Professional Documents
Culture Documents
<W>
$1,218 for 61.80% of <W> (log scale) -E-
$732
$1,450 for 78.62% of <W> (log scale)
$1,387 for 61.80% of <W> measured from
-B-
the top of <W> (log scale)
<X>
$643
-C- (X)
(C)
(A) (Y)
-D-
-A- (B) (W)
(C)
(A) -B-
(X)
<W>
-E-
$732
-B-
<X>
$643
-C-
(C) (X)
(Y)
(A)
-D-
-A- (B) (W)
(C)
(A)
-B-
(B)
The market has broken the proposed B-D trend line which indicates this triangle
concluded. We should be in the beginning stages or longer term correction if <Y>
this model is correct. -E-
-C-
(Y)
-A- -D-
(W)
(X)
-B-
<X>
$643
(C) “e”
-C-
“a”
“d”
“b”
(A)
(B)
(D) (D)
(B)
(E)
(A) -D-
(C)
So far, the move down from the highs is best counted as a “complex” correction and
not an impulse. The bears will be hoping for another sideways -x- wave to set up
(b) the last wave down (z-wave). As it stands, we have a possible completed count
coupled with a robust bounce*, so it’s time for shorts/bears to be “nimble” with
positions.
(a)
[2]
-x-
[4] (b)
[2]
[1]
[2]
[3] [4]
[1]
[5]
(c) [1]
[3]
-w- [5]
(a) [4]
* Sharp bounces on Fridays should be treated with some skepticism. [3] [5]
(c)
-y- of a?
With the break $1,175 resistance last week, that level has now become the first
support point for bulls. In the very near term, this market feels like it’s “no man’s
land.” Sideways congestion from here would obviously be bearish--the gold bulls
must prove that Friday’s nice rebound wasn’t just short covering before the
weekend. $1,186 looks to be the important “pivot” point for early this week. A
break above $1,186 should clear room for a move to $1,204.
1215
1204
1186
1175
1167
C
-Z-
-Y-
(Jan, 1980)
$873
A -X-
-W-
-X-
(Nov, 1974)
$191 B C - Wave Price Targets:
$260
(Feb, 2001)? $1,295 for 123.6% of A
$1,418 for 138.2% of A
$1,615 for 161.8% of A
$101 * “If there is a way for a wave to take longer to complete, then assume it will.”
(Aug, 1976)
$35
(Aug, 1970)
Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Gold Weekly (Log Scale)
Check out the huge diamond shape of the whole pattern. I don’t know of any
impulsive patterns that look this way. Therefore, it must be a corrective from the
Cycle lows of 1999-2001. Any wave count that attempts to label this advance
an “impulse” is incorrect.