Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Milanka Todic - Fotografija I Propaganda
Milanka Todic - Fotografija I Propaganda
PROPAGANDA
1945 1958
MILANKA TODI
,
()
, .
,
(
)
.
, ,
,
-,
,
,
,
,
.
(
,
,
, .)
.
, ,
,
(
, )
.
( . )
Milanka Todi'
PHOTOGRAPHY
AND
PROPAGANDA
19451958
2005
JU Knjievna zadruga, Banja Luka
Helicon, Panevo
Milanka Todi'
FOTOGRAFIJA
I
PROPAGANDA
19451958
2005.
,
Helicn,
(19451958)
,
Helicon,
.
.
&,
ISBN 99938-33-20-7
.
.
SADR?AJ
7
17
23
35
47
61
75
89
CONTENTS
99 Foreword
101 Art and Revolution
107 Photography in the Agitprop Culture
117 Photography and Monumental Propaganda
125 The Mass Spectacle of the Body
135 The Image of the New Man
151 Distilled Pictures
161 Notes
, , 1932.
Imagination in the Service of Propaganda, Surrealism Here and Now, 1932
PREDGOVOR
tvt, pv t t t t
t t v pd v, dpt d
v d d
.
. tg t
, ,
. ,
,
18391940,
1993. .
,
, e , ,
.
,
, , ,
.
,
,
, ,
,
, , ,
, , .1 ,
1945. 1958.
, -
, ,
,
The Total Art of
Stalinism, AvantGarde, Aesthetic. Dictatorship, and
Beyond (1992). , 1945. 1958.
, ,
(NDIO)
,
. .
, , NDIO, ,
.
, ,
1932.
,
.
7
,
,
. , ,
, ,
- . ,
, ,
.2
, 1957. , ,
.3
,
.
.
-
.
, ,
.
. , , , ,
, . , , , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
, ,
. ,
, , , , ,
,
, .
, ,
1930.
Aleksandar Vuo, A Letter to Marko Risti,
1930
, . 3, , 1932.
Surrealism Here and Now, No. 3, Belgrade, 1932
, 1947.
JugoslavijaSSSR, 1947
10
, , 1929.
Nova literatura, Belgrade, 1929
11
, , , 1949.
Milo Milunovi, Mosaic in the Yugoslav Drama Theater, Belgrade, 1949
, , 1949.
Hristifor Nastasi, Cleaning the Borehole, 1949
12
, , 1949.
Boa Ili, Trial Boring in New Belgrade, 1949
, , , 1948.
Foto Tanjug, Young Builders at the Building Site: Introducing the New Spirit at Every Working Place, New Belgrade,
1948
13
, , 1958.
Slobodan Vasiljevi Macuoka, Twelve Years of Industrial Construction, 1958
, I, 1958.
Slobodan Vasiljevi Macuoka, Twelve Years of Industrial Construction I, 1958
14
-, , 1952.
JAT Advertisement, Jugoslavija magazine, 1952
-, , 1950.
JAT Advertisement, Jugoslavija magazine, 1950
, ,
1954.
Jugoimport Advertisement, Jugoslavija magazine. 1954
-, , 1950.
IMT Advertisement, Jugoslavija magazine, 1950
15
, , 1936. ()
Miroslav Krlea, A Letter to Marko Risti, 1936 (detail)
16
UMETNOST I REVOLUCIJA
tt d t vp .
. t . pv
, , 1930. 1940. , ,
. .
, ,
,
.8
, . , ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
, , , , .
.
, .9 ,
XX -
1943. ,
,
, 1934. , .4
, ,
. ,
.5
.6 ,
, .
, , , -
.
.7
,
, .
17
.10
, , , . ,
,
. ,
,
.
: , , ., . ,
. , ,
,
.
,
, , , , ,
.
, , .
. ,
XX , .11 ,
,
,
.12 , , ,
,
.13
,
, . , , ,
, , .14
1945.
,
-,
,
,
.15
, ,
1923. .
, , ,
, , .
Limpossibl 1930.
.16 ,
,
, ,
,
18
.
L'impossible
,
,
, . , , ad hoc
, .17
,
.18
,
, , .
,
,
, .19
,
,
:
, ,
.20
, , ,
,
-.
,21
,
, ,
, 1930.
Radojica ivanovi Noe, SelfPortrait,
The Impossible, 1930
. , La Russie au travail,
,
, , , , , 1932.
,
.22 ,
1932. .23 , , ,
, 1928. , , 1932.
.24
19
, , 1932.
Instead of Social Art, Surrealism Here and Now, 1932
20
, , ,
. , . , , .25
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
. , ,
. , ,
.
,
(John Heartfield),
, Bihaly .26
1932.
, , ,
. ,
. .
,
,
, .27
, . , ,
, ,
, : ,
,
, .28
21
1. , 1946.
1st of May Celebrations in Babunica, 1946
22
, ,
,
.
, ,
, ,
,
. ,
.29
,
,
.
,
. -
, ,
, ,
.
, 1945. 1952. ,
,
.
, , , -
, ,
, , ,
.
. ,
.
.
, ,
,
,
, .
, 23
,
:
, ,
.30 ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
. , , , , ,
,
.
, , ,
.
, , , ,
,
, ,
.31 ,
,
,
,
, , ,
. ,
,
, ,
, ,
...
, .32
, , , ,
,
, . , ,
. ,
, ,
: , !. ,
, .
, ,
.
, ,
,
. , ,
: .
,
,
.33
,
,
34, ,
,
24
, , 1949.
Milan Pavi, On the BelgradeLjubljana Railroad Line, 1949
, .
,
, ,
,
,
. , , , ,
. ,
, ,
,
.
,
,
, , , .
.35
(1948)
. , ,
1950. .36 ,
,
25
,
.
,
. ,
.37
, ,
,
.
.
,
, , ,
,
.38
,
,
.
. , , ,
.
.
, 1949.
, .39
,
,
.
,
( ).
, 1919. , ,
, , .
, : ,
, .40
, .41
1947. , , , . -
,
, ,
. ,
.
, , , ,
Limpossible 1930. .42
,
, ,
, , 26
,
, 1948. .
,
, ,
,
.
, ,
, , ,
(1847). , ,
.
.
,
, ,
, ,
,
.43
,
:
,
,
.
,
, -
, 1952.
Untitled, from the Album of the Federation of Amateur
Photographers and FilmMakers of Yugoslavia, 1952
, , 1950.
Josip Bosnar, Production Brigade Consultations, 1950
1950.
, 1950.
From the Album Builders of New Belgrade on New Years
Eve in 1950, 1950
27
.
.
(1948)
, 119,4 %.
- 275 %
1947,
, 128 %,
44
280 %...
,
- , 1945.
, .
Rita Hayworth, Actress and a Sponsor of the US Aid
Committee
for
Yugoslavia,
1945
: , ; , , . ,
, , - . ,
. , , , ,
. ,
, - , ,
, ,
.
- ,
, , , , ,
, ,
, -
, - .45 . , . - , , , ,
.
, - ,
, - , ,
.
, .
, ,
28
,
(...) ,
,
,
. ,
,
,
,
1945.
,
,
The First 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1945
.46
, - , ,
.47 . ,
, ,
-
- ,
.
, .
- ,
, , , ,
( - , , ), .48
-
29
, 1952.
From the Album Amateur Photographers of
Croatia to Comrade Josip Broz Tito, 1952
, 1947.
Trade School Student Hostel Sponsored by
the Borba News Publishers, 1947
, , 1947.
1st of May Celebrations, Zagreb, 1947
30
, , 1948.
Welcoming Titos Relay Baton, Novi Sad, 1948
1. , , 1948.
1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1948
31
1950.
, 1950.
From the Album Builders of New Belgrade on New Years
Eve in 1950, 1950
. , ,
. , , , 1952.
Lj. Rajkovi, Scale Model of the Main Elevation of Terazije
Terrace, Design by Architects Maksimovi, Vrbani and
Dragi, 1952
, ( ), 1950.
Flats for Super Workers, Belgrade (Severni bulevar), 1950
32
, , 1950.
Hristifor Nastasi, Oil Drilling Tower, 1950
33
, , 1946. ( )
Cupola with Star on the Presidium Building, Belgrade, 1946 (New Palace Before the Revolution)
34
,
,
, .
,
, ,
1945. . ,
,
,
, 25. , , 50-
. 1957. ,
, , ,
, , 2.300 . ,
, 1957. 50.000 .50
1945. 1958.
.
1952. ,
. -
,
. , ,
.
,
, , , . Gesamtkunstwerk
,
: , ,
, ,
(...)
Gesamtkunstwerk-a ()
, ,
,
, ,
.49
35
, 1958.
.
, 1958. . ,
,
.
,
,
,
,
. ,
, , : .51
.
, ,
,
,
Gesamtkunstwerk-. ( 9. ,
), ,
.
( ,
, 1920)
,
.52 ,
, , ,
, ,
,
.53
, , ,
Vus, , ,
, ,
.
, , , ,54
. ,
,
.
, .55
. ,
,
. ,
, ,
.56
36
/ , .
, ,
:
, : ,
, . Gesamtkunstwerk-,58
,
1918. .59
, ,
, , 1947.
Victory Day Parade, Belgrade, 1947
; !
,
,
, .
, .57
, ,
,
- . ,
,
.
, ,
, , , 37
.
,
.
. ,
,
,
- , 1946.
Womens Day Celebrations in Dubrovnik, 1946
,
, , . . , ,
, - ,
, .
- .60
- ,
, , - -
(Tommaso .61
Campanella, Civitas Solis, 1602. ).
:
, , , , ( 1949. - ), , , - (, , ),
. . , , - ,
, , , ,
, - .
- ,
.
, , , .
, - . , , - ;
, , , - ,
, .
- , ,
.
38
.
,
,
, 1947. .63
,
.
,
,
: ,
1.
,
,
1946.
- st
, , ,
1 of May Celebrations, Ni, 1946
, , , . . , ,
, - ,
. - :
, , , , .64
.62 , ,
11,5% ready-made-a, 88,5% 1925. - ,
, , , , . - , ,
, , , ,
, . , , , -
- . , . - , , , , .
, - , ,
, .
,
- ,
- , , , .
,
. , - , - .
39
1. , , 1946.
1st of May Celebrations, Ni, 1946
,
, , ,
,
,
.
, ,
. , ,
,
. , ,
1958. ,
.
,
, . , Sacra
Congregatio de Propaganda Fide 1622. .
40
T , , 1963.
Portrait of Josip Broz Tito on the Trade Unions Hall, Belgrade, 1963
41
, ,
:
.65
,
,
.66
. , ,
.
1949. , ,
.
.
,
, .
.
, ,
.
,
: , .67
, 1941. 1944. ,
, , ,
1950.
1st of May Parade, View from the Grandstand, Belgrade, 1950
, , 1947.
Industrial Floats at the1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1947
,
, 1947.
Marchpast of Miners from Vare at the1st of May Parade,
Belgrade, 1947
42
.
, ,
.
. : ,
, , , ,
,
,
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
,
(, , ,
) , ( , ,
), . ,
. , ,
.
, , 1949.
1st of May Celebrations, Belgrade, 1949
, ,
1961.
Marchpast of Air Force Members at the 1st of May Parade,
Belgrade, 1961
, , 1950.
Filmske novosti at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1950
43
, 9. , , 1947.
9th of May, Victory Day, Parade in Belgrade, 1947
, , , 1948.
Foto Tanjug, 1st of May Celebrations, Belgrade, 1948
44
, , 1947.
Victory Day, Belgrade, 1947
- , 1945.
Rally in Zagreb on the Eve of the First Congress of the Antifascist Front of Women of Croatia, 1945
45
, , 1947.
Marchpast of Peasant Women from Vraar District at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1947
46
. ,
,
.
.
.
, , , ,
. ,
, .
,
, .
.
1948. , , .
,
,
, , . ,
, , ,
,
.68
, , , , ,
.
,
. ,
,
, XX 240 x 440 . ,
, , .
47
, ,
, .
,
. , ,
. , ,
,
. , ,
. , , , , .,
.69
,
.
, , :
,
,
,
.70
, , ,
XIX
.
, , ,
, , . ,
.
, ,
,
.71 ,
, , , 1947.
,
.
, ,
.
, -
,
.
1945. , ,
. ,
, , , ,
.72
48
, , , ,
.
,
, , :
-
,
- , 1949.
1949.
st
Marchpast of Nurses at the 1 of May Parade, Belgrade,
1949
73
. - . , ,
.
-
, - .
,
. ,
, , , ,
, -
, . ,
- , ,
.
,
, - , .
. - , ,
. - , 74
, -
, , , . , - , , ,
, .
, - - , , - , , ,
. 1947. . 49
, ,
- ,
, Gesamtkunstwerk
.
, - . - ,
, . ,
-
. - , . , , , - 887 ,
, - 211.371 ,
- .
- 6328 ,
, 56 5842
. - 42 , ,
, , , ,
- .77
. , , , , ., , - , , , , ,
- - . . ,
, ,
- , - .75
,
, . ,
,
,
,
, - , 1949. . Relay Baton Bearers with Best Wishes for Titos Birthday, 1949
.76
50
, , . ,
,
: , , , ,
.
,
, , .
,
, . ,
, .
,
, . ,
, readymade
,
, ,
.
, , , . , , ,
-
, , 1949.
Marchpast of Peasants at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1949
, ,
,78 .
, , ,
, , .79 ,
,
, . 1957. , , , ,
.
, , ,
.
. 80
, ,
.
. , ,
, ,
,
51
,
.81 ,
, . ,
,
,
.
, ,
,
.
.
:
(
).82
,
.83
. , ,
. ,
, .
.
,
, , 1950.
1st of May Parade, Ljubljana, 1950
,
.
, , , 1855. .
. ,
,
, .
,
, ,
, . , ,
52
, ,
.
, ,
,
.
, , , ,
. , , . ,
, , .
, , , .
, ,
. ,
,
.84
,
, .
, ,
, ,
. , , , -
, , 1947.
Contestants for Gymnasts Badges at the 1st of May Parade,
Belgrade, 1947
, ,
, .85 (1961)
, (1967) (1969)
, , ,
, .
53
, 1947.
From the Album Builders of the amacSarajevo Youth Railroad Line, 1947
54
, , 1950.
Zdenko Kalin and Karel Putrih, Labor and Youth, 1950
55
,
, 1961.
Women Participants in Voluntary Labor Projects to Build the Brotherhood and Unity Highway at
the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1961
, , 1956.
Celebration of Comrade Titos Birthday at the Yugoslav Peoples Army Stadium, Belgrade, 1956
56
, , 1970.
Sailors at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, around 1970
, , 1950.
Marchpast of Peasant Women at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1950
57
, ,
1957.
Formal Reception of Titos Relay Baton at the Yugoslav
Peoples Army Stadium, Belgrade, 1957
, ,
1957.
Formal Reception of Titos Relay Baton at the Yugoslav
Peoples Army Stadium, Belgrade, 1957
, ,
1957.
Formal Reception of Titos Relay Baton at the Yugoslav
Peoples Army Stadium, Belgrade, 1957
58
, ,
1957.
Formal Reception of Titos Relay Baton at the Yugoslav
Peoples Army Stadium, Belgrade, 1957
, , 1958.
Youth Day Celebration at the Yugoslav Peoples Army
Stadium, Belgrade, 1958
,
, 1957.
Delivery of Relay Baton to Comrade Tito at the Yugoslav
Peoples Army Stadium, Belgrade, 1957
59
, 1958.
From the Album Builders of the Brotherhood and Unity Highway, 1958
60
,
,
,
, , .
, , , ,
,
. ,
, , a
.
, , ,
. ,
,
. , ,
. ,
, ,
.87 ,
,
1935. .88
,
,
.
, 1958. , ,
, , , ,
.
,
,
.
. ,
,
, , ,
, .86
,
,
.
, ,
. 61
. , ,
, ,
.
,
.
31. 1989. .
XX , , ,
.
,91 ,
,
,
.
, ,
, , , ,
. ,
,
,
,
, .
.
Banknote with Alija Sirotanovi's face
: .. = ..
, = ,
,
= , .
, , a
.89
, , , ,
,
, ,
1955. 1989. .90
, , , , ,
, , , .
, ,
,
,
. ,
, 62
, , ,
. ,
.
,
.92 , , ,
, . , ,
,
:
, , ,
.93
, ,
, .
XX , o
, , , .
,
,
, ,
.
, , .
.
,
.
, ,
, .
, ,
:
.
, , .
. , ,
,
.
, .94
,
,
.
, ,
.
.95 ,
, 63
status
quo
o, ,
,
96
.
-,
. 97
,
, , ,
,
,
, ,
,
, .
.
,
,
, , , 1943. (1953)
Georgij or Skrigin, Refugees, Kneopolje, 1943 (1953)
. - ,
-
- ,
, Biblia pauperum, -
, . . , XIV
. - ,
, - , , , XIV
, 1958. , , -
, - . . - . , , - ,
, .
, , , 64
,
,
,
,
,
- ,
XVI , ,
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
,
: .
,
- , , , 1943. (1953)
, . Georgij or Skrigin, Refugees, Kneopolje, 1943 (1953)
,
:
,
- , , ; ,
.
.98 , - , .
, , , , , , , , ,
. , , , - . ,
, , -
. - , - , - . ,
. , ,
VI . -
65
.
.
.99
1925.
, 100
, ( ),
, ,
- . ,
,
. : , , ,
, ,
.
, , ,
.
,
: ,
,
, . ,
, ,
.
, , , ,
.
, .
, ,
?
.
, , , ,
. ,
, ,
, , ,
,
.
() , 1943. ,
. ,
.
,
,
. , , ,
,
. ,
. 66
,
:
,
,
,
,
.
. ,
- , 1954.
In the Kozara Reel During a Voluntary Labor Project, 1954
:
, .101 -
, , , ,
. , , ,
- , , . ,
. . ,
,
, - , , .
, , . ,
,
, ,
, .
-
. - , , . , - ,103
.102
, - , - .
, - ,
. , - .
67
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
. ,
1949. . ,
, (1937),
,
,
.104
,
,
. ,
1949. .
,
, ,
.
,
, ,
. ,
, .
, , , 1949.
Nikola Bibi, Transport of Castings, Belgrade, 1949
, ,
, 1948.
Milena Babovi, Super Worker, Operates a Welding Torch in
the Proleter Factory, 1948
,
, , 1948.
Sara Vukas, a Girl Member of the Rade Konar Farming
Cooperative, Sombor, Happily Carrying Sheaves of Grain,
1948
68
:
- ( ),
,
.
.105 ,
,
: .
. , ,
. , ,
(1957)
(1950)
, , , .
,
.106
, ,
, .107
,
, , ,
. 1954. .
Mass Ornament
(1995).
,
. , , 1954. . ,
. ,
, .
. , ,
,
,
. 1933. : ,
.108
,
,
,
, .109
69
, , 1954.
Nikola Bibi, Alija Sirotanovi, 1954
70
, , 1950.
Milorad Joji, Nikola kobi, 1950
71
, 1960, ()
Untitled, around 1960, (photomontage)
72
, ,
(), 1949.
Hristifor Nastasi, Radmila Bievac, Metalworker in the
Railroad Cars Factory at Rankovievo (Kraljevo), 1949
, (), 1949.
Too Dabac, Electrical Welding (Zagreb), 1949
,
, 1949.
Too Dabac, Autogenous Welding in a Steam Boiler Works
near Zagreb, 1949
- , (
), 1949.
Photo Center Croatia, Welder Ana Gros (Nova Gradika), 1949
73
, , 1978.
Sailors at the Stadium on Youth Day, Belgrade, 1978
74
DESTILOVANE SLIKE
t t vt ptvt g d tt!
. . v
, , ,
.
,
,
: . , ,
,
.
, .113 , ,
, ,
Gesamtkunstwerk-
.114 ,
, . .
, ,
,
. ,
, , ,
.115 , ,
, .116
-
, , ,
, , , ,
,
.110 ,
,
,
,
, , ,
, .111
.
, ,
. , , - .
, , , ,
Gesamtkunstwerk ,
.112
Gesamtkunstwerk- , ,
75
.
. ,
,
.117
,
.
, , , ,
.
, ,
, ,
,
,
,
1953. .
, , . ,
, .
, 1945. 1952,
1958. ,
, ,1953.
Funeral of Boris Kidri, Ljubljana, 1953
, , . ,
,
,
,
.
,
, . , site specific
.
, , . ,
, ,
.
,
. . , , ,
76
, , - .118 , , ,
,
.
,
,
-
.
,
. ,
; ! ,
,
.119 ,
, , ,
.
.
,
,
.
,
. -
, 4. 1958.
Josip Broz Tito on a Visit to Rovinj, 4 May, 1958
, , ,
. ,
, ,
,
, .
, , ,
,
. , ,
,
, .120
,
, .
, ,
, :
, .121 :
77
(250)
, 1952,
.124
.
,
-
, , , , , 1960.
.
Workers
of
Energoinvest
Listening
to
a
Concert
of
the
Sara
, ,
jevo Philharmonic in the Factory Hall, Sarajevo, around 1960
,
-
.
.122
, , , , , .
, , - , ,
. , , - , , , , ,
(...) . 123 - .
.
. , 1952. , - . , - ,
, - .
,
- .
. , , . , -
.125 ,
, - , , , - . .
1952. , ,
. , -
, - 78
.
,
. , ,
,
, , ,
. ,
,
, - 1958.
, .126
, ,
, , .
,
, ,
.127 .
- ,
, ,
.
,
, , , . ,
,
, .
,
, 1960.
Plowing, around 1960
,
.
, ,
. ,
,
, ,
.128
,
,
, , , ,
, .129
79
, , 1946.
Festival of Peoples Youth, New Belgrade, 1946
, , 1952.
Departing for a Labor Project, Baki Petrovac, 1952
1. , , 1946.
1st of May Celebrations, Ni, 1946
80
, , 1954.
Danilo Gagovi, Ornament of Strength, 1954
81
, , ,
1948. ()
Our Industrious Youth, Who Have Built Two Railroad Lines, Are Zealously Building a New City Across the Sava,
1948, (collage)
82
, -
, 1952.
Untitled, from the Album of the Federation of Amateur
Photographers and Film Makers of Yugoslavia, 1952
, ,
1960.
Gligor Kudjerski, Pipe Makers in Sisak Ironworks, around
1960
, , 1955.
Slavko Smolej, Furnaceman, 1955
, , 1970.
Sugar Beet Harvesting, around Novi Sad, around 1970
83
, , 1957.
Milo Pavlovi, Asphalt Workers, 1957
84
a , , 1957.
Mira Kneevi, Hanging Plates, 1957
85
- , 1952.
From The Album of the Federation of Amateur Photographers and Film Makers of Yugoslavia, 1952
86
, - , 1960, ()
Gligor Kudjerski, Chemical and Industrial Combine in Kosovska Mitrovica, around 1960, (photomontage)
,
, , 1958.
Branibor Debeljkovi, the uro akovi Steam Boiler
Works, Slavonski Brod, 1958
, ,
, 1958.
Gligor Kudjerski, in the Djuro Djakovi Factory, Slavonski
Brod, around 1958
87
, , 1957.
Miodrag Mile Djordjevi, Branka, 1957
88
NAPOMENE
1
subordination, integration and homogenisation of the governed on the basis of the integral politicisation of existence,
whether collective or individual, interpreted according to
the categories, the myths and the values of a palingenetic
ideology, institutionalised in the form of a political religion,
that aims to shape the individual and the masses through
an anthropological revolution in order to regenerate the human being and create the new man, who is dedicated in
body and soul to the realisation of the revolutionary and imperialistic policies of the totalitarian party. The ultimate goal is to create a new civilisation along ultranationalist lines,
R. Griffin, The palingenetic political community: rethinking
the legitimation of totalitarian regimes in interwar Europe, Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, Winter
2002, Vol. 3, No.3, 2443, www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/humanities/staff/hirg.html
,
, 88, , 202 25.
22. 1958. ,
.
2
14
L. Manovich, The Engineering of Vision from Constructivism to Computers, www.manovich.net/; P. Galvez, Portrait of the Artist as a MonkeyHand, October, 93, Summer
2000, 109137.
15
A. Dejneka, Iz pisma sovjetskih umetnika i naunika, Jugoslavija SSSR, br. 2, Beograd 1945, 35.
16
. , , ,
, 2002, 44.
17
. , , , , 19.
1931. : 19001950, , 1980,
219.
18
, NDIO, . 2,
1932, 10.
19
20
B. Groys, . , 39.
,
: , . -
, . ,
. , . . , J. Dereti, Kratka
istorija srpske knjievnosti, Beograd 1990, www.rastko.org.
yu/knjizevnost/jderetic_knjiz
B. Groys, . , 9.
B. Groys, . , 89.
21
. , , 2000.
22
23
24
25
M. Rowell, Constructivist Book Design: Shaping the Proletarian Conscience, in The Russian Avantgarde Book 1910
1934, The Museum of Modern Art, New York 2003, 55.
26
27
N. Gurianova, A Game in Hell, hard work in heaven: Deconstructing the Canon in Russian Futurist Books, in The Russian
Avantgarde Book 19101934, The Museum of Modern Art,
New York 2003, 25.
28
. , ,
, 1949, 5.
10
, 36.
11
. , , 1998, 24.
12
C. Greenberg, AvantGarde and Kitsch, www. sharecom.
ca/greenberg/kitsch
13
. , ,
19141946, 1983, 208.
(E. Gentile, The Sacralisation of Politics:
Definitions, Interpretations and Reflections on the Question
of Secular Religion and Totalitarianism), , , : The term totalitarianism can be taken as meaning: an experiment in political domination undertaken by
a revolutionary movement, with an integralist conception of
politics, that aspires toward a monopoly of power and that,
after having secured power, whether by legal or illegal means, destroys or transforms the previous regime and constructs a new state based on a singleparty regime, with the
chief objective of conquering society. That is, it seeks the
89
, , , ,
, ,
, . , . , 218223.
29
B. Groys, . , 21.
, ,
, , 23;
, W.
Benjamin, Pisac kao proizvoa, u Eseji, Beograd 1974, 113.
30
. , ,
19451952, 1988,
233; . ,
, , . 2, 2001, 4248. 1945.
,
1949. , .
, . ,165171.
31
F. Hlupi, Umetnika fotografija danas, Fotografija, br. 3,
Beograd 1949, 38.
32
A. Gerasimov, Protiv formalizma za visoku idejnu umetnost, Jugoslavija SSSR, br. 27, Beograd 1947, 13, 15.
33
. , , 2004, 212
215.
34
J. Imirovi, Od staljinizma do samoupravnog nacionalizma,
Beograd 1991, 1415, 25.
35
, ,
.
, ..., Fotografij, .
910, Beograd 1949, 124.
36
Druga savezna izloba umetnike fotografije Saveza foto
i kinoamatera Jugoslavije, Fotografija, br. 1, Beograd 1950,
19. : ,
, , , ,
, , :
, , , 20.
37
. , . , 195197.
38
. ., V , , .2,
1948, 17, - ,
15 , - , . 9,
1961, 9.
39
. , , ,
. 1, 1949, 8.
,
,
, B.
Groys, . , 49.
40
. , . , 213.
41
. , . , 177.
, S. Ajzentajn, Film, Jugoslavija SSSR, br. 6, Beograd 1946, 14.
42
. , , Limpossible,
1930, 6872; . , , , . 6, 1946;
, -
90
43
44
45
46
47
A.D. . , 18. a
- 1. 1961. .
: , (...)
(...)
840.000 .
,
3.500 ,
..., ,
, 567.
48
(
)
, .
.
. .
, , , ,
,
,
, .
.
! :
, 9. 1946, ,
. . 314, . 22.
1946.
, , :
-
(...)
.
,
,
.
,
,
, ,
, . 314, . 22.
,
, 1946. ,
.
,
, .
49
A. Flaker, Sovjetski masovni Gesamtkunstwerk, Lica, br. 7,
Sarajevo 1989, 10.
50
,
, , ,
7; . 1958.
51
E. tajhen, Vano je ono to umetnik osea, Foto-kino revija,
br. 1, Beograd 1958, 67. 1963.
, ,
, ,
..., Jugoslovenski drugovi obradovali su nas svojom
umetnou, Sovjetskoe foto o izlobi jugoslovenske izlobe u SSSR-u, Foto-kino revija, br. 10, Beograd, 1964, 13.
52
I. Bibikova, The Design of Revolutionary Celebrations,
Street Art of the Revolution, Festivals and Celebrations in
Russia 191833, 1729.
53
1. 1961. , :
- , - ,
10.30 , , , . 567. ,
, ,
- ,
.
54
, ,
(...) 25. , 1954. ,
, , . 7; .
19541956.
55
M. Macarol, Karakter i istoriska uloga nae urnalistike
fotografije, Fotografija, br. 7, Beograd 1950, 91.
, Foto-kino revija, . 11, Beograd
1963, 4.
56
G. Debord, . , 40.
57
M. Macarol, Karakter i istoriska uloga nae urnalistike
fotografije, 91.
58
,
, -
,
, 1950.
Hristifor Nastasi, Assembly Shop in Olt Factory in Osijek, 1950
, , 10. , 1947.
59
. , , 131, 265266.
60
1920. , . . ,
, ,
, May Day Celebrations 1920 Street Art of the
Revolution , 125.
61
. ,
, , . 2, 2001, 4248. : , , .
-.
.
.
.
.
. ,
, (1947),
, , . 314, . . I.
91
62
63
200.000 , , 3. 1947.
64
65
P. Kenez, The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of Mass Mobilization 19171929, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge 1985, 7.
66
67
G. Debord, . , 39.
68
. ,
, ,
09.01.1949, 6, L. Merenik, Ideoloki modeli: srpsko slikarstvo 19451968, Beograd 2001, 32.
69
70
71
72
-, : 1. , 2. ,
3. , 4. ,
, .
, , 138.
,
,
, . Macarol, . , Fotografija, br. 7 Beograd 1950, 92.
75
1. 20. 1947. . ,
VIII ,
30 . .
,
70 ,
,
. :
, , , . . 314, ..
, 10 , . , 1947.
,
,
-
.
,
, , , . .
314, . III.
76
. J. Imirovi, . , 24.
77
:
a 242 .
5,520.000
, 17
2.478
(1534 ).
:
13.593 -, , 41
1.579 , 774.938
1001 .
1.407 19.073 ,
87% . 166
15.101
. '
' 24.500 .
' ' 756 1.509
.
1. 15.
1947. , 13 , , , , . 371.
78
B. Groys, . , 52.
73
,
, , ,
, , E. inko, Buroaski objektivizam i partijnost, Fotografija, br. 5, Beograd 1949, 65.
74
a
,
.
.
. , ()
,
; , ,
, ,
,
, ,
92
79
,
, : 1)
25. 1955. 17 ,
, , ; 2) 28. 10 ,
; 3) 30.
10 ,
.
15.30
19 , - .
16.10 16.30 .
8 (6 , )
17 .
17 17.20
.
18.15. 18.15 ''
40 . 120 , 10 ... ,
, , V7; .
19541956.
, 17. 25. 1958. ,
,
.
' ' , ,
,
, , , ,
V7, . 1958.
25. 1958.
30.000 (...)
,
, .
80
R. Bart, Didro, Breht, Ejzentajn, Prelom, br.1, CSUb, Beograd
2001, 266.
81
P. J. Markovi, Beograd izmeu istoka i zapada 19481965,
Beograd 1996, 419.
82
R. Bart, Didro, Breht, Ejzentajn, 265.
83
S. M. Ajzentajn, Montaa atrakcija, 33.
84
P. Roubal, Bodies in formation, Mass gymnastics under communism, Budapest, 2001, www. osa.ceu.hu/galeria
85
R. Bart, Didro, Breht, Ejzentajn, 268.
86
A.D., Posle V kongresa KPJ, Fotografija, br. 2, Beograd 1948,
17.
87
. . ,
, 190230.
88
, , , 102
1935. , 14
.
,
, 219 %,
, , 1954.
Milan Pavi, Hydroelectric Power Plant on the River Zeta, 1954
, 27. 1949; 40 , , 29. 1949. ,
,
. ,
50
, (...)
, , ,
, S. Zvizdi, Alija Sirotanovi, Vjesnik, 24. mart, 1979. ,
, ,
, 1973. .
89
. , , ,
1992, . 1, 2741.
90
, 1000 ,
10
, . , . , 1918
1997, 1997, 79104.
91
. , . 1954.
, . .
, , 18. 1990; http://www.leksikonyu
mitologije.net/read.php?id=674 /
92
,
(...)
(...)
, ,
, . P. J. Markovi, .
, 195, 197.
93
93
94
95
B. Groys, . , 29.
102
96
, , . ,
, 139. , , 60- .
1947. 22 %
, 23 % , 44 %
' '.
:
103
M. Rowell, . , 57.
104
. , ,
1935, 46, . , , 344.
105
, (...)
, ,
, V. Tomi, ene
Jugoslavije u obnovi i izgradnji svoje zemlje, Jugoslavija
SSSR, . 17, Beograd 1947, 2.
106
1.
2.
3.
4. ,
107
5. ,
.
.
6. BBC
97
7. ,
, P. J. Markovi, Beograd izmeu istoka i zapada
19481965, 489.
109
.
, -,
.
.
,
,
, S. M. Ajzentajn, . , 3233.
111
98
99
108
110
B. Groys, . , 20.
. , J. Imirovi,
. , 15.
112
D. Kujundi, Boris Groys and the Specters of Marx, in Reimagining Russia: Cultural and Artistic Transformations in
PostSoviet Russia, www.usc.edu/dept/complit/tympanum/2/kujundzic.html
113
114
S. M. Ajzentajn, . , 69.
. . , ,
700 , , ,
(...) 10
,
, , 3. 1948.
, ,
, , , ,
100
101
.
,
(...)
:
,
94
, ,
, The Street Art
of the Revolution, 125.
115
, R. Barthes, Smrt Autora, Polja, br. 309, Novi
Sad 1984, 450.
B. Groys, . , 55.
116
E. inko, . , 65. -
,
,
Fotografij, . 23, Beograd 1950, 35.
117
I. Bibikova, The Design of Revolutionary Celebrations, u The
Street Art of the Revolution, 23, 124.
.
,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
. . ,
.
,
.
.
, A. V. Lunacharsky, On popular
festivals, Vestnik teatra, (Theater Courier), No. 62, Moskva
1920, 13, The Street Art of the Revolution, 124.
118
' (...)
.
, , .
, . , , 1985, 40.
,
1969. .
119
M. Macarol, Karakter i istoriska uloga nae urnalistike fotografije, 91.
120
J. Berger, Understanding a Photograph, Selected Essays,
London 2001, 215218.
121
Anonim, Najzad, razgovarali smo o fotografiji..., Foto
kino revija, br. 78, Beograd 1961, 16.
122
B. Groys, The Total Art of Stalinism, 25.
123
, ,
Ex
Ponta,
(...)
,
, . , . , 212.
124
125
126
. , , :
(19501960), 1993, 104110;
. , , , , . 3,
, 1990, 124; P. Areina,
est tipinih fotografskih karakteristika; Isti, Oblik i prostor,
Foto-kino revija, br. 4, 5, Beograd 1958, 2, 23; V. Mojsilovi,
Zakasnelo otkrie Slavka Vorkapia, Isto, br. 11, 24; V.
Mojsilovi, Jubilej Foto-kluba Beograd, Isto, . 12, 9.
127
,
- ,
, - , . 1,
1959, 3;
,
:
1.112 219 33
25.000 , 17.000 , . ,
, , . 4, 18. . . , , 242250, 359360; Lj. Kolenik,
Hrvatska spomenika skulptura u kontekstu europskog
modernizma druge polovice 20. stoljea: primjer V. Bakia,
www.hart.hr/pdf
128
129
95
, 1955.
Untitled, 1955
96
FOREWORD
Reality, precisely because it is that and because
it is beyond our individual minds, may reach
them only by multiplying itself into a thousand
faces and a thousand images.
H. Ortega y Gaset
98
, , 1948.
Belgrade, Terazije, 1948
, , 1970.
SelfManagement Workers Day, Kragujevac, around 1970
99
, , 1946.
Josip Broz Tito and Koa Popovi Review Marchpast of Sailors, Belgrade, 1946
100
, ,
1958.
Zlatko Movrin, Crane at the Zvornik HydroPower Plant, 1958
, , 1986.
Soldiers at the Stadium on Youth Day, Belgrade, 1986
104
, , 1964, ()
Gligor Kudjerski, Shipbuilders in the Trei maj Shipyard in Rijeka, 1964, (photomontage)
, 1947.
From the Album Builders of the amacSarajevo Youth Railroad Line, 1947
105
, , , 1954.
Branibor Debeljkovi, Blast Furnace, advertising page of Jugoslavija magazine, 1954
106
, 1948.
Josip Broz Tito in his Working Cabinet, 1948
Iron Curtain, or The Others, according to imperialist theories. There one can recognize inklings and
elements of the concept of later totalitarianizing
cultural trends, such as globalization, for instance,
because it involves the transplanting and imposition of ready models, regardless of the specificities of a given cultural environment, as well as the
obliteration of spatial and temporal differences.
The totalitarian model of societal organization,
which the Yugoslav communists, as in other countries of peoples democracy, only had to properly
apply, prescribed the art of socialist realism as
the only acceptable one for the entire new society. So, stylewise, the artist had to abide by realism, which caused a lot of confusion, even when
photography was discussed at meetings of the
Popular Engineering Society whose organizational structure covered photography as well as film.
Namely, socialist realism insisted on an extremely restricted choice of motifs and a strictly
canonized iconography, but in contrast to that
aesthetic restriction, it offered an amplification of
politicalism, which, primarily, referred to the ideological message of the work of art. Photography
was openly required to be in the service of the
agitation and propaganda of social reality.35 In
the years following the dramatic rejection of the
Cominform resolution (1948), it was important to
emphasize that the reaction to lies and slander
was the presentation of documents that showed
the real situation in our country. There is no doubt
that the photograph is such a cogent document,
and our amateur photographers can indeed
be propagandist photographers only if they are
photographersartists, was written in a text on
the occasion of the Second Federal Exhibition of
Artistic Photography held in 1950.36 The institution of juries of photography exhibitions, as part
of the inherited cultural conventions, remained,
but, rather than aesthetic, ideological criteria were
to be met, with its function of censorship being
in the background. Only tested cadres could be
nominated to the jury and confirmed by the ruling
party, as they were the long arm of the politicians
, , , 1952.
Branibor Debeljkovi, Josip Broz Tito at the First International
Exhibition of Photographic Art, Belgrade, 1952
mation, points to the original historical time, the by 275% in relation to 1947, and the number of
time in which Marx Communist Manifesto was members by 128%, while the number of trainees
formulated (1847). But, on the other hand, insis- who completed courses was higher by 280%...44
tence on technical culture also reminds of the poTheoreticians of the agitprop culture did not
sitions advanced in the manifestos of avantgarde expect of photography just a tautological confirgroups from futurism to the proletkult. The avant mation of the kind the world is beautiful, nor a
garde idea of the artist as an engineer is necessar- realism corresponding to the neutral naturalisily seen as closely comparable and as the ultimate tic optics of the objective. Let us recall, they deobjective aspired after in building the new man.
manded that every picture, and that included
This first editorialmanifesto of photography the photograph, had to have a specific quality
in the agitprop culture, signed by Josip Bosnar, ideological character. Ergo, something beyond,
goes on to say that the new amateur photogra- r rather, something above a mechanical reprephy breaks off with outmoded and former per- sentation of the visible world. In other words, it
ceptions of art for the sake of art, work without was not enough to register new phenomena with
content, with maudlin and unrealistic presenta- the camera, everyone had to be clear on the fact
tions, the search for effects for effects sake. Its that precisely photography has extraordinary poconcluding sentences stress that the content of tential to faithfully express the flourishing of our
photography must correspond to the time we live socialist homeland, not only as a document, but
in.43 That didactic tone with the most frequent also to shape our reality, imparting through it the
impersonal use of the verbs must and should, authors perception of objective reality, his aspiraallowed no deviations from the prescribed stan- tion to contribute to societal transformation, to
dards of realism, and, for photography to function mark the great era in which we are living. 45 The
as a mass communication medium, it had to mul- photographic representation is more firmly contiply quickly: the number of amateur clubs grew, nected with its referent than the traditional picas well as the number of trainees at photography ture is, and the photographic Here and Now are
courses, but the amount of photographic images the foundations of a convincing visual truth. To
available in public was limited, because their distri- one of its inventors, it is the paintbrush of Nature,
bution was based on a strict ideological selection but the agitprop committees pose quite specific
the ideological character criterion was deci- demands before it as Tarabukin says, the way in
sive. Many jokes in comwhich photography repmunism stemmed from
resents reality needed
the wellknown propato be radically changed.
gandist tactics of before
In the spirit of agitaand after persuasion,
tion and propaganda,
and reports on the work
the neutral concept of
of amateur photography
photography as a meclubs should be read in
chanical recording of
that context. Suffice it to
the real, had to give way
give one example which
to the demand for the
says that the realization
mechanical optics to
rate of the plan of work
be adapted to the new
,
for last year (1948) was , 1950.
vistas. The building of
119.4%. The number A Pioneer Wishes Comrade Tito a Happy Birthday at the
the new man and of the
of societies increased White Palace, Belgrade, 1950
new world demanded
111
, 1949.
Relay Baton Bearers on the Road to Novi Sad, 1949
new photographic methods: by bold foreshortening, dramatic chiaroscuro interplay or photomontage interventions, photography articulated a
representation of the great times we are living in
as Bosnar put it. Most of these new procedures
were promoted within the context of avantgarde
movements, among which, as particularly noteworthy paragons, the photography of LEF but also
of Nova Literatura or the jackets of Nolits editions
should be mentioned. In accordance with the objectives of the mass agitprop culture organized
on a centralist basis, the relatively limited number of photographs, produced to suit the desired
model, was replicated and then again reproduced
and published over the years, abiding by the
wellknown mechanisms of persuasion and propaganda. The visual matrix of the art of socialist
realism, including photography, let us stress once
again, was not prescribed by either the Yugoslav
Communist Party or the working class, nor by the
popular masses, it was imposed as a readymade
representational model and an integral part of
the imported totalitarian culture. Therefore, one
should not be surprised by the striking similarity
of the negative marks given to works of art that
did not respect the set stereotype within these
two cultural zones so different from one another
as the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia were. Works
that failed to adopt the socialist realism and ideological character matrix were said to be, both in
Moscow and in Belgrade, decadent, formalistic,
112
, , 1953.
At the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1953
, 20. 1945.
Celebration of the Liberation of Belgrade, 20 October 1945
, , 1948.
Rally on the Occasion of the Arrival of Titos Baton, Ni, 1948
113
, , 1953.
Milan Pavi, Lukavac Coke Works Near Tuzla, 1953
, , 1950.
Hristifor Nastasi, Pulp Mill in Prijedor, 1950
, 1948.
At the Voluntary Labor Drive, 1948
114
, , 1957.
Milan Pavi, The New Ship, 1957
115
, , 1986.
Youth Day Athletic Rally, Belgrade, 1986
116
117
, 1952.
The New Belgrade Construction Site, 1952
, ,
1957.
Portrait of Josip Broz Tito on the Trade Unions Hall, Belgrade,
1957
were transformed into stages showing the spectacle of progress, with the figure of the great and
glorious leader, together with other teachers of
Marxism in the center. The actual architectural
stage of streets, squares and buildings was taken
over by huge placards, slogans, red drapes, five
pointed stars, sickles and hammers, with thousands of young people in a variety of dress and a
variety of haircuts, cheering in step to the rhythm
of revolutionary marches. The new visual culture
and layout, reared on reduced avantgarde ideas,
transformed the actual city into a new, imaginary,
urban space according to the fictitious model of
the ideal city of communism. The entire decorative plane, as a segment of monumental propaganda, by which city squares in Russian and
Yugoslav cities were for decades transformed into
scenic settings, had but one task to represent a
vision of the communist city of the future.60
The origin of Lenins monumental propaganda,
119
made, on the one hand, implied the symbolization and rhetoric of propaganda, on the other. The
construction of even temporary statues, a large
mobile still camera, for instance, necessitates the
displacement of an object from a given context
and its forcible relocation to another, i.e., intervention within the existing urban space and cultural pattern of behavior. In other words, without
the complementary confrontation of the old and
tice. The advent of communism abruptly discontinued, in both the Soviet Union and in Yugoslavia,
the tradition of religious processions which took
place, on established dates, outside the consecrated church area, in the open urban milieu of city
streets, with the obligatory public display of icons
and other sacred objects relics.
Religious spectacles also necessitated the construction of temporary structures which gave con-
1. , , 1948.
1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1948
the new, the inherited cultural milieu and futuristic constructions, there can be no monumental
propaganda. Needless to say, the idea of temporary spatial compositions negates the constructive principles of traditional sculpture, finding a
foothold in the rich experience of the art of the
avantgarde, not only of constructivism, but also
of cubism, futurism, dadaism and surrealism.
Ritual sacral objects, we recall, played an exceptionally important role in Christian religious prac-
122
. , , . , , 1947.
R. Stojievi, Platform for Victory Day Celebrations, Bulevar Crvene armije, Belgrade, 1947
, , 1947.
Federation of Transportation Enterprises of
Serbia at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1947
: ,
, , , 1949.
1st of May Celebrations: Moa Pijade, Boris
Kidri, Josip Broz Tito, Belgrade, 1949
123
, , 1948.
Gymnasts at the 1st of May Celebrations, Belgrade, 1948
124
ingly represented as open, it spreads in all directions and even beyond the frame of the picture.
Its monumentality is also underlined by the line of
the horizon which is raised above the heads of the
workers led by a brawny female figure.
The effects of mechanical optics are most pronounced in both the interpretation of space in the
picture and the proportions of the figures of the
builders in the foreground. As opposed to the illusion on the grandiose void of space, the figures
are decoratively presented, as on a poster as it
were, parallel to the surface of the canvas. Their
massive voluminosity, led by the central female
figure which also appears as the prefiguration
of the genius of work threatens to spill over the
edges of the picture. The counterpoint established
between endless space and the gigantic figures
in the foreground, their dark contours pointedly
precise and clear, is additionally dynamized by
the replication of verticals and diagonals in the
picture. Perception mediated through the camera
lens, hence, photographic or mechanical optics,
in a way deforms the picture of reality because
it uses a special wideangle lens. The lens can
paste the large figures in the foreground to the
unfathomably distant ambience of the square,
stadium, building site or the high vertical plane
of a building. The Soviet film frame which insists
on perspective, clashing volumes, clashing light,
clashing space, etc., imposed the visual model for
both painting and photography.69 If Trial Boring in
New Belgrade appropriates the model of Soviet
socialist realism, we should add that together with
it it also adopts the procedures of mechanical optics offering the observer a considerably increased
125
,
, 1956.
Comrade Tito Receiving Greetings for His Birthday at the
White Palace, Belgrade, 1956
, , 1986.
Athletic Rally on Youth Day, Belgrade, 1986
, , 1955.
Josip Broz Tito, from the album Ten and His Master, 1955
railroad builders on a daily basis. As a rule, the production of information and pictures, i.e. the establishment of mass communications and a spectacle
of pictures, evolved in parallel with the construction of something tangible: a highway, an airport,
New Belgrade, factory installations, hydropower
plants and similar. By repeating the once adopted
iconography of the concept of collective creation,
of concert in action, the mass media made it possible for the photographic image to emotionally
mobilize and enlist new participants.
The pattern of dynamic tension in the frame
between large figures and a deep and broad working or parading space, the rhythmic distribution
of light and dark masses as well as emphasized
vertical movement, shaped the representational
idiom of the art of socialist realism. Mechanical
optics, i.e. a view through the camera lens and a
new perspective, are not the discovery of socialist
realism. That subject was written about much and
debated even more in the German and Russian
avantgarde circles, but the photograph of socialist realism adopted and quoted some avantgarde
visual matrices which were no longer limited
to the narrow circle of art, but were reproduced
en masse in Party papers, such as the Komunist.
Photomontage, for instance, as a process of using readymade pictures, freely confronts several
planes in the frame, employs unexpected juxtapositioning, manipulates proportion in order to
glorify mass consensus and collective work in the
multilayered visual structure of the picture. It is
in the service of agitating for the realization of the
projection of the FiveYear Plan which ambitiously
dreams of new cities, bridges, roads, factories, etc.
Socialist realism represents the Partyminded,
collective surrealism, says Groys, that flourishes
under Lenins famous slogan it is necessary to
dream and which announces the magnificent vision of the world built by the party, the total work
of art born of the will of its true creator and artist,78 Stalin or Tito.
An event, especially one lasting several
months, like the construction of a railroad line, or
,
, 23.05.1955.
Visit by Pioneers Before Josip Broz Titos Birthday, Belgrade,
23 May 1955
, , 1953.
1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1953
, , 1947.
1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1947
, , 1955.
1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1955
claimed that class determination lay at the base te blouses combined with skirts, trousers and
of what looks like an arbitrary cinematographic shorts.
relationship towards the objects placed in front
According to Vladimir Macura, the young are
83
of the camera or found there. Situations are al- the true representative of the new man, they
ways laid or found for both the film and the still have discarded the trappings of the bourgeois
camera. The camera, as an instrument, is never past. Through the bodies of children and young
able to distinguish between the staged and the people, in gymnastic spectacles, the regime reasreal hereandnow. But, we should also bear in sured itself of its vitality and optimistic the future.
mind that every frame contains a grain of truth, The use of youth in Titos cult, on the occasion of
for once some people really marched hoisting the celebration of Youth Day, symbolically revitalflags through the streets of Belgrade and Rovinj, ized the power of the aging leader.84
and some did carry heavy lengths of railroad track.
Photographs of mass parades and Titos birthday
But, the power of photographic rhetoric partly lies celebrations, especially those with live pictures
precisely in the fact that the relationship between at stadiums and mobile floats on which young
the referent and his image is so stable and un- people exercise, as well as accidental shots from
breakably fixed.
building sites constitute the true allegory of comIn the mass theater of communism, the pho- munism. It is a picture of reality, of idyllic order
tographer is not an objective witness but one of in the new society, constructed for the leader, and
the actors who, just like the other participants in indirectly, via the mass media, for all the passive
the spectacle, is costumed or identified by an ap- participants in the mass spectacle, to gaze upon.
propriate selection of attributes. His status of a In agitprop photography Party law is what: looks,
privileged observer requires of him to inform on frames, focuses, publishes, for in it, like in the
the casting, the harmony and rhythm, both in the theater, film and traditional literature, things are
symbolical plane of the mass spectacle and in the always looked at from somewhere. 85 When Duan
concrete sphere
Makavejevs film
of building the
The Parade (1961)
new world. If the
or elimir ilniks
builders of that
A Journal on Youth
new world had to
in the Village, in
be young, healthy
Winter (1967) and
and strong, then
Early Works (1969)
they are, logiput events outside
cally, represented
the official stage in
in photographs
the frame, outside
as barechested
the ideologically
muscular heroes of
desired reality, the
labor or uniformed
alarm sounded,
soldiers and workfor someone had
ers. Female comcome to doubt the
rades were also
canonized norms
costumed. They
of representation,
donned uniforms,
the still valid laws
coveralls and ap- , , , 1958.
of the Party.
rons, but also whi- Too Dabac, Workers Council in the Rade Konar Factory, Zagreb, 1958
131
25.05.1949.
Baton Bearers with Greetings for Titos Birthday in Belgrade,
25 May 1949
, , 1952.
Marchpast of the Federation of Students of Yugoslavia at
the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1952
, , 1958.
Nikola Marui, Little Chimney Sweeps, 1958
132
, , 1946.
Soldiers of the Yugoslav Army at the Parade, Belgrade, 1946
1. ,
, 1953.
The Audience at the 1st of May Celebrations in Pionirski Park,
Belgrade, 1953
, , 1947.
Marchpast of Workers at the 1st of May Parade, Belgrade,
1947
133
, 1958.
From the Album: Builders of the Brotherhood and Unity Highway, 1958
134
jection of the new man, mythologized and translated into a hero concept, as the universal cultural
clich, is reproduced and moves from literature to
sculpture, from theoretical texts to news reports,
up to photography and money.
What is believed to be the original photograph
of Alija Sirotanovi, taken by Nikola Bibi, a reporter of the Borba daily, is far better known as a
technical reproduction on a banknote than a work
of art. That photograph, i.e. its widely circulated
copies, undoubtedly belong to the repertoire of
mass performances in which the hero of the new
Yugoslav community acquires concrete visual
form. In the process of constructing the hero myth
numerous facts, such as the precise identification
of the hero, are transformed or are simply rejected
as nonfunctional. The mass spectacle of the pictures of the new man who creates great works
had to gain such popularity precisely on this example because it completely fulfilled the established
scenario and typology of the hero in totalitarianism. It is, primarily, a young and strong miner. A lot
has been said about youth and its symbolic and
archetypal role in totalitarianism, but it is very important to know here that the mythical properties
of the young hero are standardized as a norm in
the aesthetic and political system of communism
as this, above all, postulates the key ideal of the
future.87 The Party however, constructed the image of the hero of Yugoslav socialist construction
after the model of the Soviet typology of the miner shock worker Alexey Stakhanov, upon whom
an entire movement bearing the same name was
founded in 1935.88 It is interesting to note that
in the process of reproduction, the copy of the
135
, 1949.
Pioneers, 1949
137
tograph of a smiling cooperative farmer or prole- of workers selfmanagement, but also as a new
tarian with face uplifted towards the sky can be Biblia pauperum because it, with a large number
interpreted as both fact and reality, fundamen- of pictures, illustrates the basic, but for most readtally opposed to the formalistic or abstract repre- ers incomprehensible, ideological theses of comsentation of the Other, decadent and bourgeois munism. This very luxurious magazine with a clear
art. Photographs of strong young workers and message, printed in parallel in French, English and
spry female athletes are coded representations German, in one of its last numbers in 1958, toof an idyllic, primarily moral order, adorning the gether with Punia Perovis text, The Personality
classless society and the image of the new man. A and Society carries a brilliant visual manipulacritical look at photographs from the first decades tion. The entire virtual context can be seen as the
of socialism shows that spontaneously captured prototype and model of the work of ideology in
motifs were never a direct manifestation of life the sphere of mass visual communications. This
but the product of mamodel has, like many
nipulation and simulaothers, been precisely
tion of the mass media
analyzed by the Russian
under the full control of
avantgarde, and, bethe Party propaganda
sides
Mayakovskys
apparatus.95 With the
and Tarabukins, we
intention of systematishould also include here
cally transforming the
Eisensteins view on this
life of the collective and
subject, which is more
determining the class
than instructive, for it
position of the individwarns that the apparual, photography, like
ent arbitrariness of this
the other mass media,
material relative to the
was mobilized and instatus quo of nature is
strumentalized in the
much less arbitrary than
context of the grandiose
it seems, for photograutopist project of the
phy allows any degree
new reading of history,
of deformation either
i.e. of education and re
as a technical inevitabil96
education.
ity or a deliberately calOto Bihalji Merin,
culated effect.97
Jara Ribnikar and other , , , 1363. (1958)
Having already in
Too Dabac, The Apostle John, Sopoani, 1363 (1958)
artists and theoreticians
the first sentence drawn
of Marxism gathered around the Jugoslavija mag- the readers attention to the fact that the topic is
azine, constructed together, like real engineers, too complex, the author of The Personality and
by picture and by word, a heroized image of man Society had to enlist the aid of a photograph i.e.
in communism. The limits of individual freedoms picture. On the basis of carefully selected photoas well as the function of every individual in the graphic portraits and reproductions, a visual parnew social community were defined through the allel was drawn between medieval and contempoimage of the new man. This magazine is an inter rary man, since in the spirit of dialectical Marxism
textual collective masterpiece of socialist realism it was important to proffer patent proof of the
and can be seen not only as an illustrated manual substantially changed position of man in commu138
nism, which is a consequence of the transformed which Vermeer also was familiar, can most effiownership of the means of production. Opposite ciently arrest and freeze time at an ideal moment
St. Sylvester from a 14th century reliquary is re- the cigarette in the mouth of the worker in the
produced a portrait of a worker in a steam boiler boiler works is still burning and the girl is nibbling
works; a peasant woman from Slavonia is reflect- at her finger at a math class in a gesture similar to
ed like in a mirror in the image of a woman from that of the Mother of God in the basilica in Pore
the 14th century from a fresco in the Kings Church from the 6th century. Mechanical reproduction,
in Studenica; Apostle John from Sopoani monas- as visual material in the process of symbolization
tery is placed in a position of apparent similarity and allegorization, simply equalizes historicstywith a girl pupil at an athletic rally in Zagreb.
listic codes of art, effaces the borders between
The narrative of arbitrary visual comparisons sacral and profane, public and private, between
and intertextual crosswording in the form of past and present, and ultimately between realsilent movies, through
ity and fiction. The phothe editing of differtograph, like the icon,
ent frames, adjusts the
knows only one tense
meaning of selected
the present tense. The
pictures and constructs
history of man and socia real allegory at the
ety, as illustrated by the
semantic level. These
tableau The Personality
photographs, where exand Society, is conamples of medieval art
densed and cramped
have also been transbetween two extremes:
lated into the structure
on the one hand, the
of mechanical reproducdialectical contradiction
tion, merit that we recall
between the person and
the wellknown view
society, illustrated by
that the one of the
the text; on the other a
essential characteristics
visual confrontation of
of the filmed image is
opposite poles fixated
its eternal presence.98
on typified heroes St.
Normally, pictures in the
Sylvester and the worker
era of mechanical reproin the boiler works, for
duction promote a sense
instance.
of the specific feeling of , , 1958.
Photographs of worToo Dabac, A Participant in the Gymnastics Rally in Zagreb,
time, but some traditionking people, the face of
1958
al pictures as well, oils
the little man, plucked
on canvas, possessed the same kind of ability be- out of the context of everyday anonymity, engage
cause they strove to retain and extend some quite in a visual dialogue with icons, images of medibanal gestures till the end of time and the world. eval religious art thereby profaning the context
Thus, in Vermeers pictures girls are permanently, of the sacral or elevating to the level of religiosity
for centuries now, pouring milk or reading a letter, a mechanical picture of banal everyday life. For, it
while in all likelihood, it will take Bressons stroller is not only the art of socialist realism that is the
just as much time to jump over the puddle in the field in which the virtual context of the propaganstreet. Photography, like the camera obscura, with da message is constructed, but it is also the heri139
, 1946.
From the Album Women of Slovenia, 1946
of civil war. But, when we compare two photographs which are identical only at a first and cursory glance, and when in addition we know that
Skrigin, the cameraman of the first communist
film Slavica was unquestionably very familiar
with the effects of photomontage, we must conclude that the heavy clouds in the background
of the photograph Refugees have been edited in
subsequently. The photograph, which once does
not have and another time has clouds in the background, departs from naturalism and blurs the
borders between real and fictional. photomon-
, , , 1957.
Stanoje Bojovi, Jurukinje, Banja Luka, 1957
, 1947.
From the Album: Builders of the amacSarajevo Youth
Railroad Line, 1947
, 1949.
Sowing in the Crveni proleter Farming Cooperative in
Kaarevo, 1949
, 1954.
Fruit on the Montenegrin Coast, 1954
143
one of Kracauers famous essays on popular culture printed in the book Mass Ornament (1995).
Not only is it difficult to see the face of the new
man under the military helmet on it, on other
photos it is hidden behind the welders mask. It
is also barely discernible in counterlight or is an
almost invisible pattern on the grandiose dam
photographed by Milan Pavi in 1954. The body,
both of the mass and individual, is the material
used to shape the ornament of power in totalitarianism. Traces of eroticism have vanished, believes Kracauer, because the enormous number
of participants is united by identical movements
in the mass spectacle. But traces of the erotic are
lost also because the individual faces and bodies
, , 1955.
Josip Broz Tito, From the Album Ten and His Master, 1955
144
, 1956.
Josip Broz Tito and Jovanka in the Park of the White Villa at Brioni, 1956
, , 1957.
Josip Broz Tito and Jovanka Gardening, Vanga, 1957
145
, , 1958.
Too Dabac, A Student of the State Institute of Physical Culture, 1958
, , 1958.
Vidoje Mojsilovi, A Foundry Worker, 1958
, , 1949.
Too Dabac, The Quarry on Bra, 1949
146
, , 1954.
Nikola Vuemilovi, Destroyer Cannon in Action, 1954
,
, 1950.
Milan Pavi, Laboratory for Scientific and Practical Research,
1950
, , 1970.
Wheat Harvest, Panevo, around 1970
, , 1958.
Mladen Grevi, A Worker of the Steam Boiler Works, 1958
147
, , 1954.
Aca Simi, A Jet Plane Pilot, 1954
148
, , 1956.
Miodrag Djordjevi, Atop Mt. Kablar, 1956
, , 1957.
Miodrag Pei, In Movement, 1957
, , 1954.
Mladen Grevi, In the Sun and on the Waves, 1954
149
, 1947.
Outstanding Worker Badge Awardees, 1947
150
DISTILLED PICTURES
Take that life and transform it into a miracle
of art!
I.I. Anisimov
After the end of World War II, avantgarde art,
primarily surrealism, got in Yugoslavia, like it did
in the Soviet Union after the October Revolution,
a unique historical chance to, according to Boris
Groys, perceive not only an undeniable confirmation of its theoretical constructs and aesthetic intuition, but also a singular opportunity for
translating them into reality.110 The Soviet Union
was, not only to Yugoslav communists but also to
members of art avantgardes, the most progressive country in the world, the protector of all small
and oppressed peoples, a society of freedom,
justice, national equality and progress, a society
of already developed socialism on the road to
communism.111 It was the ideal which the agitprop culture in Yugoslavia aspired to and tried to
emulate in every respect. The new world, of which
the avantgarde dreamed, had to be not only
much more beautiful but also much more just.
That was, ultimately, the platform of the specific
aestheticpolitical project which was functionalized in the agitprop era. The aestheticization of
ideology and vice versa, the ideologization of aesthetics, can also be read as a mass spectacle and a
Gesamtkunstwerk project, which engages in the
exchange of ideas between aesthetic ideology
and totalitarianism.112
One can read about the grandiosity of mythical
time and space and the mass spectacle or specific
Gesamtkunstwerk of 1st of May parades, celebrations of Youth Day and voluntary work drives, in
152
space and time. In the frozen structure of the photographic image it went on even after the final
beats of the Kozara reel, and every new publishing
and multiplication of photographs reproduced
its once focused fragments anew. The Marxist
theoreticians of popular culture knew well that
every piece of news, every report and every article has its beginning and its end; photography
does not have them! It speaks for hours and days,
it speaks a language understandable to both the
worker and the intellectual, understandable and
convincing to every man.119 Therefore, if we can
say that temporary structures transformed, for a
short while, real ambiences into the ideal spaces
of the future, the ideological work of photography evolved over the long run, shrouded as it was
in the opaque veil of arrested time.
The photographic camera does not reflect reality but produces photogenic pictures of socialism
which are in the service of the propaganda of that
new social reality. We all know that the camera
cannot arrange reality so tangibly and obviously
as can painting or literature, for instance, but remaining faithful to the principles of the visual
chronicler, it employs a series of technical and stylistic effects with which it does not so much reveal
how things really look like as how they could look
if the picture was built on the basis of socialist
ideas. If one of the chief values of a photographic
image is its realism, then precisely the rhetoric
of photography was suitable for publicizing new
victories on the road to communism. To whatever
extent photography reduced the representation
of reality to typically scenic, i.e. ideological tableaux, these framed fragments were perceived as
objective, mechanical pictures. The custom of the
camera to focus only on specific events and phenomena while leaving others out altogether or
losing them from its field of vision, became its key
advantage as a medium, for fragmentary images
of an event, as allusions, could replace the whole.
In other words, different montage procedures or
specific optical deformations, closeups, unusual
perspectives and similar, allow the subsequent
J
, , 1961.
Soldiers of the Yugoslav Peoples Army at the Celebration of
Youth Day, Belgrade, 1961
, , 1978.
Athletic Rally on Youth Day, Belgrade, 1978
model of free form and limited content of cultural creation.125 That was, partly, a call to return to
order, i.e. to abandon revolution and the utopian
project of the transformation of life. The new platform opened up possibilities for vulgar socialist
realism to be replaced by its brushedup variant
socialist aestheticism in photography as well
as in other arts. That moment saw the reopening of modernist discussions on the autonomous
aesthetic principles of a picture, while in respect
of photography the possibilities of a humanized
camera are indicated. Photography, like painting, abandons the revolutionary phase and reestablishes continuity with the ideas of modernism,
although in the opinion of some authors, Vidoje
Mojsilovi, for instance, there is a lot of formalism in those works. With the intention of having
reality documented in a poetic manner, i.e. having the formal aspects of the picture suppress the
obligation of visualizing ideological canons, the
cover page of the 1958 Fotokino revija features
the boldly cutup Portrait by Mirjana Kneevi.126
Like all totalitarian cultures, agitprop culture
in Yugoslavia established a firm system of hierarchy among the different arts which was, it goes
without saying, based on the possibilities for
massscale ideological reeducation through the
media. If literature and film were on the top of the
pyramid, immediately following and far ahead of
traditional painting were sculpture and photography.127 The photographic picture is articulated
more as an informative and representative than as
an aesthetic message. It functioned in the sphere
of the mass media and visual communications together with the poster, the press and film, which
institutionally occupies the position of the leading
medium of popular culture in socialism.
The principles of the new social system, in
which art could not, but neither wished to retain
an autonomous position, were demonstrated in
the public sphere of mass oneday or several
, 1954.
Gymnastics at a Voluntary Labor Drive, 1954
155
, 1948.
1st of May Parade, Belgrade 1948
VII , 1958. ( : . ,
, . , . )
At the 7th Congress of the League of Communists of
Yugoslavia, 1958, (from left to right: E. Kardelj, Josip Broz
Tito, L. Kolievski, A. Rankovi)
, ,
1950.
The Je Humorous Magazine at the 1st of May Parade,
Belgrade, 1950
156
,
, 1958.
Duan Stanimirovi, In the Shipyard on Murter
Island, 1958
, , 1957.
Milorad Joji, Man and Steel, 1957
,
, 1958.
Too Dabac, The Laboratory in the Rade Konar
factory in Zagreb, 1958
, , 1952.
At the Rakovica Engine Factory, Belgrade, 1952
157
, , 1979.
Youth Day, Belgrade, 1979
, , 1978.
Youth Day Rally, Belgrade, 1978
158
, , , 1961.
Astronauts Forward, 1st of May Parade, Belgrade, 1961
159
, ., 1958.
Mira Kneevi, Portrait of the Artist M., 1958
160
NOTES
1
The slogan the new realism was espoused in this country in the 30s in the literature and art of the group ivot
(Life) and was advocated by the then leading critics: Milan
Bogdanovi, Velibor Gligori and Djordje Jovanovi. In the
literature of the National Liberation Struggle, featured a
somewhat toned down avantgarde component, which
we detect in the poems of O. Davio produced in the war
and the first postwar years, then in the prisoner poems
of M. Dedinac, in the war and postwar poems of D. Mati
and A. Vuo, J. Dereti, Kratka istorija srpske knjievnosti (A
Short History of Serbian Literature), Belgrade, 1990, www.
rastko.org.yu/knjizevnost/jderetic_knjiz
15
16
17
B. Groys, op.cit., 9.
18
19
20
21
22
23
10
Idem, 36.
11
12
13
24
25
26
161
28
29
30
31
32
A. Gerasimov, Protiv formalizma za visoku idejnu umetnost (Against Formalism For High Ideological Art),
JugoslavijaSSSR, No. 27 Belgrade 1947, 13, 15.
33
. , (The Totalitarian
Experience), Sofia 2004, 212215.
34
35
36
37
38
40
41
Lj. Dimi, op. cit., 177. We say that film is the most popular art in the Soviet Union, S. Eisenstein, Film, Jugoslavija
SSSR, No. 6, Belgrade 1946,14.
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
162
50
51
163
164
76
77
80
R. Barthes, ImageMusicText (Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath) Fontana Press, London 1977, 6978.
81
82
83
84
P. Roubal, Bodies in formation, Mass gymnastics under communism, Budapest, 2001, www.osa.ceu.hu/galeria
85
R. Barthes, ImageMusicText (Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath) Fontana Press, London 1977, 6978.
86
87
88
89
. , , ,
Moscow 1992, No. 1, 2741
90
91
92
Shock work principles were implemented in all areas, including science (...) The other type of hero on the front of
the struggle for the plan were innovators and production
165
94
95
96
103
104
. , , Moscow
1935, 46, in . , , 344.
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
To the sound of a march, the parade started with the appearance of detachments of workers in working clothes
and officers of the Yugoslav Peoples Army symbolically
expressing the close connection between the Army and
the people. A mass concert was held on the steps of the
National Assembly. Before thousands of listeners, nine
choirs of cultural and folklore societies from Belgrade,
merged into one enormous choir of 700 members, with
the big brass band of the Command Guard, conducted by
Oskar Danon, performed several mass songs by domestic composers. (...) big fireworks, which lasted to the wee
hours of the night started at about 10 p.m. in the square
97
98
99
R. Barthes, Mit danas (Myth Today), in Knjievnost, mitologija, semiologija (Literature, Mythology, Semeiology),
Belgrade 179, 271.
100
101
166
in front of the National Theater , wrote an anonymous reporter in the text The Workers of Yugoslavia Celebrated
1 May by Magnificent Events, Borba, 3 May, 1948. Like in
Moscow, everything ended with a large street party with
fireworks, music and dancing, where, usually early in the
morning the 1st of May Parade started with different sirens,
while the symphony of factory sirens was organized by the
Proletkult in cooperation with the conservatory, Street Art
of the Revolution, 125.
115
B. Groys, op.cit., 55.
116
E. inko, op.cit., 65. The Statute of the Federation of
Amateur Photographers and FilmMakers of Yugoslavia
requires of its members to work on implementing the program of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, to fight against
the revision of MarxismLeninism and to take part in the
socialist construction of their country, Fotografija, Nos. 23,
Belgrade 1950, 35.
117
I. Bibikova, The Design of Revolutionary Celebrations, in
Street Art of the Revolution, 24. 124.
Any democracy strives naturally towards popular festivals
(...) Democracy presupposes the free life of the masses. In
order for the masses to make themselves felt, they must
outwardly manifest themselves, and this is possible only
when, to use Robespierres phrase, they are their own spectacle. If organized masses march to music, sing in unison or
perform some extensive gymnastic manoeuvres or dances, in other words organize a kind of parade, then those
other, unorganized masses clustering round on all sides
of the streets and squares where the festival takes place,
will merge with the organized masses, and thus, one can
say: the whole people manifests its soul to itself. (...) A.V.
Lunacharsky, On popular festivals, Theater Courier, No. 62,
Moscow 1920, 13, in Street Art of the Revolution, 124.
118
One of the greatest achievements of Stalinism and one
of the conditions which prepared its destruction was the
cultural revolution (...) in the new society the most accessible was that which was least accessible in the past education and culture. It turned out that it was much easier
to give people a good education and bring them close to
the highest cultural spheres than to give them decent flats,
clothes, food. Education and culture were the strongest
compensation for the poverty of everyday life, A. Zinovjev,
The Enthusiasm of Our Youth, Belgrade 1985, 40. A washer
would emancipate my mom more than the right to vote,
says the heroine in elimir ilniks film Early Works in 1969.
119
M. Macarol, Karakter i istoriska uloga nae urnalistike fotografije (The Character and Historic Role of Our Journalistic
Photograph), 91.
120
J. Berger, Understanding a Photograph, in Selected Essays,
London 2001, 215218.
121
Anonymous, Finally, we talked about photography...,
Fotokino revija, Nos. 78, Belgrade 1961, 16.
122
B. Groys, The Total Art of Stalinism, 25. Surrealism contributed to the degradation of the renown of the Author
by constantly recommending sudden disappointment in
expecting the meaning, entrusting the hand with writing
as fast as it can of what the head is still not aware and by
accepting the principle and experience that a number of
people should write together, R. Barthes, Smrt autora (The
Death of the Author), Polja, No. 309, Novi Sad 1984, 450.
167
CIP -
,
77.031945/1953
32.019.51945/1953
,
: 19451953 /
; [ ,
]. - 1. . - : ;
: Helicon, 2005 ( : ). 167 . : . ; 28 . - ( /
, )
. . . - 500. . . -
. .
ISBN 99938-33-20-7
, 730
, 730
..: - 19451953,
- 19451953
MNF=002860
Winisis-
168
,
. ,
,
,
,
.
,
,
1945. 1958. .
pro contra
()
. ,
,
()
, ,
,
-
-.
.
, , ,
-
. ,
,
.
,
,
.
( )
PHOTOGRAPHY
PROPAGANDA
MILANKA TODI
,
( ), ( ).
,
1996.
. ,
. (): 19. , , 1989; ,
1990; 1839-1940,
1993; , 2001; , , 2002. (www.serbiansurrealism.
com).
(European Society for the History of Photography)
(AICA). Milanka Todi
is a professor at the Faculty of the Applied Arts in Belgrade. She
is specialized in the eld of history of photography and
modern art. Has curated numerous exhibitions in Serbia and
abroud and published various catalogues and articles.
Selected books: Photography in Serbia in 19th Century,
Belgrade 1989; Nikola Vuo, Vienna 1990; The History of
Serbian Photography 1839-1940, Belgrade 1993; Photography
and Picture, Belgrade 2001; The Impossible, Surrealist Art,
Belgrade 2002. (www.serbiansurrealism.com) Member of the
European Society for the History of Photography (ESHP) and
the International Association of Art Critics (AICA).
1945 1958