Site Suitability Report C07AB: LB Wandsworth, Maintenance Depot, Dormay Street

Spring 2010
Site Suitability Report C07AB

LB Wandsworth, maintenance depot, Dormay Street
Please note: After phase one consultation this site suitability report was reviewed as part of a back-check. This report was reviewed by each discipline (engineering, planning, environment, community and property), but the report was not updated as the general overall site conclusions remained valid. Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
100-RG-PNC-C07AB-900001 | Spring 2010

LB Wandsworth, maintenance depot, Dormay Street
THAMES TUNNEL
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT C07AB

LIST OF CONTENTS
Page Number 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 Purpose and structure of the report Background Consultation 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10
SITE INFORMATION 2.1 2.2 Site and surroundings Type of site
3 4
PROPOSED USE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION PHASE PROPOSED USE OF SITE OPERATIONAL PHASE 4.1 4.2 Introduction Restoration and after-use
ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Access Construction works considerations Permanent works considerations Health and safety
PLANNING ASSESSMENT 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Introduction Planning applications and permissions Planning context Consultation comments Planning comments
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 Introduction Transport Archaeology Built heritage and townscape Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Ecology Flood risk Air quality Noise Land quality
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 8.1 8.2 Socio-economic profile Issues and impacts
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT 9.1 9.2 Introduction Crown Land and Special Land comments
100-RG-PNC-C07AB-900001.doc
9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 10
Land to be acquired Property valuation comments Disturbance compensation comments Offsite statutory compensation comments Discretionary purchase costs comments Site acquisition cost assessment
10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 13
SITE CONCLUSIONS BY DISCIPLINE 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 Introduction Engineering Planning Environment Socio-economic and community Property
APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS APPENDIX 4 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN APPENDIX 6 SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN APPENDIX 7 CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT APPENDIX 8 OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT APPENDIX 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL TABLE
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SuDS TfL TD TLRN TPA UDP UXO
above Ordnance Datum Biodiversity Action Plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
1 1.1 1.1.1
INTRODUCTION Purpose and structure of the report The Site Selection Methodology (May 2009) paper (paragraphs 2.3.29 - 2.3.34) outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of shaft sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report, but they depend on the relevance to the site and professional judgement made in the assessments. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: Engineering, Planning, Environment, Property and Community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 - Sources of Information, and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to the current stage. The Background Technical Paper provides information on the requirements for different site types, their sizes and typical activities/facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an engineering options report was produced. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). This is considered in the Preferred Scheme Report. Background The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site Selection Methodology (May 2009) paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A - Creation of the long list of potential shaft (and CSO) sites Part 1B - Creation of a short list of potential shaft (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of shaft (and CSO) sites - an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of shaft (and CSO) sites - assessment against a list of detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
1.1.2
1.1.3 1.1.4
1.2 1.2.1
1.2.2
The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C - Creation of the Preferred List of shaft (and CSO) sites - site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that will result in the Preferred Scheme Report.
1.3 1.3.1
Consultation The Thames Water project team held meetings with London local authorities, statutory and other stakeholders to review the provisional short list of shaft and CSO sites. All general and site specific comments can be found in a separate report titled Consultation on the Short List of Sites: Consultation Feedback Report. These comments were considered to help determine the final short list of sites, but they were also considered at the optioneering workshops. Further meetings were held with London local authorities, statutory and other stakeholders between January and March 2010. Comments are included in this report.
1.3.2
Page 1
2 2.1 2.1.1
SITE INFORMATION Site and surroundings This site is one of the shortlisted sites for Frogmore Storm Relief Bell Lane Creek CSO. This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. Site C07AB forms part of the Frogmore Complex, an industrial estate comprising various industrial units with associated loading/unloading and parking areas, and lies within the London Borough of Wandsworth. The site is presently used by the London Borough of Wandsworth as a maintenance depot. From consultation with the Wandsworth borough council, it is understood that the depot is in 24-hour use by a large number of employees and provides storage, workshops and parking for council vehicles, including emergency response vehicles. The site is bounded by Dormay Street to the east and Frogmore to the west. The south of the site backs onto residential properties, which in turn front onto Armoury Way. The north of the site is bounded by Bell Lane Creek. Access is currently taken from Dormay Street and Frogmore. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2. The wider area comprises commercial, industrial and residential uses. Frogmore Complex forms part of a wider industrial designation which extends northwards towards the River Thames. There are further pockets of industrial activity on the south side of Armoury Way. The area immediately to the west of the site, fronting onto Frogmore, is residential and made up of flats and terraced housing. Further residential properties are located to the south and east of Armoury Way. The nearest residents would be located within London Court, Fullers House and Brewers House, approximately 100m from the proposed operational area of the site. The site is partly within Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. Wentworth House, the adjacent property, is Grade II listed and forms part of a cluster of buildings at the junction of Dormay Street and Armoury Way, including the Crane public house, the adjoining cottages and terrace. The site is within an Industrial Employment Area 2008, archaeological priority area, conservation area and Metropolitan Open Land, as shown in the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan. All the mapped designations are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. There is road access to the site via Dormay Street or Frogmore, which are both directly off the A3 and the A217. There is no rail network local to the site. East Putney London Underground station is less than 1.5km from the site and Wandsworth Town rail station is less than 1km from the site. There are no existing wharfage/jetty facilities at the site. A transport plan for the site is attached as Appendix 5.
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8 2.1.9
2.1.10 Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: Frogmore local authority maintenance depot and surrounding warehouses Rail tracks on the outside northern part of the site River wall in the north Frogmore Bell Lane Storm Relief Sewer. 2.1.11 The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre-optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. 2.1.12 Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan, which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that the shaft would be founded in London Clay. Page 2
2.1.13 It is understood that National Grid is planning to build a cable tunnel which would run through the outside eastern part of the site. If this site is selected, there would be dialogue with National Grid to consider matters if applicable (such as timing, engineering constraints, cumulative effects of the projects, potential for site sharing, etc.) 2.2 2.2.1 Type of site The site C07AB is being considered as a CSO site to intercept the Frogmore Bell Lane Storm Relief Sewer CSO. PROPOSED USE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION PHASE The proposed construction phase layouts for the CSO site are located in Appendix 7 Construction Phase Layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: the layout as a CSO site potential access point. 3.1.3 These drawings provide initial preliminary schematic layouts that have not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Photographs of typical activities associated with the CSO site construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above ground construction features include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration). 3.1.5 Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site CSO site 0.5 to 2 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
3 3.1.1 3.1.2
3.1.4
4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2
PROPOSED USE OF SITE OPERATIONAL PHASE Introduction The indicative operational phase layout for the CSO site is located in Appendix 8 Operational Phase Layout, and is based on a preliminary assessment. The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to CSO sites.
Page 3
4.1.3
The above ground infrastructure at this site is likely to comprise a ventilation column 10m high and 3m diameter, a ventilation building 5m x 15m x 5m high and a 20m x 10m top structure with openings. The top structure is to provide access and egress into the main shaft and flap valve chamber.
b
4.1.4
The top structures are envisaged to be finished at a level of 107m tunnel datum (TD) (7mAOD), and since the ground level mean value at this site is 104mTD (4mAOD), the top structures would be raised to approximately 3m above the current ground level. For further information on the generic layout of this top structure, refer to Appendix 8. A hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. The site would not be fenced. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) frequency of visits 1 daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional 1 week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per 10 years that could be night/day/weekend working. 1 van visit every six months. An additional 1 week period of 2 to 10 movements per day (estimated several vans and 2 cranes) every 10 years.
4.1.5 4.1.6
No of traffic movements
4.2 4.2.1
Restoration and after-use The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works. If any buildings were demolished, these would not be reinstated unless required. ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT Access This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2. Road
5 5.1 5.1.1
5.1.2
The site can be reached via an existing road, Dormay Street, which is directly off the A217 (Armoury Way). The site can also be accessed from Frogmore. Dormay Street leads to the local authority maintenance depot. It is expected that this road would be busy at certain hours of the day. For both the construction and operational phases, the site can be reached via the existing depot entrance at Dormay Street or Frogmore.
5.1.3
It was anticipated that the ventilation column at shaft sites would be 10m high when the assessment in this report was undertaken. Although this was subsequently changed to 15m high, the assessment was not revised as it was considered that the difference would not change any disciplines conclusion on the suitability of the site. b It was anticipated that the elevation of top structures at both CSO and shaft sites would be finished at 107mTD when the assessment in this report was undertaken. Although this was subsequently changed to 104.5mTD, the assessment was not revised as it was considered that the difference would not change any disciplines conclusion on the suitability of the site.
Page 4
Rail 5.1.4 There is no rail network local to this site. However, rail access is not considered to be a significant factor for CSO sites. River 5.1.5 River access and jetty/wharfage facilities are not a requirement for CSO sites. However, as the site is adjacent to a creek, it may be feasible to deliver and take away materials by barge to this site. This would, however, be difficult as it is a narrow creek, subject to significant tidal movements. Construction works considerations The site is currently used as a local authority maintenance depot. Demolition of part of a vehicle shed would be required. Settlement assessments and monitoring of existing buildings that would remain operational would be required to assess the impact of the shaft construction on them. Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities show that the only items in this area of concern are Frogmore Depot and surrounding warehouses, the river wall to the north and rail track on the outside northern part of the site. The rail track is approximately 70m from the drop shaft and it is unlikely that there would be any significant impact on it. Construction methods would be adopted as appropriate to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme. The interception chamber and connection culvert to the drop shaft are both within the site and therefore require no additional consideration. Permanent works considerations The top structures to the drop shaft and flap valve chamber would be 2m above ground level. Health and safety The site is a maintenance depot and there may be underground fuel tanks present. In addition, there is the possibility of contaminated ground from the sites previous use as a dye works. There are no other unusual health and safety issues with this site. PLANNING ASSESSMENT Introduction The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments.
5.2 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3
5.2.4 5.2.5
5.3 5.3.1
5.4 5.4.1
5.4.2 6 6.1 6.1.1
Page 5
6.2 6.2.1
Planning applications and permissions An initial desktop search of the London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database returned the following planning applications submitted applicable to the site. Planning permission was granted in February 2006 for the relocation and alteration of the access to Frogmore Complex. Prior to that in 2004, planning permission was granted for the erection of a four-storey building providing amenity facilities for the depot on the ground floor, with three upper floors of open plan offices. There were subsequent submissions to discharge conditions attached to this approval. More recently, consent was granted in 2008 for a first-floor extension at the northern part of the office building to provide additional offices for neighbouring Wentworth House. Planning context The following is a summary of the relevant local planning policies and designations affecting the site, as extracted from the current statutory development plan for the borough. The development plan comprises the saved policies from the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003, and the Consolidated London Plan, adopted February 2008. Policy GEN15, Industrial Employment Areas 2008 the site falls within an industrial area that is safeguarded for industrial uses. Under Policy GEN15, the council will seek to retain employment land and maximise its use by safeguarding long established industrial areas. Policy TBE14, Archaeological Priority Area, states that where development involves ground disturbance, the council will require developers to undertake an archaeological investigation. The council may also, in accordance with Policy TBE15, require the preservation of findings either in situ or by excavation. Policy TBE10, Conservation Area a small proportion of the site is located within Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. Policy TBE 10 prohibits development which would harm the character, appearance and setting of a conservation area. Of relevance to the development, Policy TBE 11 advises that the council will only permit demolition within the conservation area where the structure makes no positive contribution. Policy TBE13, Listed Building Wentworth House, to the southern boundary of the site, is Grade II listed. Policy TBE13 indicates that development which would harm listed buildings or their settings will be resisted. Policy GEN12, Housing in determining proposals for development, the council will seek to protect and enhance the character and amenity of residential areas. Policy ON1, Open Space the site is adjacent to Bell Lane Creek, which is designated open space. The policy protects open space from development which would result in the loss of open space that contributes to the character and appearance of its surrounds or has potential to be used for recreational purposes. Policy ON7, Green Chain Links, restricts development that would harm the openness of any open land which contributes towards the Green Chain or link between open spaces, especially to Metropolitan Open Land and where land forms strategic links between boroughs. Consultation comments A series of consultations on the shortlisted sites were held with London local authorities, statutory and other pan-London stakeholders during July to September 2009 and January to March 2010. This section summarises factual comments that have been made by consultees, and which have informed the SSR assessments.
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.3 6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.3.4
6.3.5
6.3.6 6.3.7
6.3.8
6.4 6.4.1
Page 6
London Borough of Wandsworth 6.4.2 The council stated that a local authority maintenance depot is located on the site which is used for maintenance, storage and engineering and operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The depot has 350 staff working at the site at any one time (requiring parking and access), and highways vehicles, special needs buses and an emergency response team all travel in and out of the site. The council own the land on the other side of the creek but access is privately owned. The council commented that the Environment Agency (EA) have been working to return the creek to its natural state and to remove the collapsed weir (near to the River Thames). The EA has placed structures into the creek and a dam to close it up. They require a minimum width for river and waterway access. English Heritage 6.4.3 English Heritage advised that the boundary of C07AB needs to be checked. Environment Agency 6.4.4 No comment. Port of London Authority 6.4.5 No comment. Transport for London 6.4.6 No comment. Other statutory consultees 6.4.7 6.5 6.5.1 No comment. Planning comments A number of planning designations are applicable both on and adjacent to the site. These designations have been identified and described in Section 6.3. The designations of most relevance to the proposed development relate to heritage and the safeguarding of employment land. The site is within an established employment area. Use of the site would result in the loss of employment space. This is not considered to be detrimental to the viability of the area as a whole, in that the site could be returned to employment use post completion of the Thames Tunnel construction works. Nevertheless, it is recognised that the existing council depot has a high level of use and that a need for alternative provision of facilities would be likely for existing businesses affected by the proposed site, to avoid them being extinguished. The proposed CSO working area is located approximately 100m from the nearest residential properties along Frogmore. This separation distance is likely to be considered sufficient to safeguard residential amenity from associated construction impacts, particularly given the wider industrial character of the surrounding area. Part of the proposal site falls within the northernmost part of Wandsworth Town Conservation Area and is in close proximity to the Grade II listed building Wentworth House. However, it is considered that, with appropriate mitigation, potential effects on appearance and setting could be minimised. A further assessment of heritage considerations is included in Section 7. The site falls within a designated archaeological priority area. Adequate site investigation requirements should be agreed with the LPA in accordance with policies TBE14 and TBE15. Further appraisal of the archaeological potential of the site is provided in Section 7 of this report.
6.5.2
6.5.3
6.5.4
6.5.5
Page 7
6.5.6
The site is located adjacent to Bell Lane Creek, a designated area of open space. Use of the site should not result in loss of the designated area and suitable mitigation measures should protect against potential adverse impacts from the construction works. ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL Introduction The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental Appraisal Tables. Transport The site is suitable in transport terms, although it would require a temporary construction and permanent site access. A temporary priority working system would be required to enable construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street, although road access route to the TLRN (A217) is otherwise unconstrained. Use of rail is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of material that CSO sites produce. If required, rail access route at Clapham Junction passes through a high street area, with no other visible restrictions. River access is not required for a CSO site as excavated material will be transported away by road to the main site. There is the possibility for the workforce to use public transport to access the site. Parking could be provided onsite for the workforce but there is no available parking nearby due to the double yellow lines along both sides of Dormay Street. Temporary traffic management would be required to construct the site access and install the priority working on Dormay Street. Archaeology Based on current information, this site is suitable as there are no records of archaeological remains being present on the site. However, the nature and extent of archaeological receptors cannot be confidently predicted because of the lack of previous investigations in the area, and it is possible that archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present. Peat deposits containing archaeological material have been commonly recorded throughout London in a similar proximity to the River Thames. Given the location of the site, and wider evidence for historical occupation along the river, it is a reasonable assumption to suggest that waterlogged remains of archaeological value may be present. Built heritage and townscape The site is suitable as the works would have only a limited impact upon the built heritage environment and the local townscape character. There would be the potential for indirect impacts on the following local receptors: Wandsworth Town Conservation Area, one Grade II listed building (Wentworth House), the character of Bell Lane Creek and some local views. Mitigation, including a high quality scheme design and/or screening, would reduce any adverse impacts. Water resources hydrogeology and surface water In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable as the drop shaft would be constructed in London Clay (non-aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head would be approximately 6.1 metres above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected, and the superficial deposits are alluvium, which is classified as a minor aquifer at the shaft site. There would be a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to the use of a diaphragm wall or caissons.
7 7.1 7.1.1
7.2 7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.3 7.3.1
7.3.2
7.4 7.4.1
7.5 7.5.1
Page 8
7.5.2
In terms of surface water resources, this site is suitable as there is no direct route for pollution to the Bell Lane Creek. Standard mitigation will be required in line with Pollution Prevention Guidelines (PPG) 1 and 5 and Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 23. Ecology This site is suitable and it may require only basic ecological surveys if selected. Flood risk The site is suitable because the site is defended to a one in 1,000-year flood level. There would be space onsite for SuDS, although an investigation would be required to determine the suitability of infiltration SuDS. Air quality This site is suitable as there is only low potential that fugitive emissions of dust during construction would have a perceptible impact at residential receptors closest to the site. Any impacts could be minimised with standard dust control measures. There would be a potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts. However, this could be mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours. Noise This site is suitable due to the distance between the site and the nearest residential properties. In addition, it is likely that there would be a low noise impact from the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and with the proposed access route, as there are very few residential properties located on Dormay Street and Armoury Way. Land quality
7.6 7.6.1 7.7 7.7.1
7.8 7.8.1
7.9 7.9.1
7.10
7.10.1 The site is less suitable as there is a high risk that contamination of the site has occurred, owing to a former dye works, depot and laundry works being located on and in the vicinity of the site. 7.10.2 This potential contamination could impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact and volatilisation exposure pathways. There is potential for contamination of surface water receptors which could occur through the migration of contaminants through the shallow (ie, River Terrace Gravel) aquifer. 8 8.1 8.1.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT Socio-economic profile The site is within the Fairfield ward of the London Borough of Wandsworth. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following indicators for the ward, in comparison to the rest of Wandsworth, London and England as a whole: A higher rate of full time employees and self-employed people A higher rate of employment in professional occupations Substantially higher proportion of people educated to Level 4/5 (degree level) Fewer people aged 19 or under, or 45 and over, (with comparably more people in their twenties and thirties) Approximately 82% people are white and around 75% of people were born in the UK A higher proportion of residents reporting a good state of health.
Page 9
8.1.2
Overall, this socio-economic profile of the area suggests that the population has a majority of young professionals. Issues and impacts Due to the proposed location of the CSO engineering works, the greatest impact of the sites use appears likely to be on the employees of Wandsworth council currently working onsite. The loss of any built facilities onsite, or impact on the workings of the maintenance depot, may have an impact on the viability of its current use which could affect the local economy. The surrounding industrial premises appear unlikely to be significantly impacted by the use of the site. There are no residential properties which appear likely to be significantly impacted by the sites use. There is some indication of improvements to the creek further towards the River Thames to connect the Causeway to Enterprise Way, although there does not appear to be any public access to the creek in close proximity to the site. The proposed location of the after-use structures appears to suggest the loss of an existing building onsite; otherwise, their presence should not significantly impact on the sites continued use as a maintenance depot. PROPERTY ASSESSMENT Introduction The site comprises part of the local authority transport and maintenance depot close to Wandsworth town centre. Crown Land and Special Land comments The land is owned by the London Borough of Wandsworth and therefore it may be classified as Special Land under Section 17 of the Acquisition of Land Act 1981. However, Section 17 does not apply where the body acquiring the land is a statutory undertaker. As Thames Water is a statutory undertaker, Section 17 will not apply to London Tideway Tunnels. However, Section 16 of the Act will apply and provides that land may not be acquired unless the Minister is satisfied that there will be no detriment to the operations of the owner, or that the land can be replaced. Therefore, the compulsory purchase may be subject to a Ministerial procedure. Contact should be made with the owner as soon as possible to establish if an acquisition can be agreed. Land to be acquired The compensation assessment assumes that the worksite within the council depot will be acquired temporarily via the acquisition of new rights for the period of the works stated in the engineering section. A right of way to the worksite will be required from Dormay Street. The operational phase will require the permanent acquisition of an area in the north of the site within the council depot, with dimensions of approximately 20m by 20m. A right of way to enable access to the above freehold will need to be acquired via the main gate to the depot fronting Dormay Street. Property valuation comments The site forms part of an operational council depot. The depot is included in the 2005 Rating List with a rateable value of 248,000.
8.2 8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.3
8.2.4
9 9.1 9.1.1
9.2 9.2.1
9.3 9.3.1
9.3.2 9.3.3 9.3.4
9.4 9.4.1
Page 10
9.4.2
Planning permission was granted in 2004 for a four-storey building providing amenity facilities for the depot on the ground floor, with three upper floors of open plan offices. The site has redevelopment potential for employment based uses. The land will be reinstated after the works are complete, as a part of the engineering works, and therefore reinstatement costs are not included in the compensation assessment. The acquisition costs of the site have been assessed on a diminution in value basis for the temporary occupation during works and access rights for operational purposes, and on a market value basis for the permanent acquisition. The costs are likely to be relatively low and therefore acceptable. Disturbance compensation comments The site is occupied by the council and is used for vehicle storage as part of the depot operations. The council may therefore claim the cost of temporary relocation for the period of the works. This cost is likely to be acceptable. The site is close to the main depot entrance, and it will be important to ensure that access to the depot is maintained at all times in order to minimise the claim for disturbance. Offsite statutory compensation comments There should be limited potential for offsite statutory compensation under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965, as there is unlikely to be any physical interference with public or private property rights, provided access is maintained to neighbouring properties on Dormay Street. There should also be limited potential for claims under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, as the completed works are unlikely to result in diminution in value to property. Discretionary purchase costs comments The terms and conditions of the discretionary scheme have not yet been finalised and therefore it is not possible to come to a view on the level of discretionary purchase costs. However, the site is surrounded by other industrial properties and therefore there is little potential for discretionary purchase costs. The construction details section of the report states that working hours will be 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday to Saturday, for a period of up to two years. The fact that work will be within normal working hours should significantly limit the potential for discretionary purchases. Site acquisition cost assessment The statutory acquisition costs are likely to be acceptable. SITE CONCLUSIONS BY DISCIPLINE Introduction
9.4.3 9.4.4
9.5 9.5.1
9.5.2
9.6 9.6.1
9.6.2
9.7 9.7.1
9.7.2
9.8 9.8.1 10 10.1
10.1.1 The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment , and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion on whether the site moves forward as one of the preferred sites or not. 10.2 Engineering
10.2.1 This site is suitable as a CSO site because it has good vehicular access and is of adequate size. The shaft can be constructed in close proximity to the combined sewer.
Page 11
10.3
Planning
10.3.1 On balance, the site is considered suitable for use as a CSO site. 10.3.2 The proposal site is unlikely to have an unacceptable impact upon residential amenity and appropriate mitigation should reduce potential impacts on the identified heritage designations. The site is within an established employment area and the loss of an existing employment use would require policy justification. There may be a requirement to relocate existing business facilities and this would require further investigation. 10.4 Environment
10.4.1 Overall, the site is suitable as a CSO site, although mitigation will be required to enable the site to be used. 10.4.2 Based on current information, the site is suitable from the perspectives of transport, archaeology, water resources (hydrogeology and surface water), flood risk, ecology, air quality, noise, built heritage and townscape. 10.4.3 This site is considered less suitable from the perspective of land quality. 10.4.4 Overall, the site is considered suitable, subject to further investigation of whether land quality impacts can be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations will include: Land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this high risk site) and/or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ. 10.5 Socio-economic and community
10.5.1 From a community impacts perspective, the use of this site appears suitable for CSO connection works. Its use is likely to have some impact on the sites current use as a maintenance depot, but this should be mitigable. 10.5.2 The site is adjacent to industrial buildings, which are unlikely to be greatly affected by the use of the site. The Bell Lane Creek adjacent to the site does not appear to be used by the public and is surrounded by industrial land and a railway line. No other potential sensitive receptors were identified in close proximity to the site. 10.6 Property
10.6.1 This site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site. 10.6.2 The advantage of the site is as follows: The acquisition costs should be acceptable. 10.6.3 The disadvantages of the site are as follows: The site is owned by the council and therefore the acquisition may be subject to a Ministerial procedure. The acquisition will result in business disturbance to the depot operation, although the uses on the site should be capable of temporary relocation.
Page 12
Site Suitability Report C07AB - Appendices
APPENDICES
Page 13
Site Suitability Report C07AB Appendix 1
APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Engineering Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail Scott Wilson Access River BMT Third Parties (Shafts/CSOs) Mott MacDonald and AECOM Geology Thames Water Utilities Thames Water and AECOM Construction and Operational Layout Template London Tideway Tunnels Background Technical Paper London Tideway Tunnels
Planning London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003 Consolidated London Plan, adopted February 2008
Environment Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) - www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east - www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans - www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores - Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map - www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring - www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes - www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides, 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency Built heritage and townscape Wandsworth List of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record - for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plans Local authority websites Bing maps Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors
Appendix 1 - Page 1
Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan - www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb - http://wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/pages/londonmap.html National Biodiversity Network - http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps - aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats - www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales - www.ukbap.org.uk Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck Air quality Local authority websites www.londonair.org.uk/london/asp/default.asp?la_id=&showbulletins=&width=1680 http://www.airquality.co.uk Noise Envirocheck - Identification of receptors Promap - Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap - Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps - Identification of existing noise levels Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information
Socio-economic and community Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data Wandsworth Council Community Safety http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/CommunityServices/CommunitySafety/CSD+ Contacts.htm http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/CommunityServices/Businesssupport/ default.htm Appendix 1 - Page 2
Wandsworth Council Bell Lane Creek bridge http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/EnvironmentandTransport/PlanningService/ Majordev/riverside.htm
Property Mouchel referencing data Rating records from VOA Web site Promap Multimap/Live Maps Dun & Bradstreet Focus
Appendix 1 - Page 3
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN
Appendix 2 - Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL N
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
Area of Main Map
&
AF T
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites
! (
CSO (Directly Controlled)
CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO
! (
C07AB
0 50 100
200 Metres 300 400
WANDSWORTH
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (c) Crown copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way.
CS07B Frogmore Storm Relief - Buckhold Road CSO
! (
Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00610 Date : .............2009/12/08 Projection : .....British National Grid
Thames Water Utilities

MAJOR PROJECTS
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
APPENDIX 2 C07AB SITES SITE LOCATION PLAN
APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS
Appendix 3 - Page 1
TI AL
EN
FI D
M
Works
3
11
5.8m
M
Goods Shed
Mean High Water
Works
Bell Lane Creek
CCLW
&
AF T
5.7m
CCLW
M M
SA
CR
M M
28
M M
SB
M M
Works
M M
M M
M M
M M
Mean Hig h Water
Co Boro
26
NO
RT
Warehouse
Mud
22
Adelaide Centre
Works
25
Warehouse
! (
MH
Mud

ee Cr k
27
Bell L
Mud
Mean High Water
Bridges
Pipe
ane C
WANDSWORTH
15
40
Depot
reek
Mud
Chy
C07AB
Depot
r Mean Hig h Wate
MLW
MLW
Sluice
4.9m
Hilden House
46
WB
AY
El Sub Sta
The Roche School

1
OG FR
MO
RE
7
Works
T HE
CAU
El Sub Sta
SE W
WANDSWORTH
1 to
8 to
13
61
Works
Works
21
11
London Court
4 1 to 12 9 to
Car Park El Sub Sta

to 2 5
1 to
Works
63
Works
Works
idg Pi pe Br
10
DW
Vauxhall Court
7 to
Wo rks
Rive
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
1 to 8
21
1 to
6.2m
20
1 to
12
49
AR
M
13
Studios
M
4.8m
Salvation Army Citadel
Child Guida nce Unit
MO
1 to 10
47
PH
AY YW UR
1 to
12
1 to
45
32
41
to 1 6
43
1 to
1 to
51
16
to
24
25
ID BR
31
16
La Cou rt
z Br a
m beth
o il H
1 to
1 to
24
37 to
42
AR EP
to 30
us
l m il dle Mid ous e H
26
ndle
r Wa
8 1 to 28
30
lt Bo
H ing
ous
5.0m
12
Vin e
8
1 to
6 to
1 to
to
36
to 11
e ls Ch
16
8 5 to 16 to
Ct ea
13
nd Wi
so
rC
ou
rt
20
14 to 1 9
ARM
22
20
WAY Y OUR
5.0m
We
1 to 6
st m
ins
te r
Ct
Brewers House
s Ho u e
ers F u ll e s Ho u
16
PH
M
4.1m
6.3m
M
Stables
Horse Exercise Area
24
LB
M
WANDSW ORTH PLAIN
HP
AS
GE
Bd W ard ns t &
Gas Holder
Gas Holder
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or Garage abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way.
2
M
4.8m
38
36
34
13 14
M SHO REHAM
Works
El Sub Sta
Switch House
5.2m
Town Centres River Walks
20
20
El Sub Sta
Boro Cons &tWard Bdy
Mud
15
19
14
EN TE RP
Y RIS E WA
FB
FB
Weir
Legend
El Sub Sta
Bell Lane
OS IE RS A RO D
Cr eek
Thames Policy Area
U SM GG
Cable Bridge
M
Mud
Cable Bridge
Industrial Area
Area of Main Map
LE RS W AY
Mixed Use Areas
Industrial Employment Areas 2008 Site Allocations Document Sites

MP 5
M M
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled)
Viaduct
Delta Park
Bell Lane Creek
Riv
Mud 4.6m
a nd er W le
! (
E TH CA EW US
Bell Lane
AY
20
10
18
4d
4a
D SU LO W A RO D
29
30
31
10
20
34
40
60
80
Metres
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (c) Crown copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
D SU LO W A RO D
51
15
R DO
ST RE ET MAY
This plan is a strategic and standardised overview based on an interpretation of GIS policy designation layers provided by affected London local authorities. Please refer to the text in the SSR's for the full planning and environment assessments.

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 3A C07AB SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN
30
24
to 20 22
C LO
SE
TI AL
19
EN
FI D
Mean High Water
Works
Bell Lane Creek
5.8m
11
Goods Shed
! !
Cable Bridge
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
Viaduct
! ! ! !
CCLW
CCLW
Works
&
! ! ! ! ! !
AF T
5.7m
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
y
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
SB
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
CR
! ! ! !
Mean Hig h Water
Co Boro
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
PH
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
MLW
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
MLW
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
8
26
T OR
HP
27
AS
SA
GE
!
Works Warehouse
! ! !
Mud !
!
MH W
22
Adelaide Centre
Works
25
Warehouse
! ! !
! Mud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! (

! ! ! !
ee Cr k
Bell ! !Lan ! e !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Mud
! Mean ! High ! Water ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Wo rks
WANDSWORTH
15
40
Depot
! ! ! !
Chy
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Creek
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Mud
Bridges ! !
Pipe
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
Sluice !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! C07AB ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Depot ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
r Mean Hig h Wate
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
4.9m! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
AY
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
e
Hilden House
46
WB
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
El Sub Sta
!
OG FR MO RE
7
!Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
T HE
CAU
El Sub Sta
SE W
! !
1 to 6
8 to 13
61
WANDSWORTH
The Roche School

1
! Works ! ! ! ! !
El Sub Sta
to 2 5
1 to
! Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
16
21
11
! ! !
! ! !
London Court
4 1 to 12 9 to
Car Park
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! Works ! !
63
! Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
20
! Works ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
idg Pi pe Br
! ! ! !
10
DW
Vauxhall Court
7 to
! ! !
!
1 to 8
! !
21
! ! !
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
1 to
6.2m
20
1 to
12
49
AR
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
13
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
4.8m
!Studios ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !

A RE H SH O MC LO S E
MO
1 to 10
47
PH
AY YW UR
1 to
12
1 to
45
32
41
to 1 6
43
1 to
1 to
51
16
to
24
25
ID BR
31
16
La Cou rt
z Br a
m beth
o il H
1 to
1 to
24
AR EP
to 30
us
30
lt Bo
H ing
ous
!
5.0m
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
WANDSW ORTH PLAIN
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
Rive
37 to
42
26
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
ndle
r Wa
8 1 to 28
1 to
6 to
12
1 to
to
36
to 11
e ls Ch
16
8 5 to 16 to
Ct ea
13
nd Wi
so
o rC
urt
20
14 to 1 9
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
22 !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! WAY RY MOU !AR! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
We
1 to 6
st m
ins
te r
Ct
Brewers House
se Ho u Vin e
! ! ! ! !
! 6.3m ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
5.0m
ers F u ll e s Ho u
! ! !
! ! 4.1m ! !
Horse Exercise Area
24
! LB
Stables
! ! ! ! ! !
Bd W ard ns t &
Gas Holder
Gas Holder
2
38
36
34
4.8m
13 14
Works
El Sub Sta
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Switch ! ! House
5.2m
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Riv
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Open Spaces Deficiency Areas

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
20
20
El Sub Sta
Mud
14
EN TE RP
Y RIS E WA
FB
FB
! !
15
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! Weir ! ! ! !
Legend
El Sub Sta
Bell Lane
OS IE RS A RO D
Cr eek
Green Corridor/Chains Open Spaces
U SM GG
Area of Main Map
LE RS W AY
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! Cable Bridge ! ! ! !
MP 5
! ! ! ! ! !
Mud
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
Legend
Delta Park
! ! ! !
! ! !
Bell Lane Creek
Mud
! !
a nd er W
4.6m
! (
le
E TH
CA
EW US
Bell Lane
28
AY
20
10
18
4d
4a
D SU LO W A RO D
29
30
31
10
20
34
40
60
80
Metres
D SU LO W A RO D
51
15
R DO
ST RE ET MAY

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 3B C07AB SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN
30
24
to 20 22
TI AL
19
EN
FI D
Mean High Water
Works
Bell Lane Creek
5.8m
11
Goods Shed
CCLW
Works
&
AF T
5.7m
CCLW
CR
Mean Hig h Water
Co Boro
26
NO
RT
Works
Warehouse
Mud
22
Adelaide Centre
Works
25
Warehouse
! (
MH
Mud

ee Cr k
27
Bell L
Mud
Mean High Water
Bridges
Pipe
ane C
WANDSWORTH
15
40
Depot
reek
Mud
Chy
C07AB
Depot
r Mean Hig h Wate
MLW
MLW
Sluice
4.9m
Hilden House
46
WB
AY
El Sub Sta
The Roche School

1
OG FR
MO
RE
7
Works
T HE
CAU
El Sub Sta
SE W
WANDSWORTH
1 to
8 to
13
61
Works
Works
!
Works
idg Pi pe Br e
21
11
London Court
4 1 to 12 9 to
Car Park El Sub Sta

to 2 5
1 to
Works
63
Works
10
DW
Vauxhall Court
7 to
Wo rks
Rive
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
1 to 8
21
1 to
6.2m
20
1 to
12
49
AR
Studios
13
4.8m

A RE H SH O MC LO S E
MO
1 to 10
47
PH
AY YW UR
1 to
12
1 to
45
32
41
to 1 6
43
1 to
1 to
51
16
to
24
25
ID BR
31
16
La Cou rt
z Br a
m beth
o il H
1 to
1 to
24
37 to
42
AR EP
to 30
us
26
ndle
r Wa
8 1 to 28
30
lt Bo
H ing
ous
5.0m
12
Vin e
8
1 to
6 to
1 to
to
36
to 11
e ls Ch
16
8 5 to 16 to
Ct ea
13
nd Wi
so
rC
ou
rt
20
14 to 1 9
ARM
22
20
WAY Y OUR
5.0m
We
1 to 6
st m
ins
te r
Ct
Brewers House
s Ho u e
16
PH
6.3m
ers F u ll e s Ho u
4.1m
LB
Horse Exercise Area
24
Stables
HP
AS
SA
GE
Bd W ard ns t &
Gas Holder
Gas Holder
2
38
36
34
4.8m
13 14
WANDSW ORTH PLAIN
SB
Works
El Sub Sta
Switch House
5.2m
Listed Buildings
20
20
El Sub Sta
Mud
14
15
EN TE RP
Y RIS E WA
FB
FB
Weir
El Sub Sta
Legend
Listed Buildings Archaeological Areas Conservation Areas
U SM GG
Bell Lane
OS IE RS A RO D
Cr eek
Area of Main Map
LE RS W AY
Cable Bridge Mud
Cable Bridge
Legend
Delta Park
Viaduct
MP 5
Bell Lane Creek
Riv
Mud 4.6m
a nd er W le
! (
E TH CA EW US
Bell Lane
28
AY
20
10
18
4d
4a
D SU LO W A RO D
29
30
31
10
20
34
40
60
80
Metres
D SU LO W A RO D
51
15
R DO
ST RE ET MAY

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 3C C07AB SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT HERITAGE PLAN
30
24
to 20 22
APPENDIX 4 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS
Appendix 4 - Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
Area of Main Map
AF T
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled)
&
! (
! (
C07AB
0 25 50
WANDSWORTH
100
150
200
Metres

MAJOR PROJECTS
! (
Title:
APPENDIX 4 C07AB SITE AERIAL PLAN
View of the entrance of the site looking west from Dormay Street.
View across the site looking towards the northwest from Dormay Street.
Appendix 4
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN
Appendix 5 - Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
&
Legend
Area of Main Map
AF T
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled) Transport Access Routes TfL Road Network Thames Path
! (
London Cycle Routes

C07AB
Narrow road
0 40 80 160
! (
Meters
240
320
400
WANDSWORTH
! (
Map Ref : ........... 101PL-SS-00738 Date : ................. 2009/11/19 Projection : ......... British National Grid

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 5 C07AB SITE TRANSPORT PLAN
APPENDIX 6 SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN
Appendix 6 - Page 1
1
Chapelier
2
House
4 N
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
1202 1252 WO
Milliners House
GEOLOGY
8250 8201 150mm
Keyplan:
AWAITING OS DATA
3133 1251 1201 ZBV030273 N.B.THIS MAIN TO BE ABANDONED
WORK IN PROGRESS
N
4.4m
POSITION AND LAYOUT OF MAINS AND ASSETS NOT CONFIRMED Ground level 3092 104 (m OD + 100)
Mud
DRAWING LOCATION
4201
Riverside House
PH Mud
7250 100(m OD + 100) Base of Made Ground and Superficial 7101

WB
PROPOSED #9599 W/R# 42QRPT
A
40 YARDS 6" MAIN LAID 31-7-69
3103
3104 7150 5703 NF 3102

Bol
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE

WB
SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 3096 DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
6.7m
WO 2101 5832 WO
1 to 26 Mud
WO 6103 4" WO EV 6102 6104

4.4m
Suggested invert level of shaft 71.89(m OD + 100) 8150 COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
6101
2102 3134 1101

Weir
2905 8152
3274
El Sub Sta Works Switch Factory Works 6.4m El Sub Sta 5.2m El Sub Sta
NOTES SWANDON WAY WANDSWORTH SPS SWANP4ZZ 1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES. 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN.BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE.
3097
Base of London Clay Formation 54(m OD + 100) 8101
WO NF
5.8m
House
3101
Goods Shed
15"STEEL TUBE RENEWED <---24-9-36
450mm VALVE WO AND 100mm BY-PASS
7153
7007 0.75" AP 7005 7004

4.8m
3093
RELAID DEC 1938 1002 1001 1003 1004 APPROX 90 YARDS
Works
7006
FH
3001
Cable Bridge
Cable Bridge
7003
Base of Lambeth Group 33(m OD + 100)

S Br
Mud 5.7m
2001 WO
NF 3135
5.0m 1005
7050 Base of Thanet Sand Formation

Delta Park
S Br Mud
LEGEND
FOUL WATER
6943
22(m OD + 100)
5705
4.9m SB
3098 3117
4.6m
8001
SURFACE WATER
OSV 3118 WO 3136 3005 3004
3003
3002 FH
4001 7002 WO 7001 SITE BOUNDARY 6944 Chalk
CLEAN WATER
GAS
Works
FIBRE OPTICS
Works Gas Holder
TELECOMMUNICATIONS 3089 8902 HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES
1907 1906 SE
2902
3903
LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
WO
FV
0402 EXISTING TUNNELS
3904 3139 2901 3902
4905
3/4" AP
FV
SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING PURPOSES
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WATER - ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
C07AB
3122 5901 DBV006076 7901 3102
STORM & FOUL SEWERS
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS: TELECOMS ELECTRICITY - ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES - LOW PRESSURE ABOVE 300mm DIAMETER - INTERMEDIATE, MEDIUM OR HIGH PRESSURE 200mm 10 m 0 100 m SCALE 1 : 1000 WO AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
2909 SE
WO 3" 3905
DBV006075 4901ZBV030269
8914 VMH
3137 3901 3119 4806
C07AF
WO 6801
PROPOSED WIMBLEDON TO KENSAL GREEN CABLE TUNNEL DBV006074 WM 0407 3094 8803 4505
GAS
3803
ZBV030270 2805 WO 2804 2851 2806 2852 2801 5803 WO 4803 4802 ZBV030268 3131 WO ZBV030267 WO 7804
VC
3140
VC 7807 SE
1801 1850 2850 3120 3802 3801 2803 3121 4804 4801 WO 7802
AC
8802
6802 SE
7805 VMH
BD 7801 3106 NF 8801 NF GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 31-07-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
ZBV030272 WO 6088 2703 2751
VC WO ZBV030266
8805
100
OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
3702 1701 6009 1750 WO VC 7703 WO 3130 5703 5702 WO 4489 26 YDS 4" MAIN LAID 22-10-64 GUAR NO 6438 7702
3111
8703
Location Code:
D
0337 ZBV030271 2750
VT
3703
N/A
Project Group:
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
Location / Town:
WASTE LONDON N/A 50

Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
2702 6089
WO 3701
6704
Site Name: Project Name:
4704 3104 DRAIN PIT NOW IN ROAD 5701 7701 IL-2.17m
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

Drawing Title:
4701 WO
SU 4703 4702 SE 3129 SE

EV DC
WW
DETAILS OF DIVERSIONS
6702
7606 7605 7604
SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN C07AB

Drawing No.:
PS
IL-2.13m
4613 VT
PLOTTED ON 04\12\09 BY Andy.Purdy LOCATION : Thames Tideway Tunnel x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\CS07A\100-DL-PNC-C07AB-146001.dgn
VT DC
WO
6614
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
LVHTCABGWF
SWFGTLV
100-DL-PNC-C07AB-146001
1:1000
A1
AB
150
FH
2812 SE
2811 VMH
VC WO
SW
WFGT
APPENDIX 7 CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT
Appendix 7 - Page 1
APPENDIX 8 OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT
Appendix 8 - Page 1
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
VENTILATION COLUMN (CSO)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE WEIR (LOCKABLE) DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
NOTE:
4m
3m
6m
1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE. 2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. GROUND LEVEL
10000
5m
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
1m DIA
SCALE 1:50
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE CSO SHAFTS ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (CSO)
- - - - - - 1500 - - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS

Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
60
2000
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE LONDON N/A 50

Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:25
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - CSO SITES
Drawing No.:
PLOTTED ON
04\12\09
BY
Andy.Purdy
LOCATION :
Thames Tideway Tunnel
x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000001.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
100-DH-GEN-00000-000001
NTS
A1
AB
100
150
200mm
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
APPENDIX 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL TABLES
Transport Site considerations Access to road network Comments Site accesses onto Dormay Street from the Frogmore Complex which is opposite the Keltbray construction business. A new temporary construction and permanent access would require construction. Dormay Street is subject to a 30mph speed limit, is street lit and features double yellow lines along its extent on both sides. It has a carriageway width of 8m which reduces to 4.2m in width through a narrow road section. A visibility splay of 90m is achievable to the south from the construction site access. Visibility to the north can be achieved to the end of the road (approximately 20m), Access to the A217 (TLRN strategic highway network) approximately 80m to the south using Dormay Street. A priority working system would be required to allow construction vehicles to pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. See Transport Access Plan in Appendix 5. Access to river River access not required for CSO site. River access not required as excavated material would be transported away by road. Use of rail unlikely to be required as CSO sites produce small quantities of excavated material. Route to possible rail link at Clapham Junction runs through a high street area along St Johns Hill and under two rail bridges with no visible restrictions in addition to the constraints encountered upon accessing the TLRN (A217). Mitigation required and conclusions Conclusion: Road access to site likely to be suitable for HGVs, with the installation of a priority working system to allow construction vehicles to pass safely along the narrow section on Dormay Street for TLRN (A217) access. A new temporary construction and permanent access would require construction. On street parking along Dormay Street prevented by double yellow lines along both sides.
Access to rail
Use of rail is unlikely to be required due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. Access to existing railway sidings at Clapham Junction from the TLRN (A217) onto the gyratory between the A217 and A3205 turning onto the A214. The route then leads onto East Hill following onto St Johns Hill before turning onto Plough Road for the Clapham Junction, Traincare Depot railway sidings.
Appendix 9 - Page 1
Transport Site considerations Comments The route contains the same constraints as the route to the TLRN (A217), in addition to passing under two rail bridges (on Swandon Way and Trinity Road) with no visible restrictions and through a high street area along St Johns Hill. Distance 2.5km to rail access point from site. Parking Some parking could be provided within the site boundary for workforce. No parking is available within the vicinity of the site as Dormay Street has continuous double yellow lines along both sides. PTAL 3-4 (Medium) as identified within Table 2.3. A new temporary construction and permanent site access would require construction. Priority working system required to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow road section (4.2m wide) on Dormay Street. Unclear whether Keltbray would continue to use their current construction site access, or whether this would be relocated. Mitigation required and conclusions Clapham Junction railway sidings at the Traincare Depot accessible using Plough Road.
Some parking for workforce to be provided within site boundary with no parking available in vicinity of the site.
Public transport accessibility
Possibility for workforce to use public transport to access the site. A new temporary construction and permanent site access would require construction. Temporary traffic management required in the form of a priority working system to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street.
Traffic Management
Summary: The site is suitable as a CSO site, although it would require the construction of a temporary construction and permanent site access. A temporary priority working system would be required to enable construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street although road access route to the TLRN (A217) is otherwise unconstrained. Use of rail is unlikely to be required due to the small quantities of material that CSO sites produce. If required, rail access route at Clapham Junction passes through a high street area with no other visible restrictions. River access is not required for a CSO site as excavated material would be transported away by road to main site. Possibility for workforce to utilise public transport to access the site. Parking could be provided onsite for the workforce but there is no available parking nearby due to the double yellow lines along both sides of Dormay Street. Temporary traffic management would be required to construct the site access and install the priority working on Dormay Street.
Appendix 9 - Page 2
Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including Archaeological Priority Areas Summary of historical uses Comments The site is within the Wandsworth Archaeological Priority Area Historic Mapping show development of several small buildings from the 1868 OS map to present Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected
No archaeological receptors are recorded within the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of high value being within the site. No archaeological receptors are recorded within the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of medium value being within the site None recorded
Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected
Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected
Extent of existing disturbance (if known)
The construction of the existing combined sewer pipeline is likely to have adversely impacted archaeological receptors for a localised area. Boreholes in the vicinity indicate up to 4m of made ground Otherwise geotechnical data is currently insufficient to assess below ground conditions. Detailed design proposals, and an outline method statement would be required to enable initial assessment of development impacts, and to inform mitigation proposals. With the currently available information it is not possible to highlight specific potential issues.
Potential issues
Mitigation methods could include: Desk based assessment Production of deposits model Archaeological monitoring of geotechnical investigations Archaeological evaluation
Appendix 9 - Page 3
Archaeology Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions Archaeological watching brief Archaeological excavation. Summary: Based on current information this site is suitable as a CSO site because there are no records of archaeological remains being present on this site. However the lack of previous investigations in the area the nature and extent of archaeological receptors cannot be confidently predicted and it is possible that archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present. Peat deposits containing archaeological material have been commonly recorded throughout London in a similar proximity to the River Thames. Given the location of the site, and wider evidence for historical occupation along the river, it is a reasonable assumption to suggest waterlogged remains of archaeological value may be present.
Appendix 9 - Page 4
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including Conservation Areas, including trees Comments Listed Buildings Wentworth House with forecourt wall, gate and gatepiers, Grade II: 35m 1-6 Church Row, Grade II*: 205m 7, 8 and 9 Church Row, Grade II: 170m Church of All Saints, Wandsworth High Street, Grade II*: 210m 22-24 Putney Bridge Road, Grade II: 235m 140-142 Wandsworth High Street, Grade II: 250m Locally Listed Buildings There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of C07AB. Conservation Areas Wandsworth Town Conservation Area: 0m Registered Historic Parks & Garden There are no registered historic parks and gardens within 250m of C07AB. Locally Listed Parks and Gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens with 250m of C07AB. Protected Views There are no protected views within 250m of C07AB. Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected The Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area has the potential to be directly affected as C07AB partially lies within the boundaries of the conservation area and the development would involve the demolition of some existing (but non-designated) buildings. Mitigation in the form of a high quality and sensitive scheme design and/or screening would be required to ensure that the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of listed buildings and conservation areas, a high quality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment in conjunction with archaeology work would be required to further determine the likely impact of the development and to inform more detailed mitigation proposals. On the basis of currently available information (June 2009) and on the basis of certain receptors not being present within 250m of C07AB, mitigation would not be applicable in the case of locally listed buildings, registered historic parks and gardens, locally listed parks and gardens and protected views.
Appendix 9 - Page 5
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Comments Not Applicable Mitigation required and conclusions Not Applicable
There is the potential for 6 listed buildings (two Grade II* and four Grade II listed) to be indirectly affected through changes to their setting.
Of the 6 listed buildings within 250m of C07AB, five do not share a visual relationship with C07AB reflecting the built up character of the area. Consequently it is unlikely that development at the site would result in an impact upon the setting of these listed buildings and mitigation is therefore unlikely to be required. However, Wentworth House (Grade II listed) is visible from C07AB and the development may therefore affect the setting of this listed building. Mitigation in the form of a high quality scheme design and/or screening may be required to reduce the visual intrusiveness of the site upon Wentworth House.
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Whole site in Industrial Employment Area. Industrial site (maintenance depot) with one shed and one small building. Bell Lane Creek to the north and east, warehouses with some residential properties to the west, majority industrial units with some residential properties to the south. Demolition of shed and building onsite would increase openness of site. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would result in temporary, minimal, direct, adverse impact on the character of the site and temporary, Appendix 9 - Page 6
Introduction of landscape scheme to include appropriate surface treatments and planting to relate to adjacent Bell Lane Creek. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings onsite would have negligible impact on the character of the site. This site is, therefore, suitable.
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments indirect adverse impacts on the neighbouring areas Potential views likely to be affected Open views from Bell Lane Creek and adjacent warehouses. Partially interrupted views from the surrounding residential properties and industrial units. Views of cranes from surrounding residences along Frogmore and Sudlow Roads. During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting. Design of top structure, vent column, and electrical kiosk to be given careful consideration. Planting to screen permanent plant. The visual amenity would be adversely impacted upon by the presence of cranes during construction. However, this site is suitable since there would be minimal permanent change in views. Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required The direct impact of permanent structures upon the character or appearance Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and the setting of one listed building would need to be carefully considered. Any permanent structures would need to be of a high quality design in order that their visual intrusiveness is minimised and, in particular, so that they preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area in accordance with planning policy and English Heritage guidance. Screening of permanent structures may also be required to reduce any visual intrusiveness of the site upon the conservation area. Mitigation through scheme design and/or screening would reduce the visual impact of the development upon the setting of the Grade II listed Wentworth House. Potential issues Although there are numerous built heritage receptors within 250m of C07AB only the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and one listed building have the potential to experience any form of Appendix 9 - Page 7
Mitigation required and conclusions
The scheme design would need to be of a sufficiently high quality and may need to include some screening in order that it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments impact. There may also be an adverse impact upon the character of Bell Lane Creek and some local views. However, there is the potential to mitigate any adverse impacts through a high quality scheme design and/or screening. Mitigation required and conclusions Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and reduces the visual impact of the site upon the setting of the grade II listed Wentworth House and the local townscape setting.
Summary: The site is suitable as a CSO site because the works would have only a limited impact upon the built heritage environment and the local townscape character. There would be the potential for indirect impacts on the following local receptors; Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area, one listed building (Wentworth House), the character of Bell Lane Creek and some local views. Mitigation, including a high quality scheme design and/or screening would reduce any adverse impacts.
Appendix 9 - Page 8
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (Groundwater and Surface Water) From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial Geology and Made Ground (4 m) London Clay (46 m) Lambeth Group (21 m) Thanet sand (11 m) Hydrogeology Piezometric Level in Chalk Aquifer: ~ -23 mAOD (~27 mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater Monitoring Location EA Hydrometry Sites: TQ27-159 - approximately 325 m southeast of the site (water levels to March 2009) Watercourses Adjacent to Bell Lane Creek River Thames approximately 300 m away to south SPZs and groundwater users SPZ Not located in a Source Protection Zone EA Licensed Groundwater Abstractions and Details No public water supply 4 licensed abstraction borehole within 2 km radius
Licence Numbers: 1. 28/39/39/0177 (2 boreholes) 2. 28/39/42/0071 (1 borehole) 3. 28/39/41/0081 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 1.11 km northwest of the site (other side of the River Thames) 2. 605 m northeast of the site 3. 616 m south of the site Operator: 1. Trustees of the Hurlingham Club 2. Hanson Quarry Prod Europe Ltd
Mitigation required and conclusions The drop shaft would be constructed to an invert level of approximately 33.11 mbgl therefore the shaft would be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head in Chalk is approximately 6.11 m above the base of the construction.
A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the 400 days travel times of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100 mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows;
1. 109m 2. 137m 3. 80m
As a result, the drop shaft is not located within any of these catchment areas.
Appendix 9 - Page 9
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments

3. London Borough of Wandsworth Abstracted Aquifer Unit: 1.Gravel 2. Chalk 3. Chalk Abstraction Purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (sports grounds/facilities- spray irrigation) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (mineral products-general use) 3. Industrial, commercial and public service (municipal grounds-make up or top up water) Abstraction Quantity (annual): 1. 15,000 m3 2. 23,515 m3 3. 8,000 m3
Mitigation required and conclusions
Local Authorities (LA) Unlicensed Groundwater Abstractions and Details Information pending from Hammersmith and Fulham Council No abstraction borehole within 1 km radius inside Wandsworth Council Boundary Borehole locations and depths There are 7 historical records of water wells: 6 deep wells and 1 shallow well within 1km radius. Depth range: 101.8 192.02m. Depth range: 6.88m. Potential impacts on surface water features The site is located approximately 300 metres south of the River Thames. The site is located adjacent to the Bell Lane Creek, a tributary of the River Wandle. The site is located behind the Flood defences and so the pathway for pollution would be through drainage to the Bell Lane Creek. Potential impacts on groundwater (resources and quality) No impact on groundwater at depth is likely since the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (non aquifer). At shallow depth, the shaft is Appendix 9 - Page 10
Not applicable.
Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23.
See below (likely types of mitigation measures that would be required).
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments located in Alluvium which is classified as a minor aquifer. Limited impact on shallow aquifer if water is excluded from the excavation by diaphragm wall or caissons. Likely types of mitigation measures that would be required Potential issues No mitigation required if groundwater is not impacted. The drop shaft to be excavated in London Clay but to below piezometric head in Chalk. Potential pressure effects. Limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer. Not applicable Confined head in Chalk to be considered as part of geotechnical design. Impact on and mitigation for shallow aquifer would depend on construction design. Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable as a CSO site because the drop shaft would be constructed in London Clay (non aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head is would be approximately 6.1 metres above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected, the superficial deposits are Alluvium which is classified as a minor aquifer at the shaft site. There would be limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer due to diaphragm wall or caissons. In terms of surface water resources this site is suitable as a CSO site because there is no direct route for pollution to the Bell Lane Creek. Standard mitigation would be required in line with Pollution Prevention Guidelines (PPG) 1 and 5 and Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 23.
Appendix 9 - Page 11
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Non-statutory designated wildlife sites Comments None within 2km Site is adjacent to the River Thames and Tidal Tributaries SMI Mitigation required and conclusions None required Care would need to be taken to avoid impacts (including contaminated runoff) into Bell Lane creek. Works are unlikely to require landtake from the BAP habitats, but care would need to be taken to avoid impacts (including contaminated runoff) into Bell Lane creek. If bat roosts were found to be present, mitigation would be required for any buildings to be affected by works, possibly including offsite provision. Careful placement of lighting to minimise illumination of surrounding habitat is likely to be required. Not applicable
BAP priority habitats
The adjacent creek shore is listed as BAP priority habitat mudflats. The Tidal Thames is a London BAP habitat
Protected or otherwise notable species within the Study Area
There is a possibility that buildings on site may be used by roosting bats. No direct impact on aquatic receptors.
Potential issues
No further issues
Summary: This site is suitable as a CSO site and it may require only basic ecological surveys if selected.
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood Risk Zone Comments Flood Zone 3 Defended to the 1 in 1000year flood level. There is the potential for a breach of the defences: mitigation for this would need to be considered as part of the FRA. Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible according to table D.2 of PPS25 Assessment of conditions for SuDS There is likely to be space onsite for SuDS. However, the site is a brownfield site and the superficial geology would necessitate an investigation into the suitability of infiltration SuDS. Attenuation SuDS would be a possibility. Potential issues No further issues Not applicable Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the risk of flooding to the site.
Summary: The site is suitable as a CSO site because the site is defended to a 1 in 1000 year flood level. There would be space onsite for SuDS, although an investigation would be required to determine the suitability of infiltration SuDS.
Air quality Site considerations AQMA Comments The air quality objective for NO2 is exceeded on major roads in vicinity of site. There are residential properties along Armory Way (A217) and Frogmore. The nearest residential properties are around 90m from the site on London Court. Existing traffic issues The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions from vehicles along the A3, A217 and A3209 corridors. See existing traffic issues above. There is no data at likely access to A217 and the nearest existing data indicates existing exceedance of AQLV. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data. There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route the construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works. Additional vehicle emissions have a high potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See existing traffic issues above. Collect minimum 6 months diffusion tube data at the nearest residential receptors to the site access to A217 or other point of access to major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hours. Standard dust control measures would minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Sensitive Receptors
Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring
Potential issues
The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts at residential properties is low.
Summary: This site is suitable as a CSO site because there is only a low potential that fugitive emissions of dust during construction would have a perceptible impact at residential receptors closest to the site. Any impacts could be minimised with standard dust control measures. There would be a potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts, however this could be mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58 dB LAeq and night-time noise levels of less than 50 dB LAeq at residential properties located at London Court and Brewers House on Frogmore Lane to the south west of the site. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience relatively low daytime and nighttime noise levels due to their distance to the A217 to the south of the site. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and would not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. Mitigation required and conclusions Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58 dB LAeq and nighttime noise levels of less than 50 dB LAeq at residential properties located at London Court and Brewers House on Frogmore Lane to the south west of the site. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience relatively low daytime and night-time noise levels due to their distance to the A217 to the south of the site. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and would not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. There are sensitive receptors in close proximity to the south western boundary of the site. Further residential properties are located to the south on Armoury Way and to the west on Sudlow Road. Sensitive receptors to the south west on Frogmore Lane consist of 3 and 4 storey residential dwellings. These are located at a distance of approximately 80-90m from the south western site boundary. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including properties on Armoury Way which would be considerably affected by HGV traffic.
Sensitive Receptors
There are sensitive receptors in close proximity to the south western boundary of the site. Further residential properties are located to the south on Armoury Way and to the west on Sudlow Road. Sensitive receptors to the south west on Frogmore Lane consist of 3 and 4 storey residential dwellings. These are located at a distance of approximately 8090m from the south western site boundary. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including properties on Armoury Way which would be considerably affected by HGV traffic.
Noise Site considerations Existing traffic issues Comments Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A217 to the south and east and the A3209 to the west would contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A217 to the south and east and the A3209 to the west would contribute to the local noise climate in the area. A railway also lies close to properties on Sudlow Road. Mitigation required and conclusions Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A217 to the south and east and the A3209 to the west would contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A217 to the south and east and the A3209 to the west would contribute to the local noise climate in the area. A railway also lies close to properties on Sudlow Road. Construction: The construction period is estimated at 0.5 to 2 years and working hours would be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm) Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the sensitive receptors surrounding the site, and in particular those located on Frogmore Lane. A relatively high number of daily HGV movements are anticipated. This number of vehicle movements has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along the length Dormay Street and Armoury Road, off which a permanent access is proposed however there are a small number of residential properties along these routes. The immediate site area is fairly small and, whilst the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant
Existing sources of significant noise emissions
Potential issues
Construction: The construction period is estimated at 0.5 to 2 years and working hours would be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm) Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the sensitive receptors surrounding the site, and in particular those located on Frogmore Lane. A relatively high number of daily HGV movements are anticipated. This number of vehicle movements has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along the length Dormay Street and Armoury Road, off which a permanent access is proposed however there are a small number of residential properties along these routes. The immediate site area is fairly small and, whilst the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant in the northern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary Appendix 9 - Page 16
Noise Site considerations Comments fencing would provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 80m and it is unlikely that vibration levels would result in minor cosmetic damage or annoyance during shaft sinking. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case by case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should not result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Mitigation required and conclusions in the northern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing would provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 80m and it is unlikely that vibration levels would result in minor cosmetic damage or annoyance during shaft sinking. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case by case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should not result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: This site is suitable as a CSO site due to the distance between the site and the nearest residential properties. In addition it is likely that there would be a low noise impact from the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and with the proposed access route, as there are very few residential properties being located on Dormay Street and Armoury Way.
Land quality Site Location Current Site Use Grid Reference: 525502, 174954 A Keltbray and Wandsworth Council depot appear to be located on the site which was not accessible for a site visit. Access to view the site was also severely limited due to other industrial sites to the south, east and west and a canal/creek with no footpath to the north. Flat Ground None observed
Topography Field Evidence of contamination (ie, visual/ olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site)
North: Creek from River Thames East: Commercial/industrial property South: Commercial/industrial property Panorama Antennas Wentworth House (Grade II listed building) lies to the south east of the site. West: Commercial/industrial property
Geological and Hydrogeological Information Geological Strata

1
Geology (thickness) Superficial Geology and Made Ground (4 m) London Clay (46 m) Lambeth Group (21 m) Thanet sand (11 m)
Underlying Aquifer Classes
Non-Aquifer: London Clay Minor Aquifer: River Terrace Deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sands Major Aquifer: Chalk
Groundwater Vulnerability/ Soil Classification (High / Intermediate/Low/ 2 Not Applicable) Source Protection Zone Details Surface Water Receptor
River Terrace Deposits - Minor Aquifer High Leaching Potential of Soils (U)
1
Not located in a Source Protection Zone Bell Lane Creek (10m north) River Wandle (65m east)
Relevant Information within a 250m radius of the site Historical Potentially Contaminating Activities (based on mapping data) Onsite Dye works with tanks and works buildings, 1868-1871 Corporation yard/hardstanding and Works buildings (close to Dye Works), 1896-1987 Works, 1896-1952 Depot, 1959 Road haulage, 1987-2008
Appendix 9 - Page 1
Land quality Offsite Dye Works, (as above but adjacent southern boundary of site), 1896-1952 Works, (adjacent western boundary of site), 1965 Works, (adjacent southern boundary of site), 1965 Works, (adjacent eastern boundary of site), 1951 Royal Laundry, (adjacent northeast boundary of site), 1896 Factory or works, use not specified, (30m south), 1989 Works, (40m south), 1964 Works, (45m north), 1896 Works, (50m southeast), 1964 Electrical sub-stations, (closest located 50m southwest), 1951 Sugar packing (60m east), 1959 Electricity works, (65m north), 1968 Railways, (70m north), 1868-present Potential Fuel Tanks, (closest located 75m northeast), 1968 Tar works with 18 tank areas, (85m east), 1951-1952 Brewing and malting, (90m south), 1920-1989, Engineering works, (100m south), 1976 Wharf (transport support and cargo handling), (100m north), 1916-1976 Depot, (110m south), 1964 Flour Mill, (110m south), 1896 Timber yard, (120m south), 1951 Works, (120m north), 1896 1951-1971 Cement works and electrical sub-station, (120m northeast), 1973 Electricity works with electrical sub-station, (120m northeast), Flour mill, (135m north), 1896 Works, (150 south), 1964 Oil, petroleum and gas refining and storage, (150m east), 1897 Electricity works, (150m east), 1916 Major food processing, (150m northwest), 1916-1920 Timber Yard, (160m east), 1896 Electrical substation, (160m northwest), 1951 Factory or works, use not specified, (160m northwest), 19161987 Garage, (160m east), 1988 Motor vehicles maintenance and repair, (170m east), 1989 Brewery, (170m south), 1896 Garage with potential tanks, (170m south), 1965 Gas works, (170m east), 1952-1980
Appendix 9 - Page 2
Land quality Gas manufacture and distribution, (180m northeast), 18731949 Wood block flooring, (190m north), 1951-1958 Works, (190m north), 1959 Engineering works, (190m southwest), 1965 Engineering works with potential tanks, (200m southwest), 1951 Garage, (200m southwest), 1965 Works, (210m east), 1964 Smithy works, (210m southwest), 1896 Smithy works, (220m southeast), 1896 Pollution Incidents to controlled waters Two incidents: Unknown sewage, significant incident, (110m southeast within River Wandle) Unknown chemicals, minor incident, (230m south) Landfill Sites Other Waste Sites Historical landfill site, ref EAHLD11043, 190m north, no data Three registered waste transfer sites: Special waste transfer station (inert/asbestos), very small (less than 10,000 t/year) since 6/2/1995, (50m west). Listed as operational. Metal, film and photo waste treatment, very small (less than 10,000 t/year), active, (80m south). Household, commercial and industrial inert waste transfer station, medium (25,000 to 75,000 t/year), inactive, (130m northwest). Registered Radioactive Substances Fuel Stations/Depots Contemporary Trade Directory Entries None One former petrol station, Armoury Way, Wandsworth, (185m east) Fifteen: Telecommunication, equipment and system, active, (35m south) Commercial cleaning service, inactive, (40 east) Waste disposal service, inactive, (40m east) Car dealer-used, inactive, (80m south) Scrap metal merchant, inactive, (90m south) Gas suppliers, inactive, (150m northeast) Domestic cleaning service, active, (150m southwest) Refrigeration equipment retail, active, (175m northeast) Distributions services, active, (180m north) Garage services, active, (180m east) Commercial vehicles servicing, repairs, parts and accessories, inactive, (180m east) Fireplace and mantelpieces, active, (180m southwest) Car dealers, inactive, (180m south) Car dealers, active, (190m southwest)
Appendix 9 - Page 3
Land quality Classic car specialist, inactive, (230m southwest) Site Classification Based on Above Information Activity Potential Site Contaminants derived from surface sources (e.g. contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Dye works Distance and Direction to Site 1) Onsite and directly adjacent to site Contaminants 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH
2) Onsite and adjacent to site
2) Metals, Nitrate, Sulphate, Phenols, TPH, Solvents 3) Metals, Sulphur, PAHs, TPH, 4) Metals, TPH, PAHs 1) Metals, TPH, PAHs 2) Metals, Sulphate, TPHs, Solvents 3) PCBs
3) Road Haulage
3) Onsite
4) Works yard/depot Potential Site Contaminants derived from offsite sources and transported to site 1) Works
4) Onsite 1) Adjacent to site
2) Laundry Works
2) Adjacent to site
3) Electrical substations Potential Contamination Pathways to Site (Conceptual Site Model)

3
3) 50 southwest
Source 1: A1, A2, A3, B4 Source 2: D6, E1, F7 Category 3 Assessed as High Risk
Contamination Category
Summary: The site is less suitable as a CSO site because there is a high risk that contamination of the site has occurred, owing to a former dye works, depot and laundry works being located on and in the vicinity of the site. This potential contamination could impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact and volatilisation exposure pathways. There is potential for contamination of surface water receptors which could occur through the migration of contaminants through the shallow (i.e. River Terrace Gravel) aquifer. Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathwayreceptors.
Appendix 9 - Page 4
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

Site Suitability Report C07AB: LB Wandsworth, Maintenance Depot, Dormay Street

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Site Suitability Report C07AB: LB Wandsworth, Maintenance Depot, Dormay Street

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Spring 2010

Site Suitability Report C07AB

100-RG-PNC-C07AB-900001 | Spring 2010

Site Suitability Report C07AB

SITE SUITABILITY REPORT C07AB

SITE INFORMATION 2.1 2.2 Site and surroundings Type of site

9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 10

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB

4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB

5.2 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3

5.4.2 6 6.1 6.1.1

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB

7.6 7.6.1 7.7 7.7.1

Site Suitability Report C07AB

9.3.2 9.3.3 9.3.4

Site Suitability Report C07AB

9.8 9.8.1 10 10.1

Site Suitability Report C07AB

Site Suitability Report C07AB - Appendices

Site Suitability Report C07AB Appendix 1

APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Site Suitability Report C07AB Appendix 1

Site Suitability Report C07AB Appendix 1

Wandsworth Council Bell Lane Creek bridge http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/EnvironmentandTransport/PlanningService/ Majordev/riverside.htm

Site Suitability Report C07AB Appendix 2

APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN

CSO (Directly Controlled)

CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO

200 Metres 300 400

CS07B Frogmore Storm Relief - Buckhold Road CSO

Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00610 Date : .............2009/12/08 Projection : .....British National Grid

Thames Water Utilities

APPENDIX 2 C07AB SITES SITE LOCATION PLAN

Site Suitability Report C07AB Appendix 3

APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS

Mean High Water

Bell Lane Creek

Mean Hig h Water

CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO

Mean High Water

r Mean Hig h Wate

The Roche School

Car Park El Sub Sta

Salvation Army Citadel

Child Guida nce Unit

l m il dle Mid ous e H

Horse Exercise Area

Town Centres River Walks

Boro Cons &tWard Bdy

Thames Policy Area

Area of Main Map

Mixed Use Areas

Industrial Employment Areas 2008 Site Allocations Document Sites

Bell Lane Creek

Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00522 Date : .............2009/11/19 Projection : .....British National Grid

Thames Water Utilities