a3

\
1/
\g
NAME:
lkrue.*1 I?e ue
f
AFTERMATTI OF WORLD WAR II: AN INTERDISCffLINARY
PROTECT
PRESENTATION
Individual 40a/a
Above Standard:
5
Meets
Standard: 4
Approaches
Stundard: 3
Belaw
Standard: 2
Missing:
I
Depth of
understanding
Presentation
demonstrates a
deep
understanding of
your assigned
topic. Points are
explained well
and supported.
Presentation
demonstrates a
good
understanding
of your assigtled
topic. Pcrigl# are
explained and
supported.
Presentation
reveals only
shallow
understanding
oftopic. Points
are not
explained well
nor supported.
Presentation
reveals
minimal
understandin
g oftopic,
points are
unclear and
unsuooorted.
Clarity of the
presentation
Presentation is
extremely clear,
accurate and easy
to follow.
Presentation is
clear, accaralq
andeasyd
followu/
Presentation is
not completely
clear, accurate
or easy to
follow.
Presentation
is unclear,
inaccurate a
nd not easy
to follow.
Speaking
Quality
Presenters talk to
the audience,
rather than
read. Eye contact
and voice
projection are
very sood.
Presenters talk
to the audienpe,
rathertharr,/
read,. Ev/
contact%nd
voice projection
are Aood.
Presenters read
their
speech. Eye
contact and
voice
projection are
inconsistbnt.
Presenters
read from
the paper.
t
COLLABORATION
AND PROCESS
Individupl - z|oh
5
Exceeds
Expectations
4
Meets Expectations
3
Approaches
Expectations
0
Below
Expectations
Collaboration &
Cooperation
Student helped
orgmize and solve
problems
that arose
while only doing the\
fair share ofthe work.
Student shared ideas
and contributed to
&op
discussions;
'aia At share ofthe
work.
Student
didn't do fair
share of the
work
Student did
very little on
this project
Focus Student used time
weil and helped
others do the same.
q
Student used class
tiure and FIW time
fie\to
accomplish
fair share of the
work
Student did
not use time
well
Student did not
accomplish
hislher share of
the project
FOLLOWUP
Individual - 20o/"
Exceeds standard
5
Meets standard
4
Approaches standard
3
Missing
0
Notes Notes show careful
attention to
presentations.
Note show utt&no,
tovreseTj6ns.
Notes are missing
important information.
Who Is
Responsible
Graph
Graph is clear and
explanation is
thoughtful and
detailed.
Graph is clqx and
explanaffiis
conq$e.
Graph has some errors,
making it difficult to
understand, and/or
explanation is weak.
\\0