haere, Fancy Reap Wines Ree de statist Peiems Good Lin _Issves Greeprion Pee Neeme Peers Peso fren IMpner one Few Passes ST Goon DD = Cae rccut Discovese AT Disen G Sar Imee Pre eR STAM A F FE Neves ic Sars |-2 3 u NAW & quu 12 1z lyip —_ ‘DER STAAT | Hella Prep ‘00 1 _ chukware Fore Wer 2 Tuer Lose Severn. Persons i Total Liberty Volume 1 Number 3 A \utumn 1998 hupu/freedom.tao ca/tllibvtiv’ hie! Beslan Amst Dry Br: bv hi stan bmchst Dlobly Bete |ARCHISM AND CIVILITY a generally accepted anarchist tenets thatthe Sate can ony be effectively (FAF ‘sathortarian revolutions gotten up by manipulative vanguadisis are rejected ae inconsistent with the anarchist belief that the means must be consistent with the 2B& ends. History has plenty of exam Tevertheless.conlgmnporany anarchists are often cevert whygu the chance of such a romay(DER STAAT | Hella Prep ‘00 || chukware | | 4 “WPA This oor a activity agape Yor ee mindedit's easy to cither ‘llack or x ‘similar ancely powered die old Sumptuary Laws which punished anyone who dressed above their social class = unnerving might make a inferior as a sarances, Political 9 atest simple se-gt sgh the dificult of rootless modem life where there are no clear cut exterior indications of what. a person might realy Be Tks. AT wT be Tike, All white i ‘Files (unless perhaps, gay) are dangerous, powerdriven and bigoted. All women |) unless, perhaps, Republican) are intuitive, nurturing and empathetic with Nature Sl senses of mince ake your peb are nol perio a mene 9 ~najortis Classifications and labels which assis usin mal decisions. {and more important) tga 5 f prejudice ally wonky Pighead: Tolerances 2 arto suggest some al Scoping Manmthe-other-check" bourgeois crap either. Qnce vou get beyond the labels, there are still unfortunately plenty of folks that it makes sense 10 despise “Arrogant wolent,infolerant, fanatical, bigoted, manipulative, rapacious individuals ‘with these characteristics must be guarded against, bu they are not found in one Casly recognised group. These adjectives equally describe individual men, women, blacks, whites, handicapped people the whole gamut ofthe human race. Nor is anyone as morally pare as some of our new puritan idealists would insist they be. A person isthe sum of ther character tats, not a dstilation of the most pronounced ne to fies of chara Iisby their