Biology Scoring Check List

Student's Name : Class :

Instrument : Title :

Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 Element 4 Element 5

Planning Skill Conducting skill Data Skill Interpreting & Scientific attitudes &
Conclusion skill Moral values
PI 1 (Investigation) PI 1 (Conducting) PI 1 (Data) PI 1 (Graph & PI 1
Objective Set up apparatus & Column and rows charts)
Problem statement material with titles and units Title
Hypothesis Technique Sufficient and Axes with units
Variables Obtaining data systematic data Uniform scale
Apparatus & 4 plotted points
Material PI 2 PI 2 (Diagram) smooth /curve/
Technique Using apparatus Quality correct shape
Procedure properly Label
Cleaning and keeping Neat or
(Activity without apparatus (diagram)
hypothesis and Disposing waste Score
variables) material 3 = PI 1 (2√) accurate
Objective and PI 2 (3√) labels
Problem statement Score with Data only neat and clear
Apparatus & 3 = PI 1 (3√) PI 1 (2√)
Material and PI 2 (3√) with diagram only PI 2
Technique 2 = PI 2 (3√) PI 2 (3√) correct relationship
Procedure and PI 2 (1 or 2√) between variables
Score 1 = PI 1 (3√) Score correct relationship
3=7 √ 5 [5] only 2 = PI 1 (1√) interpretation of
2 = 4-6 √ [3-4] and PI 2 (1-2√) data or obtain
1 = 1-3 √ [1-2] with data only accurate
PI 1 (1√) information from data
Folio, scrap book with diagram only
PI 1 PI 2(1-2√) PI 3
objective correct conclusion
Problem statement Score or restate
Apparatus & 1 = only idea of PI 1 hypothesis
Material and PI 2
Technique Score
Procedure Scrap Book & Folio 3 = PI 1 (5√)[3√]
PI 1 and PI 2 (2√)
Collect and present and PI 3 (1√)
Score PI 2
3=5√ Record relevant Score
2 = 3-4 √ information 2 = PI 1 (3-4√)(2√)
1 = 1-2 √ PI 3 and any other 2 √
Record accurately
Score
Score 1 = any ONE of the
3=3√ PI's completely or
2=2√ any TWO PI's
1=1√ not completely
 SCORE

Signature :
Name :
Date :
Element 5
Scientific attitudes &
Moral values
PI 1

Honest and
accurate
Systematic, fair
and just
Responsible and
cooperative

PI 2
Interested
Curious
Persevering,
hardworking

PI 3
Critical,
analytical and
creative
Transparent and
open minded
Rational

PI 4
Values the
contribution of
science and
technology
Practice healthy
and clean living
and values the
balance of nature
Thankful for
God's blessing

Score
3 = Any One √
from ALL the a PI's
2 = Any One √ from
Any 3 PI's
1 = Any One √ from
Any 2 PI's
 INDIVIDUAL SCORE SHEET (SA)
Name PEKA BIOLOGY
Form
Year
Centre No.

ELEMENTS
E1 E2 E3
Date Title PLANNING SKILL EXPERIMENTING DATA SKILL INTERPRETING &
SKILL CONCUSION SKILL
PP1 SCORE PP1 PP2 SCORE PP1 PP2 PP3 SCORE PP1

TOTAL OF 3 HIGHEST SCORE

GRADE
SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE SCORE
GRADING SCHEME 8.-9 A 8-9. A 8-9. A 8-9.
5-7. B 5-7. B 5-7. B 5-7.
3-4. C 3-4. C 3-4. C 3-4.
1-2. D 1-2. D 1-2. D 1-2.

MASTER GRADE SHEET (SA)

 School assessor
Signature
Principal
School Seal

E4 E5
INTERPRETING & SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDES & MORAL
CONCUSION SKILL VALUES
PP2 PP3 SCORE PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 SCORE

SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE

A 8-9. A
B 5-7. B
C 3-4. C
D 1-2. D
E1 E2 E3
PLANNING SKILL EXPERIMENTING DATA SKILL
SKILL
E4 E5
INTERPRETING & SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDES & MORAL
CONCUSION SKILL VALUES
 PEKA BIOLOGY

School
Form
Year
Center No.

Index E1 E2
No. Name IC No. No. PLANNING EXPERIMENTING
SKILL SKILL
Y

School Assessor
Signature
Principal
School Seal

E3 E4 E5
DATA SKILL INTERPRETING SCIENTIFIC
& CONCUSION ATTITUDES &
SKILL MORAL VALUES
 YEAR :

No/ School
Assesment Committee Documents
Organization Meeting Annual Circulars Manuals Letters of
chart & calender appointment
Minutes

Total√ and *
Total √
Percentage √

IndIcators of administrative effectiveness Remarks (Implementation of Peka at school level

80% - 100% Very effective
60% - 79% Effective
40% - 69% Moderately effective
SCORE STANDARDIZATION CHECKLIST (DA)
 Special cases
Standardiz- Candidates Transferred Others
appointment ation form from other candidates
schools
District :

NO SCHOOL SCORING PROCESS

Percentage of Does the
scores with teacher
deviation understand the
E1 E3 E4 scoring
procedure? *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Total

District Assesor :

Date :

* Enter Yes or No
RING PROCESS
Does the Is the teacher Remarks
teacher keep consistent in
to the scoring giving
procedure ? * scores? *
SCHOOL :
SUBJECT:
FORM:
SCHOOL ACESSOSOR :

No ELEMENT ELEMENT
I Student Particulars 1 III
SA CSA/DA/ Δ SA
STA
1 Name
IC No
Index No.
2 Name
IC No
Index No.
3 Name
IC No
Index No.
4 Name
IC No
Index No.
5 Name
IC No
Index No.
Mean Deviation Δ

SA - School Assesor
CSA - Chief School Assesor
DA - District Assessor
STA - State Assesor
Δ - Deviation √ if there is deviation and x if there is no deviation
 SCHOOL CODE :
SUBJECT CODE :

SCORE
ELEMENT ELEMENT
III IV REMARKS
CSA/DA/ Δ SA CSA/DA/ Δ
STA STA

Name :

Signature :