Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluating Chiller Plant Efficiency
Evaluating Chiller Plant Efficiency
Efficiency
0.576 kW/Ton
0.549 kW/Ton
6.10 COP
6.40 COP
lift
(DT)
60F
Tonnage
Range
Path A
Path B
Full
Change
(%)
IPLV
Change
(%)
Full
Change
(%)
IPLV
Change
(%)
< 150
0.634
9.9%
0.596
11.0%
0.639
9.2%
0.450
32.8%
0.634
0.0%
0.596
0.0%
0.639
-0.8%
0.450
24.5%
0.576
0.0%
0.549
0.0%
0.600
-4.1%
0.400
27.2%
600
0.570
1.1%
0.539
1.9%
0.590
-2.3%
0.400
27.2%
6/16/2010
IPLV =
1%
85F(30C)
57%
75
65
42%
(24C)
(18C)
kW/ton
What is
AHRI Relief
kW/ton
0.9
0.6
0.3
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Load
1.2
kW/ton
kW/ton
0.9
0.6
0.3
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Load
1.2
CHILLER LOAD %
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
SYSTEM LOAD %
Single
Two Chiller
ChillerPlant
Plant
Confidential and Proprietary
70
80
90
100
CHILLER LOAD %
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
SYSTEM LOAD %
70
80
90
100
IPLV =
1%
A +
42%
12%
45%
+
+
B
D
C
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
4% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
33% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
23% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
40% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
55F(13C)
Other Maps
60F(16C)
65F(18C)
70F(21C)
75F(24C)
80F(27C)
85F(30C)
IPLV =
1%
A +
42%
12%
45%
+
+
B
D
C
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
9% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
29% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
41% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
21% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
55F(13C)
60F(16C)
65F(18C)
70F(21C)
75F(24C)
80F(27C)
85F(30C)
IPLV =
1%
A +
42%
12%
45%
+
+
B
D
C
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
9% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
26% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
53% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
12% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
55F(13C)
60F(16C)
65F(18C)
70F(21C)
75F(24C)
80F(27C)
85F(30C)
IPLV =
1%
A +
42%
12%
45%
+
+
B
D
C
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
7% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
24% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
62% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
8% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
55F(13C)
60F(16C)
65F(18C)
70F(21C)
75F(24C)
80F(27C)
85F(30C)
Efficiency Comparison:
Washington, D. C.
Ottawa
London
Paris
Rome
Warsaw
Moscow
Beijing
Kansas City
Seoul
Tokyo
Boston
Vancouver
Shanghai
Atlanta
Seattle
Taipei
Miami
Hong Kong
Denver
Houston
Hanoi
Los Angeles
HoChiMinh
Cairo
Phoenix
Singapore
Jerusalem
Bangkok
Dallas
Mumbai
Mexico City
New Delhi
Caracas
Sao Paulo
Cape Town
Riyadh
Dubai
Sydney
Melbourne
Perth
Efficiency Comparison:
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
15% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
23% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
48% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
14% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
0
55 (13C)
55F
60 (16C)
60F
65 (18C)
65F
70 (21C)
70F
75 (24C)
75F
80 (27C)
80F
85(30C)
85F
Efficiency Comparison:
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
2% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
65% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
27% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
6% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
55F
55 (13C)
60F
60 (16C)
65F
65 (18C)
70F
70(21C)
75F
75 (24C)
80F
80 (27C)
85F
85(30C)
Efficiency Comparison:
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
5% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
18% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
64% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
13% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
0
55 (13C)
55F
60 (16C)
60F
65 (18C)
65F
70 (21C)
70F
75 (24C)
75F
80 (27C)
80F
85(30C)
85F
Efficiency Comparison:
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
15% of Operation
(IPLV = 45%)
43% of Operation
(IPLV = 42%)
19% of Operation
(IPLV = 1%)
22% of Operation
(IPLV = 12%)
0
55 (13C)
55F
60 (16C)
60F
65 (18C)
65F
70(21C)
70F
75 (24C)
75F
80 (27C)
80F
85(30C)
85F
8.0
Centrifugal
>600 tons
Screw
150-300 tons
6.0
Scroll
<100 tons
4.0
2.0
0.0
1977
1980
1989
1999
best
available
500,000 lbs/hr
air
600,000 lbs/hr
water
Confidential and Proprietary
8.0
Centrifugal
>600 tons
Screw
150-300 tons
6.0
Scroll
<100 tons
4.0
2.0
0.0
1977
1980
1989
1999
best
available
Chiller-Tower Optimization
400
300
200
optimal
set-point
total kW
chiller kW
tower kW
100
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
Building Energy
Analysis Tool
H.A.P. v4.5
ASHRAE Journal,
A Closer Look at Chiller Ratings December 2009