This document discusses constructed action and constructed dialogue in American Sign Language (ASL) narrative discourse. It summarizes previous research that has examined these discourse features and their role in ASL narratives. The current study applies a mixed qualitative and quantitative analysis to investigate the occurrence of constructed action and dialogue in 19 ASL narratives from Deaf signers across the United States. The results indicate that constructed action and dialogue play a major role in the structure of ASL narratives based on Labov's framework. The presentation will address the role of these features in narrative structure and discuss the impact of social factors.
This document discusses constructed action and constructed dialogue in American Sign Language (ASL) narrative discourse. It summarizes previous research that has examined these discourse features and their role in ASL narratives. The current study applies a mixed qualitative and quantitative analysis to investigate the occurrence of constructed action and dialogue in 19 ASL narratives from Deaf signers across the United States. The results indicate that constructed action and dialogue play a major role in the structure of ASL narratives based on Labov's framework. The presentation will address the role of these features in narrative structure and discuss the impact of social factors.
This document discusses constructed action and constructed dialogue in American Sign Language (ASL) narrative discourse. It summarizes previous research that has examined these discourse features and their role in ASL narratives. The current study applies a mixed qualitative and quantitative analysis to investigate the occurrence of constructed action and dialogue in 19 ASL narratives from Deaf signers across the United States. The results indicate that constructed action and dialogue play a major role in the structure of ASL narratives based on Labov's framework. The presentation will address the role of these features in narrative structure and discuss the impact of social factors.
Constructed action and constructed dialogue, as an interactional sociolinguistic
description of the role shifting commonly found in signed languages, has received increasing examination by signed language discourse analysts in recent years (Roy 1989;Winston1991,1992;Metzger1995;Mather1996;Wilson1996;andLucasetal 2001). Thesediscoursefeatureshavebeendescribedasinvolvementstrategiesatthediscourse level(seeRoy1898,Winston1992,andMetzger1995).However,theymayalsoplay an important role regarding discourse structure. Wilson (1996:175) suggests that constructeddialoguemayprovetobethefactorthatcontrolstheformandlengthof sections in [American Sign Language] ASL narratives. Additionally, the use of constructedactionanddialogueinASLdiscoursehasbeenfoundtohaveaninfluence ongrammaticalfeatures,suchassubjectpronounvariation(Lucasetal,2001:171). Thus, constructed action and constructed dialogue warrant further attention by researchers,andthisisthefocusofthecurrentstudy. Thismixedmethodstudyappliesbothaqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisbasedon 19ASLnarrativesoccurringinconversationalinteractionbetweennativeDeafsigners ofASLfromsevensitesacrosstheUS.Thedataistakenfromanearlierstudy(see Lucasetal2001),butthefocusofthisinvestigationisontheoccurrenceofconstructed actionandconstructeddialoguesspecificallywithinthe19narratives,andinrelationto thenarrativediscoursestructure(asdefinedbytheLabovianframework(Labov1972). Resultsindicatethatconstructedactionanddialoguedoplayamajorroleinnarrative ASLdiscoursestructure.Thispresentationwilladdresstheroleofthesefeatureswithin thenarrativestructure,andwilldiscusstheimpactofsocialfactorssuchasage,gender, ethnicity,andregion. Thecurrentpaperbuildsonandextendspreviousstudiesofroleshiftingbyexamining constructed action and constructed dialogue as a discourse level feature. The implicationsofthisinteractionalsociolinguisticstudyareboththeoreticalandpractical innature.Resultsofthestudyimproveourunderstandingofthediscoursefeaturesof signed languages, and have implications for sociolinguistic analysis of signed languages,forappliedlinguisticssuchastheteachingofsignedlanguagediscourseto firstandsecondlanguagesusers,aswellastotheteachingofinterpreters.