You are on page 1of 69

Section 2.

8
Linear Approximation and Differentials
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I
New York University
May 26, 2010
Announcements

Quiz 2 Thursday on Sections 1.52.5

No class Monday, May 31

Assignment 2 due Tuesday, June 1


. . . . . .
. . . . . .
Announcements

Quiz 2 Thursday on
Sections 1.52.5

No class Monday, May 31

Assignment 2 due
Tuesday, June 1
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 2 / 27
. . . . . .
Objectives

Use tangent lines to make


linear approximations to a
function.

Given a function and a


point in the domain,
compute the
linearization of the
function at that point.

Use linearization to
approximate values of
functions

Given a function, compute


the differential of that
function

Use the differential


notation to estimate error
in linear approximations.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 3 / 27
. . . . . .
Outline
The linear approximation of a function near a point
Examples
Questions
Differentials
Using differentials to estimate error
Advanced Examples
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 4 / 27
. . . . . .
The Big Idea
Question
Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
near a?
Answer
The tangent line, of course!
Question
What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))?
Answer
L(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
. . . . . .
The Big Idea
Question
Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
near a?
Answer
The tangent line, of course!
Question
What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))?
Answer
L(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
. . . . . .
The Big Idea
Question
Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
near a?
Answer
The tangent line, of course!
Question
What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))?
Answer
L(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
. . . . . .
The Big Idea
Question
Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
near a?
Answer
The tangent line, of course!
Question
What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))?
Answer
L(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
. . . . . .
The tangent line is a linear approximation
L(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)
is a decent approximation to f
near a.
How decent? The closer x is to
a, the better the approxmation
L(x) is to f(x)
.
.x
.y
.
.
.
.f(a)
.f(x)
.L(x)
.a .x
.x a
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 6 / 27
. . . . . .
The tangent line is a linear approximation
L(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)
is a decent approximation to f
near a.
How decent? The closer x is to
a, the better the approxmation
L(x) is to f(x)
.
.x
.y
.
.
.
.f(a)
.f(x)
.L(x)
.a .x
.x a
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 6 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_
0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_
0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

)
0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
.
.
Example
Estimate sin(61

) = sin(61/180) by using a linear approximation


(i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60

/3.
Solution (i)

If f(x) = sinx, then f(0) = 0


and f

(0) = 1.

So the linear approximation


near 0 is L(x) = 0 +1 x = x.

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_

61
180
1.06465
Solution (ii)

We have f
_

3
_
=

3
2
and
f

3
_
=
1
2
.

So L(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_

Thus
sin
_
61
180
_
0.87475
Calculator check: sin(61

) 0.87462.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration
.
.x
.y
.y = sinx
.61

.y = L
1
(x) = x
.
.0
.
.big difference!
.y = L
2
(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_
.
.

/3
.
.very little difference!
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration
.
.x
.y
.y = sinx
.61

.y = L
1
(x) = x
.
.0
.
.big difference!
.y = L
2
(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_
.
.

/3
.
.very little difference!
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration
.
.x
.y
.y = sinx
.61

.y = L
1
(x) = x
.
.0
.
.big difference!
.y = L
2
(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_
.
.

/3
.
.very little difference!
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration
.
.x
.y
.y = sinx
.61

.y = L
1
(x) = x
.
.0
.
.big difference!
.y = L
2
(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_
.
.

/3
.
.very little difference!
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration
.
.x
.y
.y = sinx
.61

.y = L
1
(x) = x
.
.0
.
.big difference!
.y = L
2
(x) =

3
2
+
1
2
_
x

3
_
.
.

/3
.
.very little difference!
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
. . . . . .
Another Example
Example
Estimate

10 using the fact that 10 = 9 +1.


Solution
The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =

x near a = 9
to estimate f(10) =

10.

10

9 +
d
dx

x=9
(1)
= 3 +
1
2 3
(1) =
19
6
3.167
Check:
_
19
6
_
2
=
361
36
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
. . . . . .
Another Example
Example
Estimate

10 using the fact that 10 = 9 +1.


Solution
The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =

x near a = 9
to estimate f(10) =

10.

10

9 +
d
dx

x=9
(1)
= 3 +
1
2 3
(1) =
19
6
3.167
Check:
_
19
6
_
2
=
361
36
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
. . . . . .
Another Example
Example
Estimate

10 using the fact that 10 = 9 +1.


Solution
The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =

x near a = 9
to estimate f(10) =

10.

10

9 +
d
dx

x=9
(1)
= 3 +
1
2 3
(1) =
19
6
3.167
Check:
_
19
6
_
2
=
361
36
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
. . . . . .
Another Example
Example
Estimate

10 using the fact that 10 = 9 +1.


Solution
The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =

x near a = 9
to estimate f(10) =

10.

10

9 +
d
dx

x=9
(1)
= 3 +
1
2 3
(1) =
19
6
3.167
Check:
_
19
6
_
2
=
361
36
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
. . . . . .
Another Example
Example
Estimate

10 using the fact that 10 = 9 +1.


Solution
The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =

x near a = 9
to estimate f(10) =

10.

10

9 +
d
dx

x=9
(1)
= 3 +
1
2 3
(1) =
19
6
3.167
Check:
_
19
6
_
2
=
361
36
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
. . . . . .
Dividing without dividing?
Example
Suppose I have an irrational fear of division and need to estimate
577 408. I write
577
408
= 1 +169
1
408
= 1 +169
1
4

1
102
.
But still I have to find
1
102
.
Solution
Let f(x) =
1
x
. We know f(100) and we want to estimate f(102).
f(102) f(100) +f

(100)(2) =
1
100

1
100
2
(2) = 0.0098
=
577
408
1.41405
Calculator check:
577
408
1.41422.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 10 / 27
. . . . . .
Dividing without dividing?
Example
Suppose I have an irrational fear of division and need to estimate
577 408. I write
577
408
= 1 +169
1
408
= 1 +169
1
4

1
102
.
But still I have to find
1
102
.
Solution
Let f(x) =
1
x
. We know f(100) and we want to estimate f(102).
f(102) f(100) +f

(100)(2) =
1
100

1
100
2
(2) = 0.0098
=
577
408
1.41405
Calculator check:
577
408
1.41422.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 10 / 27
. . . . . .
Questions
Example
Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50
mi
/hr.
How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?
Example
Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
lots? 12 more lots?
Example
Suppose a line goes through the point (x
0
, y
0
) and has slope m. If the
point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
corresponding vertical movement?
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 11 / 27
. . . . . .
Answers
Example
Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50
mi
/hr.
How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?
Answer

100mi

150mi

600mi (?) (Is it reasonable to assume 12 hours at the same


speed?)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 12 / 27
. . . . . .
Answers
Example
Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50
mi
/hr.
How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?
Answer

100mi

150mi

600mi (?) (Is it reasonable to assume 12 hours at the same


speed?)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 12 / 27
. . . . . .
Questions
Example
Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50
mi
/hr.
How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?
Example
Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
lots? 12 more lots?
Example
Suppose a line goes through the point (x
0
, y
0
) and has slope m. If the
point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
corresponding vertical movement?
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 13 / 27
. . . . . .
Answers
Example
Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
lots? 12 more lots?
Answer

$100

$150

$600 (?)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 14 / 27
. . . . . .
Questions
Example
Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50
mi
/hr.
How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?
Example
Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
lots? 12 more lots?
Example
Suppose a line goes through the point (x
0
, y
0
) and has slope m. If the
point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
corresponding vertical movement?
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 15 / 27
. . . . . .
Answers
Example
Suppose a line goes through the point (x
0
, y
0
) and has slope m. If the
point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
corresponding vertical movement?
Answer
The slope of the line is
m =
rise
run
We are given a run of dx, so the corresponding rise is mdx.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 16 / 27
. . . . . .
Answers
Example
Suppose a line goes through the point (x
0
, y
0
) and has slope m. If the
point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
corresponding vertical movement?
Answer
The slope of the line is
m =
rise
run
We are given a run of dx, so the corresponding rise is mdx.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 16 / 27
. . . . . .
Outline
The linear approximation of a function near a point
Examples
Questions
Differentials
Using differentials to estimate error
Advanced Examples
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 17 / 27
. . . . . .
Differentials are another way to express derivatives
f(x +x) f(x)
. .
y
f

(x) x
. .
dy
Rename x = dx, so we can
write this as
y dy = f

(x)dx.
And this looks a lot like the
Leibniz-Newton identity
dy
dx
= f

(x)
.
.x
.y
.
.
.x .x +x
.dx = x
.y
.dy
Linear approximation means y dy = f

(x
0
) dx near x
0
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 18 / 27
. . . . . .
Differentials are another way to express derivatives
f(x +x) f(x)
. .
y
f

(x) x
. .
dy
Rename x = dx, so we can
write this as
y dy = f

(x)dx.
And this looks a lot like the
Leibniz-Newton identity
dy
dx
= f

(x)
.
.x
.y
.
.
.x .x +x
.dx = x
.y
.dy
Linear approximation means y dy = f

(x
0
) dx near x
0
.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 18 / 27
. . . . . .
Using differentials to estimate error
If y = f(x), x
0
and x is known,
and an estimate of y is
desired:

Approximate: y dy

Differentiate: dy = f

(x) dx

Evaluate at x = x
0
and
dx = x.
.
.x
.y
.
.
.x .x +x
.dx = x
.y
.dy
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 19 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
A sheet of plywood measures 8ft 4ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
area of the sheet be off by?
Solution
Write A() =
1
2

2
. We want to know A when = 8ft and = 1in.
(I) A( +) = A
_
97
12
_
=
9409
288
So A =
9409
288
32 0.6701.
(II)
dA
d
= , so dA = d, which should be a good estimate for .
When = 8 and d =
1
12
, we have dA =
8
12
=
2
3
0.667. So we
get estimates close to the hundredth of a square foot.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
A sheet of plywood measures 8ft 4ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
area of the sheet be off by?
Solution
Write A() =
1
2

2
. We want to know A when = 8ft and = 1in.
(I) A( +) = A
_
97
12
_
=
9409
288
So A =
9409
288
32 0.6701.
(II)
dA
d
= , so dA = d, which should be a good estimate for .
When = 8 and d =
1
12
, we have dA =
8
12
=
2
3
0.667. So we
get estimates close to the hundredth of a square foot.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
A sheet of plywood measures 8ft 4ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
area of the sheet be off by?
Solution
Write A() =
1
2

2
. We want to know A when = 8ft and = 1in.
(I) A( +) = A
_
97
12
_
=
9409
288
So A =
9409
288
32 0.6701.
(II)
dA
d
= , so dA = d, which should be a good estimate for .
When = 8 and d =
1
12
, we have dA =
8
12
=
2
3
0.667. So we
get estimates close to the hundredth of a square foot.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
. . . . . .
Example
A sheet of plywood measures 8ft 4ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
area of the sheet be off by?
Solution
Write A() =
1
2

2
. We want to know A when = 8ft and = 1in.
(I) A( +) = A
_
97
12
_
=
9409
288
So A =
9409
288
32 0.6701.
(II)
dA
d
= , so dA = d, which should be a good estimate for .
When = 8 and d =
1
12
, we have dA =
8
12
=
2
3
0.667. So we
get estimates close to the hundredth of a square foot.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
. . . . . .
Why?
Why use linear approximations dy when the actual difference y is
known?

Linear approximation is quick and reliable. Finding y exactly


depends on the function.

These examples are overly simple. See the Advanced Examples


later.

In real life, sometimes only f(a) and f

(a) are known, and not the


general f(x).
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 21 / 27
. . . . . .
Outline
The linear approximation of a function near a point
Examples
Questions
Differentials
Using differentials to estimate error
Advanced Examples
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 22 / 27
. . . . . .
Gravitation
Pencils down!
Example

Drop a 1 kg ball off the roof of the Silver Center (50m high). We
usually say that a falling object feels a force F = mg from gravity.

In fact, the force felt is


F(r) =
GMm
r
2
,
where M is the mass of the earth and r is the distance from the
center of the earth to the object. G is a constant.

At r = r
e
the force really is F(r
e
) =
GMm
r
2
e
= mg.

What is the maximum error in replacing the actual force felt at the
top of the building F(r
e
+r) by the force felt at ground level
F(r
e
)? The relative error? The percentage error?
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 23 / 27
. . . . . .
Gravitation
Pencils down!
Example

Drop a 1 kg ball off the roof of the Silver Center (50m high). We
usually say that a falling object feels a force F = mg from gravity.

In fact, the force felt is


F(r) =
GMm
r
2
,
where M is the mass of the earth and r is the distance from the
center of the earth to the object. G is a constant.

At r = r
e
the force really is F(r
e
) =
GMm
r
2
e
= mg.

What is the maximum error in replacing the actual force felt at the
top of the building F(r
e
+r) by the force felt at ground level
F(r
e
)? The relative error? The percentage error?
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 23 / 27
. . . . . .
Gravitation Solution
Solution
We wonder if F = F(r
e
+r) F(r
e
) is small.

Using a linear approximation,


F dF =
dF
dr

r
e
dr = 2
GMm
r
3
e
dr
=
_
GMm
r
2
e
_
dr
r
e
= 2mg
r
r
e

The relative error is


F
F
2
r
r
e

r
e
= 6378.1km. If r = 50m,
F
F
2
r
r
e
= 2
50
6378100
= 1.56 10
5
= 0.00156%
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 24 / 27
. . . . . .
Systematic linear approximation

2 is irrational, but

9
/4 is rational and
9
/4 is close to 2.
So

2 =

9
/4
1
/4

9
/4 +
1
2(
3
/2)
(
1
/4) =
17
12

This is a better approximation since (


17
/12)
2
=
289
/144

Do it again!

2 =

289
/144
1
/144

289
/144 +
1
2(
17
/12)
(
1
/144) =
577
/408
Now
_
577
408
_
2
=
332, 929
166, 464
which is
1
166, 464
away from 2.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
. . . . . .
Systematic linear approximation

2 is irrational, but

9
/4 is rational and
9
/4 is close to 2. So

2 =

9
/4
1
/4

9
/4 +
1
2(
3
/2)
(
1
/4) =
17
12

This is a better approximation since (


17
/12)
2
=
289
/144

Do it again!

2 =

289
/144
1
/144

289
/144 +
1
2(
17
/12)
(
1
/144) =
577
/408
Now
_
577
408
_
2
=
332, 929
166, 464
which is
1
166, 464
away from 2.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
. . . . . .
Systematic linear approximation

2 is irrational, but

9
/4 is rational and
9
/4 is close to 2. So

2 =

9
/4
1
/4

9
/4 +
1
2(
3
/2)
(
1
/4) =
17
12

This is a better approximation since (


17
/12)
2
=
289
/144

Do it again!

2 =

289
/144
1
/144

289
/144 +
1
2(
17
/12)
(
1
/144) =
577
/408
Now
_
577
408
_
2
=
332, 929
166, 464
which is
1
166, 464
away from 2.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
. . . . . .
Systematic linear approximation

2 is irrational, but

9
/4 is rational and
9
/4 is close to 2. So

2 =

9
/4
1
/4

9
/4 +
1
2(
3
/2)
(
1
/4) =
17
12

This is a better approximation since (


17
/12)
2
=
289
/144

Do it again!

2 =

289
/144
1
/144

289
/144 +
1
2(
17
/12)
(
1
/144) =
577
/408
Now
_
577
408
_
2
=
332, 929
166, 464
which is
1
166, 464
away from 2.
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
(
9
4
,
3
2
)
.
.(2,
17
12
)
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
.(
9
4
,
3
2
) .
.(2,
17
/12)
.
.
_
289
144
,
17
12
_
.
.
_
2,
577
408
_
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
.(
9
4
,
3
2
) .
.(2,
17
/12)
.
.
_
289
144
,
17
12
_
.
.
_
2,
577
408
_
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Illustration of the previous example
.
.2
.
.(
9
4
,
3
2
) .
.(2,
17
/12)
.
.
_
289
144
,
17
12
_
.
.
_
2,
577
408
_
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
. . . . . .
Summary

Linear approximation: If f is differentiable at a, the best linear


approximation to f near a is given by
L
f,a
(x) = f(a) +f

(a)(x a)

Differentials: If f is differentiable at x, a good approximation to


y = f(x +x) f(x) is
y dy =
dy
dx
dx =
dy
dx
x

Dont buy plywood from me.


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 27 / 27

You might also like