Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syphon Hydraulics
Syphon Hydraulics
February 1, 2011
= 40 cumec
Bed width
= 18 m
= 2.1 m
Bed level
= 250 m
Side slope
= 1 H: 1 V
b. Drain
Flood discharge
= 100 cumec
Bed level
= 251.8 m
Depth
= 1.45 m
H.F.L.
= 253.25 m
Roadway
16 m
Drain
44.5 m
Roadway
8m
February 1, 2011
Design
1. Drainage waterway
Laceys Formula
P 4.83 Q
, P wetted perimeter
4.83 100
48.3 m
Q
40
0.9 m s
A 1.5 2.12 18 2.1
3.5 m
0.3 m
Q
40
2.29 m s
A 3.5 2.5 2
V
2.29
Fr
0.46 1
gD
9.81 2.5
V 2 ~ 3 m s
Fr 1, 0.4 ~ 0.6
18 7.3
2 10.7 m
2
18 7.3
3 16.05 m
2
At section 4
Velocity head ha
Va2
0.92
0.041 m
2 g 2 9.81
2.5 m
February 1, 2011
Velocity
Q
40
1.83 m s
A 21.9
V 2 1.83
Velocity head 3
0.17 m
2 g 2 9.81
2
V 2 V42
1.832 0.92
K2 3
0.3
0.039 m
2 9.81
2g
El. of T.E.L. at section 3 252.141 0.039 252.18m
R.L. of water surface 252.18 0.17 252.01m
R.L. of bed 252.01 3 249.01m
L V2
where,
f1= constant for syphon mouth
=0.08 for bell mouthed syphon
b
f 2 a 1 where a and b are constants depending on the
R
A
2 3.5 2.5
P 3.5 2.5 2 2
0.1
f 2 0.00316 1
0.036
0.729
70 2.29
hL 1 0.08 0.0036
0.729 2 9.81
0.381 m
2
At section 2
February 1, 2011
say 249.40 m
At section 1
V 2 V12
hL in contraction transition K1 2
2g
1.832 0.92
0.2
0.026 m
2 9.81
February 1, 2011
4. Transitions
Because the depth is varying through the transition, Metras and Chutervedis formulae
for transitions are not applicable, therefore Hinds method shall be used.
The expansion transition is explained in more details, please refer to section 4.b.
a. Contraction transition
y C x2
w.s. @ sec.1 - w.s. @ sec. 2
y1
2
252.546 252.4
0.073 m
2
length of transition 10.7
x1
5.35 m
2
2
Substitute y1 and x1 in the equation to find C
0.073 C 5.35
C 0.0026
y 0.0026 x 2
Contraction Transition
[1]
[2]
Dist.
[3]
El. of
W.S.
(m)
(m)
0.0026x2
0.00
0.0000
252.400
[4]
El. of
T.E.L.
(m)
Linear
Interp.
252.500
[5]
Velocity
head
hv (m)
[6]
Velocity
[4]-[3]
(2g hv)1/2
0.017
1.83
V (m/s)
[7]
Side
slope
s
Linear
Interp.
0:1
[8]
Area
A (m2)
21.86
[9]
Bed
level
(m)
249.40
[10]
[11]
Depth
Bed width
D (m)
[3]-[9]
A/D - s D
3.0
7.30
2.50
7.53
5.35
9.06
8.00
14.56
10.70
0.0000
252.546
252.587
0.040
0.90
b. Expansion transition
252.1 252.01
0.045 m
2
16.05
x1
8.025 m
2
y
0.045
C 12
2
x
8.025
y1
y 0.0007 x 2
1.5:1
44.44
250.45
2.1
18.00
February 1, 2011
252.1
y1
w.s. El. 252.01
PROFILE
8.025
16.05
8.02 10
18.00
13.92
10.70
8.09
9.16
7.30
7.30
Bed level
13
16.05 m
PLAN
Expansion Transition
[1]
[2]
Dist.
[3]
El. of
W.S.
(m)
0.00
0.0000
252.010
[4]
El. of
T.E.L.
(m)
Linear
Interp.
252.180
3.00
0.0063
252.016
252.173
0.157
1.753
0.28:1
22.73
249.20
2.82
7.29
6.00
0.0252
252.035
252.165
0.130
1.596
0.56:1
25.48
249.38
2.66
8.09
8.02
0.0450
252.055
252.161
0.106
1.442
0.75:1
28.37
249.50
2.56
9.16
10.00
0.0252
252.075
252.156
0.081
1.262
0.93:1
31.75
249.63
2.44
10.71
13.00
0.0063
252.094
252.150
0.056
1.051
1.21:1
38.10
249.81
2.28
13.92
16.05
0.0000
252.100
252.140
0.040
0.886
1.5:1
44.44
250.00
2.10
18.00
(m)
0.0007x2
[5]
Velocity
head
hv (m)
[6]
A (m2)
1.826
[7]
Side
slope
s
Linear
Interp.
0:1
Velocity
[4]-[3]
(2g hv)1/2
0.170
21.86
V (m/s)
[8]
Area
[9]
Bed
level
(m)
[10]
[11]
Depth
Bed width
D (m)
[3]-[9]
A/D - s D
249.01
3.00
7.30
5. Pucca floor
Provide pucca floor in half the transition length in the upstream and 3/4th
the length of the expansion transition in the downstream.
Length of pucca floor u.s.
10.7
5.35 m say 6.0 m
2
Pucca Floor
February 1, 2011
ii.
i.
, H1 2.01 m of water
11.3 4.3 11.3
H1
H2
4.3
6.97
Total seepage length = 11.3 m
ii.
February 1, 2011
8
3
6.97 m
H 2 3.25
, H 2 1.25 m of water
4.3 11.3
3.74
1.7 m say 2.0 m
2.2
February 1, 2011