Chet Rivera, CEO of Southern Tel, gave a presentation about the company's progress and vision for the future. He outlined an aggressive vision that shocked and alarmed employees at the time. While business environments have become accustomed to such attitudes today, the CEO's discourse was presented as an ultimatum rather than inspiration. The CEO wanted to shake up those content with the status quo and drive the company to be the best, make records, and achieve top performance, rather than just profit shareholders. However, a more balanced approach combining motivation and invitation may be better than threats at eliciting employees' best work.
Chet Rivera, CEO of Southern Tel, gave a presentation about the company's progress and vision for the future. He outlined an aggressive vision that shocked and alarmed employees at the time. While business environments have become accustomed to such attitudes today, the CEO's discourse was presented as an ultimatum rather than inspiration. The CEO wanted to shake up those content with the status quo and drive the company to be the best, make records, and achieve top performance, rather than just profit shareholders. However, a more balanced approach combining motivation and invitation may be better than threats at eliciting employees' best work.
Chet Rivera, CEO of Southern Tel, gave a presentation about the company's progress and vision for the future. He outlined an aggressive vision that shocked and alarmed employees at the time. While business environments have become accustomed to such attitudes today, the CEO's discourse was presented as an ultimatum rather than inspiration. The CEO wanted to shake up those content with the status quo and drive the company to be the best, make records, and achieve top performance, rather than just profit shareholders. However, a more balanced approach combining motivation and invitation may be better than threats at eliciting employees' best work.
After Chet Rivera, CEO at Southern Tel, made a presentation about the company's progress he proceeded to make a clear statement about the vision he wanted and the profile of worker he wanted in his company. This vision, though determined and progress-oriented, was perceived as very aggressive and shocking for the time. As time passed, the business environments got used to this kind of attitude so for our time this type of speech would be perceived as less shocking and more motivational, rather than an awakening call. I think he made this is statements in order to shake people who seem to be stuck in maintaining a status quo in the company rather than reaching for progress. He didn't want to settle with just numbers, he didn't want the easy way of staying comfortable in just satisfying stockholders and gaining some profit, he wanted to make the company the best it could be, he wanted to make new records, he wanted to make a new path and be as top as possible. For my taste, this kind of speech needs to be matched with more inspirational and inviting words so as not to be perceived as an ultimatum, which is the way he presents his discourse. I don't believe threatening will help get the most out of the people, maybe a more stimulating discourse would be more appealing and eventually people that are not aligned with the vision would step away from this path. It needs to be a little of both approaches, inviting new and visionary people but also stimulating the people who have been around the company for a while, for its them who have the experience and knowledge. For me, I wouldn't like to work in an atmosphere that seeks for progress through a menacing speech, I don't think that's what would keep me motivating into doing my best work.