Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4. Electrostatics of Macroscopic Media: 4.1 Multipole Expansion
Chapter 4. Electrostatics of Macroscopic Media: 4.1 Multipole Expansion
d 3 x'
x x'
x' (x' )
Fig 4.1
We consider the potential in the far-field region (see Fig. 4.1 where | |
) due to a
localized charge distribution (
for
). If the total charge is q, it is a good
approximation to treat the charge distribution as a point charge, so
zero, the potential does not vanish, but it decays much faster than
details about how the potential behaves in the far-field region.
. Even if q is
. We will discuss more
Electric dipole
r+
+q
r-
d
-q
We begin with a simple, yet exceedingly important case of charge distribution. Two equal and
opposite charges separated by a small distance form an electric dipole. Suppose that +q and q
are separated by a displacement vector d as shown in Figure 4.2, then the potential at x is
[(
) ]
(4.1)
| |
[(
)]
(4.2)
where
is the electric dipole moment. For the dipole p along the z-axis, the electric fields
take the form
(4.4)
is a unit vector.
Multipole expansion
We can expand the potential due to the charge distribution
(1.12)
|
In the far-field region,
(3.68)
. Then we find
(4.6)
(4.8)
in powers of
. The first
) is the dipole (
);
:
(4.9)
linear combinations of
):
(4.10)
linear combinations of
):
(4.11)
The expansion of
in rectangular coordinates
(4.12)
, the
(4.13)
If
)
(4.14)
(4.15)
where is called atomic polarizability. These little dipoles are aligned along the direction of
the field, and the material becomes polarized. An electric polarization P is defined as dipole
moment per unit volume:
(4.17)
is a volume element which contains many atoms, yet it is infinitesimally small in the
macroscopic scale. N is the number of atoms per unit volume and
is the average dipole
moment of the atoms.
E
pi
+
+
1
dV
dV
Bound charges
The dipole moment of
is
(4.20)
|
5
(4.21)
where
is a surface element and n is the normal unit vector. Here we define surface and
volume charge densities:
(4.22)
and
(4.23)
Then, the potential due to the bound charges becomes
(4.24)
Electric displacement
When a material system includes free charges
density
can be written:
(4.25)
And Gausss law reads
(4.26)
With the definition of the electric displacement D,
(4.27)
Equation 4.26 becomes
(4.28)
When an averaging is made of the homogeneous equation,
holds for the macroscopic, electric field E. This means that the electric field is still derivable
from a potential in electrostatics. Equations 4.28 and 4.29 are the two electrostatic equations in
the macroscopic scale.
n21 D
2
E2
2
1
D1
L
E1
Consider two media, 1 and 2, in contact as shown in Fig. 4.6. We shall assume that there is a
surface charge density . Applying the Gausss law to the small pill box S, we obtain
(4.32)
This leads to
(4.33)
(4.34)
i.e.,
Thus the discontinuity in the normal component of D is given by the surface density of free
charge on the interface.
The line integral of
This gives
(4.36)
(4.37)
i.e,
Thus the tangential component of the electric field is continuous across an interface.
(4.38)
Since
, i.e.,
(4.39)
Thus the potential in the dielectric satisfies the Poissons equation; the only difference between
this equation and the corresponding equation for the potential in vacuum is that replaces
(vacuum permittivity). In most cases of interest dielectrics contains no charge, i.e.,
. In
those circumstances, the potential satisfies Laplaces equation throughout the body of dielectric:
(4.40)
An electrostatic problem involving linear, isotropic, and homogeneous dielectrics reduces,
therefore, to finding solutions of Laplaces equation in each medium and joining the solutions in
the various media by means of the boundary conditions. We treat a few examples of the
various techniques applied to dielectric media.
Point charge near a plane interface of dielectric media
2 1
q
d
Fig 4.7.
|
|
|
|
|
(4.41)
|
8
We apply the method of images to find the potential satisfying these boundary conditions (see
Fig. 4.8). For the potential in the region
, we locate an image charge q at
. Then
the potential at a point described by cylindrical coordinates
is
(4.42)
where
and
(4.43)
. Then the
(4.44)
1 1
2 2
R1
R2
q
R1
q
q
z
2 1 , q'
1 2 , q"
The first two boundary conditions in Eq. 4.41 are for the tangential components of the electric
field:
(
[
)|
]
(4.45)
The third boundary condition in Eq. 4.41 is for the normal component of the displacement:
)|
(4.46)
From Eqs. 4.45 and 4.46, we obtain the image charges q and q:
(
{
2 1
(4.47)
and
for
2 1
Since
)|
(4.49)
In the limit
( behaves like a conductor) and
Eq. 2.2 for a point charge in front of a conducting surface.
10
E0
E0
Fig 4.9.
(4.50)
except for
equal to zero.
(4.52)
Since
is finite at
Boundary conditions at
(i) Tangential E:
(4.54)
or
(ii) Normal D:
(4.53)
11
(4.55)
(4.56)
(4.58)
We apply boundary condition (ii) results in
(4.59)
(4.61)
(4.62)
(4.63)
where
is the dielectric constant (or relative electric permittivity). From Eqs. 4.58 and
4.61, we can deduce that
for all
. The potential is therefore
(4.64)
(4.65)
12
(4.66)
For
(no dielectric), this reduces as expected to
. The field outside the dielectric is
clearly composed of the original constant field
and a field which has a characteristic dipole
distribution with dipole moment of
(4.67)
We compare this with that from integrating the polarization P over the sphere. Insider the
dielectric we have
(4.68)
E0
E0
Fig. 4.10
The uniform external electric field induces the constant polarization inside a dielectric sphere
(Eq. 4.68), and the induced polarization gives rise to surface charge which produces opposing
electric field if
, as illustrated in Fig. 4.10. The surface charge density (Eq. 4.22) is
( )
(4.69)
Fig. 4.11
Figure 4.11 sketches the problem of a spherical cavity of radius a in a dielectric medium ( ) with
an external field
. We can obtain the solution of this problem by switching and in
13
(4.70)
The field outside the dielectric is composed of the original constant field
dipole moment
(4.71)
.
+
+ pmol
+
+
Em
+
+
Internal field
In order to find out , we consider an imaginary sphere which contains neighboring molecules.
It is much larger than the molecules, yet infinitesimally small in the macroscopic scale. The
geometry is shown in Fig. 4.12. Then we can decompose into two terms:
,
where
is the field due to the neighboring molecules close to the given molecule and is
14
the contribution from all the other molecules. arises from surface charge density
the cavity surface. Using spherical coordinates, we obtain
on
and
, respectively. Therefore,
(4.72)
(
Using
(4.76)
as the relation between susceptibility (the macroscopic parameter) and molecular polarizability
(the macroscopic parameter).
15
Using
, we find
(4.78)
For a bound electron, a typical oscillation frequency is in the optical range, i.e.,
Hz.
3
-3
Then the electronic contribution is
m . For gases at NTP,
m , so that
their susceptibilities,
(see Eq. 4.77), are of the order of
at best. For example, the
experimental value of dielectric constant for air is
1.00054. For solids or liquid
-3
dielectrics,
m , therefore the susceptibility can be of the order of unity.
16
Where
where
is a function of only the internal coordinates of the molecule (e.g., kinetic energy)
so that it is independent of the applied field. Using the Boltzmann factor Eq. 4.82 we can write
the average dipole moment as:
(4.85)
Here the components of not parallel to vanish. In general, the dipole potential energy
is much smaller than the thermal energy
except at very low temperature. Then
(4.86)
In general, induced dipole effects are also present in polar molecules, yet they are independent
of temperature. Then, the total molecular polarizability is
(4.88)
17
Where
(4.89)
(4.90)
Now
(4.91)
The divergence theorem turns the first term into a surface integral, which vanishes if
localized and we integrate over all of space. Therefore, the work done is equal to
is
(4.92)
So far, this applies to any material. Now, if the medium is a linear dielectric, then
so
(4.93)
Thus
(4.94)
The total work done, then, as we build the free charge up from zero to the final configuration, is
(4.95)
A
+Q
Fig 4.13.
-Q
18
We shall find the electrostatic energy stored in a parallel-plate capacitor. Its geometry is shown
in Fig. 4.13: two conducting plates of area A (charged with +Q and -Q) is separated by d (we
assume that d is very small compared with the dimensions of the plates), and the gap is filled
with dielectric ( ).
(i) Capacitance
The electric field between the plates is
(4.96)
The potential difference
. Therefore,
(4.97)
Forces on dielectrics
We have just developed a procedure for calculating the electrostatic energy of a charge system
including dielectric media. We now discuss how the force on one of the objects in the charge
system may be calculated from this electrostatic energy. We assume all the charge resides on
the surfaces on the conductors.
Constant total charge
Let us suppose we are dealing with an isolated system composed of a number of parts
(conductors, point charges, dielectrics) and allow one of these parts to make a small
displacement
under the influence of the electrical forces acting upon it. The work
performed by the electrical force on the system is
(4.99)
Because the system is isolated, this work is done at the expense of the electrostatic energy
in other words, the change in the electrostatic energy is
. Therefore,
(4.100)
where the subscript Q has been added to denote that the system is isolated, and hence its total
charge remains constant during the displacement .
19
Fixed potential
We assume that all the conductors of the system are maintained at fixed potentials, , by
means of external sources of energy (e.g., by means of batteries). Then, the work performed
(4.101)
where
is the work supplied by the batteries. The electrostatic energy W of the system (see
Eq. 1.36) is given as
Since
(4.102)
(4.103)
s are constant,
Furthermore, the work supplied by the batteries is the work required to move each of the
charge increments
from zero potential to the potential of the appropriate conductor,
therefore,
Consequently,
(4.104)
(4.105)
, and hence
Here the subscript V is used to denote that all potentials are maintained constant.
Dielectric slab within a parallel-plate capacitor
As an example of the energy method, we consider a parallel-plate capacitor in which a dielectric
slab ( ) is partially inserted. The dimensions of each plate are length and width . The
separation between them is . The geometry is illustrated in Fig. 4.14. We shall calculate the
force tending to pull the dielectric slab back into place. We consider two cases of (i) a constant
potential difference V and (ii) a constant total charge Q.
x
+Q
V
-Q
20
( )
(4.106)
( )
(4.109)
, we find
(4.111)
Eq. 4.111 has the same expression with Eq. 4.107, but the force of constant charge (Eq. 4.111)
is a function of (C varies with x) while the force of constant potential (Eq. 4.107) is
independent of x.
21