You are on page 1of 2

Reviews Summary of reviewers notes and ratings on criteria.

Sub Unit: SIG-Democratic Citizenship in Education Review Worksheet Review #586308 Criteria
Objectives or purposes Perspective(s) or theoretical framework Methods, techniques, or modes of inquiry Data sources, evidence, objects or materials Results and/or substantiated conclusions or warrants for arguments/point of view Scientific or scholarly significance of the study or work Paper Submission: Regular Reviewer (2/2)

Rate
4/5 5/5 4/5 3/5 3/5 4/5

Comments to the Author/Submitter


The lit review is great! But the methods leave something to be desired- snowball sampling and convenience sampling substantially weaken the quality of the inferences you're able to make about your population of interest, something that you fail to address. Please speak more to this limitation of your dataset, or better yet, frame this within the more specific context of 'emerging elementary educators,' and try to think about how this may connect to how teachers use social media for civic engagement. There's promise, but it's not quite there yet.

Review #586307 Criteria


Objectives or purposes Perspective(s) or theoretical framework Methods, techniques, or modes of inquiry Data sources, evidence, objects or materials Results and/or substantiated conclusions or warrants for arguments/point of view Scientific or scholarly significance of the study or work

Rate
4/5 4/5 4/5 4/5 5/5 5/5

Comments to the Author/Submitter


This study fostering emerging adult civic engagement and the knowledge of civics and current events warrants study. I find this a very hot topic in this current political atmosphere. Your paper proposal is very interesting hoping to lead to a better understanding of how social media tools which promote civic awareness and engagement of emerging adult. 2011 All Academic, Inc.

You might also like