2AR

Vote Aff for these Reasons

a. Firstly the neg dropped are Huddelston evidence and are literally we meet

argument , that dissolves the kritik and the no link on that kritik because it was proving how we are also against the nationalist mindset firstly are Huddleston evidence speaks of how lifting the embargo helps create a unified sense , so then the Links dissolve b.On the Theory flow , at most reject the kritik not the team , we fought back on that flow on why not just rejecting the Arg not the team . Cross Apply those standards from the Neg on the Permuation onto the PIKs . Using their last standard reject the Arg on the basis ,of how the two standards double turn themselves on the basis of how on Education , they kill all in round education because instead of debating policy they will PIK out of one discourse method of the aff , over the true policies .

c. Nextly Zukalia Kritik links towards their Kritik because of how they view these threats is the true binary threat so then impact calc on this Probability outweighs the impacts of the neg because of how firstly of how the language and how they see this threat is only going to make war more likely ,and this shows how they link back to themselves thourgh the PIK which then this acts a ALT solvency takeout . Probability outweighs all magnitutude , because of how then if somethings chance of occurrence is much smaller but it could kill us , then that only shows how Probability outweighs magnitude. On Severity , this impact is much more sever because of how then we become in this endless war with a non-existent threat . d.They dont win framework on how firstly we do not link , if we do not link then the framework is not applicable e. They comepletly drop in the Reject Alt in the 2NR please do not give any weight to any of the Alts because of how that spurs Argumentive iressponibility because of how then all they need to do is prove 1% better solvency than us then that moots 8 mins of offense from the 1AC , and anything the 2AC does because we have to prove one idea from the 1AC is good . NOW LETS GET TO VOTERS OF THIS ROUND

A.CASE , they attempts to leverage their PIK against the Case , just shows how the 1AC intends to solve are impacts, on the Diease scenario , we answer SQUO solves, just in case we havent this is how we answer , first prefer are evidence which is from 13 , and 12 unlike are oppents SQUO evidence which is from 04, so from this time pe riod things could have change , so then give full weight to this Scenario. IMPACT CALC ON DIEASES This wins on Probability and Magnitude On probability are Quammen/Falco evidence outlines more towards how Dieases will spread soon and how they evolve at such as fast rate ,that they will go global then that goes over towards the Severity and Magnitude of the situation , are Quammen evidence firstly shows how this will be a pandemic and how pandemic will cause and trigger all the impacts outlined by the aff and pandemics turn PIK

b. Are Pandemic Impact Turns the PIK , because of how firstly the hysteria creates nationalism because of how then the people are going towards a national identity not a shared identity as a world . This hysteria makes then a reason to vote Aff .
c. We solve your interal link better- we do more than just establish a better political community- but we ask the question what does a political community do in the face of having done evil, regardless of borders we will always find ourselves in communities- only the affirmative gives you a concrete way to deal with violence

d. Perm is a voter , net benefit of the Perm is of how it access Case, and it shows doing both is possible , the permutation is mutallly exclusive towards how solvency towards political agency is much more spefic than the K . More explaination on the bottom Now lets go towards attack the 2NR
Firstly the Lindsey evidence is much more towards international trade no warrants of localized Cuba/Latin America, which is of what the Aff is FIATING and which is . Second WE KICKED OUT OF SOFT POWER , so then we ceed that Soft Power , can not solve for it self , so then , now they firstly do lose the thesis of how they do link towards the Plan , and their Lindsey evidence is non responsive towards the advantage . Also the WMD use impacts ,where did we have any , we kicked out that advantage , we ceded on how the WMD With Russia will occur Now onto the Alt firstly reading their alt , we can function in the World of the Alt , and also of how then there is really no link towards their own impact , if they win of how they are K of IR , they then double turn themselves on the basis of either they link back to themselves or they could never solve for the alt . On their Framework , we have an unbiased research agenda the Brookings Project on U.S. Policy

Toward a Cuba in Transition, just for example , make them give you warrants on

multiple authours we have that are biased before you actually see this argument thourgh. CASE o/w K
a. No link towards the AFF we killed all offense and then we turn what little was left b. We best solve for the PIK by how they lose the I/L when they double turn themselves c. The pure policy approach was ceded out of the 2NR , so then you vote for the Purest Method D. Permuation is the best method of Solvency now lets get into PERM solvency

PERM SOLVES BEST : In order to best solve for kritikal ideas we need to Maryrt their kritik against Nationalism in order to best solve , leaders such as MLK , firstly after his death when then turned into a Marytr for the Civil Right movement then the movement finally gained momenteum to the point where then led into Political Agency with the Civil Rights Bill of 1964, so then PERM A VOTER