You are on page 1of 3

ASSIGNMENTS 1 (Individual Task)

Issued: Week 3
Due / Presentation: Week 5
Description
Your task in this assignment is to select two websites which has been designed for
information presentation around a similar theme and to write a comparative review of
them.
Submission Reuirements
The submission consists of 3 components:
1. Written Review (minimum 2!! words" # $! marks
Write a review of %our chosen sites incorporating criteria discussed in the tools
presented in week $. &e selective about the criteria which are relevant to %our chosen
product and do not adhere slavishl% to them. This is a written review rather than a
report. Your review should be cohesive and well written' using no more than ( headings
to identif% separate sections within it. )ocus on the features which are uni*ue or
di+erent about each site as well as the most important similarities. ,se screen
captures in %our review to avoid e-cessive description.
2. .resentation /ids # 2 0arks
.rovide an aid for %our presentation. The aids should summari1e %our writing.
3. .ublic .resentation # 3 0arks
You are re*uired to demonstrate %our chosen site to the class' conducting a verbal
criti*ue of it as %ou do so.
Assessment Summar!
This assignment will be marked according to the following criteria:
1
2denti3cation of aims of the product and the techni*ues used to present the
information.
2denti3cation of the important features to review.
4iscussion of screen design and aesthetic issues (color' la%out etc".
4iscussion of interface and navigation issues (structure etc".
4iscussion of content (accurac%' completeness etc".
.ersonal comments5criti*ue.
6ualit% of writing (st%le' spelling' grammar etc".
.resentation (correct referencing where appropriate' use of screen captures etc".
6ualit% of presentation aids.
6ualit% of public presentation.
CONTENT:
1. Acknowledgement
2. Introduction
3. Aim of Product
4. User Rating Tools
(Coose an! "#
$. Personal Comment
". Conclusion
%. References
2
3

You might also like