Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spring 2011
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
1 / 38
Outline
Two Periods Binomial Model Pricing of European options Pricing of American Options The Eect of Dividend
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
2 / 38
Outline
Two Periods Binomial Model Pricing of European options Pricing of American Options The Eect of Dividend
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
3 / 38
Option Pricing
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
4 / 38
describes in a clear way the eects of all the aecting factors. can be used for pricing more complicated derivatives.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
5 / 38
where, d < 1 + r < u. The situation of a call option written on this stock is the following:
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
6 / 38
Replication Portfolio
The main idea
The main idea is to construct a portfolio which consists of stocks and a cash amount B invested in the free-risk interest rate such that: Portfolio payo = Call option payo Assuming NON-ARBITRAGE, the price of the call should be equal to cost of the portfolio at time t = 0.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
7 / 38
If we suppose that, uS(0) > K and dS(0) < K , we have to solve: uS(0) + B(1 + r ) dS(0) + B(1 + r ) (two equations and two unknowns). = uS(0) K = 0
Perfect replication
By doing so, we perfectly replicate the call option payo.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
8 / 38
B=
cd (u(1+r )) ud
Buyer side
Similarly, the strategy of the option buyer is the following: At time t = 0: Short stocks. Borrow/lend B in cash. Buy the option by giving c. At time t = T : Get the payo max{S(T ) K , 0} and use it to return S(T ) and close the interest free investment. He starts with zero and ends up with zero(no risk exposure).
By shorting an option at price c and following the replication portfolio, there is no risk exposure. The subjective probabilities of upward and downward stock movements do not aect the option price. The investors preference and predictions do not aect the option price. c is the unique non-arbitrage price. If the price of an option is dierent than that the non-arbitrage price, one can make an arbitrage by following the corresponding replication strategy. It is clear how each aecting factor inuences the option price. This method can be used for pricing any kind of derivatives written on this stock.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
11 / 38
Risk-Neutral Valuation
The option price can be written as: c= Note that
(1+r )d ud
1 cu 1+r , c=
(1 + r ) d ud > 0 and
+ cd
(1+r )d ud
u (1 + r ) ud +
u(1+r ) ud
. = 1. Hence,
+ (1 q)cd ] =
1 1+r Eq
[C (T )]
In other words, we may consider the option price as the discounted expectation of the option payo, where the probability of the upward movement of the stock price is given by q = 1+r d and ud the probability of the downward movement is given by 1 q =
u1r ud
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
12 / 38
Why is that?
The reason for which the price of the option is equal to the discounted expectation of the option payo under the risk-neutral probability is that the investment on option is risk-free and hence it should have the same expected return as the risk-free investment.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
13 / 38
There is in fact an equivalence between the non-arbitrage pricing and the risk-neutral valuation.
Important notice
If the perfect replication is possible, the risk-neutral valuation holds not only in the risk-neutral world but also in the real one.
A call option written on the Microsoft stock price, with strike price $28 and maturity after one year is described below:
Hence, the replication strategy is the following: Borrow $12 at the risk-free rate and buy 0.5 stocks at the price $28. The cost of this portfolio is 14 12 = $2. This means that c = $2. The risk-neutral probabilities are q = (1+r )d = 1.050.9 = 0.75 and 1 q = 0.25. ud 1.10.9 Hence, the call option price can also be given by: c= 1 1 (qcu + (1 q)cd ) = 0.75 2.8 + 0 = $2. 1.05 1.05
Outline
Two Periods Binomial Model Pricing of European options Pricing of American Options The Eect of Dividend
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
17 / 38
Backward Induction
In order the nd the value of the call option at each node of the binomial tree, we work backwards. First focus on two branches on the upper right:
At the node of Su , replication portfolio equations for and B are: S(0)u 2 + (1 + r )B S(0)ud + (1 + r )B = cuu = cud
ucud dcuu cuu cud whose solutions are = uS(0)(ud) and B = (ud)(1+r ) . (note the similarity with the one period case).
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
19 / 38
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
20 / 38
We get:
c = = = = 1 1 Eq [c(1)] = [qcu + (1 q)cd ] = (1 + r ) (1 + r ) 1 [q(qcuu + (1 q)cud ) + (1 q)(qcud + (1 q)cdd )] = (1 + r )2 1 q 2 cuu + 2q(1 q)cud + (1 q)2 cdd = (1 + r )2 1 Eq [c(2)]. (1 + r )2
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
21 / 38
The situation of a call option with strike price $28 is the following:
The risk-neutral probability of upward movement: q = 1.050.9 = 0.75 1.10.9 The option price at time t = 1 1 cu = 1.05 (0.75 5.88) = $4.2 and d = 0 c The option price at time t = 0 1 c = 1.05 (0.75 4.2) = 5.88) = $3
1 2 1.052 (0.75
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
23 / 38
For the perfect replication of the call option payo, we should calculate the number of the stocks that has to be purchased at each node of the binomial tree. This is the Delta hedging strategy: At time t = 1 5.88 u = 30.80.2 = 0.95 and d = 0 And at time t = 0 = = 0.75
4.2 280.2
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
24 / 38
The idea
For the price of the American option, we have to take into account the right of the option buyer to exercise the option at each node of the binomial tree. Simply, at each node the price of an American option is the maximum between the price of a corresponding European option and the intrinsic option value. In other words, for each note t, we have: Ct = max{ct , S(t) K } and Pt = max{pt , K S(t)}
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
25 / 38
The value of the European put option on this stock with strike $28 is described below:
1 (2 1.052
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
27 / 38
For the determination of the American put option price at time t = 1, we compare the two following trees: The tree of the European put option values:
At time t = 0, we compare the intrinsic value (=0 in this example) and the value Eq [P(1)] = q 0.067 + (1 q) 2.8 = 0.75025.
As we have seen, on the ex-dividend day, the stock price drops by the dividend amount. This decline occurs in two ways: The dividend is given as a cash amount. The dividend is given through a continuous dividend yield.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
30 / 38
If the dividend is given at t = 1 through a continuous dividend yield a, the tree becomes:
Outline
Two Periods Binomial Model Pricing of European options Pricing of American Options The Eect of Dividend
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
32 / 38
The upward and the downward movement, i.e. u and d. The number of the time intervals (periods) which divide the time to maturity.
The more time intervals, the more accuracy we get.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
33 / 38
u, d and
Let and be the expected (continuous) return and the volatility of the stock return, respectively. E[S(t)] = S(0)e t . If p and 1 p are the subjective probabilities of the upward and the downward movement of the stock price, we have: pS(0)u + (1 p)S(0)d = S(0)e t p = Since, Var (Stock return) = E[(Stock return)2 ] E[Stock return]2 , by taking the equation Var (Stock return) = 2 t into account, we have: pu 2 + (1 p)d 2 pu + (1 p)d 2 = 2 t. e t d . ud
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
34 / 38
u, d and contd
The next step is to replace p with
e t d ud . t
e t 1 + t +
Note however that the term (t)2 has negligible size. This gives (after some further calculations) the following equation: (1 + t)(u + d) ud (1 + 2t) = 2 t. One solution of the above equation is the pair: t t u and d =e =e The above construction of a binomial tree was proposed by Cox, Ross and Rubinstein in 1979.
M. Anthropelos (Un. of Piraeus) Binomial Model Spring 2011 35 / 38
There is a standard and constant relation between u and d: u d = 1. u and d do not depend on the expected return of the stock price or the subjective probabilities. What matters the most is the volatility of the stock price. Volatility and interest rate are constant during the life of the option.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
36 / 38
Lets consider the following example of American put option pricing: S(0) = 50, K = 50, r = 10% (continuous compounding), = 40%, T t = 5 months = 0.417 and t = 1 month = 0.083 Therefore, u = e
t
= 1.224 and d = e
= 0.891.
= 0.508.
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
37 / 38
Binomial Model
Spring 2011
38 / 38