You are on page 1of 2

Jacques W. Delleur."Appendix A" The Handbook of Groundwater Engineering Editor-in-Chief Jacques W.

Delleur Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC,1999

APPENDIX A Mathematical Appendices (A), Figures (F), and Tables (T)


Number T. 2.1 T. 2.2 F. 2.24 A.2.1 T. 4.1 T. 4.4 T. 4.5 F. 4.11 T. 5.1 T. 5.2 F. 8.2 F. 8.6 F. 8.8 F. 8.9 A. 8.1 T. 9.5 F. 9.8 F. 19.2 F. 19.4 F. 19.5 T. 19.7 T. 19.9 Title Conversion Factors for Pressures and Related Terms Approximate Equivalents of Atmospheric Pressure Solution of One-Dimensional Advection-Dispersion Equation Values of the Error Function and Complementary Error Function Some Similarities of Flow Models Probabilities for Range of Expected Values h-Sigma Bounds Standardized Normal Variates N[0,1] Space of Probability Distributions Regression Coefcients for the Brooks and Corey Parameters Regression Coefcients for the Brooks and Corey Parameters Theis Well Function W(u) versus 1/u for Fully Penetrating Wells in Conned Aquifers Hantush Well Function W(u,r/L) versus 1/u for Fully Penetrating Wells in Leaky Aquifers Hantush Well Function W(u) + fs versus 1/u for Partially Penetrating Wells in Conned Aquifers Theis Recovery Well Function W(u) W(u) versus u/u for Fully Penetrating Wells in Conned Aquifers Values of Ko (r/L) and er/L Ko (r/L) as Function of r/L (Modied Bessel Function of Order 0). Values of [sw / Q Bi] as Function of Bi as Used with Rorabaughs Method Log-log plot of [sw / Q Bi] versus Q to Determine B, C, and P according to Rorabaughs Method EIS Software Components Control Volumes for Modeling Interactions Eulerian Referential System Comparison Between Conventional and EIS Studies Comparison of Conventional and Fractal Kriging Page 2-3 2-3 2-33 2-40 4-4 4-16 4-20 4-18 5-17 5-18 8-5 8-9 8-11 8-12 8-33 9-13 9-13 19-5 19-10 19-11 19-18 19-22

1999 CRC Press LLC

You might also like