Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:7

i
2 3

Dr. Orlv Taitz ESO.

Phone t949) 683-5411 fax (949\ 766-7603 Email : Orli.taitz(Dsmai l.cdm CA Bar lic'ense 22Y433 Counselor for Plaintiffs

298-19 Santa Marsifita Pkwv Suite 100 Rancho Santa MaTsarita. C492688

5
6

8 9

U.S. DISTRICT COTJRT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTF{ERN DI\ISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT REMOVED FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CATIFORMA CASE 30-2012-00582135 originally captioned as Taitz v Obama, Feinstein, Emke'n et al

t0 l1 t2
73

l4

16

t1
18

Keith Judd, Orly Taitz, Thomas G. Macleran, Leah Lax, David Farrar Larry Rappaport, Lucien Vita Carol Vita Plaintiffs,

Case No.: l2-cv-1507

EX-PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COT]RT TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY HEARD E)?PARTE OR ONA SHORTENED RESPONSE SCIIEDULE

t9
20
27 22 23 24

25 26
21
2A

BARACK OBAMA , IN HIS CAPACITY AS A CANDIDATE ON THE BALLOT FOR THE US PRESIDENT IN 2012 ELECTION NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her
capacity ofState;

of

West

Virginia

Secretary

DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of Califomia Secretary of State;

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:8

i
2
3

BRIAN

P. KEMP, in his capacity Georgia Secretary of State;

of

WILLIAM M. GARDNER, in his capacity ofNew Hampshire Secretary

of State; NANCY PELOSI in her capacity of the Chairwoman ofthe 2008 Democratic National Convention and Signor ofthe Cedificate of Nomination for Candidate
for President Obama; MICHAIL ASTRUE in his capacity as the Commissioner of SSA;

I
9

WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD
11 L2

13
14

15

16

t?
18
:19

20
21

2l
24

25 26
21

In his capacity as former Director ofthe Selective Service; ALVIN ONAKA in his capacity as registrar ofthe Health Department of Hawaii; JANET NAPOLI'I ANO in her capacity as Secretary of Department of Homeland Security; ERIC HOLDER in his capacity as Attomey General of the USA; BRIAN SCHATZ in his capacity as 2008 Chairman ofthe Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor ofthe Cenificate for Presidency for Barack Obama; LYNN MATUSOW in her capacity as 2008 Secretary ofthe Democratic pany ofHawaii and Signor ofthe Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama AIICE TRAVIS GERMOND in her capacity as a secreury of the 2008 Democratic Nominating Convention; OBAMA FOR AMERICA; BALLOT LAW COMMISSION OF STATE OF FIEW IIAMPSHIPJ; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CALIFORMA REPTJBLICAN
Judd v .,,,, complain! - ii

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 3 of 17 Page ID #:9

t
2
3
4

PARTY; DEAN C. LOGAN in his capacity

as

5 6

Los Angeles county registrar, ELIZABETH EMKEN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot; DIANNE FEINSTEIN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot; CLAY D. LAND in his capacity as a Federal Judge, Central District of

I
9

10 11

!2
13
L4

15
16

I7
18

Georgiq JOHN AVLON, in his capacity as a reporter for Daily Beasti CHRIS MATTHEWS in his capacity as a host of MSNBC; MSNBC FORBES MAGAZINE; KEVIN LINDERHILL in his capacity as a reporter for FORBES MAGAZINE: CLEARCIIANNEL COMMUNICATIONS; KFI AM 640; JOHN AND KEN SHOW; JOHN KOBELT; PATRICK R. DONAHOE in his
capacity as Post Master General and Chief Executive Officer of United States Postal Service; JOHN DOES and JANE DOES

19 20
21 22

l-100;
Defendants

23
24

25 26 27 28

Judd

v.,.

conplaint - iii

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 4 of 17 Page ID #:10

2 3
4

EX.PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY LIEARD EX/PARTE OR ON A SHORTENED
RESPONSE SCHEDULE

Argument

I
9

t0 t1 )2

parte rehef should be granted ifthe evidence shows "that the moving party's cause will be irreparably prejudiced ifthe underlying motion is heard according to
Ex

I3
.I4

regular noticed motion procedures." Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995).

15
:16

Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their First Amended Complaint and exiibits to

the First Amended Complaint (Hereinafter "FAC") as

if fully pled herein.

t?
18

FAC shows evidence ofmassive elections fraud that requires immediate attention.

l9
20
21 22

l. Affidavits ofComputer analyst David Yun

a

shows that there are at least one and

half million invalid voter registrations in the current voter roll ofthe Secretary

of

State of Califomia. In order to prevent elections fraud CA Elections Code 2150

23
24

require electors to provide their personal information in 8 different areas, such as

name, birth date, prior voter registration, state where they were bom or

ifbom

?5 26
21

abroad, a country where they were bom. Affidavits of David Yun show that there
are 756,213 voter registrations in the Current Voter Roll

ofthe Califomia

Sec

Judd

v obim

Ex-parte Request to Hear a Motion for stay/Prelininary Injuactiou

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 5 of 17 Page ID #:11

of state without rcquired information on the State of Birth, 898 without the first
name, 757 without the birth date and so on. Second affidavit by David Yun shows

2 3

685,739 where U.S. or U.S.A. (Exhibit I herein, Exhibir

4

l8 FAC) Additionally,

an

j
6

e-mail from the oftrce ofthe Los Angeles registrar represents an admission against
interest ofthe defendants, where the employee admitted to falsification

of

I
9

records, stating that employees themselves wrote in the registration records "US"
where the state of birth was missing. (Ex-hibit 2 herein,

Exlibit 29 First

amended

10 11 12 13
14

complaint)There are 685,739 where U.S. or

U.S.A

was posted in the records.

Even ifthe employees ofthe Registrar were not to admit to forgery and

falsification ofrecords, these registrations would not be valid, as according to Election code 2150 one needs to

15 16

fill

in a STATE where he was bom, notjust U

Only ifhe was bom abroad, the elector can post the name ofthe country. Based on
this one criteria alone, without taking into consideration the other 7 areas

t1

of

i9
2A

required information there are |,441 ,942 invalid voter registrations, nearly one
and a half

million invalid voter registrations. Taitz was a candidate for the U.S.

27
22

Senate in 2012 primary election. The difference between her and candidate Emken

2:l
24 25 2a 21

who was second and proceeded to 2012 General election was only 450,000 votes. The number of invalid voter registrations in only one of8 categories is three times higher than Emken's margin of victory.

Ifan

emergency stay ofthe CA Senatorial

General election is not issued, pending removal from the voter rolls

ofall

the

Jud.! v Obafra Ex parte Request to near a Motio. fo! Sray/prelininaly Injunction

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 6 of 17 Page ID #:12

:L

invalid voter registrations and revote, Taitz will be irreparably harmed.

Considering the proximity ofthe election, ex-parte hearing or an expedited hearing
is warranted.

2
3

Additionally, both candidates, who proceeded into the top 2 general election:
Senator Feinstein aild the Republican Candidate Emken were served with the

complaint on July 10, when the complaint was originally filed in the state court. Tbey did not respond yet and chose to ignore the complaint believing that nojudge

10
1T

will

have the strength ofcharacter to stay the Senatorial election and that every

12

judge will do what is usually done in elections fraud cases: find some lame excuse
to dismiss the complaint. As Senator Feinstein has a much higher number ofvotes
than Emken, the only defendant, who can be affected by the Ex-Parte is Emken,
and she had over 2 months notice already and cannot claim detriment by ex-parte.

rl
14 15

16
L7
1B

2.

PlaintiffKeith Judd is a Candidate for the U.S. Presidency, who got

400lo

ofthe

19

vote in West Virginia Primary. Judd has standing to seek an ex-parte hearing as

2a

2I

exhibits 1-35 ofthe FAC show overwhelming evidence that the winner ofthe WV
Democratic primary, Barack Obama, placed his name on the ballot by fraud and

23 24

using forged Selective Service certificate, forged birth Certificate and a stolen Conneclicut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which according to E-verifu
and SSNYS was never assigned to Obama, but is being used by him as his

25 26
21
2A

verification of identity as late as in April 15, 2010, as posted on his tax retums.

lf

Judd v obana Er-parte Reqoest to Hea! a Molion for Stay/Prelininarv lnjunction

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 7 of 17 Page ID #:13

ex-parte hearing is not held, due to upcoming 2012 General Presidential election Judd's rights as a candidate

2 3

will be ineparably harmed. On the other hand, the only

defendant, who would be affected by such ex-parte is Defendant Obama. He

4

cannot be possibly harmed by such order, as he was served here and was served to appear in court in similar cases and he simply arrogantly chose to be in contempt

6
1

8 9

of court and not appear. Exhibit 3 herein represents an order by a Deputy Chief
administrative Judge of the State of Georgi4 Michael Malihi in response to
a

10 11
12

motion by Obama to quash subpoenas issued by Attomey Taitz. Malihi ruled in Taitz favor and upheld the subpoenas issued by Taitz for Obama and other officials
to appear in court and submit his identification papers. Obama decided to go
behind the back ofthe presiding judge and on the eve ofthe hearing Obama,

13
14

15

l6
l?
!8
79

through his attomey Michael Jablonski, submitted a letter to the Secretary of State

ofCeorgia, Brian Kemp, asking him to take the case away from the Deputy Chief
Administrative Judge Malihi as he (Obama) is supposedly suffers from Taitz.
Secretary of State Kemp responded that

20

2!
22

if Obama boycotts the heaxing

and does

not show up, he is doing so in his own peril. Obama and Jablonski did not show up
and did not provide any documents. Similarly, Obama was subpoenaed to appear at

23
24

the elections Commission hearing in the state oflndiana, where Taitz presented
26

evidence offorgery in his IDs. Obama boycotted this hearing as well. A hearing on the Indiana challenge is scheduled for September 26, 2012, I :30 pm in the
Judd v ObaRa lx-patte Request to Eear a r4otio! for stay/Preliminary hjunclion
7

27

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 8 of 17 Page ID #:14

Indiana Superior Court before Judge Sherry K Reid in Indianapolis, Indiana.

2 3

Clearly, if Obama had any valid lDs, he would show up for the court hearings or
he would have sent his attomeys with required documents. The only reasonable

5 6

explanation why Obama is boycotting the court hearings, is because he knows that
there is no legitimate reason or explanation for his use

ofa Connecticut Social

I
9

Security number which was never assigned to him according to E-verif! and SSNVS and there is no explanation orjustification for hiding the original application for the Selective Service and Birth Certificate, when alleged copies were shown to be forgeries. As Obama boycotted prior hearings and showed a complete disrespect and contempt for the Court

t0 t1 I2
13

oflaw,

there is no reason to

l4
15

believe that he will act any differently and there is no reason not to grant the

l6
L1

plaintiffs their motion for the ex-parte hearing or altematively

motion for an

18

expedited hearing on the motion to stay Obama's placement on the ballot in general

t9
2a

election or certification ofhis votes for the general election until the original

identification papers are examined by experts in light of forgery in his alleged

27 22 23
24

copies.

CONCLUSION
26
21

Motion for Stay/ Preliminary Injunction of tbe 2012 Califomia Senatorial

election, as well as 2012 Certification ofBarack Obama as a Presidential candidate
.trldd

v Obama [x parle

RequesE

lo Hear a Motion fo! Stay/Prelininarv lniuncrion

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 9 of 17 Page ID #:15

should be held ex-parte. [n altemative such motion should be heard on expedited

2 3
4

-1', Zn:a*Respectfirtly submitred

/V Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ 09.2t.2012

schedule to be set by the court.

5
6 7

I
9 10

11

!2
13

1{
L5 16

l?
18

19 20

2t

23 24 25 25 27
2A

Judd

v obanra Ex-palte

Request

to tea! a l{ot1on for stav/Prelininarv hjunction

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 10 of 17 Page ID #:16

CERTIFICATE OF SEITVICE

I I il! Dirtred rllcll lh l i rnr o!cr l8 !ea.\ oi.l. n.l a |r.r|1\ lo lhii legal.rcliorl' !

( hrjflnin r)ilhe ilousc o\.rsighl con'rrllcc

I157 ltalhtrrr Hi)use ollicc
\\ rshin-qlon. DC :{):

Il

;kiing

li

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 11 of 17 Page ID #:17

I
2 3
4 5 6

Public
I

Intcgritl

.i I)ellirtnrcnt ol Justicc

I.S- D!'pLrrtmcnt o1'Justice

C'r'iminal Division

950 Pcnn 'ylr irnirr Arcnue, N W Wirshington

D(

105.10-

1 8
9

0001

Michael :. Horor.r.'itz
1

10 11

Inspector Gcneral D(' panment

!2
13
L4

of Justicc Officc o1'the Inspcrctor General

tJ.S. Depru I mcnt ol Justice

15

15
11 18 L9

950 Pcnn

.1

lr ania Ar c-nuc,

N.W. Roorn 4706

Wash

ington D.( . 105i0

20
27

22 23
24

UN Nations committee tbr civil rights defenders OHCHR in New York

(JN Headquarters

25 26 21
2A

New York. NY I 0017

ltudd v Obatu Ex-parte Request to Hear a Motion fo! Stay/Prellrninaly hjunction

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 12 of 17 Page ID #:18

LJ,1,,\

lil
5 6

rtl

iltl

lr

:L:L

L2

!l
1.1

1l

19
2A

2l

2a
24

21

ai-parte Reqnest tc lre:r a l4ction Ior Stav/Prelini.ary lrjunct:ion

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 13 of 17 Page ID #:19

AI-FIDAVI'I OF Drlid Yu
l. Do\ l,l \ un. arn o\ er 1 8 ) c'rs old. lrille personal krlo\llcdgc ol'th! loregoitlE irnd ctro rnd altesl to iollorvirg
{he

1 r ltav'j 11vct I0 iaaas ol comttulcr rnlonnalr$1 raLhnolog\ kDo\\'ltdgc, :. i r curcnll)'a ContlNtfl lrlfbrnlaliorl S!slcms anal)rst
.r.

4. i. 5.

I ler tl,nn J:rtlrb:rs'j irn,l (('rrrl, lcr rcpirrr.i\jr\ j((s. I irave an rciuoatioDal backgrorrnd ir conuurer scicnec itor)1 Dcvrt I ldund mrlltiFl. irrcgullrili.s in tlre !'bloirtcd rlal^irrs!.

llnilerstty

lloulldnultiplclndividnuls.u'lrohavclistcdrhcirrriacc(,fbirtlras(iSorL'S,\. -^ vali(l Plr.. ('fhirl!' r\ require(l in l4 s{alcs us \lAlcd in I' fl- r\Ppcrrdix t .prll ol (:alilbmi|r volgr rL'Sistrrlion glidc. hltp, $\\\!.s(rs.ca.!rr)\'tlcclionsl!oter pnvxc-!- tinal-relxjnr
P

Il:

ADper'dir ( .pJf

Artornet Orly I artz. $'ho *as a crrldidrtLc lor lhi U S Sellrte ln ?0ll prinra$ .onlirctcd rt! rn(l orovided a D\'l) o1 xtc C,\ \ olcr rcgiJt.ali(nt:j tsktng lo alul)'ze the du?l8. l p.rr,nraill perlilrnrrd lh..: rn.rl\'srs ot the datrirase prolldecl to rrrc try attonlel Orll lailz 9 i lound nrulliplc incgulrrities iD Ihc obuintd dalilbrrsc. 10- I lound re idllo\\itr*.tsulL dntri((i): whcrc flacc ol lli(h is lis.cd tLs US or I S.\' A. 685739 (la(c ol lil. '{ecrrtls ! L AccordiDg ro CA Elcctions code :Ii0 c!or.y !oter regillrrtion is \upposed {o clrnlarn a L)rnh toler.as \rcll ar,)ihlrirllbrmalio,l.sttchilscountryolorigir.tilslanlllastnalnc prl(rr\L'tertc8'slr.ttio'r ad(lrcs:j. ,nlomration drsclorirrrg u'hctller lhc pefspcctlve \ olcr ir a isli)n or paroiecr. a .lri\ crr licenst, la\l iirur (li.!.lilr oi th Socral Securirl nrrnrb,:r' r'r an iJcrltricr ntrnrl-cr t... lLsldonllt)fcrson.il. (nrnl)sisinollyLrncr)j8parrnrclcrso1 vcrrljcali{tr. binh tlrrtc. thctc itr.' huna|eds ofth.!us.nds ol llsllr.urlly inv.llid !otcr rcgislr.rlions \h;cll lrccd 1(' be rerno\cd liorn tlle dalabdse- *htch rs a suspicious !olcr rcgisrlali('n. \rhich rleed l(r bc vcriflcd

allcji lhat illl ol thr inlirrrution h(rcin is trrc aud cdrc!:t unJer thc pcnallt of pcrjrr't
I

to llle besl r)l nly

knowlcdgc l (l,rclitrc lhi!

\ iu

'c,J

\rnrc

Da\'id Y{rD
,^ eflio4

/\,.ldress l.l(X) \\' flloRN fllN '\Vlj. AN,\llljl\'1. (

S$onl rr)d subscribci belirrc me lhis da)

FK*

{
.

1016 I

.i(oeEs.

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 14 of 17 Page ID #:20

rl,l.l l) \\ | t ()l; l)i'rirl lun

: l).r\Li \Lrr.,ro\.'i lfi\t.'r]\iJ!1.r,.,\.t'!r\t)r,!l

Ln('\\lr(iirc (,r rh(t,,n!r,!!,!r/]Li.:,i,.rDl

. lr.rt.,tlie

I llr,r\.,\$ li,\(.1\.'l (i,ift!l|g irrtirrrrrrtr,r'r tr'elrr lLr{r Inrnrl,rl:c. I i ,ir .r,,,:r:lr LiL,r, ILr..rlr,,r ir.!i,(!)\\.r,.r,.rrl\.! j I Nrl,',,,i Jrri,r:'s.rr,l.o|rlrrtr|,.prrirr<rr tts .l r.,r..,rJJ:L-.,ir,I.,1 ,,,!i!:.{ r.: .,!ii,irrr,*,,rr.Jli,'r!l).,r\lri,trrrr\ j lr,'rrrlU,lrlrit'lLirtriit,.ltul..s[,,rr. ldr,\rir,\(,1.1. ljl)\{ rs,'1,1.:rr.,\lxr.(' .$h,iirr(hirilirll\ ,. , ,r: | ..i! r Lr), .r. . rt.. ,.r () \ri\jrr!1 ()rii l.Ui,,. h!) \.r,.r r.itrh(iur. r,,r rirr I \ \(l!l(ii lrJl: trinr r errrud.ri rrrr.rr.l t,r,,i.i!.,\irjj 'ln l)\ lr L,l r!( \r,,trrr.,r.trrrrr,|:rsl.il!!r(j.!.rl\/(thc!l.,r,L i' i;'urr,'rIli1 t'(,i\'i.:(Jth.]rL.rl\:i.,,i tii(,j.,,.rn.b!t,r(,tr,irJi{'rrretr\.rilL\:1r!\ ()ri\ l.rrl/. N I ,,url ri,LLllr,le,r'r, r rrti! rD tLr','hiir\\l.i.rtirlrrse 9 I r,, il{l l,J r,,1i,." r,= i,t . \ \'rti rr((, il. { Ih,, Lr llL\l riri[. J. -:_ r. .,,r.1. 1'ri trr I .ri r.i ,:J 1' rirr..'l r,r,,r,1'$,rlj\'rLr t'1ir!!,il bLrllr I' i !. ,r.1. ,,.: ,1,,r.r.!:.rj-i. l . l.l I lr,1 t),"'rhl. Llr t) i.rtr rec,,t,j. I :.ri i ,rir..r,l-..,r,ri|:1r.t.rtr. J.r l(, \.r,1rlrrrnlL,( \ Ii,.ir,r:.,)jrI rr'!\rr\r('i{.,rLr-!r\rLirLroIr\iuptrNllt',rt,!riai,rhirrlr,l.Lr..,llhr ,., i-i ii, .,r:,. ,rr .. ..r, \ , I . !,! i:|. :I!.L,|r.I l,i i.,,,. i ,. f,l,l'!-. Ir1 ,|,rrrr,r,,l,.rl',.irr$lrrhcr litrt,ri\l,r(li\i\':l.rr.,rei.,r','r |]rtr'i(. tr'Ir\.r.ltrr'r\ ]rsl ll li:j.(,] ,'r,r!,1 |crs,rr,.iuir.r,r.ri':.r.rrr.,ri \ L'rr!,,1 S|rririrrcllr','l \rrrri..rtr,'rr.hrrr,'.lri!-ilrrr!-lle , r,r.rl ,lrl .1.., ,r .r :.r\ |..1
.l.,r,r

r.j J .,rrl

'\j,r,r I ,rtr.r1ir,r
ill.i!

r:1r.i .,.
i:\
".

l.ljrr,,.r'r.f rlltrri,,

Lrrh,

\!lill',1

rll ,'1 1r ifl,),rir!1!,,ri

!rcf.i,,r.rruL.rrr\l(rirle!L!,th(lrln,ri !rr\ [no$L(.i'r(

'-r i.r.,l

\.,rLr. \,r,1,...

lL\ i(l

\,,r1
l

I r.\ i,.':rr..:,.. - \,,:.rr:i I \" l"

\\L,r , rr .IrLruir,rr

h,!1

l,( i,!. 'r,!

t r!

l
J
r,4..

tiri 1',it/r,,r ,)ii .:

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 15 of 17 Page ID #:21

EXHIBIT 2

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 16 of 17 Page ID #:22

OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEAR]NCS STATE OF GEORGIA

DAVID FARRAR. LEAH LAX, CODY JUDY. THOMAS MALAREN, LAURIE ROTH,
Plaintiffs.

Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CEr

2l5 t36-60-MALtHI

Counscl for Plainliffs: Orly Taitz Counsel for Defendanl: Michael Jablonski

BARACK OBAMA.
Def'endant.

DAVID

P.

WELDEN,
Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-

Plaintiff.

121513760-MAL|Hl
Counsel for Plainliln Van R. Inon

BARACK OBAMA,
Counsel lbr Defendant: Michael Jablonski

Defendant.

CARL SWENSSON. Plaintiff.

Dockcl Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-

I2I62I8-60.MALIHI
Counsel for Plaintiff: J. Mark Halficld

BARACK OBAMA,
Defcndant.

Counsel for Defendanr: Michael Jablonski

KEVIN RICHARD POWELL, Plaintiff.

Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CEr

216823-60-MALtH I

Counscl for

Plaintilt

J.

Marl llalfield
iiblonski

BARACK OBAMA.
Defmdani.

CouDsel for Defendant: Michael

Case 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN Document 7

Filed 09/22/12 Page 17 of 17 Page ID #:23

ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

Deiendant, President Barack Obamo, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination foi the oflice ofthe President ofthe United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
enforced. lrhe subpoena] requircs him lo interiupt duties as President ol the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, CeorgiaHowever, Defbndani fails to provide any legal authority to suppon his motion to quash lhe subpoena to attend. Dcf'endant's motion suggests thal no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may bc concct. But Dcfendaot has failed lo enlighten the Cofi with aDy legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attfidance is "unreasonablc or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a palty's prepa.ation or presentation at the hearin& or thal basic thimess dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.'' Ga. CompR. & Regs. r.616"1-2 .19(5).
Def'endant argues

ln suppon ol his modon.

rhd

"if

Defendant funher alludes to a defect in senice of the subpoena. However- the Coun's rulcs provide fbr sen'ice ofa subpoena u!,on a pany, by serving the paiy's counsel of record. Ca. Comp. R. & Regs. r.616-l-2-.19{4). Thus, th argument regarding scrvice is withoul merit.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denicd.

SO ORDERED, this the 20'h day ofJanuary, 2012.

MICHAEL M, MALIHI, J udge

'+

lr

1r