This rubric evaluates case study presentations on two criteria: communication and depth of thought. For communication, an excellent presentation is beautifully crafted, easy to follow, with neatly constructed slides and persuasive visuals. A good presentation has a uniform slide pattern and visuals that aid persuasiveness. For depth of thought, an excellent presentation shows a well-researched and argued solution, while a good presentation offers some realistic solutions and research to support strategies. Lower scores are given for presentations with poor construction, flow, insights or research.
Original Description:
This is a rubric for the completion of a case studies for social studies.
This rubric evaluates case study presentations on two criteria: communication and depth of thought. For communication, an excellent presentation is beautifully crafted, easy to follow, with neatly constructed slides and persuasive visuals. A good presentation has a uniform slide pattern and visuals that aid persuasiveness. For depth of thought, an excellent presentation shows a well-researched and argued solution, while a good presentation offers some realistic solutions and research to support strategies. Lower scores are given for presentations with poor construction, flow, insights or research.
This rubric evaluates case study presentations on two criteria: communication and depth of thought. For communication, an excellent presentation is beautifully crafted, easy to follow, with neatly constructed slides and persuasive visuals. A good presentation has a uniform slide pattern and visuals that aid persuasiveness. For depth of thought, an excellent presentation shows a well-researched and argued solution, while a good presentation offers some realistic solutions and research to support strategies. Lower scores are given for presentations with poor construction, flow, insights or research.
Improvement Incomplete Communicat ion Presentation was beautifully crafted and easy to follow. Each slide neatly constructed and was clearly laid out and succinct. Visuals such as images or videos were well crafted and aided in persuasiveness. Presentation was visually appealing. Each slide followed a uniform pattern and was laid out efficiently. Images or videos aided in the persuasiveness of the presentation. Presentation was visually acceptable, albeit bland or unoriginal. Visuals were used, however lacked the ability to aid in the strategies or recommendations of the presentation. Presentation was poorly constructed and did not flow from one slide to the next. Disjointed visuals hindered the presentations ability to be persuasive. Presentation was not completed, or was sorely lacking in its ability to be persuasive.
Depth of thought Presentation showed great understanding of the problem at hand, and offered a solution that was well argued, well researched and well weighed out against the other solutions, which were also well thought out . Presentation offered some good insights into how to solve the case, however not all strategies offered realistic solutions. Research was conducted and aided in the persuasiveness of the presentation. Presentation offered some insight into how the case could be solved, however lacked conviction in the final recommendation. Some research was conducted, however not all strategies were well thought out. Presentation lacked critical thinking or analysis which was evident in recommendations. Presentation was poorly constructed and showed little insight into strategies that would solve the case. Little research was conducted, and this was evident in the solutions put forth during the presentation. Little to no insight was shown throughout the course of the presentation. No viable solutions were raised, and presentation showed no depth of thought or care towards solving the case.