Professional Documents
Culture Documents
224
Download (.pdf)
67.pdf
706 KB
Birdstrike is one of the most dangerous threats for ight safety and, therefore, aircraft before being put into operational service have to be certiedfor a
proven level of bird impact resistance. Since the experimental tests areexpensive and dicult to perform, numerical techniques are usually usedto
develop higheciency birdproof structures. In this work, bird strikeand (subsequent) penetration inside the airframe are investigated.
Dierentmodels of bird are considered: advantages and disadvantages of which havebeen discussed with regard to the impact of a bird
against the intake of aturbofan engine. 1 Introduction Since the early beginning of aviation history, birdstrike has been one of themost dangerous threats
for the aircraft [1] that causes every year damagesfor more than eighty millions US-dollars - though most of times it has nottragic consequences.A
birdstrike is characterised by loads with high intensity and short du-ration [2]. The materials undergo high strain rates, large deformations andinelastic strains.
In addition, a deep interaction exists between the impactloads and the response of the structure. For those reasons, only with thedevelopment of
(FEM), atthe end of the eighties, it became possible to numerically analyse the eventwith a degree
of accuracy. Nowadays, computer modelling is commonly usedto develop high eciency (i.e. highresistance lowweight) bird-proof struc-tures.
WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Vol 49Impact Loading of Lightweight Structures, M. Alves & N. Jones (Editors)c 2005 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 17433533
With specic regard to the structure of an intake, this is designed to carryaerodynamic and thermal loads. Therefore, it is not surprising that it mightcollapse when
struck by a bird. This event is extremely dicult to modelalso because, since the intake is in large part manufactured using compos-ite materials, the
.The failure of the intake is tolerated, but the y-home capability has tobe
guaranteed. In particular, for the certication, it has to be demonstrated(with an experimental test) that the bird, after strike and penetration, doesnot
damage the equipments necessary for the correct functioning of theengine that are usually placed behind the intake (Fig. 1): the intake musteither deect
the bird or absorb the most part of the impact energy.In this work, using LSTC/LS-Dyna [3], a numerical model to analyse theimpact and the subsequent
penetration of a bird inside the airframe of theintake of a turbofan engine is presented. Initially, dierent approaches tothe bird modelling are
presented and discussed. Hence, a birdstrike onto aturbofan-engine intake is considered.Figure 1: Scheme of a turbofan engine. 2 Bird modelling
when using explicit FE codes. On that depend the impact loads.Customarily, the bird is modelled like a
cylindrical water bullet
the impact velocities are rather high, this modelis commonly accepted - though it is not free from criticisms [5].
WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Vol 49Impact Loading of
Lightweight Structures, M. Alves & N. Jones (Editors)c 2005 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 17433533
Since late eighties, explicit FE codes have been used to develop high eciency bird-proof
structures [4]. Nevertheless, the analysis of birdstrike ontocompliant structures by means of these codes, which adopt a Lagrangianapproac
h, is particularly troublesome. In fact, after the early instants of theimpact, the distortions in the mesh of the bird cause a loss in accuracy,a
reduction in the time-step and, eventually, an error termination of thesimulation.In that, techniques based on
Eulerian
or
(ALE) approach seem to have an advantage and, therefore, some explicitFE codes have implemented also an Eulerian or an ALE solver.
Drawbacksof these solvers (which eventually limit their use) are: the
diffusivity
resources necessaryto run the analysis.A dierent approach to the pr oblem that recalls t he
Discrete Element Met hod
with a set of nodes endowedwith a mass. Indeed, when applied to the analysis of birdstrike, the
nodalmasses
implemented in the framework of an explicit FEcode to analyse events characterised by large deformations. In fact, being(genuinely)
meshless
, the SPH Method does not suer the problems of meshdistortion.Ano ther known meshless method is the
Element Free Galerkin
(EFG): de-veloped for crack growing analysis, it is not particularly suitable for birdstrike analysis [5].
2.2 Experimental data
The data collected during experimental tests are fundamental in the devel-opment of a numerical model.In 1996, an intense test programme has
been carried out to characterisethe numerical model of the bird [7]. Using an air-gun, 4 lb -chickens werelaunched with
order to acquire the prolein time of the impact force. Birdstrike tests are rather dicult to perform.Neverthele ss, the tests were repeatable (as shown by the close
agreementamong the data obtained) and the data acquired reliable (when comparedwith the ones of the tests previously carried out [2]).
WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Vol 49Impact Loading of Lightweight Structures, M. Alves & N. Jones (Editors)c 2005 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 17433533
Job Board About Press Blog Stories
Send us Feedback
Academia 2014