Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School State Criterion-referenced Assessment Test Proficiency Percentages by Grade Level Over Time
Grade Six
Percentages
2007-08 (n=219)
2008-09 (n=233)
2009-10 (n=240)
2010-11 (n=244)
2011-12 (n=249)
2007-08 (n=219)
2008-09 (n=233)
2009-10 (n=240)
2010-11 (n=244)
2011-12 (n=249)
2007-08 (n=226)
2008-09 (n=238)
2009-10 (n=218)
2010-11 (n=242)
2011-12 (n=232)
Numbers
Grade Level
Proficient
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Grade Seven
Percentages
Grade Level
Proficient
no
yes
no
yes
no
2007-08 (n=223)
2008-09 (n=214)
2009-10 (n=243)
2010-11 (n=224)
2011-12 (n=246)
Basic and
Proficient
Below
and Above
54%
46%
49%
51%
51%
49%
51%
49%
63%
37%
2007-08 (n=223)
2008-09 (n=214)
2009-10 (n=243)
2010-11 (n=224)
2011-12 (n=246)
Basic and
Proficient
Below
and Above
121
102
104
110
124
119
114
110
155
91
Numbers
2007-08 (n=226)
2008-09 (n=238)
2009-10 (n=218)
2010-11 (n=242)
2011-12 (n=232)
Grade Eight
Percentages
Numbers
Grade Level
Proficient
no
yes
no
no
no
Cohort Data
Basic and
Proficient and
Below
Above
41%
59%
45%
55%
51%
49%
Numbers
Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
2007-08 (n=219)
29
60
108
22
2008-09 (n=238)
30
77
112
19
2009-10 (n=243)
32
92
114
5
Basic and
Proficient and
Below
Above
89
111
107
126
124
129
Cohort 2
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Basic and
Proficient and
Below
Above
46%
54%
52%
48%
51%
49%
Numbers
Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
2008-09 (n=233)
66
41
90
36
2009-10 (n=218)
37
77
85
19
2010-11 (n=224)
36
78
86
24
Basic and
Proficient and
Below
Above
107
143
114
133
114
138
Cohort 3
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Basic and
Proficient and
Below
Above
48%
52%
50%
50%
63%
37%
Numbers
Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
2009-10 (n=240)
47
69
82
42
2010-11 (n=242)
28
93
99
22
2011-12 (n=246)
34
121
74
17
Basic and
Proficient and
Below
Above
116
158
121
143
155
172
Cohort 1
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Grade Level
Proficient
yes
yes
no
Grade Level
Proficient
yes
no
no
Grade Level
Proficient
yes
yes
no
Cohort 1
70%
Percentages
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Profeciency Levels
Cohort 2
60%
Percentages
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Proficiency Levels
Cohort 3
60%
Percentages
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2009-10
2010-11
Proficiency Levels
2011-12
Grade Level
Dataset 2
Building Assessment Results for a Common Assesment Given to All Students in the same Grade on the same Day
Student
ID
1
2
3
4
English
Gender Ethnicity Prof
Score Teacher
M
As
EP
93 B
M
W
EP
91 B
F
W
EP
91 A
M
As
EP
92 A
5 M
6 F
7 M
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
M
M
M
M
F
M
M
F
M
M
F
M
M
F
F
M
M
F
M
Hi
Hi
AA
LEP/EL
EP
EP
W
As
W
W
W
AA
As
Hi
Hi
W
As
As
Hi
W
W
AA
AA
W
As
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
Advanced
16%
96 B
91 A
91 B
100
81
86
80
89
84
81
84
86
87
80
85
88
82
72
70
78
77
75
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
Proficient
& Above
42%
Proficient
26%
Basic &
Below
58%
Basic
42%
Below Basic
16%
Teacher A
EP
LEP/EL
17
6
Teacher B
20
7
50%
Criterion
Met?
no
Grade Level
27
28
29
30
F
M
M
F
As
W
Hi
AA
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
72
73
72
73
A
B
A
B
31 F
AA
EP
78 A
32 F
Hi
LEP/EL
71 A
33 M
AA
EP
72 A
34
35
36
37
M
F
F
M
38 M
W
W
W
Hi
Hi
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
70
78
70
72
B
B
A
A
Teacher A Teacher B
Proficient &
Above and EP
Basic & Below
and EP
Proficient &
Above and
LEP/EL
Basic & Below
and LEP/EL
77 B
39 F
Hi
LEP/EL
74 A
40 M
Hi
EP
74 B
41 F
EP
74 B
42 F
EP
77 B
EP Students
Proficient and
Above
EP Students
Basic and
Below
LEP/EL
Students
Proficient and
Above
LEP/EL
Students
Basic and
Below
11
Teacher A
50%
Criterion
Teacher A Met?
Teacher B
50%
Criterion
Teacher B Met?
53% yes
45% no
47%
55%
17% no
29% no
83%
71%
Grade Level
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
M
F
F
M
F
M
M
F
AA
AA
As
W
Hi
Hi
AA
Hi
LEP/EL
EP
LEP/EL
EP
LEP/EL
LEP/EL
LEP/EL
LEP/EL
61
69
64
67
60
59
54
50
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B