Copy of letters of response from Montgomery County Public schools pursuant to a request for gifted and talented identification data. The system claims MCPS was inspired by a case study on the New York City Police Department's Computerized Crime Comparison Statistics (ComStat). Based on ComStat, MCPS developed M-Stat, a process designed to—
• thoroughly analyze individual school and student data;
• consistently and continuously monitor the data;
• identify best practices; and
• create lasting systemic change.”
Harvard goes on to say, “This process is intended to serve as a model and permeate every level of the school district, from—
• frank discourse among the executive leadership team and the superintendent; to
• open discussion among principals and their supervising community superintendents; to
• honest examination of the school data between principals and their communities; to
• authentic conversations among teachers and the principal; to
• the nexus of true school reform—the interactions between the students and the teacher.”
However, it has not provided the requested data.
Copy of letters of response from Montgomery County Public schools pursuant to a request for gifted and talented identification data. The system claims MCPS was inspired by a case study on the New York City Police Department's Computerized Crime Comparison Statistics (ComStat). Based on ComStat, MCPS developed M-Stat, a process designed to—
• thoroughly analyze individual school and student data;
• consistently and continuously monitor the data;
• identify best practices; and
• create lasting systemic change.”
Harvard goes on to say, “This process is intended to serve as a model and permeate every level of the school district, from—
• frank discourse among the executive leadership team and the superintendent; to
• open discussion among principals and their supervising community superintendents; to
• honest examination of the school data between principals and their communities; to
• authentic conversations among teachers and the principal; to
• the nexus of true school reform—the interactions between the students and the teacher.”
However, it has not provided the requested data.
Copy of letters of response from Montgomery County Public schools pursuant to a request for gifted and talented identification data. The system claims MCPS was inspired by a case study on the New York City Police Department's Computerized Crime Comparison Statistics (ComStat). Based on ComStat, MCPS developed M-Stat, a process designed to—
• thoroughly analyze individual school and student data;
• consistently and continuously monitor the data;
• identify best practices; and
• create lasting systemic change.”
Harvard goes on to say, “This process is intended to serve as a model and permeate every level of the school district, from—
• frank discourse among the executive leadership team and the superintendent; to
• open discussion among principals and their supervising community superintendents; to
• honest examination of the school data between principals and their communities; to
• authentic conversations among teachers and the principal; to
• the nexus of true school reform—the interactions between the students and the teacher.”
However, it has not provided the requested data.
MCPS MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
swrwamontgomeryschoolsmd.org MARYLAND
February 12, 2009
| am responding to your information request that was reveived in our office on January
14, 2009, secking Gifted and Talented screening data that was included in the 2004-2005
Global Screening report. [am responding on behalf of the superintendent of schools who,
1s official custodian of records for the school system, is responsible for replies under the
Maryland Public information Act, Maryland State Government Article §§10-611, et sea
‘Attached are data tables reflecting analyses ofthe Grade 2 Global Screening additional to
those appearing in the in 2007-2008 Global Screening Report. The same analyses
reported in the 2004-2005 Global Screening Report were not conducted in the
intervening years, and, therefore, additional data for these years are not available. An
snalysis was conducted in 2008, and these data are attached. We do not have a data
report by school, as you have requested. Thank you for your inquiry. Please let me know
if lean be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
7 Stephen R, Simon
Director of Public Information
SRSits
‘Attachment
Copy to:
Dr. Lacey
Mr. Cree!
Ms. Williams
"50 Hongeiord Drive, Room 112+ Rockville, Maryland 20850 » 307-279-3059TT
Attachment
Grade 2 Global Screening Process for Identification of Gifted and Talented Students in
Spring 2008
Table 1
Number of Students Tested, Number Meeting Benchmark, and Percent Meeting
Benchmark by Race or Ethnicity on Raven's Progressive Matrices, InView Analogy, and InView
Quantitative Reasoning Tests
Sean Raven Raalony Reasoning
‘umber ] Namber
; ‘Number | Feveent | Number | Nember | Perent
Met | Met_| Tested |" Met | Met
wl
Swdens | 9500| 2984| 209| 9598| 2582| 30.1| oses| 2700| 282
‘Arian T |
American | 2.143] 205] 138/242] 12) 146 | 242
146
1s05| _750| aa5| 1501| oo | 425| 1e61| 675 | a2
zors| _st7|_ 153. sr7|_12| 206r| 274] 109
‘Ameren
India| _20 7] 350| 20 7| s6o| 20| _s| 250
White
ares] 1586| a18| 9,706| 1,522 40.1| _705| 1433| 78
Yable2
[Number of Parent Surveys Sent, Number Returned, Percent Returned, Number Met
‘Benchmark, and Percent Met Benchmark by Race or Ethnicity
‘Studeat Group [Number J Number Pereeat Namber Met
Seat Returned Returned ‘Benchmark ‘Met
Benehiark
“asada aa 56a = 238|
‘tiem Americas | —2,185 [1.090 478 06
Aas American | 1.568 “1061 err 203
[space 2083 [4.077 BLT i73—|
‘merian Tadian [20 7 350 788
‘white 3006 | as as |
‘Table 3
[Number of Students Screened, and the Number and Percent Recommended by Staff Advocacy" by
Race or Fihicity
= ee
— = =
a 380 7a 188 |
ty ahoon for Gade?
‘sult Advossy provides profesional sa tor hn te cstoom acer an ppt 1 adboat f
TSGECY Sortie ince te Eng Speaker of Oter Languages (ESOL) swe, special eeaion
Secimui an ysl ucsonMCPS) MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
ww mantgomenyschoolimd.org MARYLAND,
March 13, 2009
[Lam responding tothe February 17, 2009, follow-up correspondence you sent 10
ry office, after I had responded to your public information request seeking the
same analyses of the global screening data as was conducted in the 2005 report
for the intervening years, 2006-2008. I am responding once again on behalf of the
superintendent of schools who, as official custodian of records for the school
system, is responsible for replies under the Maryland Public Information Act,
Maryland State Government Article $§10-611, et sea,
As stated previously in letter to you dated February 12, 2009, the same global
sereening analyses were not conducted for the intervening, years. The global
screening reports for the years spanning 2005-2008 are available online at
hup/sharedaccountability,mepsprimetime.org/reportsist ph.
‘You have requested by school, 14 data points for approximately 30,000 students
wit specifics that include Race, Staff Survey Score, Parent Survey Score.
Inview Analogy Seore, InView Reading Score, Raven Score, Teacher Survey
Score, GF Other Factor Score, Reading/Math Score, and Performance Level.”
Please note that your request for InView Reading Score and Reading/Math Score,
and Performance level do not match any of the global screening indicators, There
are indicators for InView Quantitative Reasoning and Reading Performance Level
and Math Performance Level. The other thee InView subtests were not
administered since 2005.
Your request will take significant sta? resources to fulfil. Maryland law, Article
410-621 allows a government unit to recover actual costs incurred to search and.
prepare records for inspection for any time beyond the first two hours. To process
{his request will take an extensive amount of staff time and resources, far beyond
the two hours you are entitled to receive without charge under the Maryland
Public Information Act. Is estimated that it will take 24 hours at $52.25 an hour
to prepare the data. Additionally itis estimated that this request could produce
1,000 peaes of documents ata cost of 15 cents per page fr total of $1,404.00. If
the full amount of estimated time is not required to process the request, any
10 Hungerod Drive Room 112 ¢ Roki, Marland 20850 6 301-279-1853Aifference would be refunded to you. Conversely ifthe project takes longer than
24 hours, we would stop working and notify you. You could choose to take what
hhad been produced to that date of remit additional funds to cover additional time
Tocating and preparing the documents request
If you wish us to proceed with your request, please submit a check made payable
to Montgomery County Public Schools for $1,404.00.
Sincerely,
Stephen R. Simon
Director of Public Information
SRSits
Copy to:
Dr Lacey
Mr. Cree!
Ms. Chesney
Ms. Williams