Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Simpkin - Description of The NCRP 147 Shielding Model Using XRAYBARR Software
Simpkin - Description of The NCRP 147 Shielding Model Using XRAYBARR Software
+
pre W
kVp x x B kVp W U kVp K
d
) , ( ) ( ) (
1
2
20
kVp
P
d
2
Scatter Radiation Scatter Radiation
i patient
21
ScaledNormalizedScatter Fraction ScaledNormalizedScatter Fraction Scaled Normalized Scatter Fraction Scaled Normalized Scatter Fraction
1 m
K
S
1 m
1m 1 m
6 +
S
K
K
6
1
10
+
=
P
S
K
K
a
22
K
P
1 cm
2
area
primary beam
at 1 m
Scaled Normalized Scatter Fraction Scaled Normalized Scatter Fraction
'
23
Scatter Radiation Scatter Radiation Scatter Radiation Scatter Radiation
Same theory as old NCRP-49
scatter fraction data of Kelley & Trout reevaluated
by Simpkin & Dixon (Health Phys 1998)
i b (
2
) d i di d pri beam area F (cm
2
) measured at pri distance d
F
conveniently taken as image receptor area @ SID
li itl h kV d d d explicitly show kVp dependence and sum over
workload distribution to yield shielded scatter
kerma kerma
) , (
) ( ) ( 10
) , (
2 2
6
1
kVp x B
d
F
d
kVp W kVp K a
x K
W
S
=
24
) ( ) (
2 2
p
d d
F
kVp
S
S
Leakage Radiation
Radiation originating from x-
ray tube focal spot but not
emanating from the tube
portal
i
portal
patient
25
Leakage radiation Leakage radiation Leakage radiation Leakage radiation
Intensitycant exceedL =100mR/hr at 1m Intensity can t exceed L 100 mR/hr at 1 m
when tube is operated at its leakage
technique factors technique factors
maximum potential for continuous operation
kVp (typically135-150kVp or 50kVpfor kVp
max
(typically 135 150 kVp, or 50 kVp for
mammography)
I
max
is the maximum continuous tube current
max
st e a u co t uoustubecu e t
possible at kVp
max
. Note that this is usually a
low mA, not typical of clinical radiography.
26
Leakage radiation Leakage radiation Leakage radiation Leakage radiation
These leakage technique factors specify
how thick the shielding in the tube housing
should be
NCRP49 suggested leakage technique gg g q
factors of 3.3 mA at 150 kVp, 4 mA at 125
kVp, 5 mA at 100 kVp; remain fairly p p y
typical today
27
Leakage radiation Leakage radiation Leakage radiation Leakage radiation
NCRP-147calculations(andshieldingmethods NCRP 147 calculations (and shielding methods
2 and 3) use
33mA at 150kVp 3.3 mA at 150 kVp
worst case leakage rates
(Subsequently wevefoundthat assuming4mA at (Subsequently, weve found that assuming 4 mA at
125 kVp leakage technique factors specifies
barriers that are 10-20% thicker than in the report) p )
However, actual leakage rates are 0-30% of the
maximum leakage so we dont see a problem
28
g p
New Leakage Model New Leakage Model gg
For tube operating at techniques (kVp, I) with p g q ( p, )
transmission through the tube housing B
housing
,
assume leakage kerma rate at 1 m through tube
housing is
) ( ) (
h i
2
kVp B I kVp kVp K
L
= dt I kVp W ) (
then unshielded leakage kerma K
L
(at 1 m) at
that kVp is
) (
) ( ) ( ) 1 (
) , 0 (
max housing max
2
max
housing
2
kVp B I kVp
kVp B kVp W U kVp L
kVp K
L
=
31
) (
max housing max max
kVp kVp
New Leakage Model New Leakage Model gg
Applyinginversesquaretodistanced
L
from Applying inverse square to distance d
L
from
tube to shielded area,
andputtingabarrier withtransmission and putting a barrier with transmission
exp(ln(2)x/HVL) between tube & area yields
) ( ) ( ) 1 (
2
kV B kV W U kV L
=
) (
) ( ) ( ) 1 (
) , (
max housing max
2
max
housing
2
kVp B I kVp
kVp B kVp W U kVp L
kVp x K
L
) (
) 2 ln(
exp
1
2
g
kVp HVL
x
d
32
) (kVp HVL d
L
How far off is NCRP How far off is NCRP- -49s leakage model? 49s leakage model?
1E-1
1E+0
1E-3
1E-2
e
/
1E 5
1E-4
Leakage dose as function of kVp
transmitted through x-ray tube
housing of 2.32 mm Pb compared
1
4
7
l
e
a
k
a
g
e
4
9
l
e
a
k
a
g
e
1E-6
1E-5
ous g o 3 b co pa ed
to that at 150 kVp
Leakage technique factors:
150 kVp, 3.3 mA for 100 mR/hr
N
C
R
P
-
1
N
C
R
P
-
4
1E-8
1E-7
33
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
kVp
1E-9
Summary: Shielding Model No 1 Summary: Shielding Model No 1 Summary: Shielding Model No. 1 Summary: Shielding Model No. 1
Rigorous model based on the well-accepted
NCRP-49 methods.
But you need a computer program y p p g
(XRAYBARR, for example) to implement
fully! f y
Is there a shielding method that allows
paper andcalculator solutions? paper and calculator solutions?
34
NCRP NCRP--147 Shielding Model No 2 147 Shielding Model No 2 NCRP NCRP 147 Shielding Model No. 2 147 Shielding Model No. 2
For each clinical workload distribution, of
l kl dW i f b h total workload W
norm
per patient, for both
primary and secondary barriers, NCRP-147
provides: provides:
K
1
, the kerma per patient at 1 m distance
Primarykermaper patient K
1
isinTable45 Primary kerma per patient K
P
is in Table 4.5
Secondary kerma per patient K
sec
1
is in Table 4.7
B, the transmission of the radiation ,
generated by this workload distribution for
primary or secondary barriers (cf App B & C)
35
NCRP NCRP--147 Shielding Model No 2 147 Shielding Model No 2 NCRP NCRP 147 Shielding Model No. 2 147 Shielding Model No. 2
Primary Air Kerma at 1 m for Workload
Di ib i K
1
36
Distributions, K
1
NCRP NCRP--147 Shielding Model No 2 147 Shielding Model No 2 NCRP NCRP 147 Shielding Model No. 2 147 Shielding Model No. 2
Secondary Air Kerma at 1 m for Workload
37
S y W
Distributions, K
1
sec
NCRP NCRP--147 Shielding Model No. 2 147 Shielding Model No. 2
For single kVp operation For single kVp operation cf. Simpkin and
Dixon Health Phys. 74(3), 350365 for y ( ),
secondary kerma per workload at 1 m at
single kVp operation g p p
All other data is available in NCRP 147
But be careful reading scientific notation: But be careful reading scientific notation:
1.234 x 10
1
= 12.34
38
Shielding Model No. 2 Shielding Model No. 2
Get theunshieldedkerma K(0) byscalingthekerma Get the unshielded kerma, K(0), by scaling the kerma
per patient at 1 m, K
1
, by
N patient procedures (suggested values of N are in Table
4.3) or, equivalently
total workload W
tot
(where workload/pat = W
norm
)
cantweakW byaQE-specifieddifferent workloadper can tweak W
tot
by a QE-specified different workload per
patient, W
site
t t
W U K N U K
1 1
Kerma is then
( h U i l db 1f d b i )
norm
tot
W d
W U K
d
N U K
K
2 2
) 0 ( = =
39
(where U is replaced by 1 for secondary barriers)
Shielding Model No. 2 Shielding Model No. 2
Ratioof P/T toK(0) istherequiredtransmission Ratio of P/T to K(0) is the required transmission
1
2
1
2
) 0 (
/
) (
W d P d P
K
T P
x B
norm
= = =
(again, U is replaced by 1 for secondary barriers)
T i i B i f i f
1 1
) 0 (
) (
UD T W UD T N
K
tot
Transmission B is now a function of
barrier material and thickness
kl ddi ib i workload distribution
primary or secondary
40
41
B=0.0047
42
x=1.2 mm Pb
Now the Now the
difficulty is in
reading the
correct curve!
43
Shielding Model No 3 for Shielding Model No 3 for Shielding Model No. 3 for Shielding Model No. 3 for
Representative Rooms Representative Rooms
Model No. 2 fails for
complicated complicated
assemblages of x-ray
tubes/ positions/
workload
distributions, such as
i di hi in a radiographic or
radiographic/
fluoroscopicroom
44
fluoroscopic room
Shielding Model No 3 for Shielding Model No 3 for Shielding Model No. 3 for Shielding Model No. 3 for
Representative Rooms Representative Rooms
(Using XRAYBARR) NCRP-147 shows
barrier thicknessrequirementscalculatedfor barrier thickness requirements calculated for
representative rooms:
Assumeconservativelysmall roomlayout Assume conservatively small room layout
assures maximum contribution from all sources
Presumesthat thekindsof exposuresmade Presumes that the kinds of exposures made
amongst the various x-ray tubes/positions follow
those observed by the AAPM TG-9 survey
45
y y
Representative Radiographic Room Representative Radiographic Room Representative Radiographic Room Representative Radiographic Room
46
Use Factors fromAAPMSurvey Use Factors fromAAPMSurvey Use Factors from AAPM Survey Use Factors from AAPM Survey
Cross-table
Rad Room:
Chest Bucky
Lateral Position
U=9%
Overtable Position
U=89% shooting down
t fl
Rad Room: floor/
other barriers applies
at floor
(Another primary wall gets
other barriers applies
to Overtable and
Crosstable positions
( p y g
U=2% of the floor/ other
barrier distribution; assume
tube is centered overtable)
47
tube is centered overtable)
Representative Radiographic Room Representative Radiographic Room p g p p g p
Cross-table
Lateral Wall Secondary Barrier
Chest
primary
y
Chest
Bucky
wall
U=2%
primary
k
y
d
a
r
y
U 2%
primary
wall
e
s
t
B
u
c
k
l
s
e
c
o
n
d
48
C
h
e
w
a
l
Secondary Barrier
RepresentativeR&F Room RepresentativeR&F Room Representative R&F Room Representative R&F Room
Also assume a Representative R&F room
Has same layout as Standard Radiographic Room
except an undertable fluoro x-ray tube and image
intensifier areadded centeredover table intensifier are added, centered over table
Does fluoro as well as standard radiographic work,
with table and chest buckies and crosstable work
Assume
75% of patients imaged as if in radiographic room p g g p
25% of patients imaged by fluoroscopy tube
49
Representative R&F Room Representative R&F Room
Overtable
Radtube
Chest Rad
tube
Rad tube
IImage
Intensifier
Crosstable
Lateral Rad
Tube
50
Tube
Undertable Fluoro Tube
RepresentativeRoom RepresentativeRoom Representative Room Representative Room
Barrier Requirements Barrier Requirements
From Model 2, transmission requirement is
2
1
2
) (
UK T N
d P
x B =
so the barrier thickness requirement must
scale as:
2
d P
T N
51
2
d P
RepresentativeRoom RepresentativeRoom Representative Room Representative Room
Barrier Requirements Barrier Requirements
Method:
GivenN patients/week, needtoshieldtoP/T, a Given N patients/week, need to shield to P/T, a
distance d from the x-ray source
Calculate in mGy
-1
m
-2
T N
y
Lookuptherequiredbarrier thicknessonthe
2
d P
Look up the required barrier thickness on the
graph appropriate for that workload
distribution, barrier, and barrier material
52
22
There are 12 There are 12 NT/Pd NT/Pd
22
graphs graphs
For Representative Radiographic and R&F
Rooms:
For Lead and Concrete:
Primarybarriers with preshielding y p g
Primarybarriers without preshielding
Secondary barriers
53
54
22
NT/Pd NT/Pd
22
curves have been fit curves have been fit
The NT/Pd
2
curves have been fit to a
modified Archer eqn:
Seefittingparametersat See fitting parameters at
http://geocities.com/djsimpkin/Shielding/Shield
ing.htm
55
g
56
NT/Pd NT/Pd
22
: From where is : From where is dd
measured? measured?
Primary Barriers
Floor overhead radiographic tube
Chest Buckywall chest tube(72" SID) Chest Bucky wall chest tube (72 SID)
Crosstable Lateral Wall cross-table tube (40" SID)
2% U wall center of table
Secondary Barriers
Floor patient ontable Floor patient on table
Chest Bucky secondary wall chest tube (72" SID)
Secondary Wall patient on table
Ceiling patient ontable
57
Ceiling patient on table
Equivalencyof ShieldingMaterialsfor Equivalencyof ShieldingMaterialsfor Equivalency of Shielding Materials for Equivalency of Shielding Materials for
Model No. 3 Calculations Model No. 3 Calculations
For representative room calculations only,
conservatively conclude y
Steel thickness requirement =
8 Pb thickness requirement q
Gypsum wallboard thickness requirement =
3.2 concrete thickness requirement
Glass thickness requirement =
1.2 concrete thickness requirement
58
Conclusions Conclusions
NCRP-147 utilizes 3 shielding models
Model No 1: Extensionof themethodsof NCRP 49 Model No. 1: Extension of the methods of NCRP-49
With kVp dependence
With new models for primary and leakage
R i t t i l t f ll Requires computer program to implement fully
Model No. 2: Based on data from model no. 1,
NCRP-147 shows kerma per patient at 1 m and transmission
i f i kl d curves appropriate for a given workload.
Calculate unshielded kerma and then transmission needed to
reduce to P/T. Look up barrier thickness.
M d l N 3 B d d f d l 1 Model No. 3: Based on data from model no. 1,
For N patients at distance d (for a particular workload
distribution & barrier), calculate NT/Pd
2
NCRP 147 h b i hi k f i f NT/Pd
2
59
NCRP-147 shows barrier thickness as function of NT/Pd
2