Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Swedish Payment
The Swedish Payment
Reflect Costs
in the Swedish
Payment
Market?
Gabriela Guibourg, November 10 2004
Why is the Riksbank
interested in this issue?
Oversight responsibility – monitor
developments in the market
Policy goals: stability and efficiency
Crude efficiency indicators:
- use of cash
- share of electronic payments
Swedish performance different from other
Nordic countries
The evolution of the card payment
market in the Nordic countries
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
4% 4%
3% 3%
2% 2%
1% 1%
0% 0%
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Sweden Finland Norway Denmark
Do users get correct price signals
in the choice of payment
instruments?
Efficiency: price = marginal cost
Is not true for a large number of payment
instruments
Private customers get worse information
through the price structure than corporate
customers
Financing of payment services through
cross subsidies.
Policy discussion
Consumers do not receive price signals in
their choice of payment instrument.
If they did, they would to a larger extent
chose:
- debit cards before cash
- debit cards before credit/charge cards
- direct debits and electronic credit
transfers
before paper based