Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How Did Adam Smith Criticize Mercantilism
How Did Adam Smith Criticize Mercantilism
Mercantilist
ideas about wealth were nonsensical and untenable. Mercantilists efforts of accumulating gold and silver by trade surplus were in vain. Mercantilist trade theory was selfcontradictory and logically confused. Invisible hand also guided foreign trade.
The transportation of commodities, when properly suited to the market, is always attended with a considerable profits; whereas that of gold and silver is scarce ever attended with any. When those metals are sent abroad in order to purchase foreign commodities, the merchants profit arises, not from the purchase, but from the sail of the returns. But when they are sent abroad merely to pay a debt, he gets no returns, and consequently no profit.
When people exchange with each other by using currency as the medium of exchanges currency merely stands for purchasing powers with which whatever goods or services can be bought whenever they are desired. That fact will be easily misunderstood as a widespread feint that wealth is only and exclusively expressed in terms of currency.
On the whole, a country was wealthy only because it had fostered a tremendous production capacity thus could produce a lot of consumable goods and services not because it possessed some amount of gold and silver. It must be of insignificance for a country to merely accumulate gold and silver. Only those enjoying their large capacity of production, being active in foreign trade, and exporting more and more goods and services to their trade partners could become wealthy countries in the world. Therefore, the ideas about wealth of mercantilists were nonsensical and untenable.
When P stands for the general price level, M stands for total amount of money stock and W stands for total amount of commodities, respectively, the following formula is concluded.
M P W
Even if mercantilists were glad that a large amount of gold and silver had been imported from abroad because the countrys trade surplus that must be too bad, not good, for the country since enlargement of its stock of money implied the overall increase in the general price level taking the total amount of commodities constant. Competitiveness of its exports would be reduced whereas goods produced in other countries would be more competitive in the home market. Gold and silver accumulated through innumerable trials and hardships would gradually out-flow till the countrys pool of money dried up. Consequently the country would at last inevitably surfer trade deficits. To sum up, Adam Smith wrote: When the quantity of gold and silver imported into any country exceeds the effectual demand, no vigilance of government can prevent their exportation.
According to zero-or-sum game what a country gained in trade was just the losses in trade suffered by the other country since the total wealth, in terms of gold and silver, of the world was constant. It must be assumed that all countries will follow the same principles of national economic egoism and desired to earn in trade.
All countries want to benefit from trade who are willing to suffer. No country wants to suffer from trade then how can the other countries acquire the possible trade benefits? If that is true is it possible for different countries to trade with each other? From where can the world find a reasonable basis for trade?
As a theory it entirely did not explore what is trade, why to trade, how to trade, and are there generally existing trade benefits? It was little more than a theoretical tool of the feudalist lords, rulers of the sovereignties and large merchants to exercise colonial exploitation and dilation flaunting the banner of trade. Trade, in the eyes of the mercantilists, was nothing but bald-faced spoliation. Mercantilist trade theory could only explain trade between the western European powers with the colonies. That must be a very special case of trade. The theory was not of general significance.
What is the species of domestic industry which his capital can employ, and of which the produce is likely to be of the greatest value, every individual, it is evident, can, in his local situation, judge much better than any statesman or law giver can do for him.
Government must reduce and, at last, abandon the administrative control over foreign trade and free trade policies must be implemented.
Try to differ mercantilist ideas of wealth from that of Adam Smith Why we say that trade theory of mercantilism was self-contradictory and logically confused? Why Adam Smith insisted that trade surplus was of no helpful to accumulate gold and silver. Try to describe the reasons for a country to implement free trade policies.