You are on page 1of 1

Name: _________________________ Subject 25 Points Above Average

The student was active in risk taking, daring to ex !ore di""erent ideas, and com#inations o" those ideas$ The artwork is uni%ue, origina!, and innovative$ The student has demonstrated a wi!!ingness to change the iece throughout the art making rocess$ The student a!so generated man& ideas #e"ore deciding on a "ina! com osition$

TOTAL OUT OF 100: __________ 20 Points Average 15 Points Below Average 10 Points Needs Improvement
The student showed !itt!e evidence "or creativit&, origina!it&, and innovation with this ro(ect and "ai!ed to ush their creative mind$

0 Points Unacceptable
The student com !ete!& co ied common imager&, or another artist)s work, and the ro(ect !acked an& essence o" origina! thought$

Creativity/ Originality
(25 Points

On!& a "ew ideas were generated The student deve!o ed on!& one #e"ore se!ecting the "ina! or two ideas #e"ore carr&ing out com osition, with a decent e""ort the assignment, and the student o" origina!it& #ut the theme has "ai!ed to take risks with imager& #een roduced revious!&, or the and conce ts$ The student imager& is common'c!iche$ The re roduced imager& that is ver& work was minima!!& modi"ied, or common, or ex ected$ the student was resistant to change and taking risks$

!""ort/Participation
(25 Points

The student showed an active The student showed an average The student was o"" task, giving The student was rare!& on task, The student did not hand in the e""ort in com !eting the sense o" work ethic, handing the in to distractions within the #eing distracted most o" the c!ass ro(ect, did not "inish the assignment e""icient!&, and on ro(ect in on time #ut sticking c!assroom$ The ro(ect was eriod$ The student handed in the ro(ect, #are!& attem ted the time$ The student took ride in (ust to the re%uirements o" the handed in !ate, or rea!!& !acked ro(ect !ate, "ai!ed to meet the ro(ect, and was distracted or the ro(ect, going #e&ond the ro(ect$ The student worked ride, and active e""ort$ The ma(orit& o" re%uirements, and com !ete!& tuned out "or most o" necessar& means to "u!"i!! di!igent!& through the ro(ect student did not meet a!! o" the showed a genera! uninterest in the working c!ass eriods$The re%uirements, active!& with minima! distractions$ The re%uirements to the ro(ect$ The com !eting the ro(ect student re"used to artici ate in artici ating in each c!ass student artici ated somewhat in student on!& artici ated in e""ective!&$ The student did not c!ass discussions$ without distractions$ The student c!ass discussions, o""ering discussion i" ca!!ed u on, and did artici ate in discussion, or active!& artici ated in c!ass thought"u! o inions and ideas i" not o""er ideas, or ersona! resentation o" in"ormation$ discussions$ ca!!ed u on$ conce ts$ The student remained atient with the rocess, without rushing through certain rocedures$ The work was com !eted di!igent!& with neatness, and c!ean!iness$ The student needs to a& more attention to detai! and consistenc& within the art making rocess, #& ushing themse!ves "urther in ski!!$ The work was handed in with smudges, "inger rints, or sma!! tears* and cou!d #e c!eaner$ The student ke t materia!s somewhat organi-ed, and their working area cou!d #e ke t c!eaner$ The student was enthusiastic a#out the ro(ect, and their ersona! work #ut remained somewhat disengaged or distracted$ The student handed in work that The student handed in torn' ver& was ver& mess& with smudges, wrink!ed work, and never "inger rints, sma!!*!arge tears, or c!eaned their s ace when the& ma(or wrink!es$ The student got were "inished$ No evidence o" "rustrated easi!& with the rocess desire to increase ski!! !eve!$ and rocedures, with !itt!e room "or atience, and erseverance$ +tudent did not ush themse!ves$ The student "re%uent!& !e"t station mess& !eaving others to c!ean u a"ter them, and su !ies'working s ace was "re%uent!& unorgani-ed$ The student was minima!!& enthusiastic a#out the ro(ect, or he!d a negative attitude towards the ro(ect'other students$ ,t is evident that the student was not invested in the ro(ect, the work is un"inished, and unre"ined$ The work was ungradea#!e due to ri s'tears'genera! messiness o" the iece$ No e""ort to ush themse!ves, or im rove$

Cra"tsmans#ip/$%ill/ Consistency
(25 Points

Attit&de/ 'esponsibility
(25 Points

The student worked enthusiastica!!& throughout the ro(ect, he! ing others around them, and #eing res ect"u! o" other)s ideas, and work s ace$ The student)s working su !ies remained organi-ed, and their working area remained c!ean$ The student c!eaned u exce tiona!!& a"ter ever& working eriod !eaving their station s ot!ess$

The student did not ut #ack The student re"used to coo erate materia!s a ro riate!&, !eaving with other students, share them to #e c!eaned u #& others, materia!s, c!ean u a"ter him'her and consistent!& he!d an se!" and was a constant unmanagea#!& mess& working disru tion to other students, s ace$ The student ma& have ho!ding a negative view on the disres ected others ro(ect, and acting out ideas'conce ts' ro(ects, and he!d negative!& ver#a!!&, or h&sica!!& a ver& negative attitude toward towards others and'or their work$ the ro(ect and others$

Comments(

You might also like