Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Duryatipblampiran 14

    Uploaded by

    Ardiansyah Ardi
    2 views2 pages
    This document contains the results of regression analyses performed to determine the optimal wood density and total density for different diameter classes of trees: 1. For diameters 20-40cm, wood density and total density were significantly correlated with productivity, with quadratic models providing the best fit. 2. For diameters 40-60cm, similar significant correlations between density and productivity were found, again with quadratic models. 3. For diameters over 60cm, wood density showed a stronger correlation to productivity than total density, with quadratic models again providing the best fits to the data.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    duryatipblampiran14

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains the results of regression analyses performed to determine the optimal wood density and total density for different diameter classes of trees: 1. For diameters 20-40cm, wood density and total density were significantly correlated with productivity, with quadratic models providing the best fit. 2. For diameters 40-60cm, similar significant correlations between density and productivity were found, again with quadratic models. 3. For diameters over 60cm, wood density showed a stronger correlation to productivity than total density, with quadratic models again providing the best fits to the data.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Duryatipblampiran 14

    Uploaded by

    Ardiansyah Ardi
    This document contains the results of regression analyses performed to determine the optimal wood density and total density for different diameter classes of trees: 1. For diameters 20-40cm, wood density and total density were significantly correlated with productivity, with quadratic models providing the best fit. 2. For diameters 40-60cm, similar significant correlations between density and productivity were found, again with quadratic models. 3. For diameters over 60cm, wood density showed a stronger correlation to productivity than total density, with quadratic models again providing the best fits to the data.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    78

    Lampiran 14. Perhitungan kerapatan jenis damar dan kerapatan total optimum
    untuk kelas diameter 2040 cm, kelas diameter 4060 cm, dan
    kelas diameter diatas 60 cm.
    1. Kelas diameter 2040 cm
    Polynomial Regression Analysis: prod per ha versus K Damar
    The regression equation is
    Prod. /Ha = 59056.0 + 1358.24 K. Damar - 1.67342 K. Damar**2
    S = 93555.0

    R-Sq = 27.9 %

    R-Sq(adj) = 27.1 %

    Analysis of Variance
    Source
    Regression
    Error
    Total
    Source
    Linear
    Quadratic

    DF
    2
    183
    185
    DF
    1
    1

    SS
    6.185E+11
    1.602E+12
    2.220E+12

    Seq SS
    5.652E+11
    5.324E+10

    MS
    3.092E+11
    8.753E+09

    F
    62.8431
    6.0827

    F
    35.3309

    P
    0.000

    P
    0.000
    0.015

    Polynomial Regression Analysis: Prod. /Ha versus K. Total


    The regression equation is
    Prod. /Ha = -17705.1 + 1328.52 K. Total - 1.22421 K. Total**2
    S = 94813.6

    R-Sq = 25.9 %

    R-Sq(adj) = 25.1 %

    Analysis of Variance
    Source
    Regression
    Error
    Total
    Source
    Linear
    Quadratic

    DF
    2
    183
    185
    DF
    1
    1

    SS
    5.751E+11
    1.645E+12
    2.220E+12

    Seq SS
    5.535E+11
    2.160E+10

    MS
    2.875E+11
    8.990E+09

    F
    61.1030
    2.4031

    F
    31.9860

    P
    0.000

    P
    0.000
    0.123

    2. Kelas diameter 4060 cm

    Polynomial Regression Analysis: prod per ha versus K Damar


    The regression equation is
    prod per ha = 30650.9 + 2219.28 K Damar - 3.62295 K Damar**2
    S = 93577.7

    R-Sq = 29.0 %

    R-Sq(adj) = 28.1 %

    Analysis of Variance
    Source
    Regression
    Error
    Total
    Source
    Linear
    Quadratic

    DF
    2
    148
    150
    DF
    1
    1

    SS
    5.303E+11
    1.296E+12
    1.826E+12

    Seq SS
    3.529E+11
    1.773E+11

    MS
    2.651E+11
    8.757E+09

    F
    35.6931
    20.2505

    F
    30.2775

    P
    0.000

    P
    0.000
    0.000

    Polynomial Regression Analysis: prod per ha versus K total


    The regression equation is
    prod per ha = -95848.7 + 2211.61 K total - 2.72264 K total**2
    S = 96111.4

    R-Sq = 25.1 %

    R-Sq(adj) = 24.1 %

    79
    Lampiran 14. (Lanjutan)
    Analysis of Variance
    Source
    Regression
    Error
    Total
    Source
    Linear
    Quadratic

    DF
    2
    148
    150
    DF
    1
    1

    SS
    4.591E+11
    1.367E+12
    1.826E+12

    Seq SS
    3.783E+11
    8.087E+10

    MS
    2.296E+11
    9.237E+09

    F
    38.9237
    8.7545

    F
    24.8520

    P
    0.000

    P
    0.000
    0.004

    3. Kelas diameter diatas 60 cm


    Polynomial Regression Analysis: Prod./Ha versus K. Damar
    The regression equation is
    Prod./Ha = -34621.3 + 3183.18 K. Damar- 5.52174 K. Damar**2
    S = 56021.5

    R-Sq = 57.2 %

    R-Sq(adj) = 55.8 %

    Analysis of Variance
    Source
    Regression
    Error
    Total
    Source
    Linear
    Quadratic

    DF
    2
    60
    62
    DF
    1
    1

    SS
    2.519E+11
    1.883E+11
    4.402E+11

    Seq SS
    1.278E+11
    1.241E+11

    MS
    1.260E+11
    3.138E+09

    F
    24.9634
    39.5357

    F
    40.1347

    P
    0.000

    P
    0.000
    0.000

    Polynomial Regression Analysis: Prod./Ha versus K.Total


    The regression equation is
    Prod./Ha = -89178.3 + 2539.80 K.Total - 3.51241 K.Total**2
    S = 74415.3

    R-Sq = 24.5 %

    R-Sq(adj) = 22.0 %

    Analysis of Variance
    Source
    Regression
    Error
    Total
    Source
    Linear
    Quadratic

    DF
    2
    60
    62
    DF
    1
    1

    SS
    1.080E+11
    3.323E+11
    4.402E+11

    Seq SS
    7.955E+10
    2.841E+10

    MS
    5.398E+10
    5.538E+09

    F
    13.4546
    5.1308

    P
    0.001
    0.027

    F
    9.74821

    P
    0.000

    You might also like