You are on page 1of 1

ConstructedActionandConstructedDialogueinASLNarrativeDiscourse

MelanieMetzger&SusanMather
GallaudetUniversity

Constructed action and constructed dialogue, as an interactional sociolinguistic


description of the role shifting commonly found in signed languages, has received
increasing examination by signed language discourse analysts in recent years (Roy
1989;Winston1991,1992;Metzger1995;Mather1996;Wilson1996;andLucasetal
2001).
Thesediscoursefeatureshavebeendescribedasinvolvementstrategiesatthediscourse
level(seeRoy1898,Winston1992,andMetzger1995).However,theymayalsoplay
an important role regarding discourse structure. Wilson (1996:175) suggests that
constructeddialoguemayprovetobethefactorthatcontrolstheformandlengthof
sections in [American Sign Language] ASL narratives. Additionally, the use of
constructedactionanddialogueinASLdiscoursehasbeenfoundtohaveaninfluence
ongrammaticalfeatures,suchassubjectpronounvariation(Lucasetal,2001:171).
Thus, constructed action and constructed dialogue warrant further attention by
researchers,andthisisthefocusofthecurrentstudy.
Thismixedmethodstudyappliesbothaqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisbasedon
19ASLnarrativesoccurringinconversationalinteractionbetweennativeDeafsigners
ofASLfromsevensitesacrosstheUS.Thedataistakenfromanearlierstudy(see
Lucasetal2001),butthefocusofthisinvestigationisontheoccurrenceofconstructed
actionandconstructeddialoguesspecificallywithinthe19narratives,andinrelationto
thenarrativediscoursestructure(asdefinedbytheLabovianframework(Labov1972).
Resultsindicatethatconstructedactionanddialoguedoplayamajorroleinnarrative
ASLdiscoursestructure.Thispresentationwilladdresstheroleofthesefeatureswithin
thenarrativestructure,andwilldiscusstheimpactofsocialfactorssuchasage,gender,
ethnicity,andregion.
Thecurrentpaperbuildsonandextendspreviousstudiesofroleshiftingbyexamining
constructed action and constructed dialogue as a discourse level feature. The
implicationsofthisinteractionalsociolinguisticstudyareboththeoreticalandpractical
innature.Resultsofthestudyimproveourunderstandingofthediscoursefeaturesof
signed languages, and have implications for sociolinguistic analysis of signed
languages,forappliedlinguisticssuchastheteachingofsignedlanguagediscourseto
firstandsecondlanguagesusers,aswellastotheteachingofinterpreters.

You might also like