You are on page 1of 6

Do Prices

Reflect Costs
in the Swedish
Payment
Market?
Gabriela Guibourg, November 10 2004
Why is the Riksbank
interested in this issue?
„ Oversight responsibility – monitor
developments in the market
„ Policy goals: stability and efficiency
„ Crude efficiency indicators:
- use of cash
- share of electronic payments
„ Swedish performance different from other
Nordic countries
The evolution of the card payment
market in the Nordic countries
100 100

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

0 0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Sweden Finland Norway Denmark


The use of cash – M0/GDP
5% 5%

4% 4%

3% 3%

2% 2%

1% 1%

0% 0%
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Sweden Finland Norway Denmark
Do users get correct price signals
in the choice of payment
instruments?
„ Efficiency: price = marginal cost
„ Is not true for a large number of payment
instruments
„ Private customers get worse information
through the price structure than corporate
customers
„ Financing of payment services through
cross subsidies.
Policy discussion
„ Consumers do not receive price signals in
their choice of payment instrument.
„ If they did, they would to a larger extent
chose:
- debit cards before cash
- debit cards before credit/charge cards
- direct debits and electronic credit
transfers
before paper based

You might also like