You are on page 1of 45

“Gh.

Asachi” Technical university of iasi


civil engineering

Contents

Written part:

1. Project Theme;

2. Technical Report;

3. Hydrothermal design of the envelope elements :

3.1. Estimation of general factor of heat loss ”G”;

3.2. Checking for condensation in one of the envelope element;

4. Estimation of the loads and the loads combination

5. Diagrams for shear wall section.

Drawing part:

1. Floor plane current (1:50);

2. Building access detail (1:50);

3. Roof plane (1:100);

4. Transversal cross section through the stair case (1:50);

5. Construction details (1:5,1:10);

1
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

1. Project Theme

The project consists in elements of design for a building that can have one of the
following destinations:
 Collective dwelling
 Hotel
 Student accommodation
 Hostel

The structure of the building is composed of monolithic reinforcement concrete,


shear walls, combined with frame structures, reinforced concrete floor slabs and
cross foundation under the walls or columns. The envelope of the building must be
covered with protective layer of efficient thermal resistance materials.

2. Technical report
This project combines all the technical documentation needed for the erection of a
hotel with Ug+Gr+4Fl. , having the structure made of masonry walls, structural exterior
walls, structural interior walls, reinforced concrete pillars and girdles.

Foundation placement
The building is situated in Suceava, at the main street. The building terrain is
leveled and has the local and general stability assured.
According to the geological study the terrain has the following characteristics:
 At the surface vegetal soil and soil fill at about 80 cm depth;
 Underground water is present below 7.00 m;
 Seismic zone “C” conf P100/92:
 Tc=0.7s – corner period;

2
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Construction solution
Infrastructure
The infrastructure will be realized under the form of a continues foundation under
the walls with a concrete skid made up of concrete (C 6/7.5) and concrete elevation (C
16/20), 90 cm thick under the first-floor walls, 105 cm under the under-ground floor.
Also, the infrastructure will be reinforced with girdles on the whole length. The
reinforcement will be made with PC52 and OB37 steel.

Superstructure
The strength structure is consisted of structural walls, masonry walls( mark 75 cal I
and masonry plaster MZ 50 ), and girdles. Exterior walls are 25 cm thick, interior walls
are 20 cm thick and exterior and interior structural walls are 20 cm thick. The materials
used in pillars, girdles and beams will be: concrete C16/20 (Bc20) and reinforcements
PC52 and OB37. The masonry will be consisted of BCA.
The stairs are made up of monolith reinforced concrete.
The slab over the ground floor will be made up of reinforced concrete (C16/20). The
slab will be 13 cm thick and it will be reinforced with steel STNB nets.
The roof over the garret is consisted of infusible fir (resinous wood).
Finishing
Exterior paintings will be carefully chosen function of the volumetric of the
house:
White and amber plaster, PVC windows, wood doors, wood handrail, PVC ditch
and down-comers.
Interior paintings will be in accordance with the hygienic-sanitary requirements
that are imposed by the active normative and by the authorization given by D.S.P.
So, interior paintings will be chosen such that the exterior-interior chromatic
sensation to be a fine one. For the living rooms we will use a white, creamy washable
lime and for the bathrooms, kitchen and stores we’ll use sandstone assorted with the
wall paintings.

Functional solution
Inner space sistematization:

BASEMENT: 265.64 [m2]


TERRACE AREA: 296.82[m2]
GROUND FLOOR:
 4 x Kitchen:45.88 [m2]
 8 x Bathroom: 30.09[m2]
 7 x Bedroom: 91.68 [m2]

3
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

 8 x Lobby: 48.68 [m2]


 Staircase: 14.68 [m2]
 Entrance Lobby: 14.77[m2]
TOTAL: 245.78 [m2]
UPPER FLOORS:
 4 x Kitchen:45.88 [m2]
 8 x Bathroom: 30.09[m2]
 8 x Bedroom: 106.44 [m2]
 8 x Lobby: 48.68 [m2]
 Staircase: 14.68 [m2]
TOTAL: 245.77*4=1494.5 [m2]

Urbanism conditions
 Water supply will be assured by S.C. RAJAC S.R.L.
 Electricity supply will be assured by „E.ON Moldova S.A.”
 The sewerage will be made by joining the sewerage network from the
neighborhood.
 The heating will be made individually by central heating.
 The fuel (gas) supply will be made joining to the local network.

4
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

3. Hydrothermal design of the envelope elements

3.1. Estimation of general factor of heat loss ”G”;

Calculus of the distinct areas for the thermal design of the building
 exterior structural wall
- total area: 403.61m2
- gap area: 32.4m2
- solid area: 371.21m2
 exterior wall
- total area: 565.896m2
- gap area: 148.8m2
- solid area: 417.10m2

Determination of the specific thermal resistance(R)

a. For structural external wall:

5
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

NO. Layer d λ R
[m] [w/mk] [m2k/w]
Interior surface - - Ri=1/8
1. Lime cement mortar 0.01 0.87 R1=0.011
2. Reinforced concrete 0.20 1.74 R2=0.114
3. Polystyrene 0.10 0.04 R3=2.500
4. External plaster 0.005 0.52 R4=0.009
External surface - - Re=1/24
TOTAL R=2.825

di 1 di 1
R=R i+ ∑ + Re = + ∑ +
λi αi λi λe
1 0.001 0.2 0.1 0.005 1
R= + + + + + =2.825 [m2 K /W ]
8 0.87 1.74 0.04 0.52 24

b. For B.C.A. masonry external wall:

NO. Layer d λ R
[m] [w/mk] [m2k/w]

6
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Interior surface - - Ri=1/8


1. Lime cement mortar 0.01 0.87 R1=0.011
2. B.C.A. 0.25 0.27 R2=0.926
3. Polystyrene 0.10 0.04 R3=2.500
4. External plaster 0.005 0.52 R4=0.009
External surface - - Re=1/24
TOTAL R=3.636

1 0.03 0.25 0.10 0.005 1


R= + + + + + =3.636[m 2 K /W ]
8 0.87 0.27 0.04 0.52 24

c. For floor over basement:

NO. Layer d λ R
2
[m] [w/mk] [m k/w]
Interior surface - - Ri=1/6
1. Cold flooring 0.03 1.16 R1=0.025
2. Equalization screed 0.03 0.91 R2=0.032
(M100)
3. Reinforced concrete slab 0.13 1.74 R3=0.074
4. Polystyrene 0.10 0.04 R4=2.500
5. Lime cement mortar 0.012 0.87 R5=0.013
External surface - - Re=1/12
TOTAL R=2.894

7
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

1 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.10 0.012 1


R= + + + + + + =2.894 [m2 K /W ]
6 1.16 0.91 1.74 0.04 0.87 12

d. For terrace:

NO. Layer d λ R
2
[m] [w/mk] [m k/w]
Interior surface - - Ri=1/8
1. Lime cement mortar 0.01 0.87 R1=0.011
2. Reinforced concrete slab 0.13 1.74 R2=0.005
3. Equalization screed 0.03 0.91 R3=0.032
4. Vapor barrier - - -
5. Protection layer - - -
6. B.C.A. 0.08 0.27 R6=0.296
7. Equalization screed 0.03 0.91 R7=0.032
8. Diffusion layer - - -
9. Polystyrene 0.25 0.04 R9=6.250
10. Protection screed 0.03 0.91 R10=0.032
11. Waterproof membrane - - -
12. Gravel - - -
External surface - - Re=1/24
TOTAL R=6.898

8
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

1 0.01 0.13 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.25 0.03 1


R= + + + + + + + + =6.898
8 0.87 1.74 0.91 0.27 0.91 0.04 0.91 24

Determination of specific thermal adjusted resistance (R’)

Element Thermal Ψ l Ψ*l A R U’ R’


bridge [w/m] [m] [w] [m2] 2
[m k/w] [m2k/w]
V. j. corner out 0.1 55.48 5.548
V. j. current ‘T’ 2*0.14 83.22 23.31
Structural V. j. at cornice 0.15 29.1 4.36 371.217 2.825 0.520 1.923
external H. j. at basement 0.18 29.1 5.23
wall H. j. current 0.11 116.4 12.8
H. j. current 0.13 116.4 15.13
V. j. corner out 0.06 55.48 3.33
V. j. current ‘T’ 2*0.06 55.48 6.657
Masonry V. j. current ‘T’ 2*0.04 83.22 6.657
external H. j. at cornice 0.14 40.8 5.72
wall H. j. at basement 0.15 40.8 6.12 417.10 3.636 0.453 2.207
H. j. current 0.09 110.4 9.93
H. j. current 0.11 110.4 12.14
H. balcony 0.15 66 9.9
0.21 66 13.86
Floor over H. j. at basement 0.27 29.1 7.85
Basement H. j. at basement 0.25 40.8 10.2 296.82 2.894 0.498 2.01
H. j. int. wall 2*0.11 123.5 27.17
Terrace H. j. at cornice 0.19 29.1 5.53 296.82 6.898 0.188 5.31
H. j. at cornice 0.18 40.8 7.34
Window Woodwork j. 0.27 471.6 127.33 181.2 - - 0.55

1 Σ(Ψ ∗l) 1
U '= + R '=
R A U'

R – specific resistance
Ψ – specific linear coefficient of the thermal transfer process
l – the length of the thermal bridge
A – area of the element

9
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Determination of global coefficient of thermal insulation (G)

1 A⋅τ
G= ⋅∑
V R '
3
( )
+0 . 34⋅n[W /(m K )]

Vheated – interior heated volume of the building


A- area of the outer cover element
n - the natural ventilation speed of the building, number of air changes per hour
n =0.6
τ -correction factor of the exterior temperature
T i−T u
τ=
T i−T e
20−5
τ basement = =0.6097
20+ 21

Vheated=Abasement ¿ l
l=5 ¿ hfloor - hslab
l=5 ¿ 2.8 - 0.13=13.87 [m]
Vheated=296.82 ¿ 13.87 [m3]

A⋅τ A exterior ⋅τ A exterior ⋅τ Abasement⋅τ Aterrace⋅τ A woodwork⋅τ


∑ ( ) R '
= '
R exterior
+ ' wall I

Rexterior
+ '
Rbasement
wallI
wallII
+ '
Rterrace
wallII
+ '
Rwoodwork

A⋅τ 371. 217⋅1 417 . 1⋅1 296 . 82⋅0 .6097 296 . 82⋅1 181. 2⋅1
∑ ( )R'
=
1 .923
+
2 .207
+
2 . 01
+
5 . 31
+
0 .55
A⋅τ
∑ ( )
R'
=857 . 412 [w/m3k]

1
G= +0.34*0.6=0.412 [w/m3k]
4116.89

10
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

A h eated 1563.167 3
= =¿ 0.37=¿ GN =0.574 [w/m k ]
V h eated 4116.85
G=0.412<GN

Checking up the risk of condensation for a structural external wall according


to C107/3

20+21
∗1
T i−T e 2.825
T Si =T i− ∗Ri=20− =18.1 ℃ → PS , Si =2079[ Pa]
R 8
T i−T e 1 d 1 20+21 1 0.03
T 1=T i −
R (
∗ + =20−
α i λ1 ) ∗( +
2.825 8 0.87
)=17.6 ℃ →

PS 1 =2014[ Pa]
T i−T e 1 d 1 d 2 20+ 21 1 0.03 0.2
T 2=T i −
R (
∗ + + =20−
α i λ1 λ2 ) ∗( + +
2.825 8 0.87 1.74
)=16.0 ℃ →

PS 2 =1818[Pa]
T i−T e 1 d 1 d 2 d 3 20+21 1 0.03 0.2 0.1
T 3=T i−
R (
∗ + + + =20−
α i λ1 λ 2 λ 3 )
∗( + + +
2.825 8 0.87 1.74 0.04
)

T 3=−20.2 ℃ → PS 3=101[Pa]
T i−T e 1 d1 d 2 d 3 d 4
T Se =T i−
R (
∗ + + + +
α i λ1 λ2 λ3 λ 4
=¿ )
20+21 1 0.03 0.2 0.1 0.005
¿ 20− ∗ +( + + +
2.825 8 0.87 1.74 0.04 0.52 )
=−20.4 ℃ → P S , Se=99[ Pa]

Dew temperature

φi=55%
Ti= +20 OC => τr=10.7 OC
TSi=18.3 OC > τr
RVi=di*μi*M [m/s]

11
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

RV1=0.03*8.5*54*108=13.77*108 [m/s]
RV2=0.2*21.3*54*108=230.04*108 [m/s]
RV3=0.1*30*54*108=162*108 [m/s]
RV4=0.005*4.7*54*108=1.269*108 [m/s]

φ i∗PSi 55∗2340
PVi= = =1287
100 100
φe∗PSe 85∗94
PVe = = =79.9
100 100

12
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Checking for the water accumulation risk as a consequence of vapors


condensation in the structure elements.

4. Estimation of the loads and the loads combination

4.1The geometrical characteristics of calculus of structural walls


External Structural Wall
Data for the vertical beam
Vertical beam 1.
13
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Active section at eccentric compression


Am ,1=4.4∗0.2+ 0.2∗0.2=0.92[m 2]
Active section at shear force
Am 1 , t=4.4∗0.2=0.88 [ m 2 ]
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A2 0∗0.88+2.1∗0.04
Y G , 1= = =0.0913 [ m ]
A1+ A2 0.92
Moment of inertia
4.4 3∗0.2 0.23∗0.2
I m 1= [12
2
+0.0913 ∗4.4∗0.2 + ][
12
2 2 4
+2.0087 ∗0.2 =1.588 [ m ] ]
Vertical beam 2.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,2=0.85∗0.2+0.65∗0.2=0.30 [m2 ]
Active section at shear force
b∗h
Am ,t =
k
k =1 for rectangular sections;
k=1.1 for sections in T and L ;
k=1.0 for sections in I and C;
0.85∗0.2
Am 2 , t = =0.154 [ m 2 ]
1.1
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A2 0∗0.17+0.025∗0.13
Y G , 2= = =0.0108 [ m ]
A 1 + A2 0.30
Moment of inertia
0.853∗0.2 0.23∗0.065
I m 2= [ 12 ][
+0.01082∗0.17 +
12 ]
+ 0.1358∗0.13 = 0.0148 [ m4 ]

Vertical beam 3.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,3=0.8∗0.2+0.2∗0.2=0.20 [m2 ]
Active section at shear force

14
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

0.8∗0.2
Am 3 , t = =0.145 [ m 2 ]
1.1
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A 2
Y G , 3= =0 [ m ]
A 1 + A2
Moment of inertia
0.83∗0.2 0.23∗0.2
I m 3= [ 12
+][ 12 ]
=0.00866 [ m4 ]

Vertical beam 4.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,4 =0.85∗0.2+ 0.65∗0.2=0.30[m 2 ]
Active section at shear force
0.85∗0.2
Am 4 ,t = =0.154 [ m 2 ]
1.1
The section centroid position
Y 1 A 1∗Y 2 A 2 0∗0.17 +0.025∗0.13
Y G , 4= = =0.0108 [ m ]
A 1+ A 2 0.30
Moment of inertia
0.853∗0.2 0.23∗0.065
I m 4= [ 12
2
+0.0108 ∗0.17 + ][
12
4
+0.1358∗0.13 =0.0148 [ m ] ]
Vertical beam 5.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,5=4.4∗0.2+0.2∗0.2=0.92[ m2 ]
Active section at shear force
Am 1 , t=4.4∗0.2=0.88 [ m 2 ]
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A2 0∗0.88+2.1∗0.04
Y G , 1= = =0.0913 [ m ]
A1+ A2 0.92
Moment of inertia
4.4 3∗0.2 0.23∗0.2
I m 1= [ 12
+0.09132∗4.4∗0.2 + ][
12
+2.0087 2∗0.22 =1.588 [ m4 ] ]
15
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Data for the cross-beam


Distance between centroids
L1−2=3.605 [ m ] L2−3=1.635 [ m ] L3 −4=1.635 [ m ] L4−5 =3.605 [ m ] L1−5=10.68 [ m ]
Section depth of the cross-beam constraining
a=0.35∗hr ≤ 0.40 [ m]
a=0.35∗1.6=0.56 [ m ] >0.40 → a=0.40 [ m ]
Length of the gap
l 0=0.90 [ m ]
Calculus length of the cross-beam
l=l 0 +2 a=0.90+2∗0.40=1.70 [ m ]
The floor plate does not pull together with the cross-beam
0.2∗1.63
I r= =0.0682 [ m ]
12
Active section at shear force
b∗hr 0.2∗1.6
Ar ,t = = =0.267[m]
k 1.2

The rigidities calculus considering the structural wall a cantilever equal with the building height.
βs
ν 0= ; I =η ∗I
θ s 4 αs 0 S s 0
ηS∗I 0
I´eS= ν =the number of levels coeffcient
ν 0∗η S∗I 0 0
1+ 2
H ∗∑ A m ,t

I 0=the global moment of inertiaof the whole section


η s=a cofficient depending on the number of levels∧λ , γ .

λ=the ratio betwe n the distorsion rigidities of the vertical∧cross−beams


γ =the coeficient wich introduces the axial deformability
n n −1

∑ K mi n−1 2∑ K r
1 1
Km = ; K r =∑ K r ; λ= n
e
2 e
1
∑ Km
1

16
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering
n

Kr ∑ Im 1 1
λ= ; γ =1+ 1 2 ( + )
Km L1 ,n Am 1 A m ,n

Rigidity of the cross-beam


6 E r∗I r L 3
Kr=
L l
∗μ ()
1 1
μ= = =0.273
30 I r 30∗0.0682
1+ 1+
A r . t∗l 2 0.2667∗1.702

6∗6.75∗0.0682∗109 3.605 3
K r ,1=
3.605

1.70 ( )
∗0.273=1.994∗109 [ N∗m ]

6∗6.75∗0.0682∗109 1.635 3
K r ,2=
1.635

1.70 ( )
∗0.273=0.41∗10 9 [ N∗m ]

6∗6.75∗0.0682∗109 1.635 3
K r ,3=
1.635

1.70 ( )
∗0.273=0.41∗10 9 [ N∗m ]

6∗6.75∗0.0682∗10 9 3.605 3
K r ,4 =
3.605

1.70( )
∗0.273=1.994∗10 9 [ N∗m ]

n −1

∑ K r=4.808∗10 9 [N∗m]
1

Rigidity at distortion
E m∗I m
Km=
he
27∗10 9∗1.588 9
K m , 1= =15.312∗10 [N∗m]
2.8
27∗10 9∗0.0148 9
K m , 2= =0.142∗10 [ N∗m]
2.8
27∗10 9∗0.00866 9
K m , 3= =0.0835∗10 [N∗m]
2.8
27∗109∗0.0148 9
K m , 4= =0.142∗10 [N∗m]
2.8

17
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

27∗10 9∗1.588 9
K m , 5= =15.312∗10 [N∗m]
2.8
n

∑ K mi=30.991∗10 9 [N∗m]
1

Calculus of the coefficients λ and γ of the structural wall


n−1
2∑ Kr
1 2∗4.808∗109
λ= n
= =0.310 .
30.991∗10 9
∑ Km
1

∑ Im
γ =1+ 1

L 2
1 ,n
( A1 + A1 )=1+ 10.68
m1 m ,n
3.214 1
( 0.92 + 0.921 )=1.061.
2

{λ=0.310
γ=1.061
→ η =0.185 s

Global Moment of Inertia


Is computed for each case.
I 0=I m ,1 + Am , 1∗c 21 + I m ,2 + Am , 2∗c 22 + I m ,3 + Am ,3∗c23 + I m , 4 + A m , 4∗c 24 + I m ,5 + Am , 5∗c 25 .

I 0=2∗ [ 1.588+ ( 5.3412∗0.92 ) + 0.0148+ ( 1.712∗0.3 ) ]+ 0.00866=57.542 m 2


Equilibrium Moment of Inertia
I 0 S=ηs∗I 0=0.185∗57.542=10.645 [ m4 ]
Equivalent Moment of Inertia
∑ A m ,t =0.88+0.154 +0.145+0.154 +0.88=2.054[m¿¿ 2]¿
ηS∗I 0 0.185∗57.542
I´eS= = =8.269 [ m4 ]
ν 0∗η S∗I 0 10.87∗0.185∗57.542
1+ 2 1+
H ∗∑ A m ,t 14 2∗2.054

18
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Internal Structural Wall


Data for the vertical beam
Vertical beam 1.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,1=4.375∗0.2+0.6∗0.2=0.995[m 2]
Active section at shear force
Am 1 , t=4.575∗0.2=0.915 [ m2 ]
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A2 0∗0.0875+2.2875∗0.012
Y G , 1= = =0.275 [ m ]
A1+ A2 0.995
Moment of inertia
4.3753∗0.2 0.23∗0.6
I m 1= [ 12
2
][
+ 0.275 ∗0.875 +
12
2 4
]
+2.0125 ∗0.12 =1.948 [ m ]

Vertical beam 2.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,2=0.8∗0.2+0.3∗0.2=0.28[m2 ]
Active section at shear force
b∗h
Am ,t =
k
k =1 for rectangular sections;
k=1.1 for sections in T and L ;
k=1.0 for sections in I and C;
0.8∗0.2
Am 2 , t = =0.145 [ m 2 ]
1.1
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A2 0∗0.16+0.1∗0.06+0.1∗0.06
Y G , 2= = =0.0428 [ m ]
A 1 + A2 0.28
Moment of inertia
0.83∗0.2 0.23∗0.3
I m 2= [12
2
+0.0428 ∗0.16 + ][
12
+0.05722∗0.06 ∗2=0.0398 [ m4 ]]
19
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Vertical beam 3.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,3=0.6∗0.2+0.2∗0.2=0.16[m 2]
Active section at shear force
0.6∗0.2
Am 3 , t = =0.109 [ m 2 ]
1.1
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A 2
Y G , 3= =0 [ m ]
A 1 + A2
Moment of inertia
0.63∗0.2 0.23∗0.2
I m 3= [ 12
+][ 12 ] 4
= 0.00373 [ m ]

Vertical beam 4.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,4 =0.8∗0.2+ 0.3∗0.2=0.28[ m2 ]
Active section at shear force
0.8∗0.2
Am 4 ,t = =0.145 [ m2 ]
1.1
The section centroid position
Y 1 A 1∗Y 2 A 2 0∗0.16 +0.1∗0.06 +0.1∗0.06
Y G , 4= = =0.0428 [ m ]
A 1+ A 2 0.28
Moment of inertia
0.83∗0.2 0.23∗0.3
I m 4= [12
2
+0.0428 ∗0.16 +
12 ][
+0.05722∗0.06 ∗2=0.0398 [ m4 ] ]
Vertical beam 5.
Active section at eccentric compression
Am ,5=4.375∗0.2+0.6∗0.2=0.995[m 2 ]
Active section at shear force
Am 5 , t=4.575∗0.2=0.915 [ m2 ]
The section centroid position
Y 1 A1∗Y 2 A 2 0∗0.0875+2.2875∗0.012
Y G , 5= = =0.275 [ m]
A1 + A2 0.995
20
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Moment of inertia
4.3753∗0.2 0.23∗0.6
I m 5= [ 12
2
][
+ 0.275 ∗0.875 +
12
2
] 4
+2.0125 ∗0.12 =1.948 [ m ]

Data for the cross-beam


Distance between centroids
L1−2=3.72 [ m] L2−3 =1.642 [ m ] L3−4 =1.642 [ m ] L 4−5=3.72 [ m ] L1−5 =10.725 [ m ]
Section depth of the cross-beam constraining
a=0.35∗hr ≤ 0.40 [ m ]
a=0.35∗0.7=0.21 [ m ]
Length of the gap
l 0=0.90 [ m ]
Calculus length of the cross-beam
l=l 0 +2 a=0.90+2∗0.21=1.32 [ m]
The floor plate does not pull together with the cross-beam
0.2∗0.73 −3
I r= =5.716∗10 [ m ]
12
Active section at shear force
b∗hr 0.2∗0.7
Ar ,t = = =0.116 [m]
k 1.2

The rigidities calculus considering the structural wall a cantilever equal with the building height.

βs
ν 0= ; I =η ∗I
θ s 4 αs 0 S s 0

ηS∗I 0
I´eS= ν =the number of levels coeffcient
ν 0∗η S∗I 0 0
1+ 2
H ∗∑ A m ,t

I 0=the global moment of inertiaof the whole section


η s=a cofficient depend ing on thenumber of levels∧λ , γ .

λ=the ratio betwen the distorsionrigidities of the vertical∧cross−beams


21
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

γ =the coeficient wich introduces the axial deformability


n n −1

∑ K mi n−1 2∑ K r
1 1
Km = ; K r =∑ K r ; λ= n
e
2 e
1
∑ Km
1

Kr ∑ Im 1 1
λ= ; γ =1+ 1 2 ( + )
Km L1 ,n Am 1 A m ,n

Rigidity of the cross-beam


6 E r∗I r L 3
Kr=
L l ()
∗μ

1 1
μ= = =0.541
30 I r 30∗5.716∗10−3
1+ 1+
A r . t∗l 2 0.116∗1.322

6∗6.75∗10 9∗5.716∗10−3 3.72 3


K r ,1=
3.72

1.32 ( )
∗0.541=0.753∗109 [ N∗m ]

6∗6.75∗10 9∗5.716∗10−3 1.643 3


K r ,2=
1.643

1.32 ( )
∗0.541=0.147∗10 9 [ N∗m ]

6∗6.75∗10 9∗5.716∗10−3 1.643 3


K r ,3=
1.643

1.32 ( )
∗0.541=0.147∗10 9 [ N∗m ]

6∗6.75∗109∗5.716∗10−3 3.72 3
K r ,4 =
3.72

1.32 ( )
∗0.541=0.753∗109 [ N∗m ]

n −1

∑ K r=2.735∗109 [ N∗m]
1

Rigidity at distortion
E m∗I m
Km=
he
27∗10 9∗1.948 9
K m , 1= =18.784∗10 [ N∗m]
2.8

22
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

27∗10 9∗0.0398 9
K m , 2= =0.383∗10 [ N∗m]
2.8
27∗10 9∗0.00373 9
K m , 3= =0.03645∗10 [N∗m]
2.8
27∗109∗0.0398 9
K m , 4= =0.383∗10 [ N∗m]
2.8
27∗10 9∗1.948 9
K m , 5= =18.784∗10 [N∗m]
2.8
n

∑ K mi=38.698∗10 9 [ N∗m]
1

Calculus of the coefficients λ and γ of the structural wall


n−1
2∑ Kr
1 2∗2.735∗10 9
λ= n
= =0.141.
38.698∗109
∑ Km
1

∑ Im
γ =1+ 1

L 2
1 ,n
( A1 + A1 )=1+ 10.725
m1
4.013
m ,n
1
( 0.9952
+
1
0.995 )
=1.070 .

{γλ=0.141
=1.070
→ η =0.197 s

Global Moment of Inertia


Is computed for each case.
I 0=I m ,1 + Am , 1∗c 21 + I m ,2 + Am , 2∗c 22 + I m ,3 + Am ,3∗c23 + I m , 4 + A m , 4∗c 24 + I m ,5 + Am , 5∗c 25 .

I 0=2∗ [ 1.948+ ( 5.36252∗0.995 ) +0.0398+ ( 1.64882∗0.28 ) ] +0.00373=63.715 m2


Equilibrium Moment of Inertia
I 0 S=ηs∗I 0=0.197∗63.715=12.55 [ m4 ]
Equivalent Moment of Inertia
∑ A m ,t =0.915+0.145+ 0.109+0.145+0.915=2.229[m¿¿ 2]¿

23
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

ηS∗I 0 0.197∗63.715
I´eS= = =9.645 [ m4 ]
ν 0∗η S∗I 0 10.87∗0.197∗63.715
1+ 2 1+
H ∗∑ A m ,t 142∗2.229

24
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

25
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

4.2 Gravitational load evaluation

 External structural wall

26
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.03 1800 54
2 Reinforced concrete 0.20 2500 500
3 Polystyrene 0.10 20 2
4 Exterior plaster 0.005 2100 10.5
Total 566.5

 External masonry wall

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.03 1800 54
2 BCA masonry 0.25 700 175
3 Polystyrene 0.10 20 2
4 Exterior plaster 0.005 2100 10.5
Total 241.5

 Internal structural wall

27
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54
2 Reinforced concrete 0.20 2500 500
3 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54
Total 608

 Internal masonry wall

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
28
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

1 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54


2 BCA masonry 0.20 700 140
3 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54
Total 248

 Partition wall

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54
2 BCA masonry 0.10 700 70
3 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54
Total 178

 Attic

29
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.03 1800 54
2 Reinforced concrete 0.10 2500 250
3 Polystyrene 0.10 20 2
4 Exterior plaster 0.005 2100 10.5
Total 316.50

 Plate over basement – cold flooring

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Ceramic plates 0.01 2400 24
2 Screed 0.03 1800 54
3 Reinforced concrete slab 0.13 2500 325
4 Polystyrene 0.10 20 2
5 Lime cement mortar 0.012 1800 21.6
Total 426.6

 Plate over basement – warm

flooring

30
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Parquet 0.02 600 12
2 Screed 0.03 1800 54
3 Reinforced concrete slab 0.13 2500 325
4 Polystyrene 0.10 20 2
5 Lime cement mortar 0.012 1800 21.6
Total 414.60

 Plate over floor – cold flooring

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Ceramic plates 0.01 2400 24
2 Screed 0.03 1800 54
3 Sound insulation 0.03 1600 48
4 Reinforced concrete slab 0.13 2500 325
5 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 18
Total 469

31
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

 Plate over floor – warm flooring

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Parquet 0.02 600 12
2 Screed 0.03 1800 54
3 Sound insulation 0.03 1600 48
4 Reinforced concrete slab 0.13 2500 325
5 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 18
Total 457

 Stairs

32
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 54
2 Reinforced concrete 0.13 2500 325
3 Concrete 0.08 2400 192
4 Mosaic 0.02 2400 48
Total 619

 Terrace

Thickness  gn
No. Layer type
[m] [daN/m3] [daN/m2]
1 Lime cement mortar 0.01 1800 18
2 Reinforced concrete 0.13 2500 325
3 Screed 0.03 1800 54
4 Vapors barrier - - -
5 Definition layer - - -
6 BCA masonry 0.08 700 56
7 Equalization screed 0.03 1800 54
33
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

8 Polystyrene 0.25 20 5
9 Screed 0.03 1800 54
10 Water proof membrane - - -
11 Gravel - - -
Total 566

34
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Internal, external walls and plates distribution


35
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

4.3 Walls load evaluation

No. of
GT
Surfaces Weight simila
Elem. gsolid gwoodworkl [daN]
r elem.
type [daN/m ] [daN/m2]
2
Ssolid Swood Stotal Gsolid Gwood Gtotal
[m2] [m2] [m2] [daN] [daN] [daN]
E1 241.5 60 7.92 2.16 10.08 1908.72 129.6 2038.32 4 8153.28
E2 241.5 60 6.27 2.97 9.24 1514.2 178.2 1692.41 4 6769.64
E3 241.5 60 8.28 2.52 10.08 1999.62 151.2 2150.82 4 8603.28
E4 566.5 60 15.85 0.81 16.66 8979.03 48.6 9027.63 4 36110.52
E5 566.5 60 3.95 0.81 4.76 2237.67 48.6 2286.27 4 9145.08
I1 248 60 13.44 1.89 15.33 3333.12 113.4 3446.52 4 13786.08
I2 608 60 13.44 1.89 15.33 8171.52 113.4 8284.92 4 33139.68
I3 248 60 15.33 0 15.33 3801.84 0 3801.84 2 7603.68
I4 248 60 4.76 0 4.76 1180.48 0 1180.48 4 4721.92
I5 608 60 2.87 1.89 4.76 1744.96 113.4 1858.36 4 7433.44
I6 608 60 7.77 1.47 9.24 4724.16 88.2 4812.36 4 19249.44
I7 608 60 20.16 0 20.16 12257.3 0 12257.2 2 24514.56
I8 248 60 7.14 0 7.14 1770.72 0 1770.72 2 3541.44
I9 248 60 6.93 0 6.93 1718.64 0 1718.64 2 3437.28
I10 608 60 5.04 1.89 6.93 3064.32 113.4 3177.72 4 12710.88
Total 198920.2

4.4 Floor load evaluation

No. of
Weight Surface Weight
simila GT
Elem. [daN/m2] [m2] [daN]
r elem.
type
Cold Warm
Scold Swarm Stotal Gcold Gwarm Gtotal
floor floor
P1 469 457 2.72 14.24 16.96 1275.68 6507.68 7783.36 4 31133.44
P2 - 457 - 16.59 16.59 0 7581.63 7581.63 4 30326.52
P3 - 457 - 14.77 14.77 0 6749.89 6749.89 4 26999.2
P4 469 - 4.8 - 4.8 2251.2 0 2251.2 4 9004.8
P5 - 457 - 4.65 4.65 0 2125.05 2125.05 1 8500.2
P6(stairs) 619 - 24.48 - 24.48 15153.1 0 15153.1 4 15153.12
P7 469 - 6.435 - 6.435 3018.1 0 3018.1 4 12072.06
Total 133189.34
Pterrace 566 - - - 305.32 0 0 172811.12

36
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

4.5 Partition walls load

Weight of the wall Equivalen


Equivalen
t Area of No. of
Element t weight of GT
g Gh weight the plate similar
type the walls [daN]
[daN/m2] [daN/m] ge [m2] elements
[daN/m2]
[daN/m2]
P1 178 475.26 150 16.96 2544 4 10176
P2 178 475.26 150 16.59 2488.5 4 9954
Total 20130

Gh<150daN/m => ge=50 daN/m2


150<Gh<300daN/m => ge=100 daN/m2
300<Gh<500 daN/m => ge=150 daN/m2

4.4 Variable load

Area qeffective No. of


Type of Qeffective
[m2] [daN/m2] similar Total
plate [daN/m2]
elemnts
P1 16.96 200 3392 4 13568
P2 16.59 200 3318 4 13272
P3 14.77 200 2954 4 11816
P4 4.8 200 960 4 3840
P5 4.65 200 930 4 3720
P6 24.48 300 7344 1 7344
P7 6.435 300 1930.5 4 7722
Total 61282
Pterrace 305.32 75 22899 1 22899

4.5 Snow load


daN
q z =μi ∙ C e ∙C t ∙ q z =0.8 ∙ 1∙ 1 ∙250=200
0
[ ]
m2
C e =1
C t=1

37
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

α ∈ ( 0 ; 30° ) → μ i 0.8
daN
q z =250
0
[ ]m2
(Suceava)

Q snow =q z ∙ S terrace =200 ∙296.82=59364[daN ]

4.6 Seismic load

G o=G 1=G 2=G 3=G plate +G walls + 0.4 ( q effective +q partition ) =133189.34+198920.20+0.4 ( 61282+20130 ) =364674.34[
1 1
G 4 =G terrace + G walls +max ( qeff , terrace ,q eff , snow ) ∙ 0.4+ gattic =172811.12+ 198920.2+59364 ∙ 0.4+633 ∙ 73.75=342700.5
2 2
land acceleration a g=0.16 g
Suceava { control period of the response spectrumT c =0.7 [s]

F b=γ L ∙ Sd ( T 1 ) m∙ λ;

γ L=1 λ= 0.85 ( T 1 ≤ T c ) ;
{ 1
3
4
T 1=CT ∙ H =0.361C T =0.05 H=5 ∙ he =14 [ m ]
T1 0.361 2
Sd =Se ( )

=8.365 ∙
2π ( )
=0.0276 ;

Se =ag ∙ β ( t ) ;

38
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Tc 0.7
β (t )=β 0 =2.75 ∙ =5.332;
T1 0.361
m
β 0=2.75 ; T c =0.7 [ s ] ; a g=0.16 g=1.569[ ];
s
Se =ag ∙ β ( t ) =1.569∙ 5.332=8.365 ;
GT
m= ;
g
G T =G 0 +G 1+ G 2+G 3 +G 4=1801397.93 [ daN ] =18013979.30[ N ]
GT
m= =1836287.4 [ Kg ] ;
g
F b=1 ∙0.0276 ∙ 183542.44 ∙ 0.85=43079.31[daN ]

5. Diagrams for shear wall section.


5.1. Calculus of sectional efforts
I Dech
i

F Db =F b
i
n
;
Dn
∑I ech
1

8.269
F Db =43079.31
1
=10043.49 [ daN ] ;
2(8.269+ 9.645)
9.645
F Db =43079.31
2
=11368.61 [ daN ] ;
2(8.269+ 9.645)
2∗n∗F Db i

q req ,i=
( n+1 ) H
H=5∗h e=14.00 [ m ]
n=5 floors
2 n ∙ F bD 1 2∙ 5 ∙10043.49
q req1 = = =1195.65[ d aN ]
( n+1 ) H 6 ∙14
2 n ∙ F Db 1 2∙ 5 ∙11368.61
q req2 = = =1353.40[daN ]
(n+1) H 6 ∙14

39
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

External structural wall (D1)

λ 0.3331
γ 1,061
5-4 2.061
4-5 0.162 m s∗q req∗H 2
M d= [ daN∗m ]
4-3 2.485 100
3-4 1.113 M d∗I m ,i
SECTION

M m ,i = [ daN∗m ]
3-2 1.624 I0
2-3 3.174
2-1 -0.703
1-2 6.108
1-0 -4.079
0-1 10.163

qreq1 H2/100 MD Im1/I0 Mm1 Mm2 Mm3


Section ms [daN/m] [daNm] [daNm] Im2/I0 [daNm] Im3/I0 [daNm]

0 1 2 3 4(1∙ 2∙ 3) 5 6 (4∙ 5) 7 8 (4∙7) 9 10(4∙9)


5-4 2.061 4829.89 917.67 8.69 5.02
4-5 0.162 379.64 72.89 0.68 0.39
4-3 2.485 5823.53 1118.11 10.48 6.056
3-4 1.113 2608.28 500.78 4.69 2.71
3-2 1.624 3805.80 730.71 6.85 3.95
2-3 3.174 7438.18 1428.13 13.38 7.735
2-1 -0.703 1195.65 1.96 -1647.46 0.192 -316.31 0.0018 -2.96 0.00104 -1.71
1-2 6.108 14313.93 2748.27 25.76 14.88
1-0 -4.079 -9559.03 -1835.3 -17.20 -9.95
0-1 10.163 23816.72 4572.81 42.87 24.76

Vertical beam 1 (Vertical beam 5)

M 5−4 −M 4−5
V 15−4 = =301.70 ¿
he

M 4 −3−M 3−4
V 14 −3= =220.47 [daN ]
he
1 M 3−2−M 2−3
V 3−2= =−249.07[daN ]
he

40
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

1 M 2−1 −M 1−2
V 2−1= =−868.55 [daN ]
he
M 1−0−M 0−1
V 11−0= =−2288.63[daN ]
he
Vertical beam 2 (Vertical beam 4)
2 M 5−4 −M 4−5
V 5−4 = =2 . 96[daN ]
he
M 4 −3−M 3−4
V 24 −3= =1 . 92[daN ]
he

2 M 3−2−M 2−3
V 3−2= =−2. 16[daN ]
he
M 2−1 −M 1−2
V 22−1= =−9 . 52[daN ]
he

2 M 1−0−M 0−1
V 1−0= =−19 . 91[daN ]
he
Vertical beam 3
M 5−4 −M 4−5
V 35−4 = =1 .71 [daN ]
he

3 M 4 −3−M 3−4
V 4 −3= =1 .11 [daN ]
he
M 3−2−M 2−3
V 33−2= =−1. 25[daN ]
he

3 M 2−1 −M 1−2
V 2−1= =−5 . 56[ daN ]
he
M 1−0−M 0−1
V 31−0= =−11 .50 [daN ]
he
Axial Force

41
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

(14.55+11.35)∙ 1.6 0.2 ∙ 0.2


A= +15.25 ∙0.2+[(0.2 ∙ 0.2+ )∙ 2]=23.83[m2 ]
2 2

I. Terrace
Dead Load from attic: 633∙ 15.2 = 9621.6 [daN]
Snow Load: 200 *23.83 = 4766 [daN]
Total Weight: 15275.03[daN]
Load from plate:
Live Load: 75*23.83=1787.25[daN]
Self Weight: 566*23.83=13487.7[daN]
Total Weight: 15275.03[daN]

II. Floor 4
Self Weight of the wall: 566.5*39.46=22354.09[daN]
Load from plate:
Live Load: 200*23.83= 4766[daN]
Partitions: 150*23.83= 3574.5[daN]
Self Weight of the plate: 469*23.83=11181.75[daN]
Total Weight: 19522.25[daN]
III. Floor 3 = Floor 2 = Ground Floor = Floor 4 = 41876.34[daN]

42
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Shear force diagram

43
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Axial force diagram

44
“Gh. Asachi” Technical university of iasi
civil engineering

Bending force diagram

45

You might also like