Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHRO Complaint 0001
CHRO Complaint 0001
Ff$'"C c e zllfig
3. The Respondent is the City af Ansonio, the Ansonia Police Department and
-
Chief of Police Kevin Hale located at 253 Main Street Ansonia CT, and 2 Elm Street
Ansonia CT.
4. I have been constantly retaliated against since I began my empioyment with the
employer, the City of Ansonia's Police Department, by and through the decisions and
actions of its Chief of Police, Kevin Hale, instituting a baseless, and conveniently timed,
internal affairs investigation against me regarding prior conduct on the part of the
Ansonia Police Department and Chief Kevin Hale referenced below. Chief Hale
ordered that I participate and provide an interview regarding alleged conduct that resulted
filing a prior CHRO complaint that related specifically to actions he has taken while in
office. In addition, Chief Hale took such action as retaliation for my decision to fight the
Defendant Hale treated me differently from all other members of the department as he
included allegations in this investigation relating to conduct that was a cofilmon practice
of the department and its employees, conduct which supervisors had approved and
conduct for which no other officer had ever been made the subject of an internal
investigation.
5. This all stems from my July 15, 2009 arrest and placement on administrative
leave.
ond my previously having oppased discriminatory conduct (ogainst both myself and
others), and my asserting my First Amendment Rights infiling a prior complaint with
the CHRO and speoking out agoinst hk actions relating to me, were in part lactors in
this action. I believe that the respondent violated the following Connecticut General
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e and the
2
COMPLAINT
l) The parliculars of my complaint are as follows:
4) The Respondent isthe City of Ansonia, the Ansonia Police Departrnent and
Chief of Police Kevin Hale withbusiness addresses of 253 Main Street Ansonia CT, and
5) I have been constantly retaliated against since I began my employment with the
aforementioned parties with the latest instance occurring on or about October 9,2009.
through, its Chief of Police Kevin Hale, instituting an internal affairs investigation
against me regarding prior conduct on the pa* of the,4 nsonia Police Department and
Kevin Hale referenced below. Chief Kevin Hale ordered that I participate and provide
administrative leave as a way to retaliate against me for filing a prior CHRO complaint.
In addition, Chief Hale took such action as retaliation for my decision to fight the false
Defendant Hale treated me differently from all other members of the department as he
included allegations in this investigation relating to conduct that was a common practice
of the department and its employees, conduct which supervisors had approved and
conduct for which no other officer had ever been made the subject of an internal
investigation.
6) I believe that my roce (African-American), my color (black), my religion (Islom)
and my prevtoasly hoving opposed discriminutory conduct (ogainst both myself ond
others) were in parl factors in this action. I believe that the respondent violated the
proceeding Connecticut General Statutes and Acts listed on the proceeding page.
8) I began working for the respondent in 1993 in the capacity of a police officer.
I 1) I repeatedly made attempts to obtain a full time position and was denied such a
12) Eventually I made a complaint in regard to the City of Ansonia's failure to hire
me for a full time position with the NAACP. After making my complaint I was
13) After obtaining this position I was subjected to constant harassment at the hands
14) In 1998 I filed a complaint with the commission on Human Rights and
Opportunities due to the fact the Ansania Police Departmenl denied me the right to wear
15) In addition to wearing a beard I also was allowed to openly practice my religion
in the form of being allowed to pray at certain times during the day.
I6) These developments angered my superiors and they took every opportunity to
against me.
19) This retaliation included failing to take action against other employees who were
frivolous intemal affairs investigations, after which I was not only cleared of any wrong
doing but issued an award for the manner in which I conducted myself.
Harassment and Discrimination Policy. This questiomaire asked if I was aware if any
21) I was then questioned about my answer by Lt. Cota, an officer in a supervisory
capacity and declined to discuss the matter with him but instead asked who other than
22) A female officer had been the victim of sexual harassment at the hands of a
superior officer and I was a witness to this. I counseled this officer and offered help in
23) I also spoke out against and supported others individuals in the City of Ansonia
who had their rights been violatedby Ansonia Chief of Police Kevin Hale.
24) These actions again angered my superiors, most specifically Ansonia Chief of
Police Kevin Hale.
" 25) This summer I was accused of stealing a garden hose from the Ansonia Police
department.
26) This hose was found within the department three days after it was reported
27) Despite the fact this hose was found inside the departm ent, Chief of Police Kevin
Hole requested the Connecticut State Police conduct an investigation and that I be
arrested.
28) I was arrested and placed on administrative leave which continues as of the date
of this complaint.
29) I never stole this garden hose as it never left department property.
30) In the past town employees have been accused of and admitted to engaging in
31) With the aforementioned false arrest as a basis, Chief Kevin Hale used his
position as Chief. and the authority vested in that position, to order, that I, pursuant to
contract, actively participate and provide an interview regarding alleged conduct that
me for:
32) Defendant Hale treated me differently from all other members of the Departrnent
my complaint- secure for me my rights as guaranteed to me under the above cited laws
Mustafu Salohuddin being duly sworn, on oath, states that he is the Complainant herein,
that he has read the foregoing complaint and knows the content thereof, that the same is
true of his own klowledge, except as to the matter herein stated on information and belief
Rob Serafinowicz