comment on each new idea’s
strengths and weaknesses for addressing the issue.
Please note that this will be the last questionnaire. After receiving all participants’
responses to this questionnaire, I will provide you with a sheet on which to assign
votes for five ideas you feel will best deal with the issue. All votes will be tallied and
results sent to participants. Your ideas will be anonymously included in the next
report.
My new ideas:
#1. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
#2. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
#3. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
4
The purpose of this ballot is to solicit votes for the five ideas that best deal with the
issue:
The following are all of the ideas that have been submitted by participants. Please
identify the top five ideas and assign five points to the most promising idea, 4 points
to the next most promising, and 3, 2, and 1 points to the third, fourth, and fifth-best
ideas. Vote for only five ideas. Your ideas will be anonymously included in the next
questionnaire.
.
.
.
.
VOTING RESULTS
The following reports the results of votes cast for ideas submitted on the issue:
Please note the rank order of the ideas based on the total number of points received.
Also indicated are the number of people who voted for each idea.
.
.
.
.
.
QUESTIONNAIRE #3 (alternative B)
Please further refine these ideas by providing additional clarification where desired
and by listing additional strengths and weaknesses you associate with each. Please
list any new ideas at the bottom of the questionnaire and comment on each new idea’s
strengths and weaknesses for addressing the issue.
Please note that this will be the last questionnaire. After receiving all participants’
responses to this questionnaire, I will send each of you a rating form on which you will
be asked to assess the merits of all ideas submitted using a 7-point scale. After those
rating forms have been returned, I will compile the results and rank-order the ideas
based on participants’ evaluations. Your ideas will be anonymously included in the
next report.
My new ideas:
#1. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
#2. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
#3. .................................
• Strengths:
• Weaknesses:
4
The purpose of this questionnaire is to report strengths, weaknesses, and clarification of all
ideas submitted in response to the third questionnaire for dealing with the issue:
Please assess the merits of all ideas listed below using a scale that ranges from 0 (no
potential for dealing with the issue) through 7 (very high potential for dealing with the issue).
Please email your evaluation to me. After all rating forms have been returned, I will
compile the information, rank-order the ideas based on the evaluations, and send you the
results. Your ideas will be anonymously included in the next report.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
.
.
.
RESULTS
The following reports the results of points that participants assigned to the ideas submitted
on the issue:
Please note the rank order of the ideas based on the total number of points received.
.
.
.
.
.