Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
Optimizing the use of the available frequency resources is fundamental in order to increase the overall capacity of a GSM system. To achieve this, a number of solutions may be adopted, like improved radio resource management policies, deployment of advanced radio features, introduction of advanced resource planning strategies such as Dynamic Channel Allocation or Fractional Loading. This paper addresses a fixed frequency planning strategy, based on the use of dedicated bands for TCH and BCCH carriers respectively. References to this technique can be found in [1] and [2]. In the following, frequency planning with band segregation is compared to conventional fixed frequency planning with common TCH/BCCH band. Three cases have been considered: 1] system performance analysis considering an ideal scenario; 2] development of frequency plans with and without band segregation with reference to a realistic cell layout; 3] system performance analysis of a realistic scenario taking into account in field cell dimensioning and parameters. The simulation results reported in case 2 were obtained with the frequency planning tool FREQUENT (FREQUency assignmENT) developed in CSELT which takes into account the mutual average interference between cells evaluated on a priori basis (e.g., without considering system functionalities nor users behavior); these results are therefore relevant for the planning process. On the contrary, results presented in case 1 and 3 were obtained by means of a software tool developed in CSELT (TOTO - TDMA Oriented sofTware tOol [3]), which models the main functionalities of the GSM system and takes into account both propagation data, system functionalities (e.g. power control, DTX), and users' behavior; these results are therefore relevant for the validation of the frequency plan. The two sets of results, although referring to two different steps of system deployment and therefore being obtained with different methodologies, show the same trend.
handover, Power Control (PC, only quality based case was considered) were taken into account, based on GSM Specification; adjacent channel interference and frequency hopping were not taken into account. 2.2 Simulation results Results obtained for the downlink are summarized in figure 1, which shows the values at 10% of the C/I cumulative distribution versus the number of transceivers per cell. Two cases are considered, corresponding to active PC or PC and DTX. The frequency plan with band segregation provides better overall performance for cell carrier equipment up to 6 transceivers per cell (corresponding to a reuse 7 for TCH) when both PC and DTX are active. Actually, this is the result of two opposite effects. As figure 2 shows, the performance of the BCCH carriers worsen when moving from the case without band segregation to the case with band segregation, due to the shorter reuse distance (with band segregation, only 12 carriers are dedicated to BCCH whereas without band segregation all 48 carriers are available for BCCH planning). On the contrary, figure 3 reveals that TCH performance improve substantially with band segregation. In this case, TCH carriers are not affected by the interference coming from the BCCH carriers (which, according to the GSM Specifications, are always transmitting with the maximum allowed power). This also allows to maximize the benefits of system functions such as power control. The introduction of DTX further improves TCH performance. However, if the number of transceivers per cell increases, thus making shorter the reuse distance of the TCH carriers, the performance improvement gradually disappears. In figure 1 it can be noted that the results with 4 TRX/cell are not aligned with other cases, in fact the performance improvement achievable with dedicated bands is slightly worse than the one achievable with 5 TRX/cell. This is due to the fact that with 4 TRX/cell the quality of the BCCH carriers is substantially lower than the quality of TCH carriers (see figure 2 and 3); this implies that almost all values in the lower part of the cumulative distribution (from which the 10% value is extracted) belong to the BCCH carriers, whose relative weight is therefore definitely higher than in other cases. If we referred to the 20% values of the C/I cumulative distributions (rather than 10%), this phenomena disappears. Figure 3 highlights that the TCH quality decreases more rapidly with band segregation when the reuse distance decreases; in fact, with the common band approach, TCH carriers suffers from the interference coming from BCCH carriers, which is basically constant, regardless of the number of carriers per cell. Simulation results do not show any advantage of the frequency planning with band segregation for the uplink. In fact, in the uplink, the increased interference due to a smaller reuse distance of both TCH and BCCH carriers is not balanced by any positive effect, since the BCCH carriers in uplink do not behave differently than normal TCH carriers (i.e. PC and DTX can be applied to BCCH carriers as well as to TCH carriers). TRX/cell 4 5 6 7 Common Band # carriers Overall reuse 48 12 48(*) 9.6 48 8 48(**) 6.86 # carriers 48 47 48 48 Band Segregation BCCH reuse 12 12 12 12 TCH reuse 12 9 7 6
(*) Results obtaind by interpolation of cases with 45 and 50 carriers (**) Results obtained by interpolation of cases with 42 and 49 carriers
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 3 4 5
TRX/cell
C/I 10% dif C/I 10% com C/I 10% com DTX C/I 10% dif DTX
21 20 19 18 17
C/I DL 10% - BCCH
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 3 4 5
TRX/cell
C/I 10% bcch dif C/I 10% bcch com C/I 10% bcch com DTX C/I 10% bcch dif DTX 6 7 8
17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 3 4 5
TRX/cell
C/I 10% tch dif C/I 10% tch com C/I 10% tch com DTX C/I 10% tch dif DTX
o o
o o
cell constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 3 between frequencies assigned to the same cell; site constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 2 between frequencies assigned to different cells belonging to the same site; 400 kHz adjacencies constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 2 between frequencies assigned to 400 kHz adjacent cells; 200 kHz adjacencies constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 1 between frequencies assigned to 200 kHz adjacent cells. The area on which the three frequency plans are accomplished is constituted by 622 cells and 2435 carriers, the elaboration time (CPU time) used for the definition of each plan is equal to 10 hours on a Sun Spark Ultra Workstation. The different plans are compared as a function of: the minimum C/I ratio associated to the BCCH carriers set; the minimum C/I ratio associated to the TCH carriers set; the number of carriers under the threshold of 9 dB; the C/I quality distribution of the BCCH carriers within the cells; the distribution of the C/I associated to the BCCH carriers; the distribution of the C/I associated to the TCH carriers. The results are shown in the following tables and diagrams: Plan 1 Minimum C/I of the BCCH carriers Minimum C/I of the TCH carriers Number of under threshold carriers 9.08 dB 9.07 dB 0 Plan 2 7.41 dB 7.13 dB 27 Plan 3 8.62 dB 7.54 dB 20
Table 3: C/I results 1 Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 100% 48.5% 37.8% 2 27.8% 33.1% 3 15% 17.5% 4 6.4% 8.8% 5 1.8% 2.6% 6 0.5% 0.2%
Table 4: BCCH quality distribution within the cells (maximum cell equipment is equal to 6 TRX)
700 600 BCCH carriers 500 400 300 200 100 0 1 2 3 Quality 4 5 6 0 plan 1 302 235 plan 2 206 173 93 109 0 0 40 55 0 11 16 0 3 1 plan 3 622
Figure 4: BCCH quality distribution < 9 dB Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 0.3% 0.2% 9-15 dB 10.4% 17% 20.6% 15-20 dB 33.3% 37.6% 41.3% 20-25 dB 32.8% 28.6% 25.5% 25-30 dB 15% 10.5% 7.1% 30-35 dB 5.1% 3.9% 3.9% > 35 dB 3.4% 2.1% 1.4%
300 250 BCCH carriers 200 150 100 50 0 2 1 0 <9 9-15 128 106 65
15-20
20-25 dB
25-30
30-35
> 35
Figure 5: C/I distribution of BCCH carriers < 9 dB Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 1.4% 1% 9-15 dB 29.4% 30.7% 30.6% 15-20 dB 41% 37.6% 38.3% 20-25 dB 20.9% 20.8% 19% 25-30 dB 5.6% 5.7% 7% 30-35 dB 1.7% 2% 2.4% > 35 dB 1.4% 1.8% 1.7%
Figure 6: C/I distribution of TCH carriers As shown in the set of tables and figures the frequency plan with common band seems to guarantee the best results, in particular for the BCCH carriers that are chosen after the planning assigning the BCCH channel to the carrier with the best C/I in the cell. This procedure cannot be performed in case of band segregation because only one frequency assigned to a generic cell is compatible with the BCCH planning; in case of segregation the first configuration guarantees the better results for the broadcast channels. As far as the TCH channels are concerned, the results are similar in case of common and segregated band but in the second and third case these results can become worse if the average number of carriers per cell increases, owing to the most intensive effects of the interferential condition and cell/site/adjacency constraints.
mobility user terminals. Discontinuous transmission (DTX), handover, Power Control (PC, only quality based case was considered) were considered, based on GSM Specifications; adjacent channel interference was taken into account. 4.2 Simulation Results Simulations have shown an high load in the network characterized by an overall blocking probability higher than the 2% considered in the ideal case. In this case the overall downlink performance in terms of C/I cumulative distribution do not improve by adopting the frequency planning with band segregation (see figure 7). Anyway, this result is not in contradiction with the one obtained by the analysis of the ideal scenario considered in section 2 above, since different conditions apply. In the realistic scenario studied here, the network load is higher and non-uniformly distributed. Under these conditions, the interference contributions from BCCH and TCH carriers tend to become more balanced; as a consequence, the use of dedicated bands do not lead to a more efficient use of functionalities such as power control and DTX. Moreover, in the scenario considered here, the number of transceivers per cell is quite high (up to 7, 5 on average) and therefore the reuse factor is quite low. Finally, the frequency planning considered for this realistic scenario was evaluated taking into account all adjacent constraints due to technology, which were not considered in the ideal case (where the cluster approach was used) and which effectively reduce the degrees of freedom available for the planning algorithm (in particular, when the number of available carriers is low, as in the dedicated bands case) with obvious impact on the final frequency plan. Therefore, in the considered realistic case, the TCH performance in the band segregation case are not capable of balancing the degradation of the BCCH performance. In the uplink, simulation results do not show any advantage of the frequency planning with band segregation, in line with results previously obtained in the ideal case.
100
90 80
60 50 COM SEG
40
30
20 10
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 C/I 33
5. Conclusion
The system performance analysis carried out considering an ideal scenario (section 2) has shown that the frequency planning with band segregation can lead to a better performance in the downlink, reducing the quality of BCCH carriers and increasing the carrier to interference ration of TCH carriers, thanks to an increased efficiency of network functionalities such as power control. The system performance analysis carried out in section 4 considering a realistic scenario under heavy traffic load has shown that the advantages of the frequency planning with dedicated bands disappear. This is confirmed by the analysis carried out with reference to the development of frequency plans with and without band segregation considering a realistic cell layout. Based on the analysis carried out in this paper, we conclude that, under the hypothesis and assumptions considered herein, the frequency planning with band segregation can be a viable solution only in case of a small number of transceivers (e.g, high reuse factor) per cell and under low traffic load.
References
[1] M. Madfors et al., High capacity with limited spectrum in cellular systems, IEEE Communications Magazine, Aug 1997 [2] F. Kronestedt, M. Frodigh, Frequency planning strategies for frequency hopping GSM, Proc. VTC97, Phoenix, Arizone, USA, May 4-7 1997, vol III, pp 1862-1866 [3] F. Delli Priscoli, N.P. Magnani, V. Palestini, F. Sestini, Application of Dynamic Channel Allocation Strategies to the GSM Cellular Network, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol 15, No 8, Oct 1997 [4] E. Damosso, F. Grimaldi, M. SantAgostino, Network Planning Tools and Activities in Italy, Proc. Mobile Radio Conference, Nov 1991