You are on page 1of 178
| | | | | INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS INTRODUCTION 70 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS invite ie a Ain irr of Corn Cao ard umber 42088 BBN orcas? Preface "This beak hasbeen written to provide a sel-eontined text on structural dynamics for use in courses offered to seniors or frt-year graduate ftadents in evil engineering, ‘The material ix based on the authors ‘oles foreach a couse given at MIT during the past few years tit presumed that the student has completed the normal undergraduate workin applied mechanic, mathomatis, and structural engineering. "The emphasis in this txt is on the practical analysis and design of es strusturer rather than oa the mathemalal techniques of dytaie ‘nalysin ‘Throughout the book examples are give to lustre appa tion of the theory to atualstrustual problems. Much ofthe material hs boon drawn from the author's experiences a consulting engine. ‘With tis emphasis the book should be useful to practicing engineers, as voll esto studente whose abjotive isto become structure designers nthe author's opinion, structural dynamies i to often taught as 8 ‘coure in vanced tathematie for engineer, For some students this ‘spproach makes the eubject unnecssarly difcult. Other students find ‘he mathematica manipulation ao intriguing that they fl to develop the ‘hynical undertanding essential for good design. In this text the author that avoided raathenateal complestiee, whieh, although they may be ital in advanced resareh, aro Unncctsary for most design purpose. ‘Chaptees 1 snd 2, im vome respects, are n review of the dyzamice ormally taught in applied mechanics. "In addition, however, two other purposes ave served: (1) the basic theory is related to actual sructres {ind (2) numerical analysis, which i not normaly covered in applied tiechanies, i intrdveed. "The order of presentation, ir, nsmerea Aoaiynis before closed sohtion, is tomewhat unorthodox. ‘The author Teioves, a6 result of his teaching experience tht this order is prefer- ble, because numerical analysis exeeuted by hand develops a physical "ea" for dynamic behavior much more rapidly than does the solution of ferential equations ‘Chapters 3 and 4 are, perhape, the heart ofthe hook, since they conta the thoory of analysis for multdegre systems, ‘The suthor hat chowen not to Use matrix notation, which is eurrently so popular, because in his ‘opinion iti podagogieally unwise to do 20 at this introductory level or thoe tethers who prefer matrix formulation, the Appendix moy be helpful Chapter 4 contaies considerable material on beam of various ‘types, because this s believed to be particularly important to structural Chapter 6 is devoted to approximate methods of design, which are veloped on the basis of the theory presented in earlier chapter ‘Because many dynanie problems in evil enginceriag involve uncertain loading conditions, tha methods are often more appropriate thay the ‘more proce but time-consuming procedure Chapters 0,7, and 8 contain applications ofthe theory to some impor ‘tant typenaf structural problema.” These treatinente are incomplete, tt they are belived to be sufciently thorough to provide sound ited tion tthe subjects ‘The author wihes to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance of hie wife, Margaret C. Biggs, who ot only typed thé manuscript, but poe ided encouragement throughout the writing of this book. Dace ‘eltran-Muldonsdo was extromely helpful in preparing the figures nd proofreading the manasrpt. ‘The author i particularly indebted to hie teacher and caleague Prof Chaves 1H. Norris for instruction and inspiration over an extended period of tte ohn Me. Bigge Contents Chapter 1 Numerical Analysis of Simple Systeme 1 Ld Intedoeton 1 12 Opedapee late Systems 3 13 Twodepee Elatic Stems tt 14. Opecdeoe Ela Sytem with Damping 17 15. Opedegrs Blouse Stems 0 18 Atermtive Methods of Nunes Anajes 28 (Chapter 2 Rigorous Analysis of One-degree Systems 34 21 Introduction 24 22 Undauped Stone 35 23, VasiowsForig Funetooe (Undamped Systeme) 40 24 Damped Satame St 25 Respoone to's Pung Yore 58 26 Sapport Motion 27 Blatoplatie Sytem 6 2B Chart Sluins for Maxim Response of One-degree ndanped He peti etme 76 (Chapter 3 Lumped-mase Malidegree Systems 8% 3 Direct Deteranation of Natural Frequencies 8 33. Chraceatie Shaper 9 84 SiodoacVinaell Procedure for Natural Fregwaies and CCharcertis Shapes fr 35, Motifod Rayleigh Method fr Natura Bre- queecies 105 85 Ungrane’s Equation 111 87. Modal Saale of Mulder Syatoms 118 88 Meldnory Rigid Pramas Sbjpted to Laer lade 8 89, Bhatplatie Analy of Malidegrs Systran 138 ‘810 Damping in Moltegre Systema 150 Chapter 4 Structres with Distributed Mass and Load 150 42 otodtion 150 482. Slaglegpn Beame—Normal Mos of Vibe 1 43. Ford Vibration f Beams 158 44 Beas wih Variable Cros Sesto and Maat 170 45 Contiuoan Beas ita 48 Beuwsieler Stee Yay AT. Pte Sab Subjectel to Normal Loads 188 448 Bhst-plstis Anal of Beane Tea Chapter 5 Approximate Design Methods 189 ‘Sd Itrodueton 190 52 died Sytem ana 53 Truaormaton Factors 209 54 Dymuinie Reston a7 35 Reon Caletens 219 458 Dds Bsamplen 204 57” Approsinate Design of Mulder Stems 233, Chapter 6 Farthquake Analysis and Design 245 8 Introduction 245 62 Respmase of Maltdgree Syetems to Support Mota 218 68 Malstoryuiting Ams 250 84 Raspon Spectra 267 85 Fartquake Groond Motions 283 188. Barshqunke Spectrum Analee of Bflidegr® Sytem 28S (G7 Prato Dosgn for Earthquake 268 Chapter 7 Bast-resintant Design 276 TA teodseton 276 72. Woading Herts of Neca Explosions 27 7 Abovearound Rectangla Strature, 22 74. Aboveground Arche nd Done 287 15 Belomerond Struct Sts 78 Ground Motions 308 (Chapter 8 Beams Subjected to Moving Loads 315 81 Tnsvoduton 315 2 Constant Force with Contant Velocity 815 83 Pulating Force with Conant Vety 318 84 Dean Teavewed by a Ring Mae, 321 8 Beam Vibaton Due to Page of Spr Mass 322 0 Bridge Vibration Dus to Moving Vekicos 823 Appendix Matrix Formation of Modal Anatyaia 329 Referens Inder a Introduction ‘The eubjoet of this tert isthe analysis and design of structures subjected ‘to dynamic Toads, ic, ods which vary with time. Although the rnajonity of civibenginering structarea ean propery” be designed as ‘hough the loads were state, there are wine importa exceptions, and it 's obviously imperative thatthe designer beable to dtingnich between Stati and dynam loads Tn fact, no steutaral loads (with the posite exception of dead lad) ‘re realy static, since they must be applied to the structure in some ‘anne, sud thi involves atime variation of fore. It obviou, hom rer, that ifthe magnitude of force varios slowly eaough, it wll have mo dynamic eect and can be treated as sate. "Slowly enough” fe wt ‘definite, abd apparently th qutetion of whether or nt w led is dynarnie isa relative matter in th signionnt parameter, andi the load varie ovly relative to this Period, it may be considered to be sate. The natural pe, losty ‘efne, isthe time required fr the stricture to go trough one ele ok free vibration, i, vibration after the fore casing the motion has been ‘emaved oF has ered to vay, ‘The interest in structural desig for dynamic fod has been increasing steadily over the year, This i in part due to advancing techolony, ‘ich hs made posible more arcurae dign, Its sso due to the face ‘that more daring sruotares Carger,Hghter, et) are being etempied, ‘nd these arw more susoptive to dynamie eer because they are gen. ‘rally more esible and have longer natural periods, Examples of situs. ‘ons in which dynamie loading mnt be coosideed include ()stuetures ‘ubjeoted to alternating fores caused by onllstng machinery, (2) sue. tures which support moving loads och abridge, (2) structures subjected to suddenly applied foroee such as blast pressure or wind gust aod (4) cass where the supports ofthe structure move, ea bullding daring ‘urns out thet the natural period ofthe structure ‘The basic principles of structural analysis ar of sures not invalidated by the fact thatthe lod is dynamic. ‘The same relationships between delction and strew apply under both dynam and static conditions Dynami analysis consist primarily of the determination of the time ‘aration of defection, from which alreses ean te diretly computed Since the natural period depends upon tho mac and wines of the erie ture, these two quantities are of perp greater importance in dynamic In this text considerable attention i given to tho inelastic behavior of structures, ie, behavior beyond the elastic limit. "This in partially important in dynamic design because iis often imprcteal or at leat lunceonomiaal, to dsign the structure 20 sto remain eompletly elastic, ‘The energy absorption which reals from th plastic deformation of the ‘material permita a much lighter structure than would be reine i ll energy had tobe absorbed by elastic sexi, ' Chapters 1 and 2 which deat with simple dynamic systems contain the ‘more elementary theory of stntaral dynamion In Chaplom 3 and thiathoory is extended to more complex structural systems Chapter 3 in preentation of spproximate design procedirs, which ae oft more ‘suitable for practical purposes than diet application of the theory. Finally, Chapters 6,7, and 8 contain applientions of the mater in res cadingchaptors to prantieal problems of importance, u 10 Ks, Kes Be, Kw » Lt wet ga List of Symbols ‘modal amplitude statis modal deletion eharacerstic amplitude, dimension constant vid frag cootcent ‘damping coeficient criti! damping consi Seiamie velocity flexibility coeficient total conerete thisknest constant Ayman load factor tffstive depth of eonerete section modus of elasticity Ieee ‘tural frequeney, eps nondiieasonal ime fonetion onatant ‘ovelertion of gravity Tight moment of inertia Inertia foree impules Kinetic energy ‘ransformatina Sectors spring constant san bending moment iat bending strogth ‘aes por unit Jeng ‘numberof modes ssl stro ressre, distributed lad Hi Lat of Sombote » S88 get see escre et ane spase d= aye y= Pyar ue ” dynamic prose reflected preware flde-on overpreseure Initia side-on overprewire Aisplacoment weapon range radios hea claneing ditance atural period time interval Toad duration load eae time shock-front velocity ‘eloety of sound steal energy relative daplacenent relative velocity hear oF reaction ‘velocity, displacement vreight| vrork "eh per nt ath ‘weapon yield Aisplacenent or defection ‘elcity sowlertion slastiosimitdefsction Stati defection ‘support mation Aisplacement, coordinate constant, phase angle constant, damping coelicient (o/281) Dartsiption factor pring distortion ondimensional digplaements ssgle of rotation Tal-arch central sngle dct ratio 0, 66 i t time variable density ‘stl rti in concrete tres intensity ‘ynamie yield eteogth dynamic conorete compremive strength ‘ine variable Dertepation factor forcing frequency, rad/see ‘natural elreula frequency 1 Numerical Analysis of Simple Systems 1A Introduction ‘The determination of the dynanie reponse of simple systems using ‘numerical procedures is iscumed in thie chapter. "The more trade ‘onal rigorous methode are introduced in Chap. 2 This onder of pros ‘sentation in followed because nomeresl analysis, rather than rigorous solution, & believed to be the most general and yet straightforward Sppresch posible and the best for introductory purposs,” Only base principles ‘of physics and the moet emuntary mathemalte are ed ‘Thus the render shouldbe uble to conoentrate onthe physical phenomena ‘avolved rather than on the mathematieal techniques employed. Te is hoped that this emphasis will help develop a physieal “fol” or intl tion, for dynamie reponse, which i nessary for suceoful analyia of ‘more complicated dynamic probleme. ‘The reader is unged to keep thin objective in mind duving his study ofthe following sctons Numerical analysis, that is, solation of the dierenial equations of ‘motion by arithmetic procedire, ie a much more general attack on the roblem than rigorous, or closed, solution, beeause the liter is pte ‘only when the londing and the rectance functions can be exprewed it risively simple mathematic! terme For the type of problems in hich we are interested, this in severe restrition, and thus the rigorous ‘pprosch is obviouly of Kmited usstulnes, The evulaiity of eleetrenie computers hee accelerated the adoption 2 Intvatuetion to Structural Dynamies = E of numerical thods by structure! engineers. Solutions to many come plex dynamie problems which wore imposible in ear times ean now be obtained with relative ease Although computer programming x not dicuiwed in this text and the procedure are ilstrated by hand ‘aleilations, itis expected that, in practice, many of these computations ould be done electronically. ‘The fllowing sections dea with systems consisting of combinations of springs and masses. It should fo emphasised that thew are not merely academic exercises, but rather thatthe system idalted inthis ‘manner is 8 convenient representation of an actual structure, For txample in Fig. 12a, the weight I, ssppored by » beat and subjectod ‘0-0 dynamic load, may often be represented by the simple meseapring ‘system shown. The same is tue of the rgi.frame stuctare shown fa Fig. 110, where the mass is distributed along the girder and only bor ontal motions are considered. Ta order for the Wdeaived sytem, to Deform in the ane way at the actual stryture, tf oly neceeanry to inako s proper selection of the system parainctors, For example, the spring constant k can be determined trom the properties ef the bens or frame since itis merely tho ratio of foes 40 defection. Ta the sansa shown, the weight, or mas, ofthe idealised aytem ie the same as that of the actual structure wince the weight of the structural members is ‘assumed to be negligible. Tn other cae thie may not be true snd & factor must be applied to obtain the equivalent mam for the ilalzed YHoume 12 Ove dor satem—Aynanin equim, fp sytem. Such a futor would be neosrary ifthe tues were distributed over the straturo—a situation which will be dacune in later chapters. ‘The loud-tire relationship, ot load faction, is urally the ane forthe two systems, although the magnitude ofthe load may difer” "The ideal ‘prngsmace rysiem svelte such thatthe defection ofthe mao isthe ‘same ust wore point of sgnieance on the slrwcturo, for example, the ‘idepan ofthe beam. ‘The important point ie that at Mdealinedsyecem hich behaves timewise in exactly the sane fashion ao the seta stuce ‘re ean be constructed and then analysed with relative ene 12 One-degree Hate Stems AA onedegcesaystom is dafied as one in which oly one typeof motion is pombe, or in other words, the positon of the system af any instant ‘an be defined interme of a single coordinate, Such s eyetem is shown in Fig 1.2, where the mase ean move in a vertieal diction only and all the mast in the system deficta by Ube same amount (the opting it 4 Intrtution to Structure Dynami ‘seeumed marese). Avan example of dyaamle analysis let us determine the motion ofthis mass resulting from the application of imesvarying fore ‘The ist sep i to iolate tho mass as shown in Fig. 1.28, "to thie ‘ntes we apply the external forces, in this ease the applnd force Fi) and the spring fores hy. Tt is uamomed here that the spring iy Hess, ke, that the foes in the speng iv always equal to the spring contend times the displacement. Nove that the weight, or gravity fore, docs ‘ot appear inthe figure. This implies thatthe dnplacemnss ya oes ‘red from the neutral postin, in ther words, the state prion whieh the mass would take if only the forew of gravity were acting “laving isolated the mans, we may write the equation of motion simply by applving the elementary formula F = Ma, "Fin of tourse the sey or algsbrsie, sum ofthe fores acting onthe mass, and the peive dice tion of fore isthe same as that fr depacement or acceleration, ‘Thus ‘the equation of motion fr this yetem at FO ~ by = Mg an This diflerential equation may be solved to determine the variation of isplacement with time oneo the loading futetion, the lita conditions, snd the other paramaters ate known. An altemative and very convenient way of writing the equation of ‘motion is by the use of D’Alember's principle of dymamie epuirium, ‘This method in illntrated in Fig. 125 where an additional imaginary fore i applic to the mass. This eth inti fore, and equal te he prvlet of the mass and the aceleration. Nee that it mis alway be ‘Applied in the diretion of negative aceeleration, or oppite to postive iplacement. “Having added this foros, we may tat the stuation shown in Vig. L.2e exactly as a problem in satle equibriam. ‘The uli equation ie Fl) ~ by ~My =0 ay 1 is sen that this approach results in exactly the same cuntion as that Previously obtained. In general, the sgond appro even, ir more convenient, expecially when distributed mames are involved Before considering & speci example we shall discus the process of ‘numerical integration in general terms, ‘The is « proeeure ty whi of ilremest with apc one orn her wnt the wee ot [Numerical Anaya of Simple Sytem 5 Tepe impabe pce o the diferential equation of motion i solved step by step, starting at sero time, when the displacement and velocity ere premumably Known, ‘Tho time wale is divided into diserte intervals, and one progresses by succomively extrapolating Uhe daplacenient from one time station 10 the next. ‘There are many uch methods avaiable, bat in Keeping with the polity stated for thie chapter, only eae of the more simple veions| will be presented here. ‘This might be ealled the conan, or Paomped-npulae, procare Suppose at analysis fr the determination of the displcerent-time variation for ® dynamic system was in progens as indisted ia Fig 13, Suppon, further, thatthe displacements y® at Gime station ¢ andy" at the preceding time station + ~ 1 had been previously dtermiued ‘The acceleration 7 ut time station + eau thon be determined ing the ‘equation of motion. ‘The problem ito determine the next diplacersent, 1", by extrapolation. Thi could be dose bythe following selfevidens forma yo 4+ dat aa) where ju tthe average velovty betwoon time stations ¢ and s+ 1, and ts the time interval between station. "The ererage veloity maybe ‘exprosoid by the folowing approximate forma ir) © Inteduetion to Structural Dymamtes whore the fiat term isthe average velocity inthe time interval between «= 1 andl, and the store term othe incase in the velocity betes the tro time intervals, assuming that is sa average asteleration Uroughout that time peciod. The assumption sated ie omalent oo “prorimating the aceleraton curve bya seis ol tr lee te shew in Fig. 1.86 and, in dition, replacing the area wader then Hoes hp ‘erin of pulsn concentrated atthe time stations. ‘Thus the shaded soos Fepresnts aa impulse applied at station # which equa th cheoge ie ‘average velocity between the two adjgcent time interaia Substteting Ea. (4) into Ba, (13), the following reewrence formula it obterond, et — By — yoo + gi (ape as ‘With thin equation one is able to extrapolate to ind the displacement ‘tthe next time station. Note, from Bg (11), that 9 maybe deter ‘mined since it depends only upon the: diplasement which ws previous obtained, and Fi), whith is Laowe ‘The reeureace formu. given by Ba. (1.3) is obviously approximate, but it give suicintly accurate reales provided that the tine interval ti taken sal inelation to the variations in weedlerntion In face, ‘5 46-0, the olution becomes exat although the number of computa, ons obviously increases as is reduced, thereby increasing the nabs of timo intervals involved. Ta general, it hae been found that noite ‘afcently necurate for practical purposst can be obtained i the tie interval is taken no larger than oveenth of the natural period of the fytem. ‘This point will be discus in more detail i eter seseore Many other recurrence formulas are available for vse." Somee of those formulas permit lrge time intervals but require tore cabana comers tations ia each step. When probleme of stability or eonvengence are encountered, more accurate reeurrence formulas’ may. lw aecooury ‘These are beyond the scope of the present dvcusion, but are eovered i Bec. 1.6. ‘The author has found the formula presated, Ray (9), to be adequate for mest problems in structural dyunnien ning the recurrence formula, the easly sizoply begins at time equals ero and procords sep by step to determine the daplaemeate af the tine stations exerted, It is necesary, however, to ue a epesial pe dure in the fit time interval beeaun, at = 0, no valve of y-0 fe svailable, ‘Two diferont procedures may be used, Fist, the sclera tion may be amumed to vary linasly up co the Art Une tation, i hich env the displacement at that time ie given by the fallowing.® v= S602 + 9) cane as) "gunn (1.0) ad (1.7 may be dary erating y= ff dt Numerical Analyteof Simpl Systema Second, the secleation may be assumed content during the fret time interval snd equal to the intial value. For the ater assumption the following equation applies v= 56 (a9 an In either ease, having established y, th analyst then proceed in the formal way, using Eq. (5). Note that Bi. (1.0) must be solved by til and error since g depends upon y. However, Ba. (1.6) smut bo used if therein zero force (and hese ere aceleration) at sero time, fot in no other way ean y be determined. Ifthe aoselers tion at f= 0 is ‘ot ser, Ta (1.7), which doo nt require iteration, may be used without sppresible eror, provided that the foree dove not change greatly ia ‘he fint interval. "Thi method of navercal soalyes used in the example which fllows. ‘The mumerial procedure outined shove wil st frst yoom tediou. However in the very common eases where no cowed solution ar poet ble, there ix no alternative. If oe i dating with a oo-degre system, {he computations ean, with alittle practine, be done very quickly. "Whe the syeten is more complicated, computers are aormally used and the Tength ofthe ealoultions is uot & serous problem. ample ‘To ihstrate the prosedures discussed above, conser the spring-mase system shown in Pig. 14a, whichis subjeted to the loadtime fooeon shown in Fig, 14, Tt Gsized to determine the variation of diplace- ‘ment with time, starting with the ystom at rest at ~ 0, Substituting into Bq, (.1) and being careful to kowp the uate consistent, the equation of motion in writen a fallow: Fi ny = Sg « $= 4700 toy a ‘Thu knowing the lo and the displacement at anytime enables one to compute necelaratio at that time. ‘The next tep i to selec atime interval for the numeri integration. ‘As mentioned abovo, this should not be greater than one-tenth of the ‘ature period of Whe system. ‘The natwal period T of « one-Jegres ‘yrtem i given by je Q aor as) hich, in thie example, in 0.198 ase. ‘The natural requncy f in the invere ofthe natural period, oe 5.04 eps, "The natural ceular fregueney = aL] revs cae Mt Bap 6) Spiga 1 2ef, or 31.6 rad/see. Natural periods and frequencies are diseued ‘ore fly ia Iter chapters, One-teath of the natural porod ia approximately 0.02 eo, and thie value will be wed in the computation. However, « second eiteron ‘murt be considred when slcting the time lateral: the interval should ‘ve small enough to represent propecy the variation of loed with time In this example i willbe noted that the time stations (AP = 092) coeur at the sudden breaks in the load function and, furthermore, thatthe Intoral is small enough so thet points at this wpacing sceureely repres sent the funetion (Pig. 142). ‘Therefore the time interval sletel Io stitactory. ‘The numerical integration for the example problem is shown in Table 11. Note that, in the ft time interval, Bq. (17) ie dned say fo the following interval, Ba. (5) & employed Since Bq. (8) gives HL ~ 0) = 25, Ba. (17) vie y(t = O02) ~ ¥4(25)(0.02)" = 0.0050. ‘sing the later value in Eq, (1.8) provides st = 0.02) = 25, and there: 0.0) = 2(.0050) 0 + 25(002)* = M0200 by’ Ba. (18), ‘The caleulations then eontinue in identieal manner. ‘Te result of the complete calculation i plotted in Fig. 1.5, where dplacement veewis time in shows. The ordinate also represnte the tz variation of the spring fore if the daplacemente are multiplied by the spring constant ‘To asst in the interpretation of the rst, the hypothetiealdiplace- Numeric Analy of Simpl Seiten — 9 Table 1 Numeric Integration; Cndemped Bale Onedere Spt, ‘ wre | 9% | tin | 940 | ten we | aewet | | a | ae bo | i 5 | d.engor oe | & Some | o.ea0 om | <0 | fo | sone | “ota om | ts | “3 | oom | ons om Soon Equation ‘ment corresponding tothe static appliation ofthe lod at any instant §2 also plotted. The maximum dipiacement which occurs at 0.12 aoe carespond to » spring fore of 1501, whichis 59 tines the taxa ‘exter! lond. ‘Submeuent peaks are somewhat smaller and correpod to mepringfores of 1671. ‘The later peak value would remain cossteat indebnitely since we have nt insluded damping ia the present exemple ‘The time interval between succesive postive (or negative) peaks is exactly equal to the natural period of the aystemn, Aer the load becomes courtant at 0.14 tee, the spring fooe varies fn sinusoidal fashion, the Dostive and negative pnks being equiditant above and below the value ofthe exteraal load, ‘The student it urged to study the computation shown in Table Lt ‘aefuly snd to mako similar compatations on his own. Ib would be ‘visable to plot the displacement as the computations proceed. ‘This crete bas two advantages: frst exors in arithmetic are quickly die covered; and second, it helpe to develop an undertanding of dynamic ——_ Iyer a Z 1 Brag, Regn of yen shows in Fig 1 behavior, Although somewhat tedious, the efor is well worthwile, ‘nce thi intuitive understanding wil be invalumble in Inter chapters Lest it be forgotten thatthe ayetom analyzed In the previous pars: raphe could reproent an actual structure, conser the frame shows in Pig, 160, This isa steel vgid frame to whichis applied n dynam force at the upper lve. It is dasized to determine the dynamie dolloe, ‘ion ofthe top ofthe fame inthe horiaontl iret. "Two sosumptions vil be made: iat the weights of the ealus and wall are nealigibley ‘nd second, the girder i suficiatly rigid to prevent sigaifeant rotation ‘tthe tope of the columns, These assumptions are not tereaary bat rl ourve to simplify the problem aud, in fat, are esentinly vereect {or many etal frames of this type ‘The perameters ofthe idealized nystnt shown in Fig. 1.08 may be aly computed aa fellows: W = 1000 x 20 ~ 30,000 1b p= BAN _ 12x30 x10" x 1128 = “a0 x = 35,2001b/18 (10) ‘The spring constant & i simply equal tothe inverse of the dafetion at the top of the frame due to & unit horisontal load, und the equation Mameriat Analyte 0 Simple Sytem 11 + See + 2 Lane — "Hocus 1.8 Rigel frame preted by om dee tye, ‘employed above may be easly verted by scnple elastic analysis. Hay lng thee parameters, the acalyet would then prover to determing the dynam dapacements for aiven load fanotion, sing the same techniqne tn in the previous example. ‘Thete diplacemente would be squat Lo the actual horizontal defections at the tp of the frame. ‘The spring {roe computed forthe idesl sytem would a all times be oqual to the taal shear in the to columag, and the maximum column bending ‘moment would be given by OBfy/4. Thus the dynamic tec ab ny time could be eal determined, 13. Two-degree Hlaste Systems 1s thin ection the analysis of two-degreeaystems wll be discus, aply- ing the same basic concepts ab those tnd in the previous section for one-degres ayatoms, A twodngree system is Geied ae ote in which ‘oro seperate types of motion are pesbie, of in other words the com ‘curation of the system at any time is completely specified by exaclly to parameters or displacements. Buch « rysem ia thown in Fig 17a, where the parameters defining the motion are the placemat of ho ‘oro mawos, namely, ys nd ys. The constants of the system are the foro mais fy and Mf, and the two spring constants ty and hyn ‘dition, the external forces F,() and F4(), which vary with time, must 12 Introtueton to Structarl Dynamics IT, nial Deen Ment tai Yowna 1.7 Two-egre stem dynamie eo be knows. 10s our purpaoe in this sition to determine the vasia- on ofthe two dicplcements with time forgiven set of exloral forces having preseribed time variation, 1 Pormulation ofthe Problem ‘The equtans of motion may be writen by applying the const of 0 [Note that zero free i epplid wo the mans Mf and thatthe foree applied to the mass, i euddenly applied at ¢~ 0 and remains constant indete ntely thereate. 1 these values re inserted into Bas. (1.11), expressions for the two scelerations may bo wetten a fllome 8: = 100069 ~ y) ~ 2000, 3 — 200 — 2000445 — 9) Only these two equations and the recurrence formula, Eq. (1.6), are required for the analysis, ‘Tho reourrence formula appiea to each of the two diaplacement independently ‘As explained previously, a proper time interval for the numerical ‘njegraton depends upon the atural period of the esetem, In thie example there are two natural periods, since we are dealing with & two- ‘agree aysem. For Uhve particular paramstars, the two naural Perinds ‘are 0.20 and 030 se. The fortes i the natural pore ofthe fit, oF fundamental, mode of vibration, and the latter isthe natural period of the second mode. The determination of natural periods for twodeqsee ‘ystems i dianuseed in Seo. 32, and will tot be conwideved here. In order for the numerical analysis to yinld accurate ruta, the time interval should aot be larger than oneteath of the smaller natural period. ‘Thus, in this example time interval fof (01 ao wl be ured, ‘The computations for this analysis are arranged in tabula form for convenience in Table 12. At each time sation the two diplaeemente have been determined by the preceding computations ‘The procedure ay Tobe 13. Numeral Integration: Undape Bie P-dpes Sytem Pia. 17) “ere St seERE REDE oEEEY oe weeee 21d) is therefore as follows: (1) the two accelerations are computed by Bas (2.12); and @) the displacements wt the next time station are computed tung the recurrence formula. For further iusteation te detailed computations leading tothe displacemente at ¢ = 0.05 are given. below Ate = 04, 51 = 0.0060, ys = oars | Ati= oo ” previously determined th = 00167, ys = 01240 Ate = 004, 1% = 100040.1249 ~ o.0167) — 200.0167) = 75 9: = 200 ~ 2000(0.1249 ~ 00167) = ~16 Att 005, sy = 2X 00167 ~ 0.0060 + 75(0.0 ye 2X 0.1240 — 00787 ~ 1600.01) = ono40 = 0.1005 Mumerice Anetgis of Simple Spateme 18 Soa ‘in nlag®3008 | rooms 18 eanpl,Repons of wo-dge tt AI values ar, of course, in unite of fet and atcouds. ‘These computs- ‘ous ace sepeated foreach tan interval in suoeeson 'At theft time station, ys determined by the special formula (1.7), since the load it appliod suddenly at ¢= 0. Por yy at the St time ‘ation, Bq, (1.6), with y= 0, used, since the aoelerstion of mae begins at aro, The raul of this analysis ie plotted in Fig, 18 where the dapiae- ments are displayed as a fanetion of time, Inspection of such data assists one to become aware ofthe general characteristics of dynamic response, For example, bith displacements yy and ys vary in what appears to be almost sinusadalfeshion tntwoen minimum of ano and some maximum value. Purthermore, the period of this siusoidel raia- ‘loa is epprosimately 0.2 se, or in other words, the sarbe asthe fist. ‘ntural period of the sytem. Thus one concludes that the response in ‘his partieular example is przarily inthe fst mode aud thatthe eft ‘of the second made of lve nigificnce. On the other hand, the differ= cove between the two displacements, which alo plotted in Fig. 8 Aatinetly abows the eect of the recond mode. The reason for this ‘havior will come more clear when modal analysis of multidegr® ‘toms ie dscumed in Chap. 3. Tt is al of interest to consider the maximum spring forces which rem fom the application of this suddenly applied loud. For example, 16 Intratueton to Structure Dynamice Ae) 000 mr 4 iL SRR f gig tng | nin fo jain the maximum force in eprag 1a 24 Ub (Fig. 1.8), whith i 2.67 ttmes the valuo of the applied extomal load. ‘The maximum force in apring 5 305 lb, which is equal to 1.53 times the marimm valve of the tpplod lod. “The multipliers given are alo the ratios of the masimum dyes spring fore to the foree which would have occurred had the exteroal Toad been appli stetieally. Thus one reaches the eoneluton, which is enerally true, that s suddenly applied foroe causes considerbly ‘reterstromes ine tructue than woud the sme fore apled sata, Before leaving this subjet the reader ie reminded thatthe ideale system shown in Fig. 1.7 im reprenentatin of wn aetual structure For feample, such a structure could be the two-story rigid frame subjected fo horisontal dynamic force as show in ig. 1.9. If its asso for ‘implcty that the girders are infinitely rigid and that the weight of the columns is negligible, the constants of the ideliaed spring ase system tay be eaily determined ne follows W, = 2000 x 40 ~ 80,000 W, = 1000 X 40 = 40,000 15 WEGH _ 1260x109 x 28 an, = HRN _ 12080 x 109 x 1128 | Be Te 8,500 I 12@0 x 109 x 1128, or x a ‘The two lumped weights (or mass are smply equ to the total weights st the two floor levels. ‘The spring constant in ove of the wioien it be 85,20015/#¢ america Analy of Simple Sptema 7 ‘merely the sum of the two column shears developed by a unit relative Aisplacement in that tory. The formula given above may be cally derived by simple elastic analysis, Having the values of ten system Darsmeters and given the two loadtime functions, we could determine ‘he horizontal displacements of the two More by exactly the sane pro- ‘dure a8 was uae for the lmped-maaseysten ofthe examplo. The spring mass system chown ia Fig. 1.9 le, of core, exactly equivalent (hat in Tig. 17 1A One-degree Elastic System with Damping ‘This section contains & very brief diseumon of the elect of damping i siructaral dynamic syetoms and methods for inelading thie ett im numerical nnaiyeis. The discussion is extended in later chaps, Damping Chorcteritie All structural dynamic ystems contain damping to some degre, but ‘2 will be shown below, the effort may not be significant if the loud das tion is short and only the maximum dynacnio response is of interest, ‘On the other hand, if contineng state of vibration s being investigated, damping may be of primary importance. In fac, if enough damping ‘a present, vibration may be completely eliminated Damping in structures may be of several diferent form It i in ict due to the internal moleeular freton of the material 1 i ey ue tothe los of energy sesocinted with the slippage of structiral con ‘octions ether between members or between the structure and the Sup porta Tn some cats it may be due to the resitanos to mation provided by air or other fds ourrounding the structure. In any ene, the eect. 's one of forces opposing the motion, and henge the azplitade of the response is decreed. Tis generally believed that, for purposes of analy, structural daanp- ing may be saramed to be of the viscous type; the damping force ‘opposite but proportional to the velocity. ARhough ether forme of damping are ‘umually present, this senumption provides reasonable emul, Accordingly, the damping force applied to a lumped mass ray be expremed by the following: Damping force = —cy here in a numerical constant, and y it the velocity of that mus. ‘The negative tign indietes that the free is always opposed to the dlzetion ofthe velocity. The magnitude ofthe eoeficent es extremely Aiffeult to determine, and for this reason tig convenient to introduce the concept of enitca! damping. ‘This is the amount of daryping that 18 Iniroduction to Structural Dynamics othe reese 130 Dnt snore ten gk ae ae ‘would complataly eliminate vibration and, for & onedegree system, is siven by the following ee 2 VEN ts) there E and M are the wills and mast ofthe astem. The concept erties damping ie uefu since iti often easier to apeity the ammount of damping as certain pereotage of extial than it to arive st the humarial value for the eocficient «The derivation of Ba. (1.18) and further discon ofthis subject are contained in Se. 2.4, 1 Formulation of the Problem Consider the simple onedegzee system shown in Fig, 1.10% and the state of dynamic equilibrium shown in Fig. 1108,” ‘Thiseyotecn differs ‘rom thooe in the previous examplee only in the inclusion ofa damping fores. Tn Fig. 1.10) the damping fores is whowa upward, or pponite to the direction of positive welotty. Using the concept of dynamic ‘uilibriom, we write the equation of motion a fllows by +My +a — FO = 0 a ‘Thus the equation of motion contaiae one additional term, and invalvex ‘velocity, bosden acceleration snd displacement ‘To illustrate the eect of damping the analysis of Se. 1.2 will be repented, but in this instance 10 pereent of eritical damping will be assumed, The parameters of the system and the loadtime fonction fare given in Fig. 14. The damping eoiiient is equal to one-tenth ‘ofthe ertealeootcient aa given by By. (1.13) » 722 ee ‘Note tnt damping coclicints must have units of force divided by velocity. By substituting the proper nameieal valves fnto Eq. (114) 62 01x 2 VEN = 02 2000 Numerics Aneyats of Simple Spteme 8 the following expremion fr aedertion is obtained: 9» PCO — 10004 ~ 6389 (115) Although numerical integration, a i previous actions wll be wee, 4 mast be modified, wince fs now neceaary to detérmine the velocity st each time station. The velocity at time sation « will be approxi ‘mately exprened by the following 9 = ESE gol 16) here the frst term i the average velocity inthe preceding time interval, snd the second term isan estimsto ofthe amount by which that everegs ‘must be inerensed to give the velocity at the next time sation, This procedure i consitent with the eonoept of nosleration pues on which Bg (1.5) b based and in adltion approximates aa the mean of the ‘sveage velocities in the adjacent time intervals (Eq. (1.4) ‘By muattuting Bg (116) into. (1.14) and raven, the fllon= ing i obtained Be by — ety yoy ear a 1 we mubetitte the numerical values ofthe problem at hand a time interval of 0.02 see, Ra, (115) becomes - fe - Pc ‘he computations for thi any, which art based on Bae (8) 0d (350), ae hows io Tae 13.” This table fer trom provout compton tales only in the aditlonal columns, which permit the talelton ofthe veoiy at each ine mation. "At = 0,9 obtained by Ba. (18) rather than (1.150), sno the vlsty i known to be nro nd the later equation isnot appleaie.”As Sn previous example, the Alplacement atthe end of the Bt interval ie cmmputed hy Ea. (4.7) ‘ther than (19) ‘The ret of thse computation i plotted in Fig. 1.11. Por compari ton, the eaiton obtained in See. which difored oly in that damp {ng was nok inchuded, ie lo plotted.” Te eould be noted that the fest of daopng onthe tet pak of resposne m not peat However th fet become considerable atthe wtond postive pal, and wil become ‘ester a tine increas. Since the damping in owt seta usar ‘tans doesnt exned 10 perent of eral may be generally one lied that damping ie not of grat Sports with opect to the 2 Introduction to Structural Dynamics Table 13 Numerical Integration: Damped Hastie One-deaee Sytem traci rmarimum streasia the strastate, which unually occurs with the fet Drak of cesponm, Tt should be noted, however, that for eortain sii Uions this satemont may not be true, Examples of auch exceptions fare multidoree systems in which higher modes are important and one degree systems with irregular lead-time fanetions 1.5 Onevdegroe Hlasto-late Systems Up to this point only Linear elastic nytems have been considered; i, the resitancefunetion has been a tright Line wth slope and without upper limit. Ta many practical cass this function iw nonlinear (the lope isnot constant) and/or inelastic (when the spring unloaded the resistance does not retura to zero by the sume path). These conditions can easily be handiod by numerical analysis provided only that the resistance is w unique function of diplacement." Attention hero will be focused on that tye of inelastic behavior which i normally sasuned in strnotaral desig, Considered below i the dynamic respons ofa structure which extends ‘through the elastic nd into the plastic ange, Because most eructares Mumerce Angas of Simple Stems — 34 ove LIL Keasple. Raapnt of daupel td sndamped eens Jnavo considerable ductility, this type of behavior i entirely feasible Although plastic behavior & not generally pormimible under continuons ‘operating conditions, iti quite appropriat for design when the structare issubjected toa wovere dynamic loading only once or at most afew tts during its life.” Among other exampea which might be ite, plat Iahavior is normally anticipated in the design of Dastrsitant struc tres and at least implied in the design of structure for earthqaake, This concept of considerable importance ia structural dvigh for dynamic lois barause a much greater portion of the enegy-absorbing ‘capacity of the structure i utiiaed thereby. The economy of the design canbe considerably increased by taking thie fact into serount. In some ‘ropects plastic behavior is similar to damping sinee i dluple the harmonic motions which sre charsctrati of elanti vibrations Resistance Function Consider the ono-degree system shown in Fig, 1.12, the spring of which is aseumed to bave the rsistance function shown in Fig. 1125, ‘The latior is usualy called @ bilinear resistance fonction see all Ube lines raking up that funtion lie in one of two drvetions, Ax the die placement iacroas from aero, the resistance incense linearly with lope of, the spring constant.” The inert continues wnt ths clastie- 22 Introduction to StructratDynames Aa ‘hin; (Sd tone ans ames limit displacement yc is reached, at which point the maximum spring force fe has been attained. Aa Une displacement inerenees furtier, the resistance is assumed to remain constant at fx. The later alae wil ‘be maintained unt the ductility limit ofthe eructur is reached. Hom ever if the displacement reaches a misximum before that Limit and then creases, the aructure is aid to “rebound” Dury rebound the resitanee is assumed to decrease slong a line perlal othe intial slastic slope. ‘Ths decrease will contings with dacreuing dplacement until a pring fore equal to — Rg it ata. ‘The resistance function described abore ban idealization of that of fan actual structure. A real structure wil have a curved transition in ‘the region of yu rater than the sharp bak thown in ig. L122. Ths ‘curvature oes oven when only one plastic hinge is aecomary to dovlop Numeric Anais o Simple Spates 23 ‘he fll plastic strength of the structure If the structure i sch that ‘more than one hing is required, the transition range wl be even wide. Nevertheless, the resistance function shown in Fig. 12h isan adoquats repreounation for the majority of structures, Stein hardening such ‘exhibited by stel may be jnored wines thie occurs only at very large strustaral deformation, whichis uaully beyond the range of interes. ‘These points are further dcused in Se. 6.2, By isolating the maze of the one-degre aystem a shown in Fig 1.128 ‘and applying the coneept of dynsine eqiibrium, the equation of motion imay be written ab in previous examples, Por this inelastic cae, i i convenient to represent the apring force, or resistance, by the more feneral notation A since the expression for resistance changes in the various ranges of tho rstance faneton. The mjuaions of motion are ss followe: (@ My+R— Po 7 My + hy FO © M+R FO MSY Se © MFR ha - 9-70 a2) <9 Sm ‘where Ba (a) the general equation of mation (2) applies in the orginal eleti ange, (2) apple inthe plastic ego, and (@) apple during the clastic tehavioe afer yq has been attained, "Additonal equatioas cou be writton, but this i unnooseary sinee in toe station rebound das not extend into the negative plastic range, The render eat easly ‘erly thee equations since (), (2), nd (0) follow directly from (a) and the included expremions for E Yecome obvious upon inspection of the resotance function in Pix. 112 O 065, the maximum responee of the ystems the same ae i the lod duration had been ifn Chacts such as Fig. 2.7 (and aloo Figs 2.8 and 2.9) are extremely ‘useful for design purposes, as illustrated in Chap. 5. Por a give load ‘igorous Analg of Onecdepre Sistema «8 funtion one need know only the nature period in order to read from ‘the chart the maximum DLP an henes the ratio of maximum éynamis to attic sires. Alo given in Fig. 2.78 (and Fige, 286 and 2.9) lathe time ut which the masimum sea, of deflection, occurs ‘This time i often a matter of considerable importance. In the derivation of thee charts no damping has bee achaded because it would have no siguicant lft, "The masimim dynamic load factor usally coreaponds to the fins peak of respons, aad the amount of damping normally encountered in sructures i nt suieient to decease appreciably this valu Consider next a system initially at reat and subjected to a force F ‘which has a initia, suddenly applied value of Fy and decreas Lnearly to sero at time 1 (Pig. 2.00)."The romponse may be computed by Ba (2.15) in two wtagea, For the Sst ete, +S i wo BHO f= Substituting those values in Bq, (2.15) and integrating, fh 2 (inet 2B naa + fi (seat ata ok « DLP = 1~ comet + 178) hich defines the eaponse before &. For the second stage, from Es. Gt, roe ail nat) Fara =F (osnaa 2) {=o Subwtitating these values in Hq, (2.15), replacing ¢ by ¢— 4 and simplifying, Py B yo Bitrin wt ~sinate— a] ~ Beast 8) on DLF Flint ~ in w(t ~ 00} ~ ens ot es) hich gives the response ater © intrtuction to Structural Dynamics function acd/or intial conditions. A closed elution i ofcourse posible only if the intagral can te evaluated. Applications of a. (215) are iluteted below. . Rectangular ple Load Consider fist the caw of « suddenly sppisd constant loud with « limited duration tas shown in Fig. 260. ‘Thomyetamn tarts at ret, and there is no damping. Up to time 4 Hq (2.10) appiny and ae that Cine we have vee Ba ents i fem Ba inate Yor the response after 4 we may apply Eq, (2.16), taking asthe initial conditions the velocity and displacement at ta Replacing t by te snd ye aud je by y, and sand noting that f) = 0, we obtain y= 21 ~ creat) con t= 0) + Ein lint = 19 = FE (oon w(t — 6) ~ on tl (2.180) Since Fi/k is the sttie deletion snd the dynamic load factor is given by W/m we may write : DIP=t-oust=t newark 164 gagy DW seat) —eaw te a 1 sf ni stam en pm cnn by ane Pe ana omg cipal lett rt a ee Sharh cet tir ueay cam Too tnclvapene cadens eae Een anmorbe tre casi date nec eae id cr sate aca be Shan nee ae Covent fee tp see ee 2 Ep er career are Ee ee a en ern SS2 a Chas wai GS Fg, 28 ad 29) we it wl er et Toate BE 2.80 see Rigorous Analg of Onecdepre Syitoms 8 fanetion one need know only the natural period inorder t read from the chart the maximum DLP and hence thereto f maximant dynamic tw static srem. Alo given in Fig. 270 (and Figs, 286 aad 298) ia the time at which the maximum etre, or deflection, occurs This ie i often a matter of considerable importance, Iu the derivation of tae hart no damping has bean included because i would have no egnicant ‘fleck, “The marimum dynamic load factor tually corresponds to the frst peak of response, and the amount af damping normaly encountered in structures i not ficient to decrease appreciably this value Milango Pans Conder next a system intially at rest and subjected to & force F hich fs an init, suddenly applied value of Fy and deere inerly to aero at time t (Fig. 2.60). ‘The reponse may be computed by Eq (2.15) in two stages. or the iret stage, +S ‘Substituting these values in Eq. (218) and intgrating, ran + E(t) enw rete erm hich defines the reponse before 4 For the second stage, from Ba, » BS ona) =F (ona et) fone Sutatitating these values in Bq, (216), replacing «by ¢— ty and sinplifying, Fe a my v= Ee trin at ~ sin att 1] Booed (2180) our Lida —ta) et ai) which gives the response ater (Me Intrtucton to Structure! Dynamics ‘lgorow Anais of Ont-tegre Systema — 4s "im 28 Tite mon cada eat ens) owas 26 (Coninae) review ple! eset fre ahr “Typical reepones for this type of forcing function age shown in Fig 266." Sexism dynamic load factors and the time of that maximus response are given in Fig. 27. As would be expected, (DLPeoy =? ‘8 /T becomes large, or im other words, Ube oct ofthe decay in Zoree in negligible inthe time required forthe roxponse to reach te int peak ey oso TT oxo YC i {I ' ‘ t HT i i | i | tn Teco to rectangular sd tear pes hg ting Oe Sim Cop of Bp) Rigorous Anais of Onedegre Sptema z wo ‘noc 28 Masimun eons of oop sit ens (dang) aie ‘oct iar ede . 7 $5 Introduction to Structure! Dynamics tae wn o "ouss29 Maximum reponse of ene degre satis amined) "leat nae orca ie tne U8 tng Capea Bagnare Consider now » ayzmmetrieal triangular pul which starts st zero and ‘reaches ® maximum at one-half the total duration (Fg. 2.6). In this cease, Bq. 2.15) must be applied in three stage, taking for th inital conditions of each stage the Enal velocity and displacement of the pre- cling stage. ‘The time fonctions toe ted are aa follows Rigorous Analy of Onedepree Stems — fy =at OSS ite fo) Mu Sekt f= 0 use Following the same procedure as in previous eases, we obtain Oct iu sina] eect ur 2 aana(-$)-soes-sawe—o] wee ‘Typical responses ace plotted in Fig 2.66 and maxim respons a4 function of f/7 is given by Pig. 28. It tay be obeerved tha, for this lead-time funtion, the maximum dynamie effet oceurs when the irae ‘ion of oadig i approximately equal othe natural period of the system, 14. Constant Pore with Fate Rie Time Since, in realty, a foree can never be applied intantansously, i is of nteret to investigate a loading which ha te rae tie bat remain constant thereafter a whown in Fig. 26d. In thi case the Ineo unetone ate Jae ree ST ree whore 8 the rie time, Proewding a in previous ease, peri ts 1 (220) DL = 14 J tein ott 6) ~ sind) 13 ‘Typical responses ae shown in Fig 264, from which it may te deduced tat, if is Inge relative to, the reaponen simply fllows the appa Joad’and the dynamic effect is negligible. In Fig. 29, (DLP owe and ‘he time of maximum response nee plotted. Here tho effect of ts tne ‘in appacent. IF is lems than about one-quarter ofthe natal prio, he elect i essentially the eae ae for w suddenly applied load. This ‘bvervation i of signifianoe in practical design snes it indietos that ‘smaller rise times may be ignore A peeuiarty of this type of load G0 tntroduction to Structural Dynamics chron ae og » en Teeceae,. ‘evar 210 Bump, Repos of «be having eet ile is the fact that ifthe rise time ie 8 whole miple of Use natural Derid, the reponse the same as F, had boen applied sttiealy inate then of the chat uk dinner theese ore bam i conte nan 2) a wee toe dyn lal atin pe shown in Fig 22 vk» mt & Dios se anda minum vl Pf Kp. be weight he eam ‘conte eg, the yn bas cay one dpe fen We ‘ito dere aint yams Snding trom Tlet th ntl ped of he ower ye must compte ‘he ming constants dete ih fora pansy Yo fuses wil doer a the ee post. Te ABB _ 4830 X10" 800.8 . 30 10 X SO 53.4 Kips, t= ae JM wae eg = ot cco Ve N56 ma tering Fig. 20 with 4/7 = 0.075/0.111 ~ 048, we obtain (DLP oun = 138 128 Rigorous Ansgl of One-depree Spies St ‘Te maximum dynamic sre equals the static rss due tothe 20kip force multiplied by (DLV ax = (DLP one Xe Fila x BUS a8 x mas sins = = ou 0X 20/4 se 5 0720/8 1.6 i oo ‘The time at which thie maim sre oscar is to=(B) i= 128 x 015 = 000 we 24 Damped Systeme ‘As mentioned proviouy, if one interested in x continuing sate of ‘ibeation rather than merely the fst pene of respoue, the leet of darmping must be included. "For the onedegnee system show in Fig 2.1, with viscous damping, the equation of motion ax derived in See. 1.4 Mat hy oi = em Danping, ndiated in Fig 2.1 by the conventional dashpot, products a force eg which oppowes the motion and dissipates some af the stergy ofthe ayatem, ‘We conser fist tho eate in which there is no exteraal free ata the ‘tem is subjected to an initial disturbance, The solution of By. (2.21) With the rgd ede equal to aero is ¥ = EMC, sin wa + Cs 008d) 2 hore 8 = o/2M, and we = Va? =P. § is © maaaure of the amount of damping presen, and wy athe natural frequency of the damped rye tem, which & somewhat different from that of the Undamped system Baguation (2.22) apples only when # < v. Tho solution for eases in ‘ich this condition is nt met (overtamping) i of lined importance And will not be considered here" the system insubjected to initial deplacement and velocity, y and, ‘the constants of Hq. (2.22) are determined hy substtating {= 0 ito that equation and its derivative as follows: = e4C sia 0) + C008 (0) cs ‘Therfore ” B= CM (OCs + eu) sin ont + (as ~ 200) co a He = ef (AC + wil) in (0) + (uses ~ BC%) v0 (0) Thereore = he ‘The total response resulting from a combination af initial diglacement sand velocity i therfore given by v= o0(EM nad + yoo ad) 25) “The rerponae de oeach ofthe to inti condon taken spaatly Aealown io Fig 21a and , where iemay be obwerved that the expo- Tenta em n Eq.(220) with an appropriate mites fre 8 eure passing trough the peaks ofthe devayingbarmnie toton “The condition p =u crete cae of ser Intret At 2 the frequeney +0, and bane eo 1a a a” Aa ry (228) rece to vr tit + 0 + ody com) rom this equation it is apparent that the motion is no longer period, or in other words, there i no vibration i the umual sense of the word ‘As given by Bq (2.24), the response to an initial displacement (sero initial velosty) isan shown in Fg. 2-11e. Rather than vibrating, the system merely crops back tothe neutral postion "The amount of damping which removes all vibration as described above (8'= 0) it known a8 erica! damping. Although this ase ix of Tile importance in itelf, the eritcal coofeiont of damping is eon venient refeenes. For example, observations indicate that typieal src: tures have between 5 and 10 percent of critical damping. Since, for eritial damping, roe fs 2 the critical coefficient is given by oe = Ble = 2. EM 225) As noted shove, damping affects the natural frequeney of the systom ‘To illustrate the significance ofthis eect, considers system with 10 per- cant of etal damping, or 8 = Olu. The damped frequency ia then ae VOB = YORI = 0.9050 Uthich is only slightly diferent from the undamped natural frequency. Tt may be eonshided, therefore, that the decreas in natural frqeney due to damping may for practical purposes be ignored, 3 o fies abe zy See) lly it Sapo and 5 Intrndction o Structure! Dynamics Another concept of imporianoe is that of the Laparithmie derement, ‘etna as the diferenee between the logarthins of two consecutive peaks in the free vibration, or Mentally, the logarithm of the ratio of bro ‘eoncutive peaks, An expression for lgaethmle decrement may be obtained by taking the logarithm of tro values given by Ba. (229), the fiat for time ¢ and the seond for a time (i+ Ti), where 7s is the damped natural period. ‘Thus oposite decrement = In monn, a0 (uar-%) am ‘Therefore i a ystem had 10 pereent of erica damping (8 = 0.10), ‘the logaritmie decrement wold be 0.2, which indicates thatthe ratio of succesive pane would be e°™, of LAT. Inverting this quantity, i could mid that each and every peak would have value 0.53 times that of the preceding peak. This ie obviously» convenient way to vimalze the effet of damping. A generalized solution for the forced vibration of a damped eystem, ray be obtained in the same manner as was used for an undamped ‘ystem in Soe.2-3a. For the damped eae, te response dust an element of impute is given by (Fig. 2.5) Fu ca inal =) “he total pons oun by sunning the leo a eet of Imus operapeng th ss a ial seins nC nas-+ nomad) vat [seer sinadt Ade 220) ‘This equation is comparable with Hq. (2.15) fr the undamped system tnd is identical when 8 = 0. ‘Consider now cysts iil et rest and gubjected to a suddenly ‘appli constant force Fy. ‘The response may be determined by direct Rigorous Anya of One-degreeSostema 58 ‘nos 212 Rent of ned ooedoge yen 4m solution of Rg, (221) with FQ) ‘nd i given by or by Eq. (27) with fe) = 1 rab lt-eo(mwetena] ‘where the diflerence between « snd ay has been ignored, ‘The rerponse Iniosted by Eq. (228) ie plotted in Fig. 2.12. It in apparent that thi response is ‘very similar to that due to an initial diplacement as shown, in Fig. 21a. If the itil dicplacement y had boon eyual to — Py), the only diferenee would have bom a ehift im the neural position by ‘a amount equal to P/k 1¢ wes stated in Sec. 23 that damping had ltl effet on the fiat Deak of response. ‘The validity ofthat statement may now be invesic ited by farther consideration of the case just presented,” With litle ror it may bo assuted that the ret peak oceurs when wf ~ x, for whieh Bq. (225) giver 228) pe Baten, Assuing for illustration tht 8 = 0.10 (10 peroent of erica darping, se obtain you = LTBF,/L For an undariped apstam the response vil be 2P/t, and hence the seduotion due to this amount of damping ‘5 12.5 percent. Since the damping assumed ie relatively high, this Dereentage effect may be considaed an uper Hnit for moet typial sMructures mbjected to lds which we fury rapid in application, $6 Introtucton to Structure Dynamiee a Gl & Coulom® Damping Up to this point we have concentrated our attention on eyetenas with, viseous damping, and will eontinue to doo hereafter, bees this type §s the most commonly assumed for stretural analysin Homever this particular section a diferent form, namely, Coulomb, or constant, damping is consbered. This would apply to © system auch as shown in Fig. 2.13, where the mass sides on surface och that the resistance to motion i provided by simple friction. ‘The magnitude ofthis ection force Fis constant and depends only upon the eosficient of (ition ‘nd the weight ofthe body." However, the direction ofthe force depende ‘upon the velocity of the mas, which i almays opposes. ‘Thus, for fre ‘ibation, the equation of motion i Mit hy + B= 0 20) where the postive sign before Fapplice when and only when the velosty is pastive. Because of the changing sign, any solution of Bq. (2.20) ‘would apply only during a tine interval in which the sign ofthe velocity remained unchanged, ‘As an illustration, consider muse which in given an intial diplaes- ‘ment y, with sr initial velocity. Duting the st halcyee of reponse, the velocity is negative and Eq, (220) becomes Mg+ly= +8, ‘Thus the situation under consdersion is equivalent o & system with & suddealy applied consent foros aud aa, iitial diplacements The Fesponge is therefore the uperposition of thee two eflecta at given by Bye (24) and (2.10), y= neon + = = (= Praets ean ‘cu 2.14 ree ibeation with Colon dpi. ‘The frst negative peak: given by Bg (2.20) =2)-- 8) In the second hall-eyelo the veloity ie positive and the equation of motion Mg + by = Fy "The response indicated by this equation ix the same as Ea, (230) if the sie ofthe force term it changed and if time is measured froma the Smt negative peak ((= r/o}, the amplitude of which taken as the ‘nial displacement. Thus, fr tho seond hall-yel, va(-nea%ene(-D-% aan ‘ent pk Goi) Oo A a = yd Sopa a (18) ana 1K may now bo deduced that motes postive peaks are given by 1 — (AF; on, where ion intger representing the numberof complete ‘eyeles,or multiples of the astura period. ‘The tounplete reponee is ‘shown in Fig. 2.14, where the damping envelope is formed by a pat of tenight ins ad each hall-eycle ea pare cosine function. ‘The response (2.3) indizates a 58 Intoetion to Struturel Dynamics is completely damped out at ¢= (T/A )y5, where 1 i the nator asd, 25 Response toa Pusating Poree In this section we shall consider the casa! solution for the meponse ‘of 6 one-dogree system to panting free ofthe form Fe Fring ea) ‘The primary reason for intert inthis ease i the fat that I, (2:32) ray represeat the dynam force applied by rotating machine to is support. ‘The lightest imbalance of the rotting part produces this type of force. Fy 5s proportional to the unbalanced weight and @ i the froqueney, or sped, af the machine. Consideration of this problem will introduce the eoucept of rexmance,traditionslly mater of interest to engineers, which occas when the natural frequeney ofthe supporting steetate i lone tothe frequency of the machine “& Undempad System with StuandalForce For an undamped ouedogiwe system subjected vo a sinaoidal forcing function E. (252)] of indefinite duration, the equation of motion i Aig + hy = Fy "The mlution i of the form ino 233) Fy singe wae = Cysin ot + Creo at + where w i the natural frequency of the system. If the aystam starts strat the constants are determined by the following = Cam) + Coe +f) 8.0) = Cen) ~ Guin) + BB 220, * Solving for Cy and the fina resulta and subtitling inthe general solution, we obtain 5 ano P= 4 at — Paint (2 5 pur~qehven[sm—Zaou] ane) ‘may be observed thatthe response consists of two part, the fee part, having the natural frequency ofthe eystem, and the forced par, having ‘Rigorous Anais of One-degree Stems — 99 SSeS Fare fF = oan Frain of UF "awa 215 Reap sr fein er of rami the frequency of the forcing function. A typical respons is shown in Fig. 2.15, where the free and foreed parts ary separse The maximum DLY ean be deermined by diferentiating and etting ‘qual aero Eg (2.34), solving fort oF the time of raximum response, ‘and substituting the later back into Bq. (2MB). Mathematelly, ‘this procedare is rather dificult, but by plotting the fre and forced Aine fonetions separstely, one ea atleast eatiate the masitnint DL. An upper limit, whih for practical purposes i euficienty cle to the ‘ato val, may be obtained by aatuming, in Bq. (2.34), that at some ime win f= 1 and sin ot = 1. Substitution of these numeral ‘values into Ba, (2348) Imada drwy to (DLP au = 4 35) (8 Intratuction to Stracturet Dynes ‘cas 216 Maximo dys led ater fr aia nd ‘This expresion is plotted in Fig. 2.16 asthe dashed line, and it i noted ‘that the maxinus reponse #0 devermined contains both the free and forend parts Tor practic applications, Eq. (2.35) overestimates the maximum eapone, since even s small amount of daunpng gulch elininaten the fee vibration. Our concern here being with continuing tate of wbra- tion rather than with tho fst few eyle, i i reasonable to assume thet ‘the free vibration hae been completely danuped out. If the fren form it removed from Eq. (2241), the maxinium reeponse obviodsly occurs ‘when sin Gr 1, and i given by ane 2.36) (DL ae = ‘This solution implies tat the damping i 0 ama hat the foroed vibea- tion isnot affected even though the fre part is completaly eliminated. More detailed consideration of damping is given in Soe, 2.83. Ruston (236) ie aloo plotted in Fig. 216.” This solution in often refered to at ‘the eedyatate response, while that including the fre pati the fromviot eeponte In Fig. 2.10 it may be oboarved that, for either ofthe salutions given, (DLP ame spproachoranity an 0/0 —>Onnd approaches sero s/o = Physically this simply meane that, if relatively smal, the loud p= sates very slowly snd the nase of the aystems “rider” along without vibration abvut the neutral positon corresponding to the instantaneout Toad value. In other word, the effet lathe same ae for static load. ‘Rigorous Anais of Onesdegro Store ‘On the other hand, if ie relatively very lang, the mass cannot follow ‘he rapid fuctuations in Joed and mip remain stationary. Therefore DLE = Datall times ‘Next consider the condition of resonance which acoure whe “Av indicate in Fig, 216, thisitation role in very large displacement, ‘which thersticlly ieeome infinite it 2 =v (Eqs. @.35) aud (230 ‘Actually, thsi an oversimplifeation, as will now be demonstrated. Win Bs. (284) 0 nade equal tou, the reat iny = 0/0 or in other ‘words the response is indeterminate, "The dgplaetnet ean, however, F be obtained by the application of Hospital's rule, whieh state thatthe Himit of Bq. (348) au > isthe derivative of the term in brackets with respect to divided ty the sane derivative of the term in paren hoon Thue (DUP snow ~ 1% With 0 = 4 thie becomen (DUI) = F4l6n wt — wt om a) em) From the last equation it is apparent that: DLE does indeed becoane Infinite at resonance, but only alter an jafinite time, Rquationt (2.35) snd 88) are therefore valid when 0 = w, but oaly ater many eyeee of vibration. Te should be noted, however, that many” eyelet may tour in a skort period of nbolute time Th practi, exact resonance dows not really our, because eysteme te naver completly linear Ax ditortions bosom larg, the charace “asties ofthe sytem change because of paste deformation snd other E_efects. "The quetion as to whether diplacemeats become ili is Ff course of atademie interest only. Tho importent engineering cos ‘sion ik Ut, at or near resonance, the defections of the stricture become very lege and hee intolerable Tes sometimes of interest to determine the amplitude of response after 4 limited number of eyeles of palating load at resonant frequency ration (2:4) cannot be used forthe purpowe snes ii indeterminate at thi point. “However, we may obtain the reponse by the application ‘of Eq. (257), Limiting the solution to peak values, we Gist ata the times of peek reponsee by maxizsing DL a follows: 4 nad — oma Beourye. = 0 = Ge eonat + walnut — w cone) Therefore final = 0 at = 4,2 3, 42 Introduction to Strstarel Dynamic ‘Nceme217 Ina etaget rept sinned, Fn, Subwitting thene values of wing, (2%), we find DLP aman = Hle, 26,85) 2) [DLPacel = Hone n= 12,3, eas) Where m is the mumber of half-eycles after the beginning of response. ‘Equation (258) atatce thet the maximm defection of an undamped fone-depre rytem subjected to sinusokal lading ie /2 tae the wate dotction Fy after 3f eyle of loading, x tory ater I eye 2/2 tines yy aftr 134 eps et. From the above dioousson it may be deduced that the initial sage of response to resonant wnusoialoading ave aa shown in Fi. 217 2, Damped Sytem with Sinsoidl Force In this eae the equation of motion i My + hy +e = Pesine 2.39) for whith th solution ig of the forma = CMC, tn a + C008 a) “PANG 08/0) ain 01 — 2(20/4) en 8) 7 (2.400) LLYN TT — a A 08 {| ane : A [ : = as 35 rie 218 Masi yao for nwa, asi, dapel syn where p = ©/2M, and ae = /aF =F, the nataral frequency of the damped syst.” As diseused previoly, the contribution of the fee part becomes nepigle after afew cycles of reponse, and therlore we ‘ow couider ony the steady-state, o forced, prt ofthe respon given ty the svat Ea. (2408). ‘Thin term may borer ae (FINO ~ OY /% + (50/1 a (E+ 0 C= a AIS am) 44 Intrdction te Strueture Dynaee where 9 in merely « phase ange. Te is apparent that this expreion isa rnsimum when the sine unity, and therefore 1 LP. ea res ra ‘The last cxprosion i often called Ube dynam mapnifcain fcter, and js plotted in Fig. 2.18 for various valuce of /a, which isthe ratio of ctu fo rita damping 1t is apparent in Fig. 2.18 that, even with emall damping, theoretically infinite amplitudes do not occur at resonanor, In the extreme eae of critical damping (B/o ~ 1), the maximum rewonant dofestion i only ‘one-half the staie defection. ‘The eurve shown for nero damping i ‘ofcourse the ame as that shown in Fig. 2.16 for forced vibration onl Ava further simplifestion, the following may be derived frm Eq. (241) for the resonant condition (DLP eae ea) % AA development such a8 that leading to Eq. (2.37) oould also be shown, for the damped ease, thus indieting that the maximums given by Fa, 242) are attained only after many cycles of vibration © Undamped Spatem with Step Fore 1k should be emphasized that « sinusoidal forcing function i not & requirement for large daplacemeate near resonance. For example, con ser the alternating step free shown in Fig. 2.10, which bas the ste period as the responding wyetem,” ‘To investigate the. responce, we proceed as follows, recognising tht, fora suddenly applied constant fore, Y= (FyB(1 ~ cow af) and for an intial diplacement, y ~ y cO8 wl In the frst half-oyee, B v= coo) aah Atala, n=2 nao In the seond haley mem we » = 2 cos (at = 2) ~ REIL ~ cos ft ~ wi} Mato ae ee 0 Rigorous Analn of Oneepre Stora — 45 1 ie therfore apparent that succemive peaks (postive or negative) ofthe vibration have the displacements - mah il = an and [DLP aul = 20 eas) svhore n is the number of hayes from the staring point. ‘The ‘response i plotted in Fig 219. Comparison of by, (243) with Bq (2.38) indicates that, at revonance, the amplitads reing from ao stealing step fore ineeace even more rapidly than thowe dae toa sinueoal force 26 Support Metons An important clas of problems isthe determination of reeponae due to ‘movement of the eupport af the ryan eather than the application of ‘sternal free. Pethape the foremost example the anelysi an degn af structures for earthquake afete, Iti shown below that, with old tli modifeation, the preceding solutions for wppicdforecs ea als bused forthe ona at hand 4 Undempod Syteme ‘Suppor that the system shown in Fig. 2.20 is eubjocted to 8 support motion ys defined by ya = sof), whore pe i some arbitrary magaitede ef —Intrtion to Structure Dynes tT ts i Ay sony ya of support displacement and fs the time function deseribing the varia ton oy, with Gime. "The equation of mation x Mg + Ky — yd = 0 a y+ hy = hye = yah ey) Comparison of Fa, (244) with thowe previously written fr exteral force funetions (Fy(0| reveals that they are intial, event that Fy hus boon replaced by yx ‘Thus previous slutions are valid thin simp eube Stiution is made For example, the generat solution given by Ea 2.1) bacomen y= at fst = ae eas) To ita tho sbve, wo contder astm the mpprt of whieh is dpuoe sdety by ko tour yy tnd then rns fed ht Posi This imposed condition coon ta nuddenly applied ‘Stat fre ant the reponse mayb otained ty ttn Re {oem Bq 10). Tho poduoe = yall — cow eas) for the absntute dsplanement snd . = =r coe wt em whore w i the relative diplacemeat ofthe ram with respect tothe aap port. “The fore in the spring is of cours hu, aad the negative sigh ix Bq. (247) indientes that he spring is inially in compretion if hi positive. "he second example, let the mpport motion be ys = yesin Using the previously ven soltion for sinusoidal fore, kyr auletuted Rigorous Anais of One-degroeSyiema for Fy fa Ba, (2.34) to obtain 35) 4) Since DLE in the sume as that exproed hy Eq, (2340), the maximum LF for sinwoidal support motion in also given by Fig. 216 without modification and Yau = Yo(DLPuuy The relative sition, which is ‘the sume asthe spring distortion, may be obtained from En, (28) van(FUp 8d) DLE). 49) where (DLP), isthe dynamie load factor for relative. daplacsmnt, Equation (249), together with « consideration of the diseuston, of ‘maximum DLP in See. 25a, lads tothe consusion that Fig, 216 ca ‘so be used to obtain masiram relative displacement if @ and care Simply interchanged. Thus, atthe extreme limits, we conclude M8 y= nanda=0 Mls ay Oana ‘This pplin throughout the respons, ax well as to the maximum valu rom the above diseusion i showld be appareat thatthe chart of (DL) sa for various forcing Fanetions previously given (Figs 27 ta 29), ‘oply equally wel to the ease of support motion having the sane time functions; Uh is Yue a(DLF)ane However, thie fat is of limited twefulnesssinee the taaxium spring force whith i proportional to "lative dispiscement cannot be obtained directly in this manwer. ‘An alterontive approach which is often useful involves representation of the input in terms of support aceleration rather than diplacement. or this purpose it is convenient to change the variable to the relative placonient ofthe nas with reoot tothe suport, which i ientied byw =~ ye Sincod = ¥~ pu Bq (244) breomes Mat 9) +h -0 o Matha = MG, = —MvafA0 (250) here Jin the time fonction fr support aceleration, and je some scitray (usually maximus) value of aupport aoeceraton. This ene ‘ions identical with thor for foreing functions Fs isteplace by Me €8—Introuetion to Structure Dynan ‘Tarr the gn wtion fa the atv ston i woe fe aint = de sy fit assumed thatthe intial support velocity is aoro. ‘Thus roults ven claewhere for external forcing functions may be weed to determine diretiy relative distortions due to support motions provided that the Inter are given in terms of acdlration. Examples of this progeure sre tobe found in, Chap. 6 © Damped Setems ‘When damping is involved, iti generally more convenient to employ the approach represented by Eq. (2.0), in which the support mation is specied in term of noelerstion rather than diplecement. This i true because the damping force in unsally proportional to lative rather han abwolute velocity, If damping ie ieluded, Eq, (250) bacon Matin dea =. ie = ~ Mio (25) ‘The general solution obtained by replacing ya by —Ma/h in Bx, (2.27) in therefore ee Hf per nll de 88) 1 the aystem starts atest (iy i wy = =O). ‘The Falatve responce to sindsodal support mation (ys = yu sin ray be obtained from W. Q.40)) if Fy i replaced by’ — Mie ence $0 ~ £40. Thos the steaig-etate response is WI — 2/8 4 4690/09) in (OL + 8) ToT + 480/05 ony tod the asinun eltive apne given by i as wm Elo awar era] a9 ‘Because ofthe similarity betwoon the ist esution and Fg, (2-4), tin spparent that Fig. 218 isa plot of the bracketed term In Eq. (36) ‘Ths the maximum ruatvediplacemeat, snd hevae the maxiniati spring force igs, be obtsinoa by Fig. 2.18 and Hq. (2.5); that (ane = n/t DLP) ane here (DLE au given by Fig, 2.18, 1f the support motion cannot be expected in. term of acserntion ‘nd if damping is to be considered, itis neceestry’ to include ae input both aluplacement and velocity.” For a dasiped aystem, Bq. (254) Docomer Mi + KG —W)+e9~ 9) -0 + o My thy Fey hy heb 255) Additional diseuion of response to support motion i given in Chap. 6 Jn connection with analysis or earthquake, F 27 aso-pasle Systeme Consider the singledogree undamped aprtom in Fig. 2.214, which is swum to have the bilear resistance function abrn in Fig. 2216 ‘A rgorous solution fo the response due t «eudenly applied, constant load is given below. "Sine there aze two dionntiquities in the reponse, thin involves three separate stage: (1) the clastic response up to the lati iit ya (2) tho plastic response between the elated the ‘maximum displcement, sad (3) rebound, oF the elaatie reponee which focus after the masimin bas been attained and the displacement begs todecrene. In the determination of displacements for tages? an 3, ‘the inkl conditions are th final diaplcement and velocity ofthe pre ‘oo 221 Rola een, coding stage. If the applied free were not constant, editions stages, ‘one for each force discontinuity, would have tobe ineladed. Obvionly, thin & a very laborious proces, and except in the mont simple canes, fone would be better advised to use auneriea! anya as seated See. 18 For the example indicated by Fig. 221, with a initial diplacoment ‘and velocity, the response inthe fret mage is given by (ee. 220), v8 46 Y= wall = cos wt) (57) D> Yao in ot e257) ‘where ve = Fy and a = ETH. The tte at which pw i reached, ‘4 may be obtain fom Ha (2.57) con uta = 1 = Ht me — 2.58) and in aig = VE a a ‘ ‘rooesing to the veond stage and Itting f= ¢ ~ te, we huve the Initial condition fr ti eae a Si ad Myth, =F, ‘The wlution by diet intgration is 9 Fhe Ral + C4 2.0) ‘Making wwe of the initial conditions (Fge, (2.50) att, = 0 to salve for Gt and Cs and substituting buck into Eq. (280), we abtain the final lution fe this tage’ MSU Gre vm gps ~ ROWE Haan vu (20) ying Ba. €281) ad eting tere sil to mo, the th of mana maf aac ia = tn a 20) ‘The maximum displacement yq ie wblained by substituting into Ba. 20. For the third and Sal stags, one could proceed a4 above, utiog ‘table equation of motion with initial conditions from the cod sta However, an easier procedure to make se of some obvi fact regard iaorous Anais of Onedepie Systema 71 = aa ‘ 4 Po ] ery \ coven lg PI ‘ym 228 Enapl, Reponu of latte oe-epe srr te ‘deny applind cota fre ing the respon, which were dincued in See. 1.5. This stage const fe residuil vibetion, whith is of tours elastic or harmoeie- Whe ‘he mae iin its neutral postion, the spring fore le equal to the applied load Fi Therefore the amplitude of vibration, or the amount by hich the deflection must decrease below yu to reach the neutml poston, i (a ~ Fy)/k. The situation we equivalent to sn intial daplncement ofthis amount on a ajatem whowe neutral pation is yo = ex Fah i fea plate oder ete (aodampd) de to venga oad pur” (U At Cure Beyer ‘Therefore tho response i given by va(e- BeBe Bee where = ¢— be = te The complete Fexponse ie therfore given by Kas. (2570), (2.61), and (2.63), andthe mes at the inteior boundaries of the three stages by gs. 258) and (2.62) ‘To illustrate rigorous clasto-plastic analysis, tho raponse of the imple steel beam shown in Fig. 222 will be investigatad. "The clastic Droperties of the aystem were determined in See. 2, but in addition {o these, the maximum, oF plastic rerstanes ie now needed, ‘The total cos ate 265) ===: ec Cae a oF 7 0 rocan 253 (Crtinue) ‘asim rositnnc i given by sc am20 Bap = BEF = SX 30 555 npn whore Str isthe ultimate bending moment (eetangular stress block) Inu on a yol-point sirea of 33 ex Since the beatnauppurts a dead ‘weight of 10 kips the masimum foree available to reset the dynamic lead Ra 868 = 10 ~ 45. kips ‘The resistance function may be assumed to be bilinear, as indicted in Fig. 222. The ebove determination of resitance of eos impli thst lateral buckling of the beam ie preventad by ome means, 14 Introduction to Strcturl Dynamice Aew oF ar ‘e 70 (anamped) de to tsrogla ond ula mi we Te (GS Aemy Cage of Baynes) ‘We wish to determine the complete response due tos suddenly appli, fonstant fore of 0 hips. ‘The parameters required for snalyia of the syst area fellows = 834 ipy/in APS 00230 kissin T= 0.111 see: w = 56.8 ead/ne Ra = 45.2 kp Ya ~ Raf = 0588 in t= Fk = 0.360 in. 1 fs apparent that the response will reach the plastir range since tale Ba <2, ‘a fellom te WSS ty Rigorous Analg f One degree Sprtoma 18 ice wr aces 294 (Cote) ‘The total solution based on the equations derived above 0.3001 ~ con 96.84) (asta) 0880 8ty = 0.508 Ba, (2.58) 36.84 0871 se sinaty = 0.61 Yr ~2056" + 1766 +0585 Bg. 200) fin = 0.0208 se Ba. 02) 1 ta fig = 0.0660 ae 16 Introduction to Structrat Danamice ‘Rigorous Analy of Onedepre Systeme F Downe 228 Nasi rome feats oaedegne tse solampd ‘Therefore te = —208(0.0208)" + 17,6(00208) + 0548 = 0808 in, Ase y= 00622 + 0.184 cos 50. Ea. (2.68) =e 00688 The complete solution given bythe foregoing ie shown in Fig, 2.22 28 Charied Solutions for Maximum Response of One-degree Undamped lasto-planie Syeteme Because the analysis of clastoplstic aystems is eatnbersome, is eon ‘venient to make tse of charts giving the maximum reeponee, Usually, tH a a Poe errr 4 ‘the structural designer interested only in the maitnamn displacement, ‘nd therefore such charts need give only that quantity rather than the ‘ample response ae «fonction of time, Preatnted in this section ace response charts for fou load-tine functions. twill be found in practice, ‘That many actual loading conditions can be approximated by one of thes imple unctions. 14 Inroduction to Structural Dynamics ‘ea hn ospf=ogP oo fogP a 4: Nondimensionet Eguatons of Motion ‘The procure given in See, 27 may be used to derive the desied shart, but for plotting purpoes it ie convenient to nondimensionalise the paraineter. Th the Base equation of slartic motion, M+ by = PAO) i \ { ‘gorous Anais of Onecepre Store 18 sca 2.2 (Contin) we transform the variables by letting £ = ¢/T and y = v/v fy dy pa, Thee = Sh tats as eee he, Mets FO) er = Red = 4, distr fino ow Inthe pats ge try Ha sn ot 1 the same wibetitations se tow lending to Ba. (268) are nade, the ‘equation of motion for this range becomea eet Bo em 50 Introction to Structure! Dynamee Tnopietion of Ege (254) and (265) revels that in order Uo obtain Ue response in terms ofthe parkmeter y, one ued only know the ratio, F/R and the loadtime funtion in terms of the parameter In add ‘om fo the variable tf the latter involves ony the ratio, ene isthe duration or some other time value eharacteriaing the loading (ace below). Thus the two parameters Pit, and are suicint for & complete solution (i the system starts at rest and there sno damping). 1, Maimuen-reeponse Chara "The chars shown in Figs. 2 23 0226 incusiveare based upon numeri- ‘al solutions of Eqs (264) and (268). The results thus provided are or undaunped one-dogre systems with bilinear resistance funtion and without intial motion. Th the eate of the rectangular pulse, J(@) tunity up to € = t/ 7 and aero thereafter For the trianguly pulse With aero rise time, fle) 1 €(7/l) up to § = WT and then "er. When the force is constant but with fnit rss time, @ = e(T/) up to f= 4/P and unity at later Unee, For the triangular funetion of Fig. 2.26,/() ~ (27) upto = 6/27, followed by {0 = 2 ~ €2T/t) up to {= lg/T and zero thereafter. The charts wore constructed by inating thoes expressions orf) into qs. (2.64) and (268) and obtuin- ing the maximum displacement by numeral integration for dierete value of the parameters F/fe and 4/7 of. "The valuce provided by the charts are the nasizoun nondimensional ispaccmest, ous ~ Yo/ta = wand the nondimensiona time of masi- tum diplacement, fa = a/te OF t/t. Tt should be noted thatthe bottom curve in each ease (Ufy/F, ~ 2) represonts completely elastic espoune If (Ba/P,) > 2, the Sastcresponme chart (Figs. 27 to 29) ‘hold be wand & Hramote ‘To ilustzate uso of the charts prosatad above, let the team ete in See, 2.7 (Fig. 222) be subjected to a suddenly applied teangular pulse loading defined by F, — 40 ki and & ~ 02 se. The maximum mie span defection ofthe beam anid Uh tne of that defection are obtained ftom Fig. 2.24 as follows: Ra 853 wo 02 Roo M8 pe gin 8 From Fig, 2240, = 20 Fron Fig 2.24, e036 “Therefore ve = mya = 2.0 X 0.545 = 1.09 in 0.36 x 02 = 0077 see Rigorous Any of Onedapre Stems — 92 ‘Ap willbe illustrated in Chaps, 5 and 7, eberts such as Fgh 2.23 to 22555 gre wl for din pps, oid tat te lal ne variation can be approximated by one of these nnple functinas Sinilar charts can be developed for other tan funetons the thepss ‘are completely defined by two parameters, that i Fy and le Problems 2d Wie the expen or the natara ogee naar! proof haa ‘own in Pi 227th the beam andthe mag my be ine sea set {tational nea nay be acta ‘mount 227 Probe 21,22,25,26,28, ad oo +1 J £4 For he ye Poh 2, Wi, HL = 10 ent, = 00 1 Beier hana dishes 08 tate a Seti th pees an lyse Lee 424 Compe ntl toaecy ne hore made he eed rane shorn oF 8“ may Dette! ye ade Sofie tame my bagel iam Ts lie 24 Reps Poh 23, aig iat sot er Hey. The ental ‘member i & noel 1850 member, : rowan 2.25 Preblons 29,24 and 27 Giga ee tt £3 friar cy StL A120) fore of 101 apd mdeny 1 ~ Dan een easly 26 “ag on oii odo he maximum doa sd ine {Srter eel The foe inreara nol ro su at = 0 4 Lipset = 0 ee Serhan meat Nahe nao dation adie £28, Repat Tob. 22, anming hat the system ba 18 prea fev! dtpig. 129. Repeat Prob 256, naming hat thre 1 pee feral ping 1210, Por the leasime fenton in Fig. 2.22, dive the enreton for DLP a « feamon of td wa apis when > ricina 209 Problem 2.10, oedine fe 2.11 For the dyoamie we and lod futon shown in Fig. 20, compute by ‘awrous methods an pt the dgacaeet vs Gna tol =O ne a rszns 230 Problo 211. Dynamic opt and lad | ‘loorous Anaya of Onecegree Stara 3 212 Ricca ew hat he amp of ie iran ie he ae is Gpetas fa anne? HHL dling Nok tho Fg 212 a atu pvil of 05, od he "a If the bloc in given an nial dilacement atin aller eye vomtont PEC eli pen min vat 10, Rt he alt er Bes oe 216 4 singe undaped spring am nner rgueny of 10 ie Side bjecaltaforce Prana Compute tie DLF att ~Oieve OS, Was sant (d= 50, The vyntem mara tr 218. peat Po 214 or th ra of percent ote apg 216 What ald be the way tate maxniin DEF for the dane aye of Fob. 218 flr many lst ig? ‘tea baricatal foes a tho ine er f(1000 is) Amrng yesc ‘dtp, ha he ye apd faa ri 218 “he fun of Pig. 231 mbes t oriental apport meton, ng the ‘pio nt dtr te simu sb idab po ee vooan 281 Probleme 247 t 220, 28 Jn rob 218 competi ang tre in tesla = 030 ‘oper selena ven ya i no 421 forthe dyna ten adn anton shown in Fig. 233, ompte he —_ oe "ume 28 Pens 221 and 222, Dyn tem ‘itt delotn for the tem and lading of Pig 280s te rable 4221 Use the appropiate chart, teri te as detonate tine that defection forte etm fig. and the lal fencing 230 tat rene 3 Lumped-mass Multidegree Systems 34 Introduction ‘The subject ofthis chaptar isthe analysis of dinrete-parameter systems, ie, eystems contiating of fniteaumber of lumped masses eoanected by springs. ‘The momber of degrees of frovdom ie equal to the number of independent types of motion poate in the system, Stated diferent the number of degrees equals the number of dependent condos roceary and cufiieat to deine completly the eonfguration of the system. To illustrate, the positon of the pendulum shown in Fig. 3.16 ‘ould be defined either by y or by , but not by both, snc the two coord fnies are not independent. Therefore it t'& one- rather thau & tron degre eystem, The double pendulum shown in Fig, 31) on the eter hand, » two-degroe system, since two coordinates (for example, and 9s oF nnd 0) ate reid. tay be sated that for each degree of freedom, there isan inde- pendent diferental equation of ation. For example, the equations for the two-degre system shown in Fig. 3.2, obtained by considering the dynam equilibrium ofthe tro maa, are MGs han ~ Hae — 9) = Pld Mahe + alge = 9) = FO Cap As someyhat diferent example, consider the rigid muse supported by two springs shown in Fig 3.3, Amuing no horiaontal notion, 56 Introduction to Strcturel Dynamioe o ova. One and twee ons there are two independent evordinates,y and 6, and hence i 4 two- agree eystm. "The pring forms are given by By A) for sal ota tions, and the two equations of motion based on vertial and rotational Ayaan equilibrium are My + 2h = £0 HF aaa = ado cS where Ie the mast moment of neti, eee | a a Ft [ae Fone mm “i, Ate 7% wm Tend mia 2 Two-degre ate dynamie equi. as owas 23 Unouple to degre yen ‘An impoctat distinction may be made between Rag. (3:1) and (2.2). 1m the former, ys andy, appear in both equation, andthe pat ate said ‘to be coupled. Determination of the respanan of the aystam therefore involves the simattanow solution of fwo equations, Hquations (32) are ‘on the other hand, kncovpied, snd ech ofthe two equations aay be mlved ‘separately. The abalys af the ayatem represented ty the later equ ‘os may therefore be treated as that for tr ladependest one degree systems Te should also bo apparent from the above thatthe number of degrees ‘of freedom is not necessary equal to the number of lmmped ‘Our consideration erin will be reetvctd to planar ayten for which ‘there ean be no mare than theve degrees of freedom per mass, In the ‘most general cage a tree dimensional notion, si eoordinates are required 1 define tho potion of exch macs "The springs ina lumped-mase yet may be arsengedin diferent ways, depending upon the characteristic ofthe strstare. For example if ‘the three-story building frame of Fig. 2.4, the gider righty approaches Safty, the eystem (considering only hosiontal motion) may be repre- rented as sown in ig. 345. On the athar hand, if the girders are fox ‘ble, a proper represttation ax shown in Fig. 34. The reason for ‘hi diference may be understood i on imegines that the thd Moor ke eplaced horiaootlly while the second Noor ig held xed. With rigid ier, no free is transmitted to the ft oor, and therefore no spring Inneeded baton the third and fret, With lei gidery however, the joints at the second level would rtat, the elumas below would be di. {orted, and forees would therfore be applied tothe fist Roor, causing it to diplace, ‘This Interaction i represented in Fig. 3 do by the sping, and the suns reasoning account for springs fy ad hehe ebstem in Wig, 34% is sad to be cloeecoupled, and that in Fg. 8.4, Jarcouple, Although the number of springs afeote the equations of motion, both 8 Introduction to Stractur! Dynamics yee ara a th act tie systems heve threo dogross of freedom and the method of enlysis re nti ‘Beams or other elements with signifeant mass at more than one point sre always fa-coupled aystema. For example, the beat with two ast ‘concentrations as shown in Fig. 8.5a could be represented a indicated in Fig. 85. Thi proper ance a deflection at mas 1 (but not nt mast 2) would couse a resstion at support 3. This accounted for by spring ky Te sould be emphasised that lumped-maee syst are not Henle nd analyses of sich eystems are not intended to be mere seademiec ‘xereigen. Many’ struetures sich asthe fume in ig. 3.40 have eseen- tilly Iamped masses since the weight of the columns and walls i often negli compared with that of the fore, Hence an analysis based on ‘the systems shown in Fig. 3.40 or is enatially exact. Truly distrib~ ‘ved mass systems, eg. a beat with usforny diatibuted weight, have ‘i infinite number of degrees of freedom. However, as willbe seen in Chap. 4, any practical analysis deals with s limited taimber of degre which ots be represented by « lumped-masespring system. Thus the ‘methods of analy given in this chapter have «wide ange of sppliction, Ts appropriate at this pot to inteoduce tentatively the concept of. normal modes (or natural modes) of vibration. A system has exactly the ‘ume number of normal modes as degrees of freedom. Associated with, each modo sa natural fequency and a characteitic shape. ‘The ditioe ishing feature of « normal mode i thatthe aystem could under ertaia tion the ratio ofthe dgplacemments of any two moos i constant with time. ‘These ration define the characteristic shape of the mode. AR txtremely important fact, which inthe basis of rultdegres analysis, is that the complete motion of theeystem may be obtined by superimposing ‘owas 25 Bats with bmped mee rules naping ytem ia the independent motion of the individual mode, More complete df- nition and the great signfiesnoe of nornal modes will unfall in Inter sections of this chapter "The nest four eetions dest with the detrssination of natural fe ‘queacies und characteristic abapen of normal modes. "This emphasis Aiberate for two reons (1) sch determination mut be the et xt in the dynamic analysis of the system; and (2) am experianced analy fan deo a great deal eoncering the behavior of & structure from Inowlsdge of ite normal modes ‘32 Direct Determination of Natural Frequencies ‘The equations of motion fora system having N mass and 1 degrees of freedom but no external frees have the following frm: Alage thats ays bbs = 8 Male + Ruan thee * thm =O gy) Majer + beans rays bb ana = 0 whote the are ain coeficionts, which are apring constants or ot: ‘iontions thereof, andthe ’'eare the daplaementa of the lumped mnaes ag iss atonnviouty cone when digi anes gti ‘hte meng of enon so heave lave for atetry sae ‘Riots formation the modal metho of talnin ie the Append 2 Introduction to Structure Dynami 1 wl frst be shown tht vibration ins normal made must abnays be harmonic. As stated in the previous votion, during vibration in singe mode, the displeements of the several masses are always inthe ame proportion; ie, all posible postionsare geometrically tlc, This may be indioted ns afl. 9 = a0, where {(0 isthe same timo function in cach ease, and the o's aro the smplitudes of the individual motions, Substituting into Eye, (9), vos asd en MaaglO + bret + baal + <= + kansas) = 0 Madi) + bed) + koa) + ynefl) = 0 Meant + brunt) + bead) +--+ nasi = where Ji the second derivative off) with pect to ime, Regrang- ing thes last cautions, Wo © bus ~ tay + tae 1 ta 0 tom tn has aw i = brway ‘Since the left sides of Eqs. (3.5) are al identi, the vight sides must be ‘equal tothe same constant, which wil be identified by —o!. ‘Tha all ‘quntions may be writen as io o HO + fo = eo) uation (8.0), when solved, yields $19 © Corin ot 0, cosat = Corin vt +a) 7) ‘Ths it has been shown that motion as defined by Ey (3.4) i possible ‘and furthermore, that such motion is harmon with «natura feequessy of. This conclusion apples to aay one of the WV normal modes of the fystem. Note that all masses vibrato in phase with the same natural Irequnes. ‘Lumped.man Mulidepre Store 9 ‘To determine the natural frequency of the several modes, Bas. (8) ‘may be used. Substituting the constant —4*for the llt-and side en rearranging, hu ~ Baas haan + 2 + hires = 0 Ra + (l= Maton + tee 8 as ‘Thea equations ean bo usd to ove for relative values ofthe amplitudes ‘x. Recalling Cramer rule for ealvingwuch equations, we may ‘ate that nontrivial valuos of the amplitudes ext only ifthe determinant of the coocients of « is equal to zero, boeause the equations are homo tesoour; i, the right sides are sero. Sine fee vibration mart be poe sible in a ormal meds, we writs er a ae ba hn br |g ay kw bn © Che = Mat Alla are premumably known, and expansion of this determinant leeds to Jreency equation which ean he ealved fr, ‘Thote tune tel Ok for each normal mode, and hence nataral frequencies ae obtained ‘This procedure forthe determination of natural frequencies i ue ‘eated by an examplo involving a two-degree tystem, in the following Daragraph. Tt will become apparent that solution ofthe fejuney eae ‘ion becomes extzeinely eumbersoma as the nuruber of modee ingen For this eso other procedures have ben devised. An iterative method 5 given in Sec. 34, and an approximate method in See: 3. Jn mathematical terms the problem dipaseed shove it known © haractriniovalueproblon and the quantities x! a characlere value & cipewaluen, The solution of this prablem ix of importance in many engineering ls and several methods forthe detertinnton and manip lution of eigenvalues are to be found in theliterature."**" Attention herein ‘il be focused on those methods whieh sem most useful forthe type of Problems comtdered, 1 Teo-degresSateme ‘The equations of fee motion forthe fr-couped undamped twondegree system shown in Pig 3. are Mis hay bos — 99 = 0 Mags + kale ~ ys) + kus = 0 os) 41 Introduction to Structural Dyamice 4 aed oH [= Hawar-f tS anon 7 ff i qt "Tew teunes™ As indicated by Eq, (3.7), if tho estem i vibrating in & normal mode, the {oro displacements are bermonie aad im phase, and maybe expresed by ne arin +e) i ata Wes arsinalt +6) Hh = ~awtsinutl + 0) ‘As an alternative to the direct use af Eqs. (89) forthe determination of ‘tural frequencies, we may substitute thes expressions into Bas. (3.10) to obtain [oMiwtas + fas ~ sles ~ a) sin w+ «) = 0 [-Mtsstas + bles ~ a) “+ Roan (l-+ a) = 0 o (Mut th kon + (has = 0 (Heder Eat Eb, Adan = 0 ean [In order forthe amplitudes vo have any values ather than aro (4 nese ‘ary condition for a normal mode), the determinant ofthe coeficints ‘us be equal 1 sro, [omen tan (oka (ha (Mat thet ky Bxpanding this determinant gives the equation (CM hb ba (— Maat + ha +) ~ (Bt = 0 ow (BEB HEH) MEME 9 Gn) ‘Thisie the frequen ‘tro real root are modes ‘quation forthe two-dogreeeystem in Fig 38, The squares of the natural frequencios af the fro normal Lumped-maue Mulidegroe Spore 38 ‘To illstute further, suppose that all thes spring constants are equal to: aud both masses equal to. Equation (£42) then becomes ( "The two rots ofthis equation are ot wth meine ‘Theve ar the nara ireula frequencies of the two normal modes. ‘The sulle frequency wy corresponds to the fundomenta, oft made, whe ‘4s the frequency of the scond mode. wom 83 Charneteristie Shapes ‘ving the natural frequencies of the multidegres system represented by ge (3), the ehameterstic shapes of the modes may be obtained by ‘the we of Eqs (3.8). Ifthe value of at fort partoular mode x subi ‘uted into these NV equations, there ste then exactly unknowns, namely, the character amplitudes a; ay of that mode, Since the Fight idee of Ege, (3.8) arw aero, unique values of the o's are not obtained However, is posible to obtain the relative values ofall amplitudes, of ‘nother words, the ratio of any two. If an arbitrary value in given One amplitude, all others are then fixed in magutude. A set of auch abic trary amplitudes deine the characteristic spe, since the latter io not dependent upon abyolut values of amplitude. In mathematical rmy, ‘tet of modal amplitudes = known ae 8 eharalraie eter eis not surprising that unigue values ofthe characteristic amplitudes see unobtainable. We are hoe dealing with fre vibration, the ease of hich hasnot boon defined by ether intial conditions or forsag funeton, ‘The important poi is thatthe amplitudes of «normal mode ae alway in the same proportion; ie, the shape is mintained, regardles of the ‘use ofthe vibration ‘To illustrate the above, consider again tne two-dagres eps of Sec. ‘32a and Fla, 26, for which tho rturalfrequencls were found to be VE/M and 1.78-VR/H. Since the Ws were taken Wo be onal a8 were The eBags. (2.11) become (Met + 200+ (bas = 0 (Cha + (Mat + 2b; © 0 4 Intrducton Structure Dynamics Sutetituting m, the frequency of the Sint mode, into the rst equation veld (Cr+ Bhan + (“han 0 ‘Therefore on on whioh defines the characters shape of the fst mv, ‘The same result ‘would ave been obtained by eubstittion ito the seed eitation. The notation adopted ie thatthe fret mbecrpt cn the e indicates the many ‘or point on the structure at whish the semplitie occur, aad the secon subveript dosignates the mode, Substituting ey into either equstion yield (BE Aya + (Ban = ‘Thenetore ie 0m) hich defines the eharastaistio shape ofthe teond mode. Ibis desired to assign arbitrary values to the amplitude, the two medal shapes cole oe indleted by ‘The two chameterstic shapes, icy the motions aseoiated with the normal modee, re indicated in Fig. 37. In the fret mode the two mastes ‘move in the same direction and by thessme amount, Th the seond ode ‘hey more bythe same amount but in opposite dineetions. In both eace ‘isons 3.7 Chart shapes f som ad, ‘Lumped.mava Malidepres Systems $8 the motions ofthe two maases are in phase; the manimam dpc: ‘ents are attained simultaneously. The neutral point of the vibttion ' the static deadoad position, and the a's ar in reality amplitude of ‘the total motion. Tt shoul be intultively obvious that the typeof di tortion associated with th fest mode shoud, as we haye shown, have 8 lower natural frequency than that ssociated withthe second mode, « Orthoponatity An extrmoly important property of normal mode athe fet that any ‘0 modes ar orthogonal. Thin may be expresed as flows 3 Manon = 0 (ta0) hete m and m identify any two normal mode of the rytem, and the subscript refers to the rb mage ovt of «total of j masses ‘he sum ‘matin therefore indicates a serin with one tern for cach mae of the system. The proof of Eq. (8.182) is given below.* ‘When the system i vibruting in the nth mode and hae attained the ‘maximum amplitude, the masse could be planed a statis equilibria by ‘he application of inertia frees equal to Ma". ‘Thi tatemen, whieh isnot limited o maximum displacement but ould be ade for any modal position, is merely D’Alemberts principle of dynamic equiliviam, For ‘the nth mode ad the rt maa, the inertia force would be identied hy Manas, Suppote now that virtual displacement cotreponding to the ‘nth mode is intraduced, "The virtual wore dan bythe loerfin foree luring thi proone ie 3 rata 1 the proces is now reversed, ie, virtual digploements corresponding ‘othe nth ode are impose onthe system aleady in the mth ode the ‘virtual work §Otaan den According to the elementary principle known as Bet aw, tise 0 {Segue attest of rthognalty i hatte el pode wo nema ian cance veto i seo Var Pte nye fad taboos ‘soil athena" "The one given hae perp deve! y te ae ‘Gon tetra eneeps. An aberatv ests wan otabie gen int open 96 Intrducton to Structure Dynes Virtual work quantitieg mut be equal, ‘Therefore § Manta = ot § Maat o ( = 08) ¥ Mere = 0 Since (ac! ~ a) cannot be xero ifm my, ° @.130) 3 Maat hich isthe erthoponality contin. Thies an extremely weal consept in the analyis of multidegre sytem, "The validity of Bq, (12) ean bw demonstrated by consideration of the twordegree example of ace &:2e and 3.3, for which the charter shupee were found to be snd substituting My = Bf, ~ AF (as asqumed in the example) and the humeriel characteristic amplitudes, we obtain MCN + MOHD "Thus the orthogouality condition ie satisfied, “Another form of erthogonality which iv also psf! involves sping eon ‘ants rather than muses and may be developed as follows. Fora system vibrating in a norms] mode, the inertia and ping force form a st of fores in equiibrim, By the lw of virtual work the net work done by sich « ot during «vietal distortion mist be rer. For ‘he nth moda, let the inert force at mast rb Man andthe fore in spring ¢ bed. where dys is the spring distortion ‘Then the tata work during virtual distortion in the form ofthe mth mode e §, tantandon + $ hbetm emped-mate MutiepreeSpttems $1 where j and » are the number of masses and spring, epectively. By ‘Ba. (120, the frat scien inthe lst esation We are ae thereto Brana, =o aim) ‘hich isthe wzond erthoponaly condition. In the twouegres example previo cite, the mal sping dor tions may be determined from the modal amplitudes ae fallws (Pig 3.) an " ‘Therefor, singe all spring eoustanta arf, suetitution into Bq (8.13) 3 Rebate = ECHICED) + HO(—2) 4 EEI=D =O hich demonstrates the validity of the second orthogonality condition, 34 Stodola-Vianelo Procedure for Natural Frequencies and Chara teristic Shapes Direct determination of natural frequencies and characteristic sped as biven in Sec, 8:2 is exeemively todious if there ae inore than two, oF Dethaps tec, degrees of freedom. Thin ie trie becouse, for an’ Ne degre aystem, the frequency equation leg, Ea, (8.12)] bol degree N and ‘the voluton is very laborious if 7 > 2 or 3. Furthermore, the expan son of the determinant [Eq (3.)] ray be impenciel in such eaten Te 4s therefore necewary to resort to mutneriea, erative (ac, enka fron) procedures. ‘The most commenly ved ofthe thal associated with the names of Stodae and Viaell In the general cae, this progodure involves the saution of Bas. (8.8) by iteration, which yields both the natural Trequency athe charaster- isle shape. The procedure i at fellows: (1) assume choractorisio shape, i. a ot of o values; (2) using one of Ra, (38), solve for a (8) sing the raining (¥ — 1) equations, obtain a new shape by saving for (9 ~ 1) o's in terms ofthe tho; and (4) ting the new shape jst computed as the assumed shape in the next cycle, epeat the provedare to convergence, i, uatl the computed shape te the sume as th prev ‘unlyaswumed shape. In step 3 ie wally convenient to asin Wi value to the Nth a.” The rate of convergence may be ineretsed by “over: relaxation,” i, by using an improved tstiate ofthe shape instep 4, 98 Introsucton to Structure Dynes rs , Be baw ” 2, Wht prion yal nd, Mrcnt nm 1 e rn 35 Tener bse on the trend of convergence rather than that actually computed instep 3, However, this refinement i not asrsary and eins exper tengo to be done uecesflly. ‘The proedure outlined will eonvergo on either the highest or the lowest rode, depending upon the form of the equations of motion (Ste. 3.4. ‘The other modes are then obtained, using the same procedure, after having fist clminated one of the equations by xe ofthe orthogonality condition ‘The Stodoln-Viauello method is het described by a numerical exanple, ‘or this purpose the natural frequencies and eharaeteriste shapes of the ‘hree-degre yetem shown in Fig, 3.8 willbe determined. ‘The equation, of fee motion are Mags + kay — bn 9) = 0 Mage + alte — 9) ~ Bis = 9) = 0 18) Bie + hss = 99) = 0 Proceeding as before, we substitute Won sine) and 9, = ~eyntsinanlt +a) ‘neal the commen sine tara, and rearrange to obtain (-Alsa + + bee + (kam = 0 (ohm + Man + be hale (Shida = 0 18) Chitin + (Allie + ham = 0 where the subseript m indicates that the equations apply to any mode, ‘For the sumerieal example, the following valune sre giv: My 2tbswctfin. My = My = 1 Io-ee!/in 1b, = 6000 Ibfin ke = 4000 18 /in, by = 2000 lovin. Lumped-mans Multidegrce Sptome 98 Insertion of these values in Eq. (8.15) and rearrangement leads to the following convenient form ofthe equations: io 0m = 500054. ~ 2000 ® (S00, = 4000 + 60000. ~ 20004. a1 e Sen, = 200005 + 20003, ‘The procedure is to substitute an assumed shape in the right sides of the equations, use one equation to compute wy, and uso the two renaiing ‘uations to obtain the scond tral shape. AVter this procow has beh repeated several ies, the shape will caver on that ofthe higher, ot third, mode, and therefore the analyt sould begin by making ex et imate of the mative amplitudes for that mode.” Vor example, kus ane Ht ays 15 Substituting these ia Ea, (8.180), eH1) = 5000(41) ~ 2000(—1.8) Substituting this valu foros ad tho ein the right wide of Ba. (3.108), 8000(0u) = 4000-41) + 6000(1.8) — 2000¢+0.5) ‘Therefore a= 05 inal, om Ba, (2162), 000K) = ~2000(—1.5) + 2000(0.5) an = +05 ‘Therefore the ret estimate of wy e 8000, and the next til shape eto be taken a8 n= +1, cu = 1.75, and am ~ 40.5. This procedure ia repeated until convergence is sebioved se indieated in Table 31. Tt ray bo soen that ve eyeles are required to obtain what i considered to De eatfactory agreoment between the aarimed and corpited shapes "Tho last valuea computed are adopted as thown in the euunmaty of Table 3.1, ‘Tesimportant to retain mficlent sigifeat Sgoresin the Sst mde omputed since small errors here would rau in large error ithe last ‘mode eoroputed. Tt should be realed thatthe abelute mplitudss are indeterminate and tse vaio used sre arbitrary, since ay, wat arbitrarily {ken as unity. However, the ratior of the amplitudes aro ll that i requited, Prootoding to the next move, we use the orthogonality condition to redace the number of equations by one. If, ia B. (3.18), taken to tbe the third mode just computed and we the second mode now to be cam a= 405; ce = $000 100 Intraduction to Structure Dynamites Table Stedola-Vanello Procedure lor Sone Shon In Fg 8) i} Bk te Bip | we) ‘ 40388 | 1.00 ~[«]"~[.*]- |e Teint wade | sta <1ae| oan | ea | aw Seondinede 3470 fore | Toa] io | "Sa Finnie | tm fir | Gat] so | cs pled, the expanded ste ie 3 Mate = Asin + Mise + Matt = Mos)F1) + Non) —1860) + ay) (+0.858) or (y= 881004 + 8.368, ey Substituting the last expression foray into Bigs (8.10) results in only ‘eo Independent equations, which may be written as fllows @ i as) Lumpod-mace MaltieprenSortems 10h ‘We now iterate Eqs (2.18) to obtain i, ay td ayy, and then ws Ba, @.17) to obtain ayn Asrume oxy +1, aye = +08, By Eq. (180), C41) = 8000641) ~ 2000(40.5) et = 4000 By Bq. .188), : 4000(an) = 322041) — 736405) an = +0213 Subsequent cycles of iteration are given in Table 3.1, where i may be seen that four eydle are required foreatfactory rela, In the last ep, Bq. (3:17 is used to obtain ay ‘The frat mode ean now be computed directly from the orthogonality foutltion. ‘This always true ofthe lat mode computed, Equation (G.130) must be applied twice, ot combining the third snd Gest modes, ‘nd then combining the second and Grt modes, S Sat Mans + Mason + Morvan, ° = 2H Dan + 1OTEI)en + 1-108), 3 Masa = Mon + Manan + 6.19) = 2G Tan + 1(-1.868)00) + 1(+0.554)an = 0 Taking ay ~ +1, thew two equations are solved simultaneously to provide an 4211 ay = +280 Any one of Eqs (8.16) may now be used to compute ait. Using Ba, 0), eI) ~ 500041) — 2000(42.11) ot = 780 Ass check on the accurey ofthe solution, the frqueney and shape of ‘he last computed mode may be wbatitted into either Eq. (2.108) oF (8.106). Tell be found that, in mort case, liderul emptation dove ‘not provide fen signifesnt figures ther are more tha thee modes. ‘The summary in Table 3.1 gives the complete soatin ofthe problem, i, the frequencies snd characteristic shapes of the normal modes for the stem in Fig. 328. The characteris shapes are depicted graph cally n Pg. 39, se Altrnatio Ue ofFesiiity and titres Ravations In the preceding svetons the natural frequencies and characteritic shapes wore derived from tifaees equations i, the equations of motion 42 Introducion to Structural Dares Jensorsen Fy Iowe tee rere written in terms of stiffness coeficents f, For example, cach of Eqs (3) ofthe form ay + Div =0 G20) here the W's ate stitfcanes, When the Stodole-Vianllo procedure is applied to sich equation, the Hest mode obtained isthe highet mode, eg, in the computations awd on Fig. 3.8 the third mode mae Sst coblained. In many eases this it underrble since the fundamental, or firs, mode i uaully of greatest interest. To fect, when dealing with rary degres of freedom, analyasf often based on the fit few moder alone, while the higher modes are uegleste, ‘This dificulty can be circumvented if the equations of motion are writen in tera of fertility eaeicions, ‘Tha forma of the equations is then y+ Dmg = oa where the D's are feibilitycoeBicints, 1 the Stodola-Vianello method ‘in sppled to equations such us (3.21), the Get mode obtained, rather than the ghost, e he fundamental, “To ilustete the so of feiilityooefclents, consider the beam with three concentrated asses ar shown in Fig. 2-10. ‘The eneiients are noted by Dy, whic, by the usual structural convention, indicates the —_ room 239 tan with enemas LY {}—, defection st point ‘dus toa unit fore aplied wt point j. ‘Thus the coe cinta are determined by the suceeive application of wit force the various points. or example, in Fig. 10) the covfeients obtained by. spplying a ust fore at point I are indented, Sino, in normal made, ‘he ony forces involved are inertia fores, the qutions of motion are erved from the fast that at any instant, the tot defotion isthe sume af the defections due to the individual inertia forces Considering the force system shown in Fg 5.10, the following rye writen: = BAD ~ MegDis — MapDus Wee ~MDa — Med Dee — Manns 2 = =MGDy ~ MebDa— MaDe ‘Asin previous discumsion, we now sulstitete y, = ay in w(t +) and Sr =~ a(t + a, canoe the common sine terms, and reerane to obtain (03h) ag + Uta + dda tdaten + (sidn~ Jou + OnDadan = 0 022) atDn) brea + (inde oe hoes equstions are equivalent to Es. (3.8) or, in the previous example sven, Kae. (18), The Stodoly-Vianello procedure may be applied to gn (23) in exactly the same manner ax previously described for sti. 106 Introduction to Structural Dynamics ness equations. The fst step would be to rewrite the equations inthe form 85 = MDutis + MeDitin + MeDustn 25 = MDetuct MDutin + MD ro a2 = M Dest + MDs + MeDeae, hich are equivalent to Bags. (16). The procedure would then be racy the same as Mustrated after Ege (3.16). willbe found that ‘the fundamental mode i fet obtained "Tn viow of the advantage of obtaining the highest mode ft, the only ceuton for using sifu equations that in many caus, the le ew coofeients are more easly computed. For example, the stfness oefiients forthe rigid frame of Fig. 3.11 are obtained by introducing Unit deletions at the floor. One wt of eoufiients would be computed by a simple morment-distebutionsidewmay tolution a lutrated in ig SD, whore the holding foro aro the desired sili coficeate, On the other hand, determination ef simular set of flerbility eefcente requires a more complex analysis involving the superposition of three tidesway’ elution followed by defestion computations a indvatad in Fig Ste Tn other cases, the Mxibility coefficients are more easily determined than are the siffesecooficionta. For exemple, for the team of Fig, 5.10, its easier to determine the deflections duc to nit loeds than to ‘eters holding forces due to imposed unit deflections, If shearing distortions are tobe Sneladed, ie impomible to obtain the stiffens cet ‘ents directly, and one must begin with eb Tt should be noted that equations of one type ean, Wf necemary, be inwred to obtain the equatins of the oer type. For example i Ea ‘oom 3.1 Rigi ramet ad Sexy conicient Lumped.mate Multidgre Stems 168 (8.22) ae saved for Majh, May and Ma, one obtains the corresponding ‘iffees equation in the form of Eqs. (88)."This or the reveree operas tion is sometimes a wef procedure 35 Modited Rayleigh Method for Nataral Frequencies When the gstem has many degres of freedom, the Stodla-Vianello ‘method for determining frequencice and characteritc whaper becomes ‘sactedingly cumbertome, if not impossible This ie tue because ene ‘ust dal with Une completa st of equations af mation, one equation for ech degre of freedom. In this ection an proximate mth usualy Atrbuted to Rayleigh i presented fr tse when one i interested in aly 1 few ofthe lower moden ‘in show in ce, 3. tha, by thie method, the natural frequency of ‘the fundamental mode ean be obtained with considerable sceureey tad Yet with relative ease. The charaterate ehape obtnined i eos tocar ‘ate, but can be improved ly an erative procedure, In See. 35%, the vwethod i extended to include higher natural modce The method ‘exeribed herein is particularly uefl for eyeams with continuous mass slstribution and henee an infinite numberof degree of freedom. Appi ‘ations ofthis sort ae given in Chap. Fundamental Mode The Raylsigh method is an energy procedure based on sa assumed ‘haractariatic shape. ‘Let (2) be an nesimed nondimensonal shape, ‘where zis. a coordinate defining positions on the eructue, and lt the swoumed diplacements be A’g'(2}, whore lis am azbitary constant For » hunped-mase system, the aerumed diplacement at tame io xpresed by A's If this were the true shape of 2 normal mode, the corerpending inertia force would be MA’ = constant (4) Since the abtolate value ofthe inertia force is indeterminate and of 20 ‘mportaue, the constant may be dropped. Therefore lt Fy represent thi foree at be given by Fan Ms Suppose thal the ores, were applied tothe system and the resulting Aslleoted shape determined.” This nem ehape wil be ieatied Uy 9”, the dinpicemente by 49"), aud that at maser ly 491 thewe dleplacements represent the te modal shape, i ean be stated that the kinetic eneray ofthis yetom at ero displacement equals tho werk done by the inertia forees at the wpstem mioven from aero to mia di 06 ntroduction to Structural Dyariee placement, ‘This statement may be farther explained hy the fact that the work done by the inartie forse must equal the strain energy inthe system at masinum displacement and, furthermore, that thi axis ‘train energy must qual the masinnus:kineiceoergy ater doplacemtnt, Since 4” ia the maximum digplaeement and the sotlon is barmonk ‘the maximum velocity of masts A's, ‘Therefore, forthe complete system, x= Syantaretan w= S sercarety Where 3 = total hoe energy’ at sero daplucement A= toa rin eoegy at sini dplcement ° = amber of meee 1 the expremion for sin eomry, the 34 factor appears because the force varanasi rot ero toa aimin ws the dapaceneat increases quating the ubove energy expense obtain D Pee! oh 025) ae $ ser hich gives the natural rogueney ofthe fundamental mode fra lumped ‘ns system besed on an assumed shape #(a)..‘The computed Hape 6") a better approximation of the characteristic shape of the rode, ‘To.ummarte, the complete prosedure sas follows (1) asim shape #1); @) compute the corresponding inertia ores Fy; (8) eompute the destin dae to FoF "(2s and (2) compute the natal frequey hy Eq. (2.25). If greater asouracy ie require, thie procedure ean be repeated using ¢”(2) a the amumed shape for the next evel "The succes ofthe Rayligh method lies in the fant that seeurat values of fequeney are obtained even though the seamed shape i only approsi Inntely correct. ‘The bet frst ertimate ofthe fundamental-mode spe is usually that produced by the dead wight, or in other words, by the ruvity fore ating on the masts ofthe mysem, ‘This was infact, the Insc conceptof the origins! Rayleigh mtbed. ‘The complication encoun tered in applying the method to higher modes that no such simple devon ‘rita for etimating the modal shapes ‘To illustrate the sbove method, we shall determine the natural tre ‘queney and characteristic shape forthe fundamental mode ofthe three Alegre system shown in Fig. 3.12. Thi the same eyatem a ht ned “Lumped-macs Mulidepre Systems ot ~— etme nae @ "owns 12 Deleination of fundamental de by he Rayhigh thd for illsteation ofthe Stodole-Viaellosuthod in See, 34. For the Ray leigh methed, the first step i to compute the dendloed defections as indicated in Fig, 3.12). g(a evaluated by arbitrarily letting 4” equal ‘the deflstion ab maa 1, aad ence 4 = 1.” The rerninder of the pro- cedure is shown in Table 32, where the deal ahspe i te wanted shape in the Gat eyce, and the computed shape of thet cycle is taken to be the assumed shape of the second epee. Te may he bwerved that the frequency ablained in the it cycle is indeed acrurete, sites no ler improvement is made, However, the characteristic shape is not very ‘osurate, and thre cycles are shown to indieate the rte of convergence, Comparison withthe values forthe fundamental mode in Table 2.1 (the same problem done by Stodas-Vianllo) reveal that the two give ‘wentially the same remult. Sion the fist raodo was the lst obtained in the Stodola-Vianllo procedure, tho values given in Table 8.2 are the more seeurate Te should be apparent that the Rayleigh method is extremely weal for systems having many degrees of frdom. This ix periulrly teve ‘ben the completa set of equations of mation are not required for eller ‘rps and whoa the stroctaro auth Ut eifnes and exit toe ficients ae gifteult tocompute. By this method deeetions need team ted for only ove set of loud, while to write the equstioae needed for ‘he Stodola-Vianllo method requirer a whole serie of computations for ites or Hesblty coulis 188 Intraducton to Strcturl Dynamics [able £3 Mule Rayleigh Method for Fundamental Mode of Sisto i ct | Ha ag | Game a] ta | 20 [ose | By 2s: 3 | 3% | Sa [oot ya coi 20 1. Higher Me ‘The Rayleigh method may be extended to obtain shigher-mode shape And frequoney by the Schmid! ethoonatzation proedure® In shor, thia procedure is to assume 8 shape, “sweep out” thor eomponeate of the shape associated with lower modes, and then apply the Rayleigh ‘method bnsed onthe residual shape, The eomputation wil slwaye con ‘verge on she next highor mode.’ ‘The theoreti base forthe procedure Is given below. Any shipe which might be assumed ean be expressed a 0 vate 2 where re = amumed deflection of nase r 4 = datetion coordinate for mth mode ‘bs = portcipation factor for mth mode IN = umber of modee ‘Lumpedsmass MatiepreeSprtona 108 ‘This equation states the known fact that any shape which might be imagined can be formed by a linear combination of model shapes" TE both sides of Ra, (3.26) are maltiptied by Avy where gyi the dee. tion coordinate fr the ath mode, we obtain, Mrbetn = 3 atl am Summing overall mases, Saotn= SS vattints ea) Since by the orthogonality condition Mbt = al terms on the right side of a. (3.28) may be eiinated, except those orm ~ 9, and the uation may be writen 3 Mette = Si vesh, ‘Therefore the partisipation factor forthe eth mode is om ‘nd the participation ofthe qth mode inthe assumed defection st mass in Yabo If for example the shapes of two modes and ¢ had been previously determined and the asmumed defection “swept” of thse ‘mode oe would be given by fae = re Pee = Vator (930) ‘This swept shape would be used in Faq, (3:25) to compute the frequency ofthe next higher mode after and e. It thould be reognized that the foregoing development ie merely device by which the amined shape i adjusted wo a6 to satity the orthogonality condition forall previously ‘computed shapes This istry euesneeay shapes dion yen N cordate ‘hee ornnny 6) poder sistas quate, ich ele {able 3.3 Modi Rapegh Method for Second Made of Sytem in Fi. 228 Lumped-mane Maltuapree Sietome 11 ‘To ilustante the above procure we shall obtain the second mode of the aystem shown in Fig. 3.12. The computations ave shown in Table 33, where the frat mode is swept fom the assed shape in ath eye using the characteristic shape computed in Table 32 for that made Otherwise Une procedure is the sume as that used for the ist mode, The fiet-mode shape gyi taken as the last computed values in Table 3.2, ‘The assumed shape inthe fist oyele is merely an educated gues. Ain the cas of the fst mode, the natural fayaeney is obtamed quite securely inthe firs excl of compatation, tnt several eyeles are requiced {o obtain an aceurts characteristic shape, ‘The dference between the final shape compute (6, in the third eyele) with that given bythe Stadols-Vianello method in Table 3.1 isd to errors in both proces ‘eeulting frm roundoff and incompite eonvergenee, For a many degree syatem, the above procedure could be continued for as many modes ws required. ‘The last mode, sy the thind mode in the example, can be computed directly by the orthogonality contin. This would not occur in practic, however, sine fall modes are tobe obtained, tho Stodala-Vianelo method i probably more couvenint. [Lagrange's uation Before proceeding tothe determination of response for mutidegree aye {ems it iseonvoniont to develapa basi too, nately, Lagrange’ cation, ‘This formulation, which is based upon energy concept, an extremely powerful devie for the snalsia of dynamie systema. ts wef Bol Only fr Iumped-mamsaystems, but pezhape ven more for systems with istiuted tna, and wil bo sed extensively in Chap. 4, Several de vations of Lagrange’s equstion my be found in the literature 95 The approach given blow ie band on the lw of Vitus! work bocase structural engineers are frill with this principle. More concise devel ‘opment is pombe, bat requtes knowledge of certain prinipes of mate. rntiee whieh are ot presumed herein. ‘Consider the configuration shown in Pg. 2.23, consisting of wn elastic structure (shown tes simple beam for cotwenienee) supporting & Eroup 1 | El -- = — int i- a| = - cos = ea] Se g 12 Introduction to Structural Dynaie fj rmmes, Mr nd subjected toa group of m frees Fe ‘The defected thape is defined by 8 set of N gonraiedeoordinaten gc Ut i nocesary thatthe abape be completely dened by W and only N coordinates, Thu the system hus N degree of freedom. The point at which thes coord rntos ae gvon neod nat ined the thas aad lad pots bat the dese tions aé the later points must be dened by the generlied coordinates ‘Suppose now tht virtual distortion is introdaped eonsieting of a tal hang in one georalized eoordinate, Let this ebange be designated by bq. By the law of virtual work, the work done by the externa frees. during the virtual distortion must equal the change in intesal sain energy. Noting tha, in a dynamie syste, external frees inchide both ‘eal louds and inertia ores, we may write the preceding satemont B+ Bg fA BL ean) vrhore a8, = virtual work done by external fonds {3a = virtual work done by inertia forces 1, = virtual work done by damping forces 34. = change in internal strain energy ‘Three of thes terms may be exprewed simply ae @ © 32) ° tnd evaluated by the partial diferentiation indicated, Ia order for Eas (6.32) to proce the desired reslt W,, 1, and mst be the work and ‘nergy due to sal changes inal gonezlied coordaates, ‘The partial derivatives thon give the rte of change with repet to oe coordinate, 4. ‘The fourth term, 3, requires further manipulation. ‘Thin may be cexprecced by rem ~ — $ ara Sam whereof the total dgpiacement at mass The right se indicates the sum forall mases of the product ofthe inertia forse and the virtual displacement at r resulting from ag. For reanons which will become ‘pparent blow, tise now expreand in the equivalent form G33) Lumped-mase Matidegre Sytome 13 ‘Tho lst basd upon the fact that @ ® as) © Furthermore, since», = fe, and Be mnt 5 a equation (3340) may threorw be writen a = Sue, 330) © Be Swe @ Subetitating Bigs. (5.34) and (S meee E(8)n+(Be aa Finally, subsisting Res. (8.35) and (3.2) into wo obtain (G31) and canceling $@)-24B aw aaa, 3g au aa. which i the woul form of Lagrange’s equation Ta the applieation of Eq. (550), exprenions are Gest written for the inetie energy 3, the strain energy 1, the work done by the damping foreosW,, and the work done by real exteral Toros ‘Wallin terms of ‘the generalized coordinates gy "gy. When thee expressions wre die ferentinted ge indiated and sbtited ito Hq (3.38), the reali a8 equation of motion, there being one euch equation foreach coordinate g Ii all eases cousidored herein, aK/8q is wero, since kinetic energy is 8 function of velocity rather than of displacement. He rome 3.1 Raample, Ooedegre nate, In onder to gain fniliarty with Legrange's equation, we investigate to simple examples below. ‘These are trivial sppliations af the “Lagrange equation, but are presented for the purpose of emphacizng the phyeicl meaning ofthe various terms and of demonstrating the validity of Ba. (8.30 or the sizple one-degrosaystem in Fig. 3.14, there only one coordie ante; Ut is g = The energy exprestiona in terms yar allows: Kinetic energy — a = J49* Strain energy = 4 = Béla? ‘Work by damping foree = W- = (oi) Work by external free = 8, = FOOy ‘The damping force must be taken as negative, singe « pastive damping {ores is alwayn in a diretion opposite to positive y. ‘The eomeary 2 derivatives are aa) = 0 au ay - a me Substitution into Ba. (3.38) leads to the equation of motion Da - Fe My thy ta = FO which in obviously correct and the same as that oo Consideration of dynamite equilibria, ‘Second, consider the two-degree damped system in Fig, 3.15. There are now tv generalized coordinate, ys and yx, ‘The energy expresions ood directly by Lumped-mane Multieprn Systems 186 HK ont tm * even Pen wie ee cic | fire oem 3.15 Example. ‘Twestgree 410 ale Co @ in thse terme are = BA + 36ane = Skin? + Seen — 98 cbse + (elds = vllds ~ 9) WE Rn + Pon Note that, in thee expromions, i is important o include all the energy of the eystem. "Note also that, a8 thin system ie dined, the damping Toree between th Uo masrs proportions to the relative velo, and the distance through which that force moves while doing work i the relative diplacement. "The required desivativs are A (ex So (5) a 4@)-" OOF Lg ao Bo by, = bape + hs MH bays — ks BE tanta Be mentee oy wand KB fa rao 2 ran 18 Introduction to Structural Dyas Substitution of the derivatives with rxpect to y that i yy = 4) into Bg. (3.30), fellowed by the wbelitution of derivatives with respect to ys, ‘yields the two equations of motion Mohs + bas ~ false — 9) + obs ~ el = 9) = Pal) Mabe b Bale ~ 99) + el =) = PAD ‘hese equations are readily veried by the conridortion of dynamie eae [bem a indionted in Fig. 3.18, The above method i abviouly an Inaleint way to write the equations of motion, Furthermore, it should bbe recognized that the Lagrange equation is merely a devie for writing the equation of motion and i not a method of solution. However, at willbe soen in the remainder of this chapter and in fllowing chapters, the Lagrange equation has tome very important cs, 87 Modal Analysis of Muldegree Spurs? Having developed the ideas and procedures presented in the foregoing sections, wo ae now in position to determine the response of multidegroe Syma duc to applied frees or initial conditions ‘This will be accom plished by the modal method, in which the repens in tho normal modes fro determined seperately, and then superimposed to provide the total response. At will be proved below, the ‘important point is that cack ‘normal mode maybe treed as an independent oe-dere system, “The applicability ofthe modal method of saalyi i iited to linearly aslo ystems and to eases in which al forom applied to the stueture have the same time varistion. These are rather severe limitations ‘When these conditions are not met, america analeia must be used, 28 demonstrated in See. 3. Model qutione ‘We shall now demonstrate that the normal modes are indeed inde- pendent aad at the sume time develop the governing modal equations of ‘aotion. This objetive is conveniently aceomplied by the use of the [Lagrangian equation ‘Consider s humpod-mase system having j masses, springs, and 1 normal modes, The system may be close or farcoupled. At any ingtant the total Kinetic energy in the system in seu Ea)? wan * Aa alternative developent ofthe mola meted of nay ing atta ‘inn von he Appi Lumped-maee Mutiepre Systems TIF ‘where dhs i the velocity component of mus + asociated with the th ‘mode, "The total strain energy im the springs of the eye s jad ) 38) Iwhere yi the distortion of spring g (ie, the relative displacement of its ends) in the mth mode, snd by i the sifu of that spring. Both qs. (6.37) and (8.38) ar based on the fact that any displacement er ‘velocity is oqual to tho sum of the modal campansats "The squared were in Bq, (37) equivalent tothe sum ofthe squares ofall rool components of, plus twice the som of al eros products of these componeats. When sommed over all snus the total of thea rou products must be neo, aoerding to the orthogonality condition {24 (SN). To demon, cone «trot trie ere Soa ayrs Sram eaacean Sue, 3 att § avin “The second sve is idetea with Ba (3.154), exept thw the modal terme are velo ther than dpacementa. Hfowever, tac dharo {eric chaps als apply to vloity veto thier mut als bez. ‘hereore Bg (3.7) may be wren a2 xo Syn 3 a, 30) 1 exaetty the same reasoning is applied to Ea, (338) and use it made ofthe second orthogonality condition (fg. (3.130) i i clear that Ea (6.58) can be writen ae Considering the external fores F, acting at the + masses, we ind that the work done in term of the displacement aay For each mode it is convenient to alot a modal displacement Ay x0 ‘hat all Individual mace doplcements may be expreee in erm of this 118 ntraducton to Structure Dynamites fone variable, Anis usually taken ua the displacement of one abitaily Selected masa, "The ane As (SE) = tate a= ds(S2) = date 1) = Attn here de tnd gay are constants for a given mode, A wt of mich con ‘tans deine the characteristic hape or may be determined therefrom, guations (3.39) to (B41) may therefore be weten ae @ ® Gam © For wie in Lagrange’ equation, the following partial deivatives are obtained: Sim Sodom, a(Gh)~ 4 9 wa Bt ~S tedesin = 4S tthe as Ba She Whore Ax the modal diplactment and also an asbitrary coordinate ‘which will replace qin Eq. (888). Note that, in each ease, only one term in the modal eres Shs derivative. Subtitation of Kas. (8.48) in Bq. (8.38) produces Simei ta States frie aa Comparison ofthis equation with that for w one degree mytom Mg + by = FOO Lumped-man Mulidepre Spteme 119 reveals the important fact thas the motal equation of mation (3.44) iin ‘ractly the sume form as that for one-degroo system. "Furthermore the ‘thre seis may be asoeated with an equivalent one-degreesyetenn a fellows: Baca, euia a Shite Sem ‘squivalet pring constant 45) osivalnt foros "The modal equation may aleo be writen inthe form Sram Ata, Ma or singe F, a fonetion of time and F. = PlfOh $0 S Pat Aut othe = 48) Mat, 2, ‘This ie tho most immportant equation inthis chapter. The two summe- tions in Ea, (2-46) are constants fora given mode and loading, and the ‘modal respons in vems of Ay may be determined by this equation with ‘out dificalty." Sines, must have been previosly determined (in order ‘ta obtain the modal shape), ther iano need to compute the equivalent spring constant. Inspection of Eq, (2.40) makes i apparent tat the ‘odal method as formulated here ean be weed only f/() it the sane for fall fore acting on the structure, However this restriction ean be Femoved i the modal equations are solved hy numerical methods. 118 sre eatnent th itary amps a «mote ae mermaid that $ret. 1. ‘thant dacomintor on hig wo, (4) woe aways e'unisy. In he pm spinon dere le no wgiSaat vantage in this Carrying the analogy to.» ono-dogree system further, we see that the ‘modal sti deeation must be given by £ Fite wt 3 Mesh since for a onodegre ayer yu = Ful = Bi/a8Bf. ‘The reponse ix therfore given by a Ast) = Ase(DLF), ts) ® (Ade = ACIDE, ‘whore (DLE), depends only on () and wy. All solutions and charts for DEP given in Chap. 2 may therefore be applied tothe analysin of mali Adegoee cysts. This isan important conclusion The total defection at any point + is obtained by superimposing the nodes. Aan = ey 10> 3 Asta(DLP. am Given the modal froquencion and charateriate sbapes, Ube anaysa of ralidegree systems ning Eqs, (247) to (349) booomee relatively sinple The analogy betwen» mode and aa equivalent one-degree system, may be stetad quite simply as folowa The equivalent one-depree system is one for which the kinetic energy, internal strain oergy, and ‘work done by all external ores are a al ine ual to the same quant: ties fr the complete multhgree system when vibrating inthis normal ‘mode’ alone. Referring to Fig. 3.16, whore the equivalent system is dlained by ky My and F,, we may trandlate the foregoing statement as follows Print tt ei vat» § sth 3m, and therefore a uatng sein eur Maa =F ahiandund! sot arte be Stole Lumped-mane Multidepree Store 13 aad i cst @ come 316 Modal ania. a) Male pte hating work by external forces, FAA $ random tad tf 149 » $ tm ‘Thao expressions for equivalent-eystom parameters are ential with thooe of Eq. Gs). Thee i, of coun, « unique set of equltaient parameter for each normal mode. ‘This way of vsualising the base Principle wometims nfl ‘The response ofthe threedegeee syste shown in Fig. 3.17, resulting from the load shown in the same figure, it to be deterained, The 182 Introduction to Structural Dynamice serrate aan 120008 Ware eh esta Nraearuirto) normal modes were obtained in See, 34 for the same numerial values af the parameters, and the routing natural frequencies ad charae- teristic shapes are shown in Fig. 8.0. The fest step i to evaluate the ‘uivalent peak load and ase for uae in Bq. (3.40). These rather Staple computations are shown in Table 34.” For each mode, Ay i Table 24 Medal Anatat; Modal Static Detection fr Syst in Fig? a ee ee ee ee » wo] [aa] oo 1 | om) aon) aw | 2.0m [ oe = aero 2] 3 | om] Be) ge] | Se LS z “ae| [Teer] =O ou Lumped-mane Maltiepree Sonoma 128 arbteaiy taken to be the deflection of suse 1. Rauation (247) is ‘the used to compute the modal sttie deflections Anu. For cach mode, DLF is piven by Eq. (2.170) of Soe 2.3, which may be written as ou, seed _t fort ct coe att Equation (2.185) would be used for £> tan either cate (DLAs t merely the valu for one-degroeayeten of natural frsqueney ox and tubjested to's triangular load pulee as shown in Fig. 17. The total detection at any point i given by Bg. (8.49). For example, the df. tion of mass? at & funetion of time i In) = Ande DLE) + Avid DLP + Avabas(DLE)s = (F030 42.N(DLF), + (0680)(40.765) DLP), + (0111-1 865)(DLE = 094 DLR), + 049(DLE), + 021(DLF), 6.50) ‘The moitl eomponents of yl) [the separate terms in Bq 850) are plotted in Fig. 3.18. Thene were obtained by evilating Eqs, (2.179) find @.18)) foreach mode, Tho total daflestion at anytime i ofcourse the aum ofthe modal component. Te should be observed that the degree to which a mode participates In the total vibration ia greatly affected by the distribution of lad 124 traduction to Structural Dynamlee ‘Thin fact in reectad in the quantity ZPivie, The more neasly the load values are similar t the corregponding amplitudes of the characte istic shape, th greater isthe participation. In fect, if the lds at all points were proportions to the charneteritic amplitudes of « certain ‘ode times the mass at the same points the response would be eatinly In that mode and that mode alone "The determination of maximum defection at point 2 would involve diterentintion of Eq. (8.30) with respect to time inorder to obtain fst ‘the time of maximum repose. ‘Thins obviously a very dificlt Drocea. In many ease the practical solution i to proceed graphically fo in Fig, 8.18 and from this plot approximately daduoe the time of ‘aimuin reapone, “An upper Knit fr the maximum response ay be obtained by adding ‘nomereally the maximue of the moder taken separately. This ean aly be done by uve of Fig. 27, which given (DLE)ane. Ta tht par ‘eal cae we have Pint mote Te onime = 048 Lian = 112 fhoond ne: Tao 4900 Ua = 18 Thind mode Taoo7 ate DLP an = 188 ‘Therefore the upper bound of ys it Yaaae < 0.64012) + 040(1.53) + 021¢1.68) Inspection of Fig, 3.18 indiesto that, for thie example, the value just computed i a rather conservative entimate of the maxinin displace ‘ent. In fact, tho true value, occuring at about O85 we, is 131m However, iPone move had been more dominant and ifthe diferences betmeen the natural frequencies had been greater, both of which cond tions ually cerur, the upper bound would have been more acceptable. Wit ie desired to compate a ets maximum in the rructure, or in the above example, a maximum spring fre, the proedire is eeentilly ‘he sume aa that wad nbove for maximum deplacement, For example, the characteristic distortions of spring 2 are 182i, fine doe = gn = LL oss = dun on = 0285 Gan On — Gun = —2868, Lumped-mase Multidegre Sptome 188 "The sping fore at any time i given by ots) = $a afan(DLPe = HiC+0300¢4-1.11)0DLP), + (40.640(-.0285)0DLF). “+ (=0.11)(—2886)(DU = HOM4(DLF), — 015(DLF): + 082DLF)y| "The upper bound ofthe maximum epring fore is therefore (hone < 4000.34.12) + 0150.88) + 0920.68) 4600 1 38 Mulistory Rig Frames Sobjeted to Lateral Lond ‘To illustrate farther the use af the principles devcloped in the preeding sections, spplication in now made to act structares. ‘The examplet elected are rigid bulding Trance abjected to horiontal ditartances, ‘eg, dynamic loading due to blast or wind gust. ‘The majority of such structures may be considered, without appreciable error, to be lumped ‘nes eystema, withthe mames concentrated ut oor levels. Only hor 2ontal motions aro considered, and Uae are aanimed tobe independent ‘of vertical motions. ‘This aamimption i permiable becaoe vera! ‘motion due o changes in column length or Mexure of gers hae relatively ‘inal amplitade and hence litle eect on the horizontal erponse In many practical eases the prdersifsses relative to the columns ‘re sufiently largo that they may be aarumed infinite, Since this simplifies the analysis somewhat, responses are often computed on this basi.” Structares of this type are sometimes ealed shear budge ‘The building to be analysed is the simple ate rig frame shown in Fig. 8.19. ‘The weights of the foors and walls ar indlatad and are ‘ssumed to include the stuetural weight. ‘The bulding conse of ‘ris of wu frames spaced at 15. Tei assumed Uh both stretura Properties and lending are uniform along the lenath of the building, ad ‘therfore that the analysis to be nade of an interior frame yields the ‘sponte of the entire building.” ‘The los which are concentrated 4 for loves are an acceptable Sdelization of distributed dynatie pes sve applied to the walls All loads have the ine function inated in Fig 8.9, nde the ascumption sated, the entire building may be represented by the cloweeoupled springsnass wystem shown im Pig. 310.” ‘The con- 126 Introduction to Stractral Dynamlee re 0 Ly jowre —ow |e OT) oovma.19 Beale. Stel rae with ig iden. centred weights which are each taken ne the total oor weight plus ‘hat ofthe tributary wall aes ar consputed ae follows Ws, = 104(30)5) + 20012.5)(8)(2) = 54,300 1 1M = 141 seein Ws = 100(30)15) + 20(10)18)(2) = 51,000 0 My = 132 Iosoet/in W = 0(80)45) + 20(5(15)<2) = 35,500 My = 66 seein, It should be pointed out thatthe weights used in the dynamic analyrie shold be thow expected to exat wt the time of responce and are not Lumped-maee Maltepree Speen 127 loot loads. Since the gidery are ‘he column base, each wprng constant is given by neces related to the design scoured Fa is ke , 28102) po ‘nd the individual values fr Ue wee-olunn sections indent are 3260 X 1094882) « 55709, U5 x18 one by = !2G0% 1091106332) = 4 49 aw ym 2G2 ODIO 4500 ‘The equations of motion for the yyten, deduced by considering the dynamic euiibyium of each many are Mags + ay — ban ~ a) = FO Mats + bile — yn) — Rage — 99 = 08) Made + lis — v9) = OFC "The frat sep is to obtain the natural frequencies and characteristic shaper of the thot modes. Inthe usual manner, the equations of motion ‘te modified by taking the right siden equal to sare und subetitting the ‘modal eomponrats(y ~ a sin) for the displacements ad aecleraton toobtain (oitaee + + ban + (shane = 0 (oho + (Oto + Ee ban + (hden = 0 Chine + Bad + bao = 0 rom the last st of equations the nomial mods may be obtained either by direct determination (ve, setting the determinant of the oocficente ‘ual to ser a in ec. 3.2) or by the Stodola-Vianello method (Se. 4) {mn this particular ene, the two methods are sbost equally convenient ‘because of the zero terms in the detorminant, Otherwie the latter method is preferable. ‘The natural periods and characteristic thapes ‘eulting from thees computations are given in ig. 3.20, ‘Next, the medal state deflections are computed by the evaluation of a, (47). ‘These computations are shown in Table 3.3. Tk it inme- Aisely apparent from the valuea of Ava that the fundamental mode Adominstes this respone Tn order to define competaly the response (as urd here reponse is {ken to men any diplacemert or siren), ute is made of Ea (89), in which (DLE), is given by Bq, (2.20) for this parteular loadtime une 138 Intraducton to Structure Dune Lumped-maes Mitepree Stems 128 ee Tae Teble 25 Modal State Detection for Frame in Fg 2.29 and 3.30 ‘ian 320 Characters sap ae in Fig 2:9, ‘lon. The marimam dynaiaie lod factor fr any mode may be obtained from Fig. 29. ‘The latter valu for this example are: Moe | OF _| OF me 1 | am | ame 2 fom | x a fa fat ‘The maximum roof defections (for example) given by Be. (3.4) for the modes repartaly are therefore es © (40,388)(41.599)(180) — 41.1 in, es = (@.0L48)(~1.011)(.28) = 0.02 in as = (+0.0018)(+2.680)(.11) = +0.005 in Since the fist mode proves hy far the major contribution, the upper ound (ie, the numerical sum) of maximum deflection may be tied without spprovibleertor. Therefore ‘This overriding influence of the fst mode on deflections is typical of ‘ullding frames, provided ony that al the loads actin the eae direction. ‘The efeet of the higher modes on streses may, however, be tore signifeant. For example, consider the column’ bending “moments In the top story for which the amociated characteristo acplitude is a= ¢= 62. Thus the maximum relative story duplacement in each node anaes = Analdan)(DLE on Seine = (40.356)(1.690 —Tart(.s9) = +0114 in, ‘inane = (F0.0146)(—1.041 + 0.140)0.28) = —0017 in Ansnee = (+0.00181)(2.680-42220)(1.11) = +0010 in, 1 may be observed that, although the frst mode sill dominate, the higher modes are relatively more important than in the previous Eos utation, ‘The time histories of the modal components of sory displace tent are plottod iu Fig S21. ‘Thow are based on the time vartion ‘ova 821 Modal emposent of top ory trina fr exaple eet in Fg 318 129 Introduction to Stractural Dynamics of BL mn by Ra (20) Inco ig 231 rea at, 1 Rips eatin tt punt wv aine lo sla mo ara ‘i dscrneiy or 07 "The nein nage ‘ern al hp ty re = SRA Sth = san ato10900% 19 Tien "The wie of the algebraic am is prope in this example only because the loads continue to'act on the stlctre. Jf the lds had diminished to tec, all DLs would have beta + aud the numerical sum would have ‘en inore appropriate, It may be noted that tho slgcbraie sum could ‘io have been used in computing the maximim rof deflertin. ‘The above is intended to ilustrate the fact tat maximum responses can often be satisfactory etineted without golng Unrough the tedious Job of masinixing the sum of the modal response mathematialy (One must proceed with eaution, however and ite lays conservative to tse the upper bound, or numerical eum, of the maximum rpodal esponses. ‘To ilustrate the procedure for taking into account girder flexibility tnd ao to indate the magnitude ofthe eet, an anlyso now made of the samo building fame as shown in Fig. 3.19, except that the girders fre amined ¢0 coi of the seal ection shown in Fig 2.22. "The Touding end mes distributions are identical ‘The’ stifwes coeficents, which are derived from a conventional ‘dastio analysn of the frame, are shown in Fig, 822. The proeedure it Simply to impose « unit deflection at each Boor in turn and to compute the seulting hlding forces by moment ditribution or any ose aporo- Prints method. A portive coefeint corresponds to a holding force [2 the postive y diretion, Also shown in Fig. 822 are the eolun end ‘moments corresponding to the unit distortions Tn writing the equations of motion, it must be recognised that the stuns coefceata correpond to internal column shears, which resist the metion if the coefieent ie postive. For example, referring 10 Fig. 3:22, we ese that fy resist the postive motion ofthe rt foo tye is postive, while fy, being negative, incre te positive mation of the second floor when i is postive, ‘Thus the equations of motion for each ‘mae have the form ag = FD —Dly Lumped-mase Multidepre Systeme 181 ° area _ lowes: be © sour o owe ou jowras fs panes noone 1.2 Eeampl Hig frame with tile ier, Sif orien. "The completo set of equations for thie yet ia Age + bays + hats + as = Full) Mage + Bre + Beats + as = Fu Ma haar + kas + Bets = FAC) After we set tho right side equal to sto, replace the ys by the modal forms (a sin), and abitate nui ales (Se. 38), hae Otay, = 726 0ae — 2a + 22a 0.182090 = — 48.204 + S1.80m ~ 40.000, O.06Gara5. = $2204, — 40.00 + 37 Be ‘whore the unite re kipe and inches. By applying the Stodla-Vinello procedure usin previous examples, the natal frequencin and charac teristic shapes shown in Table 3.6 are obtained, "Comparison of thee values with thowe in Fig. 8:20 revels the effect of gindeeexiiity. Az am Table 26 Modal Shape and Moda Setic Detection or Frame in Fe. 2.22 ase F 3/8821 |e Byey rr ax 2/888 oF El acals = g ialenak. i 3/88 iss ilales iff] 4/838 x [ese = a Lumped-maet Multiegree Sytem 138 ‘mould be expestod, the natural periods ave increased, but only aight. ‘The chucactristic shapes are alo afected, but not radially chugs, ‘The computation leading to the modal eat deflections are tabulated in Tele 20, Next, the maximum DLFs are obtained from Fig. 29) ‘follows (for the Toad function shown in Fig. 8.19)" Mole | | thaw abe BBE Multiplication ofthe modal static deostion, the character amplic ‘unde, and the DL yields te fllowing rnin tna oor de Sections Te an oo Mo | hua 04 UP aoe +1. 788) 41.32 [~ 1] cose (2238) a0 su 2 | coon (ii aan) | 6 Sa tn fae | sae 2 | rowan {228 a.05 a8 Comparten of the thint-foor deflections with thoes obinined for ‘igi gidern [Bas (8.51) shows that, as expected, ll have been lightly incrend. This increase is primarily due to the smaller tine of te ‘oiling, aa would be true for static loading, although ia addition the DLs ae lightly diferent because of the longer ntural periods In order to compate a bending momont in the Frame the snamente ue to unit dflections given in Fig. 3.22 are multiplied hy the sctal defctions. For example, the bending tuoment at the bottom of the {op-tory column may be computod fr ach mode ne fellows: int mode $1.82(— 1150) + 1.15(41250) + 0.75(—05) = —168 nine 126 Indroduction to Structurat Dynamics ond mode 00284 —1180) + 0.0(41250) + 0.025(—95) ~ +428 n-kins ‘Thind mode: +0.006(—1160) ~ 0005(4-1280) + .008(—95) = —19 in-kipe ‘The algrbraie sum of these moments is 138 kip-in. compared with the sam of 142.6 kipin, computed previously, when girder fexibilty was ot considered As ilustrated by the txo precding examples, the only addition, fort required to take into account. gitderflexibtiee lee tn the some putation of slices coefisiote. Although for mort typical balding frames the effect isnot great, this eort ray be worthwhile, vo fatense the accuracy of the analysis, partiulely if the girder are unusually flexible. The basis forthe deision i esetilly the same as one woul se for u statis analysis of horiontal deiction Frames Subjected Paltating Forces ‘To illustrate further the response of multitory building frames, the cflet of a sinusoidal horizontl force ia ow invetigatad. This eons ‘on might be causod by the operation of mashinery on one of the Bora Although this effect seldom causes major structural damage, cases in which the renting vibration ie objectionable for ou reson or anther tre fity ooenmon, CConsder again te frame with exile girders in See, 8.86 (Fi. 3.22) Suppose tat horizontal foros F; sia wore epplind to the fet foo: ‘indicated in Pig. 3.220. A general solution wil bo developed which will apply to all poole value of ‘The analtien! procedure W ‘same as for previous examplas excep that now there is oly one lad Yn = Auadin(DL). 4.520) Fibs am) here Au = wt 3 aah snd (DLE), i equal to that for a onedegseeaystem subjected to snus ‘ial foree a4 developed in Sc. 25. More sbecfeally, W damping included, the DLF eoresponding to maxinuon seedy sate response ven by Eq, (241) or Fig 218, After substitution ofthe numereal values given in Table .6 for this structure, Bq. (8.528) yields the following atic defections fer the e Sich ort 8 te cram 3.25 Rig re subjected puting fore eons a tp ‘hive modes: 1 the damping is taken to be 10 peroet of etic in each mode, the maximum DLE at reonane is 6.0, aesording to Pig. 218. ‘Thus the ‘maximum posible modal component of defnstion wt any point may be camputed by Kg. (320). For example, these values forthe rol are Yrinee = Ain X 1788 X50 F422 X10") in Uaee = Anu X 1128 X50 GSO X10-) Sin Yroone = Avs X 2015 X80 = FYCLOS X 10-) i "These maximoms occur only when the forcing frequeney sequel to the froqueney of the partioulsr mode. A complete deeripion of poeble ven by Fig. 3.23, which wae derived by the ust of Ei. (8352), and Fig. 2.18, which provides DLF ae. function of a Ii sppareat thatthe fest mode produces by far the large deflections, but these occur over a rather all range of forcing frequency. For higher frequencios of the applied force, the second and third mader bozome ‘more important than the frst. Fora given 8, the total maximum root Aisplacement eoald be conservatively taken s6'tho numerical am of the medal amplitudes ‘Although the mrimwn fret-mode amplitude ie Inigo, it should not bo implied that the higher modes may be diegardod. In fact, the ‘modal acceleration may be more signifeant than the amplitude since the inertia Fores applied to the contents ofthe building ate proportional to acceleration. Such freee are mare likely to cause damnage to the Dullding or iseomfort to penons within the building than isthe mere oocurrence of displacement. ‘Therefore itis of interes. to investigate ‘masimum modal accelerations, and theee are plated in Fig. 3 2 Since maximum acedlerstion equals maximum displacement tines fre fqueney squared, the ordinaen of Fig. 32%e are merely un? tee the Grdinatee of Tig, 3.236. It i insotiatly apparent that response in the fnt mode isnot the nou vrious with respect to aederaion In all previous examples it has beon assumed that tho structure is supported ona rigid foundation. Ifthe stricture infounded on relatively Lumpad-maceMultiapren Spee 187 TL a bon se, ai - oe fee sft toil, t may be necesary to include the eft of distortion within the eurth adjacent to the foundation. For example, suppose « ciple ame were supported by x foundetion mat as thown in Pg. 2240. "At foreee are trananitted from the eracture to the eurounding weil (or vice verna in the ease of ground tootons, the vires and reulting Aeformation inthe latter permit the maa Of the foundation to move If attention is restricted 0 horiontal motion (vertical motion would ‘usualy bean unenupled phenomenon) and the base mt sete rgd, ‘he ayatem raay be repremnted a shown in Fig, 3.24. ‘The spring com: stants hy and (otationl pring) roy be detersined atleast approxi- Instly, using bese procaiares of soll mechani, he sytem hus three degres of freedom associated with the coordi tutes yu, du and @. If changes in column length are noslgble, both rates rotate by the same amount. As indleatad by the eqilitehum diagrams in Fig. 424 the three equstio of motion aren fllows The fret state Uhehorlootalequiltrivm of tose 1, aud the weoad of 198 Introduction to Stractaral Dynamlee ‘mass 2, and the third stats the overall rotational eguiliirim about the tae Mads + hye = fae — ae = 68) = 0 Mais + lds 91 — 9) = FO IDA TES Magh + be = FOR here Iie the mace moment of inertia. Note thit, snes the ys are absolute displacement, the distortion of spring 2 ie the relative rotlon ‘of the two mass mninus 8, which i that portion othe relative motion ‘hat does not eause a spring fore. Based theae aqustions, analyse may proeod as fr any thren-logree eye. ‘The type of analysis indicated above oould of courte aio be made for stractares on spresd footings or pile Tounetions. Por most rigid frame structures on typical foundations, the effet of soil distortion le not signifinot and aay be safely Ignore, Investigations of earthquake response have indicated that foundetion Aexibilty has lite effect on sires in the bulding frame, but dove afet the acceleration input; ie the acceleration ofthe frame foundation not the sume asthe free. Seid acceleration away from the stustie, ‘The support lexbiity may have © signieant effet on the natural frequencies, end if thee are in themanlves tnportant, x, when Une structure is part of a machine, it should be taken int aceount. This hn been Tound to be tre ofthe supporting structure of certain teacking ‘radars controlled by srequaney seastivewervorectanims 3.9) Hlaso-plasle Analysis of Maltdegree Systems ‘Rigorous analysis of inelastic multidegreeayetems i in most cases not practien, and therefore numerical analysis is usually employed, hit can be done ina straightforward menue, using the procedure proseted in Chap. 1 ‘When dealing with building fries which deflect into the plastic "ange iti prudent to coasider the tractor to be # shear building; the girder flexibilities are jnored. This is true beesuse the eyes 38 ‘hanged each tine a plastic hinge is formed a any point in the structure. For example, the stifles ooefcenta shown in Hig. 3.22 ae comect only slong aa the complete structure elastic If «single hinge formed, the structural syatem ie altered and all coeficiente change Thee will change agin whon « scond hlage appears of meh one iy eliminated ‘A completely Fgorous analysis would therefore require the evaluation of many coefficients, Furthermore, the proces of Ieping tras. of ‘he changing pattern of ager i exceedingly tedious. "The ffort equired for this type of wnalyi, while not maple wldom worth- Lmped-mace Multiage Syrtems 138 sl i Ke, he i "a cca ls ry Tow "act 2.5 Bap, ingle ame aya. Stace ae a while ‘The error introduced by adopting © shear building oF close ‘oupled model i, except in are cass tolerable. This statement follows from the fat that, ifthe reponse telat, the girder fexdblltes are ‘of secondary importance (Bee. 880). These exiles are even less ‘ignifeant ater patie hinges have formed, because the inelastic behavior ‘is unualiy restricted to the columns, ead hence the paste shear resistance lof m story i not aflectod by the ginderwiffremen An elato-platic analyse of the frame in Pig. 3.19 wil be made to ‘astra the detailed procedure. "The appied Ine functions are shown in Fig. 3.25. For generality, the lod-tme functions, ie, the durations have boen made diferent for tho three loads, The computation are shown in Table 37, a8 are the equations of mation, The maximus Fosstance in ach sory i given by 49, where a ete paste bend ing strength of the column section. The resistance nctione ere asuned tobe bine, as dicused in See 1.54. The numerical procedure repre= sented by Table 3.7 is intial with that used in Chap. I sod employs ‘the Tumped-impulse method as indieatet by the recurrence formula ven. Since the smallest natural period is 0.170 se (Fg. 320), te JnMerval of 0.02 re, or approximately one-tenth ofthat period, is wd Wa lager interval had been usd, the computations would ot properly have reflected the participation ofthe hid mode. _ | —~ pen ‘The reall of the analysin plotted in Fig. 326, where the relative story displacements are shown In the fist sory, only the frd-mode ‘eponse apparent, But the effect of the higher tnodes is evident in the upper-story rerpoases, Note that only the tp wary remain sate: ‘The maximum defection in the bottom story i about 1. times the lactic imit. During the ine covered by theee computations, the ect cof damping i mall, but ia longer period of response were vo be inves ‘ated, damping shouldbe include. 340 Damping in Miuidegree Systems ‘The inclusion of damping in muikidegee analysis inolves some rather troublesome problems. This is true because there is ftle theoreti moans for determining the nature of the damping. In terme of the iealized system, one eannot be wire what arrangement of dampers to sine and, if seamed, what cosficanta to asrgn. Experisental Investigations have thrown little light on the subject, fa modal analyais oe in Soe. 3.7 and 3.8 i being made, one may simply sasume a reasonable peroentage of ertieal demping in ath mode ‘With thie atmption, the analyst snersy involve aking that aazount ‘of damping into account when eompting the DLFe forthe modes, which tuay then be superimposed before. This isa etsfactory prosolare umped-macs MuitdeproeSyeteme at ‘ince the analyst can usualy estimate the pirsntage of critical damping beter than he can estimate the individual damping coelicients, Ws numeriealanalyia ae in Se, 3.9 fe to be nade nla dampiog, setualcocficients mast in some way be determined, In order to be re that the oefcieats are retonable tic advible to rele theme to the percentage of eritieal damping in tach mode, This relation sna. be extublished hy the following procedure. ‘The general equation of free motion for the rk mas of limped-parameter aysern nay be a+ Sent See 0 om where J indiontes sores in which there i ome term foreach of the & Aeplacoionts. cy isthe dasnping coafcient, which applies to the sth velocity in the rth oquation of motion. Bavation (88) may be soo ‘verted nto a modal equation for the mth mode by the wubtitations wand Thus we obtain ra(Sub)ea(Sad)one for a one-deyro aystem, it iv apparent that rita! damping in the nth oode i dened by i oxy where C. i the ratio of actual to critical damping in th nth mde Tn wayetem having N degree of freodom, there ace dacnping conti cienta to be computed. These are provided by Eq. (858), whieh repre sents N* equations; ie, for each of the 2V made, there one equation for exch of the mass. Tt i not nocomary to mive the entire act ‘mltancoaly, singe the N equations written form partiula tate ace Independent aed may be wlved for the N coefiente usornted with ‘hat mass. Furthermore, the matrix of eoeeiente ie symmetee that Table 2 Numarial Anaya of Blt plate Three degree Sytem (Pa #26 144 Introduction to Stractral Dynamies + LP ueemantm bene aan ai fone feet Aoeco0 4 eo L etm ‘novMe 127 Erample, Nom mode damped trodes se To ilstrate the above procedure, consider the two-degre system shown in Fig. 3.27, where the natural Trequencie and characteristic ‘hapes are given. There ae fur eoeficient tobe determined from the following four equations, all derived fom Ba. (3.4): First mode (n=) Mule = Dien XA + on XH = 2X2 X 81.6 X Ci Male = 2):0u X Mob en XT = 2X LX HUB XC, Second mode (n= 2): AUG = Dien XI ben X (3) = 2X2 x O82 XC Male = 2): On X (“HF em KL = 2A ORK Cr Suppose we deie to have 5 percent of rita damping inthe frst mode (Ci = 006) and 10 pereat inthe second (C, = 0.1). ‘The laet equations ‘thea betome eu Rew = 882 Men + en = 3.16 en 6 = 2528 men ben = 1264 ‘The frat and third are solved independently, as are the second and {orth aad thus we obtain fo 41896 on = ~0.82 ene 7832 ea = $62 all inthe unite pound-tconds per inch. As expested 1 = ou Lumped.man Multitepree Stems 4s FL eect L| 2 oe | Bb et ge Rdg a I ‘The two equations of motion for the damped system may now be ‘written by aubsttating into Eq. (1.55) the damping eoicente com ‘ted above andthe other numtvieal paraanter given in Fig 3.27 29. + 60004, ~ 20004, + 18.96), ~ 83295 = 0 th ~ 200). + 2000/5 — 6329, + 6:32, = 0 ‘Thase provide the desired amount of damping. ‘When dealing with « eystem having many degrees of fractom, the above procedure is rather cumbersome, Furthermore, i only «few of ‘the lower modes are being considered, it may not be desirable to compute al natural frequencies ns required by this procedure, 1 is posible to approximate the damping coofiients and thersby aveid the dificaltios of the more rgorovs approach givin above, One vray of doing this sto sume two acts of dampers, one asoeiated with ‘the springs and the other withthe maces. The former are given ceti= cant, each proportional tothe corrponding spring stiffs, and the latter are given coefeients proportional to the mame Such system of dampers shown in Fig. 328, where cand care constant common 4 the cacfcents in each set. Note thatthe damping foros ae pro- Portional to relative velocity inthe fist ease and abvolute velocity in Ue other. "Values fc and e-may be determined ro at give reasonable damping in each mode. This accomplished at follows ‘The general equation of free motion of & mass + in ayetem damped In thi manner may be written Main + kan + Leshan + May = 0 3.55) Operating on this equation as wan done on Ba. (8.8), we ablain the ‘modal equation wart (Suto (ole hich may also be writen it edie = Mads + Rete + (hg + 6H = 0 Since this oquation of motion it of the same form as tbat for & one degree aystem, it is apparent that eit! damping inthe nth mode defined by fF. (2.25) Gy + et Dividing both sidee by Mf, and noting that M,/t, must be oy 2a (ote + oe o ‘Gast #0), = Cult) (6.56) there Cy is the ratio of actual to eritical damping. ‘The advantage in ‘suming thie patiular damping eerengement is ow apparent. Equa tion (3.50) involves only the natural frequeney, ad hence relates divctiy the couficints and the percent oferta dating for cach ofthe modes, Since there ae two coetcents to be determined, namely, cand es sre may contol the percentage of ritalin two tode, bat no mote ‘The usual procedure is to adjust the bwo coofciente until» eatouable rosult is obtained. Note that, if only one form of darnping had been Included (e,,, relative damping), only one mode could have been con rolled, In general, cy is more effective in the higher modes, and. in the lower ‘To ilustrate application of the above, suppose that, for the three- gree system of Be. 3.86 (Fig. 322), it was desired to have 10 percent damping in the fst modo and 5 percent ia the third, ‘The natural frequencies are w= 7.75, 0s = 227, sad oy = 38,6 rad/s, Writing nq. (3.50) for the rst and third moda, (00) +e = 01 7.75) elim) +2 = 0050 x 33.6) ‘Lamped:mans Multidepre Systeme 147 ‘When rlved, these simultaneous equations yikd 6, 0.00108 wee, = 1.45 set Substitution of these values into Eq. (3.58) yields the damping rtio for the aeond mode 5 = 9.001605) + 1.45 6, = SOMANEETI) F145 «9651, or 5.1% ‘This may well be considered « proper representation of damping in the fystem. If no, the values cy and c can be adjusted until a satisfactory result, considering all three ‘modes, it obtained. The equations of totion to be used in © numerial analysis of the damped eter are ive dietly by Bas. (2.58). Por example the fit of these i Mb + haa + Baa + hate + elds + Rabe + had) + es = 0 hich, together with the other two equations, ean be solved inthe mul Probleme LEA tvodeqre sem (ig. 32) bathe lowing parte: My = Alba, By ea ands etd NBT ‘The problem is now to determine values of al which satisy thin equation, [Note that cr: and aude have a constant relationship forgiven beats properties, aid hence one may be replaced by a cattast Hiner the other." In gener auch frequency equations are not easly wolved and ® traband-rror procedure must be employed. This process may be ‘eoeorted by the uve of published tables giving values of @ and. ‘To ilusteate by « specie reat, lt ua tke the case of fo spans ‘dentcal in ifs, length, and mas. ‘The froqueney equation now becomes Gut On = 0 ‘This equation hus two sets of root, the Bret corresponding to Ou = Ga = te nd the second to Gyy ~ Gas = 0. The root are als = tay = 2n, 3, snd ls = toss = 8.97, 7.06, 102, Se, ee, ee, oR ‘he nt gn ae eo sen ty + Bloat =e ORT, yc ‘The characters sbapes forthe st four modes are shown in Pig 4.10, [Note thatthe frat set of rots (the odd modes) are for antieymmetrzal ‘modes and are the seme as the natural modes of single simply supported span." “The second tot of roota are for symmetrical modes whith coe- respond to single span Sxed at one end and simply eupported at the other. This similarity to a single span in obviowiy comet, sines In ‘an antiyymmetsical mode there lt «node at the ceater support and Thence one span dows not affect the other. On the other haa in 7m ‘metrical mode there can be no rotation at the center auppert, and the situation isthe some af that wore » fixed support. Second, consider « tveespon eam sack am in Fig. 411, Writing By (438) twin, J+ [een]-° 2 ~e [ait wal Goh, sxa[ iin] - =+[ atin cada] *° [Bxpanding the determinant of the eneisients of 9, we obtain the fre ‘quency equation Gal, Cah Gut [ecibie* cei [dats + Note tne 1 4.300) ale mati By a ‘mode ust bee ate forte tepndea sfane Lal potest Se For three identical epans this becomes 4008 — Het = 0 o 26, = i, where G, and Hy apply to any of the span The three sete of roots {this equation are (I) @, = Hy = +: the fist root of the oot is ‘a ~ + and the complate set i the same az for the modes of singe, ‘simply supported span; 2) 2G, = ~H th frst root of the est which 1s the scand mode of the beam ism at 3.35 and all modes of thi wet have a node atthe enter ofthe midale span; and (3) 20, = -+H.: the fit oot of this, orth tied mode ofthe beam, inal = 430. These Siro Uhree modes ate shown in Fig 4.11 "We could proceed in the sine manner to fvestigatem fourepan bam, ‘nut of eoure the fequeney equation ls znuch more complicated. How” lever, for identical epans it reduces to V2G,~ tHe Agni, there are Ube sete of root, the fst of whichis th sume as that {ora simply supported, single span. The lowent three modes are shown in Fig. 4.12, Te thould be apparent from the above disewsion tha, for any mumboe of Senticalepane with hingor nt exterior supports, the fundamental ‘mode isthe same fora single, imply supported man. ‘The higher Imodes of the singloapan ease are alia higher modse of the mltispen ‘ate, but these are iaterspered with other modes.” There is another ‘roup of symmetrical modes with only small rotations at oteior up ports which correspond roughly to a singe Sixed-ended wpan, Ib ad tion, there sre various combinations ofthese two types, the number of ‘omible combinations increasing withthe number of sp. 189 Introduction to Structural Dyamice Several investigators have devised ingenious ways of obtaining naturel frequencies for continuous baurea™=" "Although hee are usu, they do not generally provide charscterstic shapes, and it an wafortunate {nt that the later are required for complete dynam analyai Tt ie for thin reason that one is usually foro to make epprvainatesualyss, Hrampl of ReaponteCaleultion To ifustrate complete dynamic analy, lt us onsier a menagcable problem such as the determination of responce forthe two-span beam thown in Fig. 4.18." Only the fiat two modes will be consider, sinen for this type of loading (ie, eoncentented lad ear ove milan) higher modes would not make rgnfcant contention to the reponse Tn ce, 4.5 it wan shown that these mode are ented by 1 Blt + ot Be foam oe = BORD on woe = HGR tis alo known by deduction thet the characteristic shapes are given by Eq, (4.8) (singe, simply supported span) forthe frst mode nad by Bg. (614) (single, fx-hinged span) for the second mode. However, tollutrate the procedure tht woud be used for uooual spans, we hal follow a more general approach. ‘The characteristic shapes may be derived from the bound tions represented by Teg (4:30) to (42%), Equations (© provide cond (a) and 8400) = 0 = Gy + Da, 8 =0= on + dy 400) = 0= Oy + De from which we obtain B= DO and Dam Oe Making woe of thee relations between i and 5 and noting that for ential spans, gy = aye = a, we may write ©) 4-0 asain a+ Cu sith add = 0 @ Bh = 0540) a eon aal + Ca cosh a = Cas + Oat ©) ho = 420) ~arsived +e sithed = 2a.” (442) © 0 =0 Gag sin a + Gale al ~ cosh a) “+ iasinh a= 0 ta_ steed Tee For any value of al, thse four equations may bo solved simultaneously to obtain four ofthe unknown eonfcient i terns of the Sith “This will define the charsetriatie shape or Use rt mode we aubetitate aul = a obtan, fom Eqs. (442), Letting dis ~ Ai, the esbitrary modal amplitude, and subetituting into ‘the general expression for (2), me obtain the charaeteritie shape ul) = Ausin ae = Aun FE OxG) = —Avsin™? (as) or u(a) = sin™E—ula) ~~ sin ‘Thase are ae expected, the ananeehape aa that fr the fist mde of & single, simply supported spe. For the second mode we substitute a= 3:92 and solve the four ‘qutions (442) sirultancously. ‘Tie produces the raul n= =25800 Gn = $35.0000 n= 25100, Dy = 428.1904, Gn = $2532eq ‘where ey, ln arbitrarily been taken asthe rfereneecofisient The ‘econd-mode characteristic tapes forthe two spans ere therefore 6)» (sin 22+ ch 322) re) = en (25.2 in AP — 25.10 ne EE T T 30 dun #92 4 95:10 cosh 8228 — 28.90 inh 2925 4 25.10 ench 2922 182 Introduction to Structural Dyamice Since it is known that this mode i symmetrical the first ofthese may be ued fr the mcond span if fr that epan the dietion of zis reverend fand the origin taken tthe right support. Furthermore, it it 8 con- venience to refer to the mispan defection. If thie done, sn) se) ~ Aso in 2224 one in a ‘where Asis the modal dipplacement at either midepan, ‘The modal equations of motion may now tie eblained by the direct pplication of Eq. (4.28), with the Toad integral replaced by one term, ‘noe we are dealing with's single concentrated lad, Hetty = MOU on) aS [eas a5) ‘The mummation in the right-side denominator indicates thatthe intgra- ‘tion must include both spans. For the fst mode, using Pa. (43) nfo() =n) =n mS foe eam [td = mt 1m the lst computation the sum for the two spans ia twice the value of ‘the integral for one span since tho shapes dilfer only in sig, ‘Thus the ‘equation of mation forthe frst rode ie A tupay = Beto a) sd he ods state deletion by Ba, 4.28) fue By ae {or the second mode, and weing Bq. (44), doin = F(OMS sn 195+ 027 ah 198) =, sD feria =m (as and or aah 222) ae maasad Jn the last computation the aymmetry of the mode has been recogniaad ‘and edivantage as bean taken of the act thatthe valu ofthe integral ‘aust be the same for both spans "The equation of motion forthe sacond nade i therefore dat ony = FLO. + 7 it ont, = FLO) as) sd the modal stati dfleetion ix fh fu tense 449) Combining the two modes end using Fa. (4.25), we fly obtain the total midypen dymamie deflection ¥) = Ay(DLE): + An(DLE}s = yaat OEP) + Spay PEPI= 5 [ou a hore the DLs depend on the loadtime fanetionf() and ate evaluated in the usual way a8 for n onedegree system. Rquaton (650) giver the defetion at the center ofthe lft span since thee ee taken 8 the characteristic amplitade at thet point. The dynamic deflection at ‘the center ofthe right pan would be Wo wil SP" Gee] 1 may be nota Ut, in tia cas, the eontebution af the modes are roughly Ceegleting posible diferenses in DLP) in proportion to I/" ‘Therefore the second-mode eonteibution i (/3.02), 18 may aio be observed tha, i aymmetrie (downward) lad had also Ten applied tothe right span, the fist mode would have eontribited rothing. and the second.mode displacement. would have teen twice that indiested above, 46 Beamgrder Systeme ‘The analysis of floor systems oF other structures consisting of combina- tious of bear or girders i obviously rather lavelved. Not only fe ‘each cloment « complex ayrtem, a+ we have sen in previous eationn, ‘but the interaction of elemente creates the posblity of many sguicant 184 Introduction to Structural Dynamics fo — pee sie Fy ee = ‘nodal shapes. What follows fs approximate in that only the most important of these shapes are included. The procedure is suficiently accurate, however, for structures of the type disewmed, namely, those ‘which ar ementialyaymmetical with respect to both teucturel prop ‘ties ad loading ‘We shall consider the simple system shown in Wig. 4.14, which consists ‘of one for bear support by two identical girders Al ements are ‘considered to be simply support, and the dynamic load is applied at ‘midepao of the beam. For this analysis i wil be named that there is only one posible deilcted shape for each miemaber end that this the ‘sme as the fondamental mode of a simply eupported,indepeadetly scting beam. By this asnumption the eyetem ‘bua three degrees of frowdom. "However, since the structure ad lading aro both symmete cal, one of thse wil not be excited and need not be eonsdered in the snaiysis ‘The deflections of the two giders will always be Mentca, ‘he same saps egies by o vm asin h sn = net mln where ye nd yp are the midapan ordinates, Sinee the two later ordi ‘tes are unrelated, they completely define the two-degree dynamic radel ‘The equations of motion may be derived by we of the Lagrangian quation (8). The total kinetic energy i given by =m [*( ont +r tn 2530 f(r dy nina omin memes am inne yb ind hy te evn +BY art) a Ate mini of he ml eri a (4 hi 2 (6m feasg) ta-+ at [*(—mafan Ba Blatt), Eight take Ela (458) as ‘The general expression forexteaal work by the load at midapan of the beams w= FO + 10) as) Trto Lagrange’ equation ales, ta Oe wre mubsitate the nevemary derivatives, at tang g.~ yo and hen te ito obtain mn (2 te) + mde + BEE ye = FO nh: +240) +R = 0 4) 40m 408) ‘These are the equations of motion for the two-dagre sytem "For eonveaienze, we now assign the following mamerial vale: 0.1 Ibeetfin 2X10" Tint Substituting thes value into Bs, (4.5) and rearranging, 0.696 + fn + 12,1804 = 00580) (as0) 0.500%, + 0.6869, + 6090p. = 0.95F() 1M Introduction t Structural Dynamioe ‘To determine the natural froquencee, we substitute y = asin a0, P= suet inn and PQ = 0, to obtain ~ 0.638 anm + (2a + 12,180)agm = 0 0,5, = 0000} + (-0.68Baap = 0 Setting the determinant of the coeficinte equal to sero, expanding the Aloterninant, and solving the resulting equation lend to. 8 = 4810 yt = 25,800 as) Sutstituting these into either one of Eqs. (4.57) gives the charncteratic shapes = 40836055 ‘Ths, inthe frst mode, all beams vibrata in phase, while in the second, they are 180" out of phase, the beam disertion being considerably renter. Tt must be rememibeed tht athe boar ample relate to the ger, and thus the total deletion i the algebrie sum of tox td aoe "To obtain the modal equations, we frst rewrite the energy expressions in modal terms, We shall arbitrary take the girder defection yr the modal amplitad. Therefore, for the fit mode, we substitute he = Arad y= OBBA, into Bae. (452) to (58) and inert numer tl ynlus for the parameters to obtain x= ss10ds ‘a = 164,040 we, = Lary For the sacond mode we substitute Yo. Agand yy = ~2404s Thus xo inede cus sT2Q004y wee 1A We now write the Lagrangian equation for eech mode separately to obtain the modal equations of mation Jy + 38104, ~ oo2s0r 1) A+ 25,8004, = 0.0088) Ce Denoting the applied load by FQ) = lfO) and referring bask to Eqs (4.28) and (4.24 (the equation of mation in goneral fom), re see ‘thatthe modal static deletions are merely the ight ide of Bas (58), vith the time funstion removed end divided by ust. Therefore .200F, poet ag = OOPS = 5.58 x 10-97, =BOREP sas x 10-4, Furthermore since Ain the modal value of yo the dynamic defstions te aire by Yell) = AudDLE) + ADEE). £5.58 X 1O-P (DLP) ~ 148 X 10-+FDLMs e459) tO) = 0895du(DLF) + (—240) (DLE), = #405 X 10-# (DLE), + 3.25 X 10-FF(DLY)> Retursing now tothe ata platings any that Ps = 00 b and 0" 43 raion If we at nerd th ead repos, ‘runing thatthe fee par han moved damping the maton DiringnenbyEa 3) OL ou = ts ‘hich fr the fat nd sand mde 41.72 and +108, repel nmin of than acre (3) gves he tasam dls to trope edna = $0080 in, nnn = +0.050 in ‘Thow are the amplitudes of harmonic mation, which, boeaut the free vibration has been removed by damping, has the sane fequeney se ‘the appliod force. ‘The postive signs indicate that the motion isin ‘hase with that free. A negative sgn would indleate « mation 180" ‘out of phase. The total amplitude atthe beam midspan is th sam, oF “0.090 ia ‘The bending moments in the members are of course direttyrelatod ‘to the midspan detections, in accordance with tho aanumed chapes. Using Bas (51), we fod ore = Bla iy Ben Blea lay 105 nd tg = a ‘The provedure given above could be extended to include systeme with sore than one floor beam. If the loading dintebution were not sym ‘metrical, it would be meowtaary Uo treat the tx geders individually 185 Intraducton to Structural Dynamics Furthermore, the analysis eould be refined by including additional sine terms inthe assumed shapes (Eq, (4.51). All this could be sccomplished without changing tho basic procedure. However, each such medica tion ineroaus the number of degree of freedom, and hance the dieuity of slution. 47 Plates or Saba Subjected to Normal Loads Tn thie section we shall investigate the dynamnie behavior of rvtangular plates or dade. This ia « Uhreedimensional problem and obviously fomewhit more complex than analysis of the two-dimensional elements previously considera. Although the analysis which fllows is for 4 Dhomogensous and iotropie material, i commonly uso for reinforced conorete slab (Consider the alab shown in Fig, 4.15, which ia eetangular (a X b) ‘in plan, uniform in thickness b atid miss m, simply mupported ‘on all lges, and subjected to a unifermly distributed dynamic Toad p( ‘The deflected shape nay be taken v= 5 § ac sindtt anise am where Aya the moval ordinate atthe center of the plate. Kgustion (4.00) obviously stisis the boundary conditions y ~ 0, #y/@s" = 0, sand 3'y/de? = Oatall four edges. Bach posible combination of integer values of j and defines « modal shape. I the fllowing, only the Rest. rode wil be considered, that i,j = 7 ~ 1, but the method of extension 7 ‘une 1 Bip eppertd tanga sa to higher modes willbe apparent. Thus we shall da! with the shape Yo dvs a sn and use the Lagrangian equation a(8) 4 aoa) * en to obtain the modal equation of mation Since the Kinetic energy of any element i given by ie Mengde de where m i the mass per unit are, tho total kinetic energy obtained by Integrating over the dab area is “rppelateryee Teton 38) = soma mn me, aa ‘The total srin energy by conventional plate theory ist wm mat ay [GY + GY a at 9 (25) Jere where £ = modus of elasticity 2 plate thick = Poinon's ratio for the Nomogencous material Operating on Eq. (4.61), we obtain eu ee Sutatituting thew expressions and integrating as indented above, we find thatthe strain nergy ie given by wm ahh ae(A +h) (403) 1H0 Intron te Stratrel Danae ‘he extra work by #uifrmiy diss is = HO f° Avo Eoin tee = 0 (tt) as aan Finally, mibatitation of Bq (462) andthe derivatives of Ege (462) and (4.04) into the Lagrange equation yelde the modal equation of motion Y mab Be + sae (3 + py A= v0 (2) = Bis (beg) as~ 9o(28) aan ae ee a hess oem G+8) a 1 the gonralexprasion for deflected shape (Ba, (4.00) bad been vse throughout the above development, it would have been found that the natural froquencia af all modes wee given by (a) ‘The higher modes are obtained by taking various integer combinations of {snd i, "The correspondence betwoun these intogers and the modes in ‘the onder of inereasing frequency depends upon the ratio of «to 3. In ‘tho cso of a square slab, taking jo ¢ equal to 2 and the other equal to 1 provides two modes having th same frequeney bu different shapes "Formulation of the analyse for other than simply supported plates, ‘iil not imposible is rather cumbersome. Apprexinate methods are ‘ised in Chap. 5. Bample {tin desired to dotermine the maximum dynamic bending sre in a ‘at, simply supportet, rectangular steel plate having the following imensions and parametor: (in b= A0in, = 30 X10 pi 7 = 035, A Lin (ms = 000073 Ib-es¥/n®) ‘orm 438 Pht ean Sor ‘The pte is subjected toa uniformly diatebuted blast pressure with the time variation shown in Fig. 4.16." Subetitition ofthe numerical values into Fa. (685) provides Ay + 2000004, ~ 2220p) (40) Therefore es = V2O,000 ~ 539 enn 1, = = 0.017 see Proceeding asin Se. 4.3 and noting that 9) = 4), we rcogniae that the modal static dateetion i the right nde of Eq, (48), with the time funtion removed and divided by wt mano x 40 20000 Awe = 0.305 i, ‘The maximum DLE for the load funetin spaced ie given by Fig 2.7 tering this gure with /T, — 005/00117 = 43, we ead (DLP a = 188 ‘The maximum dynamie defection at the center of the pate is Usereore x= (Aidate * Ara(DLP) ae 0.306 X 1.8 = 0.575 in, ‘oe bending ere inthe = diretion may be computed by 182 Introduction to Structured Dynaee ‘The maximum bending stress occuring at the center of the plate (2 0/2, 2 = 0/2) i therefore (n= Anns (8+) Substituting (4:)eue~ 0.575 in, and the other parameters a8 given, we find the mavimum bending stess in the = direction to be 68,000 pe ‘The maximum dynanio stres in the 2 direction obtained by inter changing o and b ie 39,500 pi ‘An alternative method for computing the dynamo streaee would be ‘hat based on the clesical solution for static loads. In the above example, the dynamic stem would eal the state stress due tom pres ‘sure of 40 pal multiplied by the DLE, or 188. A alight dlerence would te found between this eqlt and thet given above. Neither would be ‘ract singe in Uh orginal analysis, we neglected the higher odes and, inthe alternative proach, we amazed in effet Ut all modes have the same DLP as the frst mode” In this example the Set mode dominatet both dynamic and static respons; therefore there Ile error ia either method 48 laso-platc Analysis of Beams ‘The determination of inelastic reqponse for beams or other elements having distributed mass and loud is extremely dffealt One pole "approach i to conduct the wunl elastic analysis up to the tine when the timate bending capacity ie attained at some pont along the beam and ‘then to assume that an iealined ings has formed at this pot, thus renting a new elatio system, The analy would then be eoetinued “until a second hinge i formed or the rotation a the fist hinge reverses Alrection, thus idioatng that elatic bevior should be restored st this pint. ‘This type of analysis i extremely cumbersome, because the sytem may change several times during the response and ssi pot exact Snes the plastic behaviors ally not eqnonntrated at pint ax eared, ‘An alternative approach is to replace the member by a lumped prameter eystam ae indested in Fig. 4178. ‘The mas snd load are both conskered tobe concentrated at discrete point long the span, abd itis assumed that plastic hinges may form only at these points. For the clastic range the silfaes coeficents would be determined in he ubual Inanner by introducing unit deletions at each point, When a paste Inge forma a a patiular pot, «now sto ines coats may be computed for the beam, with « pin inserted at that point. Although ‘more practical than the frst method mentioned, this xpprosch it alo rao 437 Piteienae formation ate pai very cumbersome, beet srrangements ‘A simplieaton ofthe lumped-parameter approach is posible if ws is ‘made of frite-iferencetchnigues. Considara simple bean (ig. 4.17) ‘wth uniform loed pt), uniformly direbated mame m per unit length, tad constant righty £1.” The beam ie divided nto eal sgments 3 ‘hat the Iumped parameters ue of the large mumber of potential hinge M= mia) FO = (ar) 194 Introduction to Structural Dynamics The curvature at point r may be approximately expreed i terms ofthe second ental derocr flow where ys isthe detction at point r. The bending tnomeat at this pant 5s therefore m— a = nate yo 400) 1 we now consider the equilibrium ofa segment of beau (assured 6 be ‘masales) a shown in Fig 4.17, the seat in that segment obviously fiven by Vou = Beales Next consider the dynamic equilibrium of mast ras indicated in Fig 4.174.” Phe equation of ston for thi nae Made + nas — Vorgs 4 Ob = PAD - Bac Bi te y R@y am Wheto ¢ is the damping eofisint and it ie assumed that the damping Force proportional to the velocity a this point. At anytime and for & riven distortion ofthe nystem, Iq. (4.69) provides the bending moments A al points and Eq, (4.70) permits computation of the neeleratins at theo points. Thus aumereal analysis may be excoutad in the urual anne for lnmped-mace multidegre aytems (See. 3.9). ‘When one af the moments reaches theultimate bending capacity str, ‘the mmment i held constant at that valuo ia subsequont computations However its nesetary to continue evaluation of Bq. (469) until pele i reached and the hypothetial , begins ta decrence, "This reversal indiatee thet the point has rotreed to clastic behavior, and su ‘sequently the moment eould be computed by Eolous Biba) me ‘where 9" ie the hypothetical peak previously computad. Equation (4-71) ie based on the idealized momeat-curvature reletionship shown in Fig. 417 Te showld be apparent thatthe equations given above oan easily be ‘modified #0 a8 to be applicable to beams with nonuniform distributions of rss iit, ad londing* In order to obtain acceptable accuracy by the method just outinad, {sity large numberof mass pointe mut be used. ‘The number depend ‘pon the typeof losing, but in typical cage i might be necewary to divide a simple beam span into 10 segmente Thus the lumped syeem ‘would have nine degres af readom, a Uo time interval forthe mer: ‘Sl analy would have to be taken a2 «fraction ofthe alles. natural period ofthe elastic system. Tt i apparent that this type of anaes ot feuible for hand computation. THowever, i i Mealy outed to ‘lectronie computation, and systems consisting of may Tumiped masses ‘ean be handled with relative case, 1 the lading on the bear i auch thatthe hinge lesions ase kaw in advance and only one or two hinge arrangements oveur, the procedure given abore is unneecsariy comples. The much simpler procedures presented in Chap. 5 are quite adequate for such cases Problema inn 30 fost yr font al pan 41, Detering he masa dynamic valent of ) af mids defection, ‘Shtayen bonding meaty ad shuns forth beam of Fi dares ae oped onan promure of magae yb oone 8 role 1 4 196 Introduction to Strcturl Dynamiet 424, We the sero a uma of a LE forth dai mien ating ‘Seat the bam of Pig 155 ‘or the See wo modes sly, dtring th sasimum modal componente ‘lop bending moment nol cd shar for the ad tne fnsun oP 43h eae may et) Te zap. me WES 1aap 0b 4 ton iteatog ony that mode sompte the sasimum dys bending mom the Seam afgtfeaiw boii ate 0." (Wa: ay ‘ever See heh enn i tert and DLE rte aon at Tor oath ofthe int tro odeatompate mparately te maximum dysumie ett ch dp Saat anton a Pe 8 th ped Trin oes wy = 56x viet ind: 2 40 10-8 Repeat) fr dee eam Paes Vi, O18, 48 simply mapped bam i abet oan tad eat op ‘ih seen rend Wee the mri pan fo therein ne vee “stead derminethe amped ater 9, 446A oneness AO Th ial tothe ua pit fe ‘tpi oppor open ihre 0 prem era amp what tap Soe inn oF) otal tess whee amterpot nch 42 "Toi thy Rashi method, deve an sprsinat exo forthe nde- ‘ota ata euuney in tern of Band's or the aad ba ia P42 [Both Bandy vary Hnmary beewon mapa tnd npr Dive tsb et me 421 Proton 42, Haunehed bam, Ft te 7) Detamioe the fret natrl quan of woapancontinure eat ‘tarmac! Bi; and “Toseruor por artes, nel he bn ite ‘re both pi, bat one pan neice mang ar he tet tompieeityat he entre maps By compara ih eta ga oe Spaon wet erento fort eral resi of tet fe {£10 Coser Uinta team sow in Pig 32. Suppo taty aie to ‘Seonmenrnte eco PW, tar unoly dso fre ofp on "ht apn an eat 9 fhe mane for tosh ec Die eens isto Fe 0) he ue ape ttre 4.11 9. Wie theequaonrof motos othe tre ra pte of Fig-428; sam lng te lowing stapes y= leo ey) a = gat an e/ Yori te deen atte nda he cance der and yo te dps tan, ‘Dever tra request the we made or the fllowing parame m= fry =O eins Thi She “Wit ml tn —— mate wvne 4.2 Probie 411, Beam giderayien. 4198 Introduction to Structure Dynes 412 A fred cacrte a ingly suppor onl eget 9 pes sm ately debuted oer te sete! oposite ty he seed ae Tig, (3a. "The pear the tine fie Bewa Consdering ey he fet iy emi mac vai econ se them of esa.” The iar races 623 Poin 42. Twosy 418 Comite i singly sapere Yes with erly diated yaa oat ‘Sthown in iq 424.” Ae etc satas nto ney ang the fate ifreee ‘ae i ren ad aya 5 Approximate Design Methods 51 Introduction ‘We must conclude from the developments in previous chapters that exact cor rigorous dynamic analysis poeible only for relatively staple sewer tures This is partially trae of structures with continvoumase diz tribution, the anaes of which i extrmely complex forall bit the moet simple boundary conditions, We have lag sea tht igor solaion is posible only when te Toad-time and the resistance-isplncement vais ‘Hous ate convenient mathematical functions. For these reasons ite ‘often prudent, st least for practical design purpose, to sdopt approx rate methods which permit rapid analyse of even complex srusturse with easonable accuracy. ‘Then methods unualy require that bath the stricture and the leading be ideaiza in some degree. This chapter deals with methods by which the deliation may be accomplished, Ts frequently posible to reduce the nystem to one ogres of freedom For example all three of the structural elements shown in Fig. 5.1 ca for practical purposes, be reprevnted. ty an equivalent oue-degee ‘stem having the peramcters Pm and b,Bven though ach elements fre parts ofa complete structure, tb often perme to treat. them independently ‘One method of simplifying an analyse in the elastic range eto include only one ora few ofthe normal modes,” For example twa wen fn the Previous chapter that satinfctory solution for simply supported, sigle- ‘spn beams could be obtained by eonsidering only the fundamental mode ‘This procure i, in for, an idetization of Ue actual dyaasmie eytem However, for many structural elementa this approach eannot be used, ‘becase itis too dificult to determine the modal shapes, Therefore even ‘he fundamental mode must be approximated “The approximate procedures developed herein are not based on the fundamental modo, even though the shape ofthat mode may be huowa, ‘The methods presented are somewhat more aosurate snd are more general since the eharacereti spe isnot required ‘Nonlinear rosistanee or nonttathemaieal lad-time functions can be dealt with by numerical analyai, However, this i tedious end often Anprximate Design Methods 308 not justied beoaato of other uncertainties in the formulation of the problem whish eannot be removed. This chapter dele pinay with Aire, or closed, solutions based oa approximate mathematical mods (Of pariula importance ithe difielty i handling plaetic behavior of structural slements, Rigorous solutions for eich cases are not practical {or design parprees, ‘The diftelty is ‘lustreted by the beat of Fig 5.2, which goes through three stages of deformation, The fet stage i purely elas; the seoond, occuring alter ages have been formed at the Supports, sa combination of clastic and patio; andthe thint might be lawiSed ae porely plastic, “Pach stage has diferent. characteristic shapes, and iti not posible to identify modal shapes which ae meaning ful throughout the reponse. The approximation teed een ito test each stage ae complutely independent, eg, the incremental distortions In the second stage of Hig, 6. are aaumed to have the characterite shapes of simply supported bean rom the viewpoint of practical desig, the approximate methods pro sented here are extremely important. They should not be regarded 86 merely nude approximations obo used for rough or preliminary analysis, ‘or should thay be regarded ee methods tobe vcd ony by eagnoars Who Taek the taining or intalet to employ more eophisiontd teohaiques Problems in structural dynamics typielly involve significant uncertsin- ‘ea, patcuaniy with rand to lending characteristics, Such being the se, complet methods of analsin are often nt justified. Thee waste of tine to emplay methods having precision much greater than that of tho Inpatof the analyse, 22 nraduction to Structural Dynamice 152 ldealized Syxtem In onder to define an equivalent onedogres system, it ia oectamry to evaluate the parameters of that syste, matey, fy ky and Fan shown in Fig. 1, In addition, the loadtime faction f() must be established in onder to analyae the system. These parameiere end loading ae dit- ‘cused below. With this ropresentation of the actual structure and Tending, the dynazic enalysia becomes relatively simple by uso af the methods for one-degreeaprtoms promated ia Chaps. Land 2 "The equivalet syetom is unuallyesactd wo that the deflcction of the ‘conoentrated mass ir the same as that for some signifeant point on the structure, 6, the midspen of a beam. I should be noted tha trees ‘ad fore in Che idealized aytam are not dretly equivalent tothe ame (quantities inthe stritire. Howover, knowing the deflection, the tresses in the real structure may be readily computed. Since the time sale ix not altered, the reponse of the equivalent eystem, defined in terms of ‘eplncemant and time, in exactly the same aa thet ofthe significant point fon the eructure, "The constants ofthe equivalent eysem are evaluated onthe basis of «n ‘sumed shape of the actual structure, This shape will be taken to be the same at tht remlting from the static pplication of the dynamic leads This ennoept is not quit the sume as that using the fret-mode shape, and for the typos of elements considered here i somewhat more Ssccurate, particularly with regard to stress computation. Furthermore, sre are hote dling primarily with eases in which the modal shapes can. fot be easly determined or, if determined, are expresble only by ‘nounageable mathematical fanetions Tt i convenient to introduce below certain trangermation factors. "These fatar, denoted by K, ate used to convert the real system ito the squivalent syatem, When the total load, maze, resistance, and stifnese ofthe real etracture are multiplied by the corresponding trasformstion factor, we obtain Uhoe parameters or the equivalent one-degre system, ‘As developed in See. 8.72, the equivalent mass of » mode or, inthe present case, of the equivalent one depres eyeom, i ivan by = 3 moe (619) for 8 lumpod-masseystom oF My = Imore) de Gy Approximate Design Methods 80 {ora structure with continuous masa. In Bar, (6:1), oF (2) isthe ‘seumed-aape fantion on which the equivalent syst in based. For fonvenience, we now inteduce tho mace far Ky, which ie dened the vatio of equivalent mace tothe actual total mus of the structure aeeeeeneee 62 For example, inthe cas of th beam shown in ig. 5.) My — mL, where isthe epan, and My is as givea by Ba. (610) AAs shown in Soe, 8.7, the equivalent force on the idealiaed system le ven by (60) fora ruta with cotta fr row [Hela de om for distributed loads. ‘The load factor Ki, ie defined sa the ratio of equivalent to actual total free ®, Kak 6 For the beam of Fig. 6.1, Fe= pl and Fie piven by Eq, (538). ‘The sbove spplies to magnitude of fore, and both equivalent and real loads have the mame tine fonction. ‘The reitance functions for actual structures my have a variety of forms. ‘Three possible shapes are shown in Fig. 58a. Curve A corre- sponds to « stracture of britle material. Curvo B would apply to « Sruture nade ofa ductile material with marked yielding ach a tec ‘or reinforeed coneete. Curve C represents situation in which revist- fee decreases above a certain deflection but before complete failure. The later might occur in s siructue of plan concrete or one in which failure reelte from instability. Ta order to simply analysis, thew resistance functions mast be ideaired, For mart structures It por ‘sible to employ « bilinear funotion ae indicated in Pig. 83, Tho soalyse dscusend herin will be made oa tis bass, ‘The retstance ofan element i the intra force tending to restore the lement to fe unloaded static postion. Far eur present purpose we define resistance in terms ofthe losd distribution for which the analysis Isbeing made ‘Thus the maximum reitance ithe total load having he tiven distribution which tho clement could mpport satcally. ‘The titans is numericlly equl tothe total lad of the same distribution ‘hich would cause unit defetion at the point where the deflection ie cual to that ofthe eqlvalentayatem, By thse deiaitions it i epparcat that the reitance factor Ky tmust always equal the load factor Ki, Therefore Ba -e- week (os Ke Ky 650) and Ke where Kus given by Ea, (.), together with Ba. (58). Relering to the bream of Fig. 1 and to Fig. 5.3, wee Ut Ry is Ue maximum value of PL, oF the plasticlimit lad which the beams could suppor statically, ‘nd F isthe value of px which would cause a unit clasti delection at ‘idspan. Resistance nnd deflection are related in Ube elastic range by = by for tho real structure and R, = ky forthe equivalent apeters or the fxed-ended beam af Fig 5.1, ae well agi other casey the resitance function i not bilinear even if ideal hinge forsuaion i wssne. ‘This is true beeause hinges fst form atthe support and further dele tion is required to form the midspan hinge and ence attain maximum resitanee (Fg. 52). The reult le the resistance function indicted by the soil line in Fig. 54. Sine we require, for simplified sali, « billear function, this sab tne wil be replaced by the dashed ine shown ln Fig. 54. The “‘ffective” spring constant willbe sloted ao that the areas under tho two eurves are equal. "Ths the energy sieobed will remain coostant, and there will be tle error in the maximum dynamic displacement computed, This concept ls applied to an example it Bes. Approximate Design Methode 386 Tal Vale Uae + Any reasonable load-time funetion ean be handled by nomic sualyeie However, ifs lowed solution is doied, ti usually nocesary to Melize he actual function by tome simple mathematielsbape. This can often be done without appreciable ero in the nal eel. Puther- ‘nore, the seal unetin is usually not o well known that precision in te representation justi ‘Exazples ofthis type ofidealieeton are shown in Fig. 6.5. In each cage the acta funetion (eid line) has been reduced to one of tho for hich sfations were given i= Chap. 2 (gu 27 to 20 and 2.28 to 2.20), ‘Thus the maximum response ean be determined vey ely by use ofthe charts provided. ‘The eletion of the idealized loadtime funtion requis judgment by the analyst. It is important to note that the actual and idelined func tions need be similar only in the ite range of intret. For example in Fig 5, forthe determination of maxim response, fonction might be uted if, wore the time of masizmum response; but B might be used if that tine were ft ia for this purposs that the times of maximam Teaponse given i Fig, 27 to-29 and 2.2 to 2.26 are partiularly useful 52 Transformation Factors {In thie section transformation factors are tabulated for beams and sabe Ibaving various types of support conditions. ‘These table contain all information necessary to convert actual structural coments of thee "Novae 56 dela! na ie fin, ‘pes into equivalent onedayree cysts forthe purpose of appronimate aly? ‘Table 5.1 i applicable to beams or one-way slabs having simple (binge) supports. Fuotos are given for thee diferent load distrib As previously explained, these are based on the statie deflected spe corresponding tothe particular load distribution, ‘Thee thapes te indicated in Fig. 56 and expresod by the following Uniform load: Bet +24) slantie z< plastic 2 Concenteated loud at msidepan 0) ~ rau —any that char failure ig aot ert, ‘The dynamic restions given in Table 6.1 are dscused in Se. 5.4. ‘ables §.2 and 5.3 contain tranformation factors for fixed-ended beams and for beans with one end Bxed and the oter simply supported. These were derived in exactly the ame manner as wee those for rmply supported beame, the only ditfereaos being in the aseuied ehapea, I thes ces three ranger of behavior ust be comibered since the stam changes but doesnot become fully plastic when the hinge ie formed she support. "By the assumptions of the procedure being presented, the ‘idle range, which we shall al elatiplartis, i anointed withthe 4 Renna” US. Army Corp of Reiners Manel EM 1110545416, Tiss yu prt of scone maar Tp ch osu eur “Een of tustars to Reith Bea ot Nowe rs nag pee maneg inj miong IONE EERE same shape as that of an elastic, imply cupported beam, and therefore ‘the factors are ential. Furthermore, in the plastic rang, the shape i Independent of the original support condition and therefore all beams have the same factors "The maximum resistances given in Tablos 5.2 and 6.3 are those which ecur atthe upper limit ofeach range- Ta addition to the spring eon. ‘ants associated with cach range, the "eetive” spring constant encom. passing all ranges is also given. ‘Thincononpt was dsoueed in connestion ‘with Fig 54 Tranaformation factors at well ax the constants defining the rvintance function, are given in Tables 8-4 end 55, for two-way slabs with simple fd feed supports, respectively. These were obtained In the same ‘manner as were those for beams,” Values are given for several rtion of the length of the two sides "Aller Use deflected shapes fora slab have ben assumed, the transforma tion factors are obtained by Integration over the slab eurfce. The factors given were based upon approximations to the clamical plate ‘hoor fr defeton inthe late range ad yield ne theory ia the plastic range. Ta the later range the shape was assumed to be planar between Yyeld lines. In the simply supported eave there is obviooly an lato. blasts, or transition, ange, but the behavior ie excedingly comple, fad in order to simplify the procedure thi range has been ignored. 18 ‘the ease off supports, the elastic range has been terminsted when the ‘montent along most ofthe log edge has reached ultimate. This transi tion point cannot be determined precisely, and the limiting resistances given are cotimates. For tho elactie-pasticrango, it has boos uasumed {hat the shape (but not the rsgtance), and hence the factor, are the samo as thos fr simply supportd sab Th Tables 54 and 53, the moment notation is as follows: total poritivealtimate moment cepscity slong midspan so ‘on parle to sot edge ‘ai, = total negative ultimate moment capeity along short ogo ‘tha = negative ultimate moment capacity pr unit width at eter of Tong edge {nthe expression for spring constant, [=e th moment of inertia pr unit width, "Note that both manimusn seeitnce and spring constant reler to the ttt load on the el, ‘Transformation factore and resistance funetions for square, iteior fat slabs are given in Table 56, Various sien of column eapital are considered, ‘These fstore were based on approximate dellcted shapes, Tabled Tramuformation Pactra for Peo-iey Slab: Simple Supporte—Posr Skies, Uniform Loud sm, ‘oh a= tal dame ratios slog rt ee Vo = tel name ration one ne ee ida aera gaat bead 2? a Peers A aes fegdad lajssesee/eezese we e2sag/ssae3 Reis eez2/a2e¢ | nl i “aray Cone at Fagnen Hanan EME TOES, “ears: "Das of Satur fo est he iio ot ome Weapman? TB crt om {VE Anwoinat atin Methods 6 Foust annmaton Pcs tr Pa Stab Square SAB abet eee Hn HEHE: tes as in the ease of two-way slabs. Because of the compleity of the tehavion, the elatic plastic transition range has been ignored. Noto that both load and resistance are for th surface nea onde the eum. pital Load applied diretiy to the column capital is asumed to be farrid by the column and not to afect the elab reponse. Ia Table 5.6 the following notation is used: ‘May Shrnn ~ postive and negative ultimate moment eapasity per Unie width in mle stip of width 0/2 ines Bs = postive and negative ultimate moment capacity por ‘it with fm golem atip of width 0/2 gesese “The data given for slbein Tables 5 o 6.6 are obviously approximate ‘The transformation factors are based on easumed shape, abd the ull- nate eset on yisk-ine theory. More refined data could probably be developed, but in view of the many unceraintice in the dynamic stalyais of lab, ie doubtful that this would be warranted for design purposes. CConsior now the wzple rigid frame showa io ig. 6.7. ‘The mass i istrbuted along both the Toof and the tides, and the dynamic loud 216 Introduction to Structural Dynamice ke mae fife po) iE ‘acme 67 Bulan onedegre ayn fori fae consists of eoneenteatad fore at roof level plus distributed load on ‘one wall wurface. Only horizontal motion is considered. We wish to ‘define the equivalent onedeyree system. ‘The displacement of this system y is taken to be that at the top of the frame, Te will be assumed thatthe walls remain stright; that i, y. = 2y/h, whece ys the displacement ofa point ata distanen 2 from the base, an “vis that at the top of the fame. Although the eaurans of Ue frame and. Drobably the wale ofthe building do notin fact remain struight, this ‘an acceptable approximation. For the assumption slated abows, the equivalsat mass is given by a. 6. M. mitt f'me (sae = m+ Sk &o were and mar the mans per ut gh long th fae) fe ‘oof and walls, respectively. ‘he elvlt a Ba.€3)) ray = ro fro (ie = ro +08 6 Since we have taken the dfetion of the equivalent aystem tobe the sme as that at roo! level, the equivalent stifaoss fis equal to the setual Stina of the frame refered to 8 horioatal Toad at the top. This sina may be computed by conventional frame analysis and is merely the concenteatd free required to produce « unit horaontl deflection ot the rk ‘The maxinum resistance of both the res! and idesizod ystems is simply the maximum horizontal force which ean be cari by Ue frame. Anproimate Design Methode 27 1 the columns havo les bending strength than the girder (the esa nse), = = Se hore ty isthe ultimato column bending strength ‘On the basis ofthe foregoing, the equivalent system is etablised and thon analyred in the usual manner. ‘The analysi yields the fame defection, and stree within the frame are directly related to this ‘quantity.’ Ifa closed solution is to bo made, both FC) and pf) mit Ihave the me time variation. Otherwise numerical sys x necessary Yor mulistory frames with mass and load distibated over the wal, iti in most cases euiintly accurate to ump the ma ed load Root Tevelson the basis of tributary wall ae "Transformation and resitance factors mich as those dleeusind ebove ‘ould be derived fora wide amortment of strvetral elements ‘The oly Fequirenents are assumed shapes in the posible srain ranges and the ‘naximin reitange foreach range. Following the principles developed hove, the general prosedure should be apparent. Tn ome enue shear distortion may be important, and shouldbe con- sidered when determining the deleted shspe, spring constant, and max ‘mum resistance. For example, the shear effect may be sgnieant in cop beam of reinforced concrete “Traser my be bandied Inthe sume manner as beams ther by express Jing the propertis in tarms of equivalent beam paramoters or by compute ‘ng the defected shape the basis of trust analysis. Because of iste bility of individual compression members, it may aot be posible to 15 ~ 922,000 18 sod Required bd = $22,000/29.6 = 10,00 int Let wsey Desi and d= 270% ‘Theneore Beam weight = 450 th/te ‘Total gt = 450206 = 25,001 4, 6 = ot oe t= Hin + 08 = BED es x 001s + 008) = aon AF 38 10924500 — 549 5 sory = Mf A 7 LO 0.95 10h in By Table 5.1, the lud-mass factors are 0.78 and 0.66 forthe elute and paste ranges, respectively. Since the behavior is to be more plant {han cate e = 3), we emtinate tha the proper Ruy is O20, The (Kinds 4, (O70 KBD _ poy, ee VE = PV ea5 x Toe ~ 985 ee 38 Uring the Int two values computed, we obtain fom Fig, 228 » = 3.7. ‘This is somewhat more than desired, ud the bean should be lightly tremgthened tobtain a = 8. However, napection of Fig, 224 indicate ‘hat an inrease of less than 10 pereont would be requized, ad this sep ‘ill ot be ineladed hee Tn order to determine accurately the maximum besm shear, ot end reaction, a more complete analysis would be raced. ‘The masinaum shear occurs ut the ead of the clare range (ener at Inter times is onetant and F decreases), but there & o convenient way to obtain the ‘corresponding time without making a rigorous analysis of the eats ange, As. slightly conservative estimae, we may combine the maxi num load with the maximum restenee, wing the expremion for dynam reaction given in Table 1. Thus Var = 039% (et) + O.11F + dead + 0.39 X 300,000 + 0.11 x 20,000 x 16 + 46 x 25,000 = 162,000 15 ‘The err in this value in al since the late init eatin in vome= ‘hing les than half the natural period, at whic tne Uhre has been tle decrease in the applied load, et woe owas 19 Dmg onal, bean ‘The fxedended beam shown in Fig. 5.18 ie to be designed using standard stl section. Tis required that the bending stra fn the besa hot exceed 30,000 pe For simiplisty twill be aauined thatthe dnd lod of Tkip/t includes am allowance for besmn weight. If wll lo be ‘sumed that the beam isso braced that the powbity af buckling i sliinated, Inspetion of the appropriate response chart, Fig. 2, indicates that tho DLF will probably not exeed 14, rings t/P wil probably not be lees than about 3§. Adopting this value of (DEF)one and combining dead tod dymanic eos, me eiat the masimu momen the pert whe old, Poly Pub Me = AE Fa Fae 20 x 206-450 194 x 14 = 4 20x 195 +90 1951 5475-4 002 ~ 412 kine eauited ston moan = 2 — 12% 12 Mor coon mation, 20776 = 26 in so itbains = MBE _ 1020 x 1092008 eo ox 165 int Table 2 Tm order to estab the equivalent system, the eoneuntrated and di {ssbuted ronson must be deat with sparstely, sag Uh factor rea in ‘Table 2. A dead loud must ofcourse oprent a raee which spat of ‘the system, The computations leading tothe atual sree intensity are 1 tow: Ki=10 y= 10, consented mas Ku=0a7 — Sasined na Mo Saeyar = BXEOLIXIX 087 05 pen ‘ 8X 10 = 28 Ryn, road OR ott we Mig 20 (DUP an = 128 ee 130 205 286 + 20 996 3188 103 Bp woe = = HE ar ‘Thus lightly smaller beam ste coud be used, but we shall not consider furthr tela ere, ‘To determine the maximum beam shear we fst obser, ia Fig. 2:b, that ta is always greater than unity, which indiestes thst under any ‘éreumstanees, the maximum load, 80 kip, would be acting atthe fine ‘of masimum response. At thie ame tin, that pat of the beam res ‘aco ssoeated with the dyna load is 1.35 % 80 = 67.5 hips. There- {ore ing the expreaoa fr dynam reaction in Tele 2, the maximum shear, or reaction, x found tobe Vous = O71 X 67.5 ~ O21 X 50 + dead = 480 ~ 105 + 34 X 20-41 C30 X 36 = 62.5 kine “The two-say slab shown in Fig, 5.14 i ed on all four edge nd sub- Jscted to a uniformly ditibuted presice, having the triangular trae function indicated. The design ito be based on an allowable dection of Gin, a the center ofthe slab, Although this it very large deflection, it would be an appropriate eritrion ifthe aim ofthe design were merely to prevent collapse under a rae loading condition. Delton, rather than ductility ratio, i specied, presumably because clearance or some ‘other functional eonsieration, rather than structaral damage, controle ‘the desien. ‘The design factors for this caso are given In Table 55. Tn order to simplify the procedure, we shal make ize ofthe “efctve” restance fonction as lndiated in Fig. 54.” To teplty farther, et us acwarne poroximate Deen Methods 321 ‘thatthe total bending szength of the slab isthe sie along each edge nd leo alang the two midepan axes, ‘Thus, by the notation of Se 53» and Table 5.8, Mire = Thr = Bry = na = Oa According to Table 8.5 for 0/5 = 12/15 = 08 and with the notation of Fie 34, Ry = MAM 4120p + Ar) + 10.5(aRr + tra = Ma (120) + 10.301 ts = 5589055 Re ots hue (wo = B = 0.0815 ase Ba Rs gang hye ade = (wos + Boe-B! m 0176 Bho Referring to Fig. 5, i we equate the area under the trilinear resistance ‘oarve up to (yale to the arn under the bilinear (aabed) curve upto the same point, we obtain mpaat oe ~ 0.100 Re _ S08, and ue &- hich define the “lective” bilinear rexitance funetin. Referring to Table 5.3, the load-mace factors forthe thee ranges of ‘behavior are found to be 068, 071, and 0.54. Since, in this ease, the 22 Intraducton to Streturel Dynami ‘behavior is primarily plastic, we slot & value near that forthe plastic range, ony, Kew = 037. A a fet tril lot us investigate slab with a resistance just equal to the peak value of the applied loa ie, Ba = 20 pi X 148 X12 X15 = 52 X 10'Ib ‘Thersore » tigen Bey 82X10! © 9600 tin in Required atta = 5, = 2220" ~ ss00 in ‘whore the dead weight has been neglected 1f the dynamic material strengths are em = $0,000 psi and, ~ 4000 ai and if we azbitarly set the atoel ratio as p= 0.0, the bending Strength por inc of la width in a= ove (1 $8) = 86 in ‘The raquired effective dopth of ala i therefore jana, _ 00 Reale = eV abe and the total depth might be 6 in, Using the empiri expremion for moment of inertia, snd neglecting diferenes inthe uo direstons, (= "B50 +0085 - 249 65 x 001 +008) ‘we compute the parameters of the equivalent system, fe = HDB _ NG 1098.20 arog yin My = OX 8X8 6 tin Pw ae AM 3, TEES «6.045 fe Saas ‘Bntering Fig. 224 with thie value of /T and with Ra/Pi = 1, weread B43 Sinoe Ba 52x 108 p> 303,000 Gade = 138 in Anoroximate Design Methods 230 ‘he maximum deflection at midalah is au = olyade = 43 X 1.28 = 87 in ‘This defection is clow to the value desired (in ‘therefore deemed stifctory. z and the dvign ie 57 Approximate Design of Maltidegree Sytem ‘Thus far in this chapter, we have dealt with the analysis and design of ‘ingle elements with distributed mash which eould be atalyzed on the ‘oa of an equivalent one-degre system. Of courte, moet structures, onset of combinations of such elements. However, i any ease ti Permissible to assume tat the individual elements ach independently of fhe others. For example, if we conser a heath supported by girder i say be yomile to analyze the former aa though t were om rgd supports ind to disgn the girders forthe dynam reactions ofthe beam so det ‘mined. This is permisble provided thatthe natural perads of the ee ‘ments ave suficently diferent. It the girders ave. such longer Derod, they will respond slowly and the inertia forees long the eat ‘ive to the der motion will be small compared with thoee eto the vibration of the beam ited, and henge wil have litle effect on bear Fespoase, On the other handy if the girder period is short compared vith that ofthe beam, the giderdeflstion wil be sal lative to beam Aatetion, and again thre wil be tle effet ou bear responses As an ‘approximate rule of thumb, it may be asi that two ouch elements may bo treated separtaly 1 the periods differ by a fastor of? or more. A ‘example of this type of uncoupled eystm it given in Soe. 5.70. 1 the periods of the elements are not sufcenty diferent, is necos sary to analyze the multidegre system ax each, Ganeraly, this cabo done by aesarning a single abape for each element. This the number of degrees of freedom equals the numberof elements, This procedure was demonstrated for a bear girder system in Soe 4.6 and i farther demons strated in Ser, 5.70), using the methods of this ehapter. (2 Reid Frame with Vertea Load ‘Sappore it is requied to determine the maximum dynamic stresses in the frame of Fig. 5.158, The analysis of suc a rigid fame involves on sideration of two sparable eects of the applied Toad: (1) the oxual strewes in the ginder and columns, and (2) the axial steece in the solusons. The periods of tho natural moder amocinted with th fist ‘fect are much larger then Uhove aaocited with the seeond, ‘Stated liferentiy, the vertial displacements due to change in column length o nova 516 Bua, Rigiésramew Approximate Devin Methods 336 ‘re too smal to affect the fxural response, Furthermore, the gieder response develope w slowly that the load on the column tay be come sidered sittic."Therelore our procedure wil be to anayee the flexural eponm, ignoring the change In column leg and then to degn the ‘lum fr the masimum girder reaction applied statically. twill be sufficiently aceurate to ge the ferural analysis on an equit- seat onedogree systom. Aa in previous cates, the deflected shape na lated with the predominant mode will be taken ae that due fo sats ‘pplication of the load. In Fig. 5.185 are shown the moments due to ‘this loud obtained by conventional frame analysis. ‘The deflections cor- "sponding to these moments as obtained by the moment-an tnethod or tome other standard procedure are given by ef for which the coordinate are defined in Pig, 5.18, ‘The midapan ginder Aetction given by If we soot this defection as the modal coordinate, the characteristic Shape it dened we follows © wean 618) ® sea) lace, by defiitin, w= Ala) and y= wld Referring to Ba. (5.1), we se that the equivalent macs ofthe apatoun is Men 2[ mteteordn +2 [ mdbsedtten where my nnd my age the mae per unit length ofthe girder and column, respectively. Executing the integrations, we obtain = 044i + 00tona (i) an nd substituting the numeral vals en in Fig 6.154, M, = 5174 + 002 = 5.76 vac'/in, 428 Intradueton to Structure Dynami Tt may be observed that the contribution ofthe column mass (0.02) is very small and might well have been ignored. Furthermore, tbe mace factor for the girder (0.43) les between that for w simply supported ‘ea (0.40) ad that for «Bx ear (0.37) ao gv by Tabls 5.1 and 5.2 ‘The latter obervation mugeate that we might have estimated the mace {actor by approximate interpolation botween those two extremes without Introducing appreciabe error ‘Sinco we have scloted the deflcction of the load point yu to be the etction ofthe equivalent system, the lod factor Kes unity. Thus baton Fou OE ae. Wn in and FAO = FW) = PALO ‘The natarapetiod of the estar ie ran = 26 GEIR = an me {Forth given lnd-tme funetion shown in Fig 6.15, the maximum DLP in given by Tig, 23, (DEP) nue = 128 “The tne of mains pone ea hy Fi 28 fee 0ss t=055 006 = 00220 ‘The maximum dynam girder destin i therefore sand the maximus bending moment ie 200 51.25 = AIF, bin In onder to obtain the maxiznum olan load, we must fst darive the ‘exprecion forthe dynamic girder reaction. Following the procedure of ‘ee. 4, we consider tho dynamic equilibrium ofthe half girder wpan a8 indicate in Fig. 5.154." ‘Tho location ofthe recltantincria forces the Anorosimate Design Methods 237 nto of the aren under tho cbarsetevistie shape defined by Ea (6:18) ‘Taking moments about this pot and noting thatthe grr end moment ie always one-half the midspan moment, we obtain the equation Pct +E 4 — 36m 0 Bixby defiition the static load of the type appli corresponding to ven deformation or stress condition of the fame, and i fllows tat BE. = RI/6. Using this expresion to eliminate rot the lst equation and solving, we obtain V = 0708 - o20F 620) hich is also the dynamic eolumn loud. Comparison with the eore- ‘ponding expressions in Teles 51 and 5:2 indicates thatthe oetieate in Fg (5.20) le between those for pinned and fxoi-endod beams, a8 ‘would be expected. ‘Tn the present eas, the maximum resistance occur at = 022 ane at hich tine = 0.97, apd = 1.23%, ‘Thus the maximomeelui lod it ¥ = 076(1.29F)) ~ 026,098.) = 0707, ‘As fr s column sual strom i conoerned the led ie apps very slowly relive to the period of tho mode corwpeudingto this tren. ‘These the column ay be designed ag thoagh the load just computed mere ‘sppled statically. “The rasimim clam bending moment which oeurs ‘Simultaneously is equal to (F/12)1.28. | Bastoplstc Beam-srder Spat In this section the analysis of the beamginder system and losing shown in Fig. 5.16i8cosidered. Itisknown from prelinary considers: tions thatthe gdere and or bean will deflect nto the plate range. The ‘maximum defections ofboth beam and girders ae died Tn order to determine whether or aot Use ean and giders snay be ‘weated ae uncoupled, the natural period of the separate crac ould ‘bo compared. Using the late ftetor in Table 51, me gst fr the bea Ms, Kaas = 0.50(200 X 0,1) = 20 th sein ‘BALD gy S842 100 fy — Kas = Ka SARE = 0.04 84 MEO" — 425,000 2 = a6 f= lg ~ 0087 wo or one ofthe girder, the efotive mas is that of th gider tel pe ate ee —— ‘oo 518 Brame. Eha-latissnlsie of beanie te. ‘nec the beam mas (since this “ides” alongwith the side) with & ass factor of unity Myo = Koa My + 34M = 040(200 X 0.1) + 4200 % 0.) = 1058 scot 19 $82 10 Ro ‘The two periods differ by lec than factor of 2, and therefore we must conser the dynamic interaction; ic, me must analyse at « two-degree systam. The symmetry of structure and loading eliminates pastiipetion ofthe thind mode In writing the equation of motion for the beam, we mast include as ‘ditional lad the inertia frees due to the rigd-body acceleration nas ated with the mipport motion as indiated in Fig 5.78.” Thur Kua + Kakon = Kulp(O' — mb) here yand yy ae the relative bern midapan deflection and the ssdepan Finder deflsction, respectively. In this equation kg athe resistance fy Anprsimate Design Methods 239 CETTE iormn 17 Brample. Fes iit, vbich a nied by Byy = 83/4 ~ 64,000 Ib. With the loud end mass factors given forthe asic range ip Table 51 (Kus = O04, en = 0.50) snd the numerical properties given in Fig. 5.16, the equation of motion becomes 109+ (12,0004 oF 41,000) = 12890) — 1289, G21) ‘The beam retin, which i the dynamie asd on the girder, ie simply ‘oveshalf the tots! net force (inluding inertia effects) on the bon a indicat in Fig. 5.178. "This ie given by a= Slp(h ~ mag, ~ 0.64) = 100p(0) — 109." 64 62) ‘The ctor 0.68 is derived from the sondition that the distribution curve of rative inertia foreois the deoeted shape. ‘The equation of motion or ‘the pirdr ie thereore (Pig. 8.170), KusMate + Kudite = Keg¥o 240 Introduction to Structural Dynamice "The girder resistance is gy, and whea the girder isin the platioxang, this term ia replaced by" the constant yy = 43ty/l = 82000 ‘With the ivertion ofthe clatc load and mas factors for ® beam with concentrated load at midgpan (Table 51: Key = 1.0, Kuy = 049) and the numeriea values ofthe ginler properties (Fig 5.10), the giderequ- tion of motion becomes 9.84, + (20,000, oF 32,000) = 1009() — 104, — 6.496.628) Equations (5.21) aud (5.23) wil form the basifor anelyas, which must tue done by numerical integration, since we anticipate plastic behavior ‘The student may wih to compare the elastic wquations given sbove with those derived for the sume beam-girdar system in Se. 4.8. Tt will be ound that they ate practically identical, there Lx only eight dite ‘ences in the numeral coefficients which reslt from difeenoss in the ‘sured shapes. In See. 4.0 the aatumed shapes were sine waves (2. ‘the fundamental mode shapee), while here they are the static-load- Aellcstion carver upon which Table 61 je based ‘Stretly speaking, Eqs, (6.21) and (6:28) shouldbe altered in the plastic range by changiag tse load and mast factors to reflect the chalge in deflected shape. However, if this were done, four conditions would have to be considered: both elements elastic, both plastic, der elasie/ beam plastic, and girder platie/beacn elastic, "Thus four sets of equations ‘would have to be uted. This greatly complicates the analysis and the Inereasod aecaraey in probably not enough to warrant the oor. “As the oquations of motion now stand, cach stop inthe analysis would have to be done by tri sine both accelerations appear in each qution ‘To avoid this, we may solve Hage. (5.21) and (6.23) simultaneously to ‘obtain two som equations, each involving only one aoederation. The reaul x (6) f= 108) + (48,2004, 0F 690) — (21,0009 07 6.990) 4 4), ) = 1.500 + (67909 0F 2,200) — (10,3004, oF 2700) ‘The alternative constant terms within the parenthoses aro merly Upper limits of the resistance. For example, in Bq. (24a), 3,80 should be ‘sed in place of 18,2009, i the Inter excends the former." Rebound into the oleic range is handled in tho usual way (See. 1.3). ‘The natural periods ofthe twosdegreespstem may be derived from the elastic equations of mation. This was done in See. 40 with the reslt ‘T= 0000 and 7; ~ 0.000 ane, The time terval for the numeral alysis ie taken ar approximately one-tenth of Ube shorter prod, 00K wee. ‘The computations leading to maximum displacements are shown in Table 57. Raferene ie made to Chap. I for the details of the ‘numerical prooaure. foie oar |oonat | 0 306 20 a0 |-0.008| 0.4850 um eo oar | 7 sora |-0 x22 |o rs ‘300 ie 200 sao | 0 © wo | ae ose cae ear on oo 2 on] 0.098 00s Coors ae Cane | Thies [oes oa Tene [70 oan Tso ra non | sam [40.0107 roo | "3590 Sa | a 0 | ois0 a0 | ooo 3500 seo | too 100 ‘TabeS1- Numeric! Integration; Boa-sirder Seem of Fist ye ay — yr (at 328 1 Data by wi Fp Ta = BOON ae 22 Introduction to Structural Dyas With reference to the computations, the boar defletion exceeds the slasti Timit at 0.028 see ad the gleder goes plastic at D6 see. ‘The ‘beam rebounds elastically after 0.016 sea, The maxim beam deflect tion (relative to the girder s0.61 in, or 18 times the elasilimi, and the ‘maximum ger defetion i 0.7 i, of 2.9 tres ie elastic lini Problems 4, Deloria the trantrmaton atte Ky and Kors easilee brn det “airy dntoutod fond. U Ue testa detstian eure ae satuned Spe, Compare the natural raguency bad on thw face with eect expen (or he fn ara nde Ps = 040; Ky = 0257 © Vcoar yom a= Ra 2A simply mpprted bam as warmly died ne an in don, "impel oe tom atthe ted fit the pants acted ox tcrmlydtated num ced Compote te any ita, ad the ‘ivi onedepre a [55 Demme the tnnwtrmaton aco or agers, ally ode pe Sed ‘ett adja ead rte tbe edge shape cnt ae oP Panes Capt co whore aon ag then 2 ‘oe perpen consis wth eg at th nae of the Ee ge ‘540 A tanbeoed Yea with conceit mips i neptve nomeat ‘put ecu w oe tal th pov moment ep. Pot the ear tant {ttn a ernie the cet neo te aural near nt, 4S ‘en-gb preteen In Fig 5.18 jet 12 ‘Selandime fein stows.” Using te appmnnate method of sae for tale Be a ne 5: Compute tbe va fa ich oul etn = 2 a if rennin 5 le “riaume 6.18 Probie “ Approximate Dasign Methods 268 ake 46, Ateanguer ne pl with miei inept monedgre yt 1 ‘he nd drain isfy, (10 ath eld ence hey Might err. To Iveta the rng i wh ig (S10) ight bt pte Tal of Reve thr tothe cores wae au for = on wen the ‘rine aes yur aan? [Er Katerag to Pb, fq. (16) ave te coed esse with ony lh ‘rorif the lad duration taint aber ‘To vette he tgs I wl Eq Ge) might be und, pot te Fal of even try tothe Pret ae ‘ews i/T for y= 8.” ew wold tr value t-test your tones? {EA_-Agune snowy Se aed leer an oad ty seo cht reich apd een than ty 01 a en ge ‘Sun 208 ‘it = 100 Tenant B.S rci0' tom Bre Mrs Ba = 2000 pn, {eta sport strain accompa te masinum cen er (St By th rpms cart (Fig. 2.20, tad onan ees dtr dan {By eral tet, hing in sn athe ae ange 459" intra coerce ony i fed one easing eupored a he lhe, Att atjeid toe undorniy rte nay wth tne fn owe in FE, ‘She am proper ‘Sun = 208 nears 22 Bn otal dpe = 280) E00 psi, = 500 pl Perea ‘gone $10 Pron 8 ‘Te sal rato grn ape bth pave and negation moment enpsion Com tute'byspprsinae nthols ti manne tyme obese ppc aba dita 24 Introduction to Structured Dynamice 40g ended ne-yo i ny spd cnet yo E11 ply ported 2607 tel bam bas naps f 20 otal dou wiht t000 tod dynmin yd sgt 4500 pe, Deere se male sc Gfrtion de to Ia ath third ya the ean, ach having» "ie 0a ands eran ve tna of 126i, Wt athe ene {snsul-pl ed of nga 10 kp and dation Ol se" Te od enn Wate a midpan ad there aunty bad meg atin the ‘om ta 300 "The san af Tt may be mod hn ekg Previn, atthe abr caps tthe beam sled senile duced, ot = ‘oan pat 543 Meting ros 4, iss unl wal item dna: va ngsar pe with sr [Rf nod'e dream of 028 se andthe tate beading topes Dp foe the Beam oi 80 kp fr he enter ier 6 Earthquake Analysis and Design 1. Introduction "The problems associated with tho dasign of structures to withstand arthquakes have long bon of great interest to engineers. ‘This is da ‘ot only to the eatastrophie nature of the posible faire bat mln to the fact that the dilute eaeountered are techleally intriguing, ‘The literature onthe subject is voluminous aad is ineresing rapidly. Con- siderable progres ie being made, but in spite of this fact, © rally stis- factory tsethod of doign ell door not exe. ‘The major difiealty lies in the proiction ofthe charaotor and intensity ofthe earthquakes to which a tractue night be eubjectod during ite ie Strong eathgukes are Tare events, and the number of acs measure ‘ments whieh have been made isin statistical sense very snall. Design rt therefore be based on rather enue etinatn ofthe expected ground “Anothor major dificult leg in the fact that a realistic analysis for carthqunke should nocount for felsic behavior of the stretare. Very {ow structures could withstand strong carthauake without some plastic deformation. In fct it would be uneconomical to design a structure ‘that Ie vould romain completely cletic. The inherent. diiclty of Inelasti analyeis of mulidegreeapstome, coupled withthe iene and unoertain nature of the ground motion, makes w rigorous solution to the problem impractical" 246 Introduction to Structural Dynamics {ts obvious that inthis bref chapter only an Introduction tothe aub- ject an be ofered. Attention wil be rested to a fow basi ooncepta ‘which will provide a foundation for further study. (62 Response of Multidgree Systems to Support Motion In Seo, 2.6 the reponse to support motion of one-egros systems wuch as ‘hat shown in Fig, G1 war investigated. Tt was found there that the ‘equation of mation could be written as Mat but ob = — Mansi) or Bokeh 2B Ie (ox) ‘nnd the responce could be expressed by uo = - 2 0un. on here) = sltve displacement the mas with repost tothemppor, Lone and (DLE). = wf f(@)e8™ sin oll — 9) de ee = manu suport sezleration 140 = te fonction for sepportacedersion Y= dahl 15 = damping cobceat = o/28 (DLR, i te dynanie oad factor a previously dnd, except hay in {his tte it tamed onthe te fontion for the support acceleration ‘hy ofthe LF xprewions developed in Chap 2 fora pif kine fone- tion could therefore ume thi function reread the vars in {pound acletnn, Ie ahold be noted tht the expen given shove {or DLP). ald only the ital ground velocity i we. be ‘guan 61 Damped ened sonen en ith sapert mt, Barthquote Analy and Design 20 ein signifeant fat that the maximum relative dinplaoment a nd ‘the masinum sbeolute acelerstion ga are dzely related. "To deman= strate, we conser the equation of motion (Fig 6.1) My teat hao Which, at roacimum relative displacement (i = 0), beiomes Min + hg = 0 ‘Observe that gy and tig must ooeur simultaneously. Tharefore (DEP an 6a) ba im sich indicates that the maximum values of abssutesccleration and Felative displacement are rdated inthe same way ae the corresponding terms fora pure harmonic motion. Theis inthe nature ofa coineidente, snd it should not be concluded thatthe reponse du to support motion is Turmanie.. The ftitions velocity asoeiated with tis apparent harmonic ‘oti ie somaetnnen called Use spectral ull, and te nasi vale a rive by 6 DLP) oe In the analyuis of multidegresaystems with suppost mation, wo may poly the model method as developed in Soe..." "Tho mov equation of motion (Bq. 8-48) fora lumped-ma system with exteraal frees is 10 Sate Bat otha td = SE San, where the applied fore at mass is FJ). Te was shown in See 2.6 that the response due to support motian i oquivslent ta the eaponse du to applied ores equal fo. ~ Mfg. Por the sltidegre ease, the equvaent foroe at mass r would therefore be —ACg. = —Majof(), and if thie in ‘ved to replace #af() in the above, the resulting mal equation for support motion is te Sm $ met "The egies hich follow aes presen in maze form in the Appn Ay 4 why + 28a = — on) 1K mst be remembered tat Ay the rine model dplacement with Fapost to th support Comparon ofthis equation wih By (6) foro ondege aystem reveals tha he ony ference the prscos of he {io atmatione in tho rh id of Bq (65), Since thea are conta fornmadeand merely molly the faputacodratin, he same odie toe ay be apie to the raponue of the ane degra atmo bias She modal reponse It we dese the mda prtpaon Yar by $ ston -5— 6) Suan ‘he the mol Somer a ven bi A = Ba) 6 fer te pa of thon syste ving ae ny ta egy Be 20 =- Hour. 69 rs DL) eth gio nd esa nt el oy sed {th the freacney a andthe time Function fl). "The modal dinplace- tment at mace tall) = TaD oo) ud the total relative diuplacement ie a 10) 1 the ground motion had been given in tems of displacement rather than acceleration, the abeolute response of the onedagreeaystem could be obtained by (Se. 2.6) 20 = DLP). and the relative response by 0 = we(DEN). — vl) om where y() = yaf(), and (DLE). ie based on tho time function {rather than jn the analyse ofa multidegresaystem, By. (6.11) would be tuted in place ofa. (6) ify athor than j, were spect ss input ber 82 000M i Oy seen 259 Intraducion to Stracturel Dynamiee 63. Mulistor-building Analysis ‘To lllustrate application ofthe modal analysis developed in the precoding section, we consider the two-stary wel frame shown in Fig. 62. "The ‘weight ofthe roof, frst oor, snd walls are indiated in Fig 62a, a2 are the moment of teria of Use structural slements, ‘The limped masses at ‘the floor levels whish are given in Fig. 6.26 have been computed on the basin of the floor weights plus that ofthe tributary wall are The lastistiffene coeclents thown in Fig. 6:2 have been compated by ‘conventional frame analysis. If there were no support mation, the cond tion of dynam equilibrium would be as ladiated in Fg. 624 ‘Before considering the actual input, we shall establish the normal modes ofthe aystom.. Based on Fig, 624, the equations of motion are Migs + 45) — 528y, ~ 0 Mags = 52895 + 108.891 = 0 When computing aormal modes no ground motion is considered, and therefore the atin Fig, 6.24 are both absolute diapicemeats an those relative to the ground. Operating on these equation in the usual way, tre find that the natural frequencies ure wr 20 rad/exe uy = 23.5 ead/one snd that the characteris shapes may be defized by int mode: ou = $1.00 on F187 Seoond made on = $1.00 on = 100 ‘Wo now wish to make an analysis ofthe building frame for the ground notion gives in Fig: 63 ‘Tia rntwoidal motion i not intended to be T {i : \ ‘ |___oseee____ ‘rooms 63 Empl, Amuned spy net, erthqunke Analysis and Deion 51 tical of earthquakes, but will serve to illustrate analysis for ground ‘notion. We sal st mako a completely late unalyris nd then ota ‘an inelastic solution forthe eas in which the column strenghe ae ted 59 ta Wo cause such behavior. A comparton ofthese two selutons wil serve to demonstzate the signifesnoe of plate behovior in erthquke esi Making we of Ba, (6.6), the ods pastsipation fectors are computed a2 follows Sane. - 2204¢1.00) + 0774457) + qa oO = OTrTIo7 y= 0281.00) + 077(—1.00) > 294¢L. co) 0.77 = 108)" ~ r, $0215 ‘The dynamie lod factor (ignoring damping) i given by un. =o [isan Jae whe) = eaten ya o (soa ~ Zanes) hich isthe mame as Bq, (2.48). ‘The modal values ofthis quantity are (DLs), = =1.05(en tet — 1.40 sn 0.09 (DLE), = 1A0Gsn dt — 0.586 an 28,5 By Ba, (6.11), we have forthe two modes ws = O5(DLE), ~ 0.5 sin tet = ~1.005 nin An 0.785 in 800 wl) = O5(DLE), ~ 05 sin dee = 02 win et — 0375 xin 23.5 Finally, the relative displacement of the two muses as given by Ba, (6.10) are mal) = O786)UMOKLOO) + @215){uA(91C.00) = 07889} + 0254") wld) = 0784s %DIC.ST) + (25 )ue4OK—1.08) = 1.230(410) — 0225;u0(0) 352 Intrauction to Stratural Dynamics HN. . eoulAl ete. une 84 Tame, Tejon af woatory tae ‘The fst of thew i also the fiat-story datortion, i, the motion of the floor above relative wo the lor below. ‘The second-tory datrten would be given by tal) — wld) = 0.4460] — 0.481040] "The story shones which determine the magoitide of column bending would be computed by (Pig. 622) Rem $8un) ~ 52.8640) B= Stan) — Au) ‘The magnitude of Unow shear, computed after evaluating the above ‘expressions fora.) an wa() at various tines, are plotod in Fg. 6.6 ‘through two eyels of ground mation. "The story shears compted above are very lage; the maximum in the top story is about 06 of the roa! eight and that in the bottom story is about one-third of the total bulding weight. ‘Theve are mich larger than would normally be used for earthquake design, even thoveh the autumed ground motion isnot particulary severe az compared with sctual earthquakes. "There are abveral rotons for thie diferenee? (0) earthquake motions are not perfectly harmonic; 2) damping was Jgnored inthe analysand (2) some plastic deformation ofthe columns it permissible, and the column strengths need not be as grest se the sheare Berthquake Anas and Den 389 bon Corre anf] Jsseounim + ataoen Cite er Fae a i ‘oem 3. Iealand owo-tery tne computed above indicate. The validity of the last point wil now be Aeinonetstod. 2. Hat plaatle Solution ‘Suppowe tht the definition ofthe problem is now medied by wing ‘laste limits for the story shears. Te will arbitrarily be saruted that {hee values are approximetely oneal ofthe masini shears computed Intheclasticanalysisabove. ‘Thus the maxiniam Pasi story resistances ste taken tobe Ray = 205 hips Ray ~ 21 bps nal other respects, inching column stiffs, the structure romain ae shown in Fig 621 cad the ground motion remains as shown in Fig. 63. ‘Au iscused in See. 8.9, i dificult, and probably not worthwhile, to include the effet of girder fextbilty in an lasto-pastic analysis of bullding frame. We shall therefore assume the girders to be rei, with ‘he rau that Ure are only two springs in the sealized aye.” "The stifaes ofeach spring comesponding toa story p= BED ran ‘where isthe sory height, and I isthe moment of inet of ove column inthe sory. Thus the idealized dypamie eyetor is as shown in Fig. 65, ‘Tho rsistac funtion foreach story i aumed to be bine. 384 Introduction to Structured Dynaice Table nelsicAnaisin of Teo-story Bung Frame (i. 65) SSE RESET "The equations of motion in term of abvote deplacement, wx derived from the condition of dyneinie aquirium abowa in Fig 6.5, are @) Mag + Re o Aon RRO here 12) ° y= kaye — yy or 21 max © By = kage = yo) oF 29.5 mae Since the system ix sontiness, numeri analysis provides th easiest rethod of eottion, and the fiat few stepe are sown iTable 6.1. Since ‘the smaller natural period is 0.27 se (2x/u), the tre interval is taken a8 (0.025 sce." Analyas auch ax this a be excated withthe aid of a com puter for buildings of many stories. For very tall buldings, it may be estab to Tump the mares at every second or thied Moor rather than st ‘exch lor in arder to rede machine tim. ‘The rsit ofthe inelastie analysis ie plosted in Fig. 66 in Ue form of story distortions. Also shown are the elastic responses computed in See. 6.80. The important point to be noted ls thatthe distortions of the inlatic structure are setally aller, ven though the masini story resistances are only onc-balf of the resistances developed inthe elastic ‘ase. ‘This is teue primary because the plastic deformation tends to ‘lminato the resonat effect of the sinusoidal input. ven Usough carth- ‘quake motions aze not harmoaie, uh resonant effets do oowur, and the 5 it ie ‘ins 66 Fasiple, hati and nat: rp ‘general conclusion reached here ia till valid. Since the cost of the structural fame is related to the resistances provided, the economic advantage of permitting plastic deformation is spparent."This dor, of ‘ours, reaultin some permaseat distortion, but i kept within resonable Timit, doesnot imply serious damage. 256 Introduction to Structure! Dynan Fam ys a ta "ova G8 Response pects or gn upper mon erthquake Anagae and Dan 387 64 Response Spectra Before proceeding tothe actual earthquake probe, it wl be wat to inteoduce the concept ofa reonsespecrn. This es plot giving the maximum rexponses Gin teem of dipiaosnent or tress or acelin, ste, ofall posible near one-dagre systems due to given input, which in th present cage in» ground motion. The abana of the spectrum it ‘the natural frequency (or prio) af the aysttn, and the ordinate tthe ‘maximum response. Such a plot x shown in Fig 67. Thuy inorder determine reeponse for the particu input, we ced know only the natural froqueney of the responding eysteun =" ‘To iwsteate the construction af a response apectrum, consider the ‘zound accleration shown in Fig. 6 8e, whieh correponds tothe ground ‘iplacement shown in Fig. 68h. We wish to plot spetre for masnuon relative diaplcement und maximum shalute actleation of undamped Wi roone 68 (Cominad) 351 Intraduction to Structure! Dynamics “ner ems, Acoding (62) and (63), the did vale ae © (es) ® ‘The time function fr the acderation it aie Sin i— i bem $0) =0 > 2 nd the dynamie load factor ie (oun. =4 f'(1~j)snwe— nae rea shih when integrated, rs (DLP), = 1 cont + # i ‘Aer time 24, we may express the DLF as fem (618) (OU, = (DLPan.co ol ~ 2) + DEP an AAE= 29 (ar) ‘which is based upon consderstion of the DL and its derivative at {=e as aa initial displacement and velocity for the following mation ‘The maximum value of (DLF). which may be obtained from Eas. (8.14) snd (6.15) depends only onthe ratio /P. ‘This spotted in Fig. 68 ‘We may now determine the maximums reaponses hy Eqs. (613). To take a uurarical example, let ju = p (the acoeleration of gravity) sod 4 0.1 ace. For these input parameters the spectrum forthe abolate ‘value of maximum relative displacement ie ax shown in Fig. 68 and that for maximum sacleration, in Fig. 682, In conneetion with the so of Eq. (6.130) for relative displacement, i shoud be noted that, ae «> 0, (DL) aase alo approtches sero andthe value of tas i indeterminate. However, may be shown tha, as «0, wan approaches the maxim ground motion. a fet, the ofdinates tothe spectra atthe extremes of ratural frequency are intuitively obvious, For example, if in very Jarge ie, Ube eructre in very atthe assertion is applied waddealy with a corresponding DLF of 2, and hence the masimum aceleration of ‘he mass is twice the inal ground acceleration. At the sama tne the spring distortion in negligible (ence the stiffness great), and hence the 2m foo | | . Vl nal 220 motion of the muss i the aame se that of the ground; ie, the relative ‘motion i very amal.” On the other hand, iis very sal, the spring “exible, and henge the mass remains sationary while the ground mover beneath i. ‘Thus the relative dieplacenent equals the ground diplace ‘ment, and the geeleration ofthe mai tro ‘An alternative representation of the response spectrum isthe logog Plot ia Fig, 09, where the result of the presoding example i repeated ‘This pe of plot has the advantage that all petra for the Kind tip ‘onaidered herein consis asentialyof two straight lines, exept that there is some distortion nar the intrestion ‘This is teue boone, rogardecs ofthe detals of the input, the duplacement responce in the sale frequency range is constant equal to the maximum groutd dispacemeat, ‘nd, a large frequencies, the responce aseleration i constant qual lo ‘tiple ofthe nasimum ground acderation. Tn the late feequeney "ange the maximum relative diplacrnet given by “ode 180, Introduction to Structural Dynamics oeus 610 Reaponn mor or snail pa where esa constant which depends oa the type of input (a = 2 in the xample of Fig. 68). Tho last equation is, of course, a straight ie on the Joglog pot, ‘Tho fact that all spectra ave the ame general form on 8 Jog-log plot makos the estimation of «spectrum fora port defined input somewhat easier I the spectrum grew relative displacement ain Fig. 63, the nboolute aceleration of the reeponse ean be computed rectly thorefom snd a stond plot not rally nooseary. “As tecond example wo consider the spectrum fora snussidal variation ‘of ground motion. ‘The acelerstion ie shown in Fig. 10 and the corre. ponding ground dieplacement shown in Fig. 6108, with the amamp- tion that there isan initial velocity of ~y/M The maximum DLF for the damped stendy-tate response (whieh dove not depend on the initial ican 8.10 (Conined) conditions) was developed for this input in See. 2.54 and ix given by Bq, (240) 1 OLD ee = TBAT RTT ‘Thin is pleted in Fig. 610 for 20 percent of erties damping; that fe = 0.2. "The weparate response species for relative dxpucement and ‘bene aoseleration, computed by Kqs. (6.13), ae plated a Figg 6.104, fod for the specific parameters gu = g and = 2r rad/ece. Both curves display the expected peak nent the point of resonance. At small, frequeney: the maxitaum retive diplacerent eas the msximam, sound displacement, and at large froqueney u approaches sero athe ‘maximum ‘edlration response approaches the. maximem qrownd ‘cccertion. In the latter ean Ube mae of the nye rniply “rides” slong with the ground and the two motions are identical ‘The loglog plot of the spectrum forthe sizusoidal input with 20 por cent damping ‘lo shown in Fig. 9, where the to staight lines mentioned previously Peed Beate ‘tome 8.11 Kamla, Beam with apport ota correspond exactly to the maximum ground displacement and the ‘maximum ground acceleration; that, « = 1 To illustats the application ofthe eeponse-apetrum toshnique to an ‘ctu structural element, cosidr the simple boam sown in Fig. 6.11 Suppose that both supports move vertially in the musnerindiented to Fig: 8a. "We wish to determine the maximum beading stem in the ‘bain resulting fom this support motion. Oaly the fuudaineutal mode Wil be eouidered since higher modes are of itl importanes Tn ordeeto_uoe the response spectrum, we fit compute the nataral frequeney by Ba. (87) sls fiom 1> 2h Vie” Team Vox = 81 oP Reding cither Fig. 69 or 4, we find the maximum relative displace- rent of the equivalent obedegree system to be ae = 04 i, “This ia nok the bean defen we mek, snc the matin of the beam suppor in ot drei equivalent to the motion ofthe suport ofthe tauvalent rete, For the prot exampo involving cisabated as, it appaceat that a. (52), which gives the modal participation etn, should be writen [imocey ae ” Pmecres Substituting 62) ~ sin (e/!) for the fundamental ode and evaluating the integral, *e dnd * Yalu of ho integrals are ven ‘Table fr bes wih varios euport Se Terry By (7), niin ane Pac $304 = 56 ‘ez dat in dnt ots ep tng lative {0 the support ‘Sings we are eonsiering only the rt mode, the bending moment computed as fllows there ‘Therefore Sane = "The maximum bending sres is © _ Bat aes = Sine f= whore ci half the beam depth, ‘Therefore (0.x 109? a0)" Which ie the deste rel % 0.58 = 20,100 pei (65 Earthquake Ground Motions ‘The motions ofthe ground during an earthquake ae eentally random; iy the peaks of wosertion, bith postive ad negsive, have vars amplitades and occur at vavious time intervals without any reglae Daiter. These oeur in all dieting, bt our attention willbe reid to horinontal mations, which are the toot damaging. Up to the preseat time (1964) very few records of actual straag motion earthquakes have ben obtained and thre i therefore Ite statistical bass for the predies ‘on of fature earthquakes. In any event, we shall never be wble to pre cic the eet natar of the earthquake for which «given rbure should 1 designed, ‘There are two pombe solution to the problem of defining the input Fiat, we could adopt a “standard” earthquake, with a ertain amplitude of socelertion and time variation. This would be comparable with the ‘pprosch commonly used with other types of lade eg standard design 24 ntrauction to Structure Dynan ‘ruck load), bat would aks even low sens in the onse of earthquake, ‘beause ot only the magnitude ofthe input, but also the time variation, has an important effect on atrictral reponse, A segond and more Dromising approach is to treat the ground motion wea random variable By this method the motion ould be enviseged asthe superposition of runny tne waves of various frequencies, the amplitudes of which have ‘ertain probability ditiutions. Altermativly, the mation eouid be represted by a sree of random impulses If the intensity, or “power,” ‘of the random input i selected wo a to be equivalent to that of ctu) ‘measured earthquakes, the structural responae shold be sina, ‘This ‘ype of analysis produccs a probailiie result; eit would give the Drobabltce that the raative displacement of the wre would not ‘exceed certain values. Such an approsch has not buen developed sa- ‘antl for dizcct application, and further diacarion ix beyond the ope ofthe tere et practical approach vo the problern involves the seal response spectra such as discussed in Se. 4. Although this method is perhaps an versinplieation and eectialy approxima, it appears jolie, in view fol the limited date available on earthquake mations. Many investigators have computed spectra fom actual earthquake record. This i som plished by the direst appliation of Ba. (62). The DLP may be eom- puted by numevea intgeution ofthe mearared azeleration time funeton (0. The tpt is normally in the form of acceleration rather than dis placement, because fold instruments measure the former. Response Spectra derived in this way ae of cours limited in wefnees snes they spply only to the particular earthquake which happens to have been ecorded, However, they are very ureful in estahing the general ‘ature of responte to earthquake. ‘Based upan spectre computed for actual earthquakes, ti poaible to ‘stimate& proper apectrum for general purposes, Its here tha tb log lox plot for spetra (Pg. 6.9) particularly wef Tess noted in ee. 6:4 that the general forms of all pectra are sila, snd thie fact i ef in cstinating the earthquake responge spectrum. Blume, Newmark, and Corning’ have suggested that the spectrum can be approsimated by ‘thee straight lines as follows: (1) line of eonstantsreleration equal to ‘win tho maximum ground acedleration, (2) a line of onstant spectral velocity equal ta 1.5 tines the maximam ground veloity, and (3) line of ‘constant displacement equal to the maxinum ground displacement. spectrum constructed in this way shown in Fig, 8.12 as chee e. Iti thse on the May 18, 1940, Centro, Calif, earthquake (N-Scomponent), for which the recorded maximum quanttea were 0.33, 1.7 i/o, and 83in. Itiintandad vo apply to late systems having betworn 5 and 10 pereent of enti damping. For the El Cuatro input given above, the arthquake Anayis and Devon 385 roeae 12 Kalind raga psn for EL Cire arhcuke My 18 1, Xt rompeneat and SEAOG sesame ‘thre straight lines are defined by o he = (Hadane = 8 in, stall ° Intermediate @ large ‘The simplified spoetrum thus dofned aod chown in Fig. 612 is bused ona particular earthquake and! may not be appropriate for general design ‘burpows. “Additional data which wil Dome available in the future may Indiate that Ube amplitades of ground motion andthe multiplying cot ‘ents shouldbe altered. 86 Earthquake Spectrum Analpss of Mulddegree Systems In Sec, 6.2 we developed a procure of modal analysis for structure sub jected to round motion, ahd in See. 6 5 we deused responce spectra Cr farthquake. We now combine these two concep in order to make 8h pproxinate caste multdegre analysis for earthquake. ‘Sine he response spectra give only maxima response, we shall bsin ‘tho masimum value for ouch mad, which most then be euperimposed to tive total response." The acta tim varition ofthe sign earthuake tnotion is unkowa, end therefore it ie imposible to compte the time ‘aviation of reponse eithor for modal component or forthe total. A ‘conservative upper bound forthe total raponte may be obtained by ad Ing numerically the maximim modal components, However, this is ‘excesively conservative, and it has been suggested that the “probable” ‘ale of the maximum response is approximately the square r0ot of the ‘um of the aquaree (oot mean square) of the modal maxima." This tated on the amimption that the modal componente sre sxndom Yaris es, which i eonastnt with the randots ature of the input, The weeu- racy of thie approach ineraees with the number of dees of fredom, “The elastic analysis demonstrated below isnot intended to represent proper method for earthquake design. A design on thie basis would be toorconservative and inconsistent withthe cbwerved behavior of structures luring earthquake. ‘The primary reaon fortis drerepany sth oat structures can undergo some plastic deformation without excemive damage. As demonstrated in See. 6.5, this capability role in & coo ‘derabe dcraune inthe required strength and stiffen ofthe structure Unortunately, inelastic analyin of multidgree aysteme wubjected to zandom earthquake motion eannat cay be asomplihed. Consdershe research is being conducted on tho problem (1064), and in time satis fetory mathods will probably be devsoped. In the meantime, Ube ‘empirical approach ap diseased in See. 6.7 i the most prctieal design procedure. "The example of elatio anal given below is prevented 0 five the student a bute insight into the general problem and to denon ‘rate a method whieh would be applieable to thove special enes i which ‘truly elastic reponse is desired 1: Bultding-trame Beample ‘To illustrate modal spectrum analysis, we coutider the throcstory tui frame shown in ig. 6.135. If thi s considered to be s “shear bling” (See. 3.8), it may be represented by the closeaupled system sown in Fig. 6158. Assuming the masse and siffarser shown, the rntural frequencis end characteristic shapes have been computed, with the reals tabulated in Pig. 6130 (Se. 28) "The next step into compte the modal participation factors ae given by a. (8.8). "These computations are shown in Table 62. Tt wil be assumed thatthe input cau be represented by the reponse spctruin shown in Fig 6.12 (eurve e). Tt wil be recalled that thin an Crnpiricl represontation of m particular earthquake and assumes a ‘moderate amount of damping in the system. Tu validity for general design purposes has not been proved. The responses of the equivalent Berthquake Anaiea and Doign 37 Morten b= 0 ar Mea Bia. 4 #1000 en 121500 rf hm [ae [aie | ae igo” | soSte [ate | 38 By [seine | cedas | 258 oe | obo "$38 |"T0 ‘ovne 618 Keample. Thneeaory shar bung Table 6 Modal Pertcipation Pastors Stracture Shown in Pl 618) [ore [oa aoe | 1 | * | aal on aa] moo #0 n= 080 r= 40008 ‘onedegres systems in terms of relative dapasement sau are read dirty from Fig. 6.12 and depend only on natural Sregucney. ‘The ‘modal responses due are simply thove values multiplied bythe ore "ponding participation factor [Eq (6.7) Having the maximum modal amplitudes, any other function such as placement or acceleration ata polnt ota eertaln fore orate may be ‘ompated by Kq. (69). For example, the marimum model componente (of fire-loor defection (elative to Ube ground) are obtained by mally Ing the modal amplitnde by the charncteriti-shape factor for that Hoot (f cones, signs should not bo attached to these modal deletions, since ‘ach could bein either direction. The upper bound for the masimam ‘defection ofthis oor isthe numeriel sur ofthe modal components, of 201 in. The “probable” maximum, ar root mean square, is 1.50 in. ‘The latter may not be appropriato in this ease anen there are only three degree of Srowlom. In fact the maximum may be expected to i ome ‘where betmeen the two valuea computed. Of primary inteeet in earthquake design are the maximum values of thestary shears. To obtain the, we fet multiply the modal aplituden Anau by the relative story displacements coreaponding to the modal ahapes, 0. ‘This provides the marion tory displacenent dy of the eeponte mhic, when multiplied by the spring constant, gives the story shear. "The computations leading to thew values ar shown in Tae 63. Tablet Marimum Story Shear by Spectro Analy Sytem in Pi 18 orthquake Anais and Design 208 [may be obecryed that the fist mode make the major eostibuton in ll cases although in the top sory the second-mode effet isa igiicant. ‘Teinay also bw of intrest to compate the masitmm expeted horizontal sccleratin of lor. Tn any made the masinvutn abate acceleration of mus i simply the maximuin displacement ine the sare of the rataral requetey; that %, Gn)ame™ Annan For example, the scceleration of the top Boor ia computed as follows. ‘Tied ror probate” marimun sorderans, 228i fe? ‘As would be expected, the higher modes are relatively more important in the eas of accleration. The “probable” valve eompted shove it bout 0:69, which i very revere with regard te romstruclural damage to ‘he building and it contnts, 67 Practical Design for Earthquake As discus inthe foregoing sections, me are not presently capahle of ‘pplying rigorous methods of analysis to the design of sta structures to ‘withstand earthquake. This i not meant to inply that wear unable to execute ratsfactory designs. Although the detailed tehavior of «given ‘rictur cannot be accurately prtieted, we ean ensure with reasonable onfidenee that it will survive. Survival require Ut the etreture be able to withstand & moderste earthquake, such as might oecur several times during ie li, with only alight damage. Te should alm be abe to withstand the most severe carthquake without collapse, The latter requirement ean be met if advantage i taken of the ability of roa ste tures to absorb energy Dy inelastic reponse. It is apparast tat, ia carthquake-resotant dsiga, the structure should be proportioned aod ‘cial 90 as to enoure the ductility necomary for inlatn behave. ‘Current prctoe in earthquake desig i embodied in devign eo, one ‘of which i dscused below. Ideally, these are basd on experience gained by the observation of structures which have undergone earthgukeeoli= ‘tions, coupled with an underanding of the nature of dynarie response {to support motion. Although special steuoturer may justify more eM | isonet ‘thorough investigation, the better codes provide a simple yet adequate method of dein ‘& Design Cotes Aran example of «commouly used code, we shall consider the Reeor ‘mended Lateral Foroe Requirements (1950) of the Structural Engineers Association of California SEAOC). Ensentilly, the procedure epeided ‘therein is based on only the ft mode ofthe etructre, whichis jstified ty the belie Una the higher modes are of resondary importance By ‘umumnings carsctaritie shape for the st sode, ts pole to convert ‘the maximum condition of response into at of equivalent stati forces. ‘The actual design may then be executed on the bast of static anal ‘The basic eoneept of the SEAOC reeominendation i contained in the ‘wo formulae ow (18) 0.05 a 6.7) vehere V = total dynamic base shear 1 = total weight of building ‘7 = natural peviod of fit mode K = cocficient, varying betwee 0.07 and 1.50 In the above, C, the acme oeficient, is euivaient to the maximum acceleration exprosed ae a fraction ofp, snee, when multiplod by the weight it gives the maximum horizontal inertia foree (Fig, 618).”‘The aeficient Ks intended to rfet the ability ofthe structure to deform into the paste range. For example, the salt value (0.67) applies to ‘moment resisting foams which are relatively ductile, while higher aloes poly to lms ductile arrangemonts such as thone song ne of eonerete ‘hear walls (= 1.33). ‘The expression for C may be interpreted i the ight ofthe discus of See. 05. By reference to Fig. 6.14 and with K = I, it apparent that Borthquake Anayss and Design 31 the spring distortion and the mimic coefficient are related by Itnue = V = CoM nore ne Substitting Ba. (6.17) for €, 1/f for T, and 2ef for w, we obtain 049,, shee = 98 in (18) here f i in eyles per second. This equation represents «response spectrum as plotted in Vig, 612 (curved), where t appears aa straight Tine. “When compared with the idealised sami sportrun. previously ‘wed, Ba, (6.18) indicates lew severe response over most of the frequency ‘ange. This sto be expected, since, a diseusaed previously, the ease ‘pertrun ie unduly conservative. ‘The important point being demon. trated is that Eq. (6.17), and hence (6.18), takes ito agent the eect ofthe natural period in rational ann ‘Tho response spectrum repreentad y 1. (6.8) could of course not be used for elastic modal snalyia ae im See. 66 bret it npc incase reaponse. However, the qusstion should not aris, sings the code con sider only one mode of reponse. Inthe mode eosidered, the maxis inertia fore on maser of lumped-inare sytem ie given by Fem Mokate where A isthe maximum modal aeleration, and 4,8 the coordinate of the characteristic shape at maser. Furthermors, for dysami equ Tibrium, the sum ofall neti frees on m building met eual the base HE nivodueion to Structure! Dynamiee shear. "Thue AS Ma =¥ iiminating Aa fom the last two equations, we obtain, forthe inertia force an tase 7, My, Sane The SEAOC recommendation impli that gy = h/Hf, where fy is the heh abovegeound ofthe rth man and He the total bight of the strc tre. By this aaumption pe MID 69) “which is the SEAOC reeommendstion forthe distribution of lateral oreo. ‘The resulting set of fore in dyanie equilibrium i own in Fg. 615 For design purposes the building may be analyaed ae though these foreos vere applied statically ‘As indicated above, Hq. (6.19) is based on the aamumption that the hacacterstic shape of the fundamental mode ew staigh ine frm the {oandtion to the top ofthe building. This of course an approximation, Dut is reasonable fr typialbuldings. The jutifntion forthe asin” ton may be undemtood i i recognned thatthe total ditrtion of © typical building isthe som of two effete: (1) the shear distortion in the stories ofthe frame and (2) the chabge in length of the columns die to ‘overall beng ofthe bulding. "The former tend to produte a deleted ‘shape which is coneave tothe lft, and the Inter «shape coneeve to the Fight. "The combined eet romita in shape which approaches straight Tine, ‘To illustrate application of the SEAOC: code, we comsider again the three-ory frame shown in Fig. 6.13, which was analyzed in Se. 6, using the eastio response spectrum, The weight of the three Boor ere = Wa = 3000 kige and Ws = 1545 hips, and the total weight ie 7725 Lips. The fundamental mode has a natural (euney of 1.00 eps, ‘oF period of 1.00 ee. Using Eq, (6.17), we nd @ = 005, and if Ks (ken to be 0.67 (rnoment reiting frame), the total base shear is V = KOW = 0.67 x 005 X 7725 = 250 Kips arthquake Analyte nd Denon 73 According to Ba, (6.19, the Boor foros are 3000 X12 5x10" 2 SB STE 800 ETHAN * 259 = “Tero ~ 8 Kw 3000 X24 oso - a45 by . P= OA 5259 = 115 ioe 15 x38 Fy SES 9 250 = BO hips ‘Thus the denign value ofthe story sheers are int ory, 250 ipa Second story, 201 kips ‘Third story, 86 kipe Comparison o these values with those tabulated in Table 6. revels that thoy are approximately inthe same proportion bt that the code vas fare roughly one-tenth of thowe given by the elatic analy The fact ‘hat the relation between the throe etry shears mile the two eaoee Indeates thatthe SEAOC recommendations are a reaonablerepresetar tion of the dynamic response, The fect thatthe code valves are very ‘much smaller should not be alarming boone the elastic analysis known to be exceaiely convervative..‘Tho response spectrum om whish the latter analysis was based (Fig. 6.12, curve a) isan approniation for & rather strong earthquake, and a structure should be expected to undergo tonsiderabe paste distortion under that condition. Furthertore, the two ost of shears are not exactly comparable because the code vl ‘would be used with allowable design stremon rather than yield value, Probleme 1. Thofalloving data are iene ax undampodonedegron rtm ith al fappert maton (Fy. 610) = 10 pata = 050 pein and f= 1S Infect “‘Determiae the maize rain sein ft fam Wik ape te ‘tpportaceteration continues for aay eae eye (Se. 2.8). 314 Intreducton to Struct! Dynami ‘Sc ("Sp Ite rapport motion (ranvrm to the etn) the tae te ‘W radjowe? Conder ony th Sr bear rode and arume the sap of tht moe 2 “The mpport ofthe onm-egee mata fn Prob 1 moreso insted in Mg Sire he at ie dpeemet sae man aba 44 Tn mort of the twodage quien shown Fg 18 more nde. ‘isthe lat deertion of My upto f= 0 ae. The haar gue hie ‘tem nee deere Posh {45 Reering wy Prob. 64, compute the maximo vl f the ml sompenente 465 “Trib og ofthe singin Poh 64ar ay ~ SOT and = the ‘eaponse wil rnc the ple mage sag a asimov aay amputee 467 Pet an late epost aun ig 9 for he ern matin shows T J Syesco0mm Zn e200 Dapee tact oie ocna 638 Problem 64, Borthquse Anaya and Deion 18 simu tol tps rh neg em of Pos 0.” Asa {Seid my tm ed ery nara he mui en, 9 "Tapas Po 8 or the tree-ry biking rane of Pah 35 ir_ earings ert tn SEAOC esmmendaien 7 Blast-resistant Design TA Intoduetion ‘Since the end of World War Ia great deal of rssarch has been conducted fon the rerponge of structures to the effects of miclnr weapons, This lffort has not only rented in the development of tehuiquea by which strueturee may be designed to resist nuclear attack, but has sho con ‘eibuted very appreciably tothe fel of structural dymamiee in gener "The mathods of dynamic analysis which willbe tied in thir chap ter have been presinted previously.” The problem scum herein Of 559 = 08 Ram L2(otyy + Mra) + 1084p + es) {Theol yrs wold beh rater ifthe at wor tracing athe oa Aietoe f e bing ae the mtr fo ding mlé banaue Homeee, ‘ply the ample thoovditon i act oie re 286 Introduction to Structure! Dynamiee te | fe i | i room 74 Bangle, Real nding “hie if we maketh bending sae egal tl pits and in directions, becomes ™ fn Ra = Moll B(emny X16) + 10.520» 20) = 49.8 where i the bending resistance per unit of width. Therefore Required ey = Restle My 880,000 tied Re 80000 «200 mete For bending strength we use the exprenion| phe (1 ‘hich becomes me = 5603" ee it wearbitariy lt the ston ratio», ~ 0.01 and ior the material proper ties ven. ‘Thus the required efetive thickness i obtained by 17,300) += (ae = 68in, hich corresponds to total lah thickneetof about 7 in, ‘We must now refine the design by computing the reponse more exactly. {In Sc. 5: it wae determized that, for a tworway la having sopeet. ratio of 08, the effostive sine 1908. bey = 08 lan-redatant Deen 387 ‘ning the approximate expreion for moment of inertia (Se. 56), +5 X 001 + 0.085) sr find he tifinom to be 480(4 x 10922 ox 1a ‘The total maa ofthe slab ie = MOX 1g X19 x 20 80 “The os-ae factor Kw forthe sab ie 0.54 in the plat ange and 0.69 ‘iu the elatie range (Table 55). Tt in catimated that «proper value for this ease a= 8) is O57. Therefore [Rai _ 5, (0s xTa PR PEN 5 5 1 We enter Hig, 2.24, the reponse chart for triangular pals, with the valuee ke 5.5 X 10° bi, M = 125 tbaeeyin, = 0054 me Be 187 Bee 8 snd read p40 Beau = 012x048 = 0058 me Tho computed » value is suicintly close to that desired (a = 5) since nly a very alight decrease in Ry could be permitted. Furthermore, at the tim of maximum response, the idealised load (Pig. 7.8) has not departed signifeanly from the actual presure-tine curve. We there fore conclude thatthe triangle slcted to represent the load i suicient ly sccurate ead tht the Ti ala i euisfactory "The dsign ofthe root pnd is compliested by the fet that tis element ‘must perform bre Functions (1) i must mpport the roof dab; aud 2) i rt perform ita part ofthe franve action rer the horizontal frees. ‘tthe girder i forced into the pati range bythe vrtiel load, te bility tg restrain the column may be impaired. Tt i therefore advisable to Voi x 135 x10" = 0.081 se ‘To determine the maximum response, we enter Fig. 2 with ty = 0014/0031 = 048 aod rad (DLFom = 1.70, This 2 some ‘what Tes then the value of 2.0 originally anaumed, aod the girder is some ‘what overdesigned. However, a second eyele nec not be demonstented here We should now reconsider some of the base asrumptions made in ‘tho lab and girder design, ‘The time of maximum girder response may be determined by reading on Fig. 20 taj, ~ 1.63, from which 12 1.63 X 0.014 = 0.028 me. ‘Thas the we of Fig. 2.9 vali, since 12 < 0058, the tine of maximum slab response at which the girder loud dloereaes (Fig 7 a). Furthermore, the decay ina rection duc tothe Aeereae of overpremmure isnot approsihle inthe time range of inert, Alo in question isthe easumption that the slab and girder may be (weated asindependent one-depresaystems. This nay be investigated by comparing the defection of the two demente. ‘The dynamic gider ‘detection is given by 5 32,600 Wows = (DLP) ne! = 1.70 x SEED, = 045i, sd the maim slab deletion by Bo, 840000 tae = Bn m ROO x 40 = 6. 1 is apparent that the girder detection is too sna to have an appre: ‘able effet on the slab response, and hence on the applied girder load itself. Thu itis permiable to treat the to element eparstly ‘The walla the building wll be considered to bes one-may, simply aup- ported sab, Its presurubly supported atthe bottom by a wall footing, ‘which js assumed to lack the vigiity necamary to provide rotational restraint, and at the top by the root slab, which has considerably Tees thickness, and hence insuflint stifles and strength to retain. the wall sppretably. The sab oould alo be supported by the veri! see ‘lunns, thus beeoming s two-way slab, but this arrangement has litle fsdvantage. Both exterior walle would of cours be designed for fact-on ‘last exposure since the explosion sould aocur on either side Tn See. 73a, the reflect premir was ompited tobe 50.5 pi and the clearing time for this prssure 0.022 se. "The drag coeficint for the front fae i about 0, and hence the total premare after reflection 2.4 09pe. The total pressuretime curve la therefore aa shown in Fig. 710.” Since the natural period ofthe wal, and hence the tine of response, will be short, the ouding mey be considered as frst approxi- ration tobe the single rangle defined by the initial peak of 9.5 pl and ‘the duration of 0.098 ace (Fig, 710). This wil be corre i the time of ‘maximum response ilove than 0.022 ee. ‘AL this point an estimate must be made of the slab natural period. Suppose a'valve of O03 se is aaumed 90 that 4/7 = 1.3, where tis (0080 se. "Thon, by Fig. 224, the response ebart fr tangles load- time fuvetions, we obtain, for p= 5, Required Be = 075, Required Re = 078 X $9.5 = 445 psi Considering = strip of the simply mopported lab, we find #440 x (2 x 19° 5 Required ov, = = 116,000 tsi. fin AAs in the roof slab design the required slab depth is given by (it we take», = 001) aged 2) eu «= (Ht hh pont a hin of sou 1a aking GF Table 5 and the empirical expresion for moment of neti, the natural period is computed a follows 144 in, t= 8 in 0089 = 5001+ 008) = die BACK X 1097206 _ = 46 10° — 21,2001 /n. per och of width U4 6g ee or 254,000 Ibn. per fot of width My = "eX 160% 12 X Hig = O21 late, er Fook of width “i ERE oxo 253,000 = 01026 see las-redtant Deion 288 ‘We now reenter Fig. 2.24 with _ 00 Be eons Po dom 15 smd E07 to obtain w= 56 and to/lp = 070. From the Inter we compute fe = 070 x 0,00 = 0.027, whic in greater than 01122, and henoe the eased lnding whieh departed from the actual value atthe later time isnot valid (Pig. 7.10) ‘The nb should be strengthened to rue below the decign valu of 5. This ehoald be dane before revising the idcalied Toad becmuse f wll be AMfected by a change in strength. For example, if tho eftive slab ‘hieknos were ineremed £91525 in. (otal thins = 16.5 jn.) and the brenda gn are pind wo ald Be 60 2, and fe ~ 0.083 wee. The ater ite only slightly greater han G2 ac, and the ieaied loading x consderod to be saictory. If ‘a were all apprcialy larger than 0.02, posible procedure would be toasopt two ranges forthe Healeed loud neti and to compte by the us of Ea, (618) in See 5.50, Tn the above nnalysa the effect ofthe horiontal fame motion on the salah erponte has ben ignored. The jstifeaton for this implied ‘tpprosch wil be considered after the frame has been designed Rig rome ‘The totel horizontal foree onthe sec frame ithe algbrai am ofthe front and rear-wall reactions. Tha fr the font wall piven by the ‘exprsion for dynamic rnction in Table 5.1, V = 058R, + 0137 where Fis the external wall pressure (Fig, 710) maltipied by the tiba- {ary wall aren (20 X 12/0), and Fi 0 pl (oe above), or 178 X 1081 for one frame. Since it le probably short compared withthe natu period of the frame, the time required to dovelop this reaction may be Fgaored. After the iasinurn wallelab reeponme (= 0038 se), it may be aanmed that the wall rection ix merely one-balf the applied Toad F, “The residval elstic wall vibration after 0023 sec actually results in a variation about thie mean (2), but cis has Bite eft on total frame response becanse it oovare with relative rapidity. Based on ‘hee ialiaations, the force applied to the fame by the front wall sas shown in Fig. 7-110 "The total pressure on the roar wall i P= pO. g {Intraduetion to Strtarel Dynami B88 n "uae 1 ep, Hott halogen bing there —0.5isthe drag coeticint. ‘This begins to develop when the shoek front reaches the rear ofthe building (¢ = 1/0 = 20/1680 = 0.12 see) And ts a rise time oqual to 48,/07 = 4 X 12/1650 = 0.029 ace, Under ‘his loading the wall would remain latin, and if the vibration ignore, ‘the rettion ot the fracue ix satp % 14)(12 X20) Which is ako plotted in Fig. 7.tta. ‘The net horizontal foreron ane frame ie merely the dflerence between ‘the tno wal reactions. ‘This plotted in ig 7.115. Ar wf approx ination this ond function is wealizd by the dated line, which is defined by Fy = 1000 kipe and G = 0.05 se. Therefore, assuming thst the frame period will bo about 0.08 ce, wecatinate, withthe ad of Pig, 2.24 thatthe required strength should be approximately ou half of the initia Toad peat i to be 8 ‘act-eaatant Deen 28 On the above bass the required resistance ofthe fra to horizontal Toad is approximately Ba = MP = 500 kipe the unbraced height of the colamnn ie, the required bending strength ™, = 1125 ips Beh _ sox 9 Toe Using the given yield strength of 8,000 pei, itis found that an 18WFIO5 steal soetion (= 1852 4) provides the retired plaac, beading ‘orient. Note that, in the above ealeulation, the eet of axial slum stress has been ignored. ‘Thin is permindble heeaise the amount of Aire sizes is not suiient to rede spprociably the enum bending strength. However, « more refined analysis would tas this eect into ‘onderation mn order 1 check the above preliminary column design, me fit com- pute the natural period based upon elective valoen offen and mare (ace See. 58%). "The wtifaes is merely tho inverve of the borlzontel Aefetion due o & unit Rorizantal loud at the top ofthe frame. With ‘the moments of inertia ofthe gider snd enluana previously determined, conventional elastic analysis Tends to the expreaion wast, 2 a sehere Tin the column moment of inertia and i the effective eon Tenath (08). "Thur = 1BAGOX 1091852 69 pwn. = BAGO 101852 | 510 sis ‘The effective mas (Fa. (5.6) i that nt rot level pls one-third of the val masses Roof slab Tg X 180 X 20 X 17.25 = 30,2001 Roo girder 116 X 1725 = 2,000, Walle 36 X 2 x 18.5/12 X 150 x 12 X 20 = 38,000 Column 3X2 105 00 = 600 Total weight soon “HE, = 65,800/386 = 170 tei, "The natural period i therefore 1 ae FE telly ote 286 Introduction to Structural Dynaice We now reenter Fig. 224 with the parameters & _ 9.080 7” oor and fone sndead a3 ad ‘Therefore t= 1.2 X 0.050 = 0.060 see. Refering back to Fig 7.110, we may now make «better load approximation. The proper erierion ie that the areas under the motual snd idealized lod fenction thou be approximately equa upto time a. On this basi it appears that x better approximation for the idealized oad would be i= 060 Kips and 4¢= 0.058 sce, For thin losding the revived parasneers are = 055 and 4 _ 0058 Be. ss FFE = 064 and Be = 809649 = 058 sand we obtain from Hig, 2.24 fm 1.1 X 0.058 = 0.064 ace ‘The load approximation now appears reasonable, aud we conlude that the duality ratio i indeed about 5, the desired value, ‘Therefore the ISWFIOS column setion ie ratifactory. ‘The method of frame anslyais given above is spproxinate in several respects, nnd it may be deeable to make final design based on more eset procedures." This would have to be executed ty numerical Analy, because there are several time-varying efeta and the power might difer fro the above analysis inthe following respecte (1) the ‘ctu load function rather thaa the trangularJoad idealization would be ‘ned (2) the eet of dient treason the cluran bending erength wold te included and (3) the eect ofthe vertial loud asting onthe horizontal defection might be considered. The last would take into seount the ‘eccentricity ofthe vertical load, the effoct of which ito reduce the frame resistance by Fh, where Fis the total veri lad and is th hor ‘2ontal deflection. ‘Ta both procedure 2 and 3, the vertical clus lade should be based on the dynamic reactions ofthe rot gider. Thus even in the plastic range, the frame resistance would be recomputed ut each ‘time statin of the numerical analysis Te will be realed that the wal slab was analyzed as though om rigid supports; ie, the frame motion was ignored. ‘This leeds to only aight feror because, a8 now known, the frame responds more dowly and the Inertia ores onthe wall due to frame motion are small eompared with ‘hove duo to distortion of th wall pate all. Ax donate in Se. 57, the alterative is to consider the two clement ax coupod nytena the transeors rig frame of the eurrent example were to be designed in reinforced conerete rather then ste), the metod of dyoamic analysis ‘would not difer from that given above. However, an important df= ence in column design reults from the fact thatthe eft of axil com- reson on bending strength ie signeant inthe ence of reinforced con tote and should he included. ‘The vertical root load my cause en ‘ppesiable increase in eoluma bending sreng, and to ignore this fact ‘iv unduly conservative, If, ac above, standard response charts ae being ‘sed, some average value of column ompromion most be assitid romain constant during the respons, If thine consered to ere, the frame must be analyzed by numerical step-by-step methods, "For higher design overpiearee rig fate of ether steel or reine force concrete are not economia and the designer may recor tothe use of reinforced concrete shear walle in teneverve panes In addition to the fet thet tho space within th building bobstrcted, shear walls have the disadvantage (rom the viewpoint of rouird strength) of low duc- ‘tility capacity ad great aiff As ral he lateral natural period ofthe building i small andthe design x value mrt be stat a relatively low level. Both of these fasts tend to increase the requir etrength ‘This is of course compensated fr bythe great inherent shear capeity of ‘infored wall" TA Aboveground Arches and Domes ‘The behavior of arches and domes when subjected to the ets of nuclear Dast is obviously a complex phenomenon. ‘The loading, both with reapoct to epi distribution a! time variation ie difieal to Getering ‘oeuso ofthe curvature ofthe exposed surfaces Th addton the seat ‘condition is more compliatad than for other types of structural leanents, ‘och ae besa or frames. Fainly exact methods of sualyse are posse, ‘ut thee are not practical for design purpows. We shall thorefore limit curelves to approximate procedures, ‘The sope of the following dis- ‘usson is resteted to eteular arches and aphereal domes, both of teinfread concrete, ‘The loading may be covadere to const of thos parts: (1) the gecera ‘overpeeaure, which by isl produces uiforza compresin inthe arch oF ‘dome, (2) the retceted presere, which largot atthe windward bare of the structure where the mirface in mort neatly vertical, and (3) the drag ressres, which ae gnerlly postive on Une windward wile and negative ‘on the opposite side, The later two componeate are unsymmetrical and 298 Introduction to Structural Dynamlet ~ 4 ey enn 12 Teated moda nado et dame produce bending in the arch and nonuniform membrane atemes in the ome Tehae boon suggested thatthe total load could be sepreented by two components: (1) “compeusion” mode, costing of x uniform radial ‘prasure and (2) a "lerural” mode, consisting ofan antinymaetel but ‘uniformly distributed presure. These are shown in Tig. 7.12.” The Joad-time funtion and magitide forthe eompression mode ae taken to bb the samo as tho overpresure, except that there is finite rine tne Which i conservatively satiated toe obe-alf the tata tine of the shock front Le, one-half the time roguized for the front to ete the Structure. "The fexural mode le given peak-presite intensity of Pim = pr donee co r= (0542) pe che @ hore is one-half the ceatral angle ofthe arch or dome, and py isthe ‘asim relctod premare om the dome, "The later occurs atthe base, lastsreviatant Devon 298 tnd is given by Bq. (74), provided thet A > 55°. ‘Theae peak vals ste atiainad after about one-half the trait ine (ie, the shor font has ‘eached the canter of te structure). ‘The feral mode presture thee ecreass until at 25 trannit times and thereafter te equal o (8/0 Pd here psi the dynamic presure and Ce ls the doug eoeBcient. The latter coaficient is approximately 4 Tor pu < 50 pe and 1.0 for pe > 78 pal. This change in Ca rele from the Tact that the drag on curved objects displays « Reynolde- number et. Between the two prere levels given, Ce may be mssumed bo vary lineal. ‘The lod component given above are obviously rather erate approxi- rations but are baieved to be conservative and suficlenty accurate for sign purposes. It should be apparent that one reason for alerting ‘theteditibutions (symametceal and antsysuneciea!) was that inter! srcanes may be readily compat forthe cases, This method of load efnition shoud not be used for small weapons say, Y <0. MT, “iaving defined th loadin the manaer outlived above, th eractore ‘may be assumed to have two dogros of fesom, one mods eoremponding to each of the two modal loads. ‘The dynamo analysis may then be executed using any of the methods prevoialy developed 4: Retntorcod Concrete arel Archer ‘The compreaion mode of an arch coresponds to a condition of wiform ‘xl strain and is therefore analogous toa circular ring under uniform radial premure asin Fig, 718. The natirl period may be derived ae follow: Ring stein = Pe here + and Dare the radius and thisknen of the rng, and isthe ‘modulus of elie of concrete. Reiforcng viel has in most cass, 8 nog eect onthe stain. ‘hernia deflcton fe "DE, 114 eral mode dite of and the sifney, define a total radial loud per unit width divided by ail defen, in be 2p _ uD, "The total mass por unit wid i given by aeDe we 7 where pis the concrete density. The natural period of the compression modi therefore nem lates. nd if we take » = 144 Jh/* and 4X 10 pi thie bocomes Tee iy ome an where +i the radius in fet, An seen in Fig. 7-12, the be time forthe compresion made lad ie L/2U. For the overprowures of interest in connection with aboveground szchet (tay, px < 100 pl) and the internal anges ually enevustered, this rie time is of about the same magnitude ae the natural period 7. Such being the ease, the dynamic increase in load effects generally smal (Fig. 29), oF in other words, the loading only lightly more severe ha ftatiolond ofthe same maguitude Purtersnore isthe ene ofan above: sound arch, the mode of failure ie one of exeewive dieotion du flexure, and the major effet of the compressive force isto may the ‘ending resistance of the enfored coneete ero section, ‘This effect is significant throughout the time of fexural respons, and therfore re sock, ‘ot the masimam compresive stem, but an average over thi in, whieh in ewentially the meen, or static, valve. For both of these reason the ‘ompresion in the arch may be appeonimated asa constant with vale equal fo that corresponding © pu. Tn other words, Pape ws here P inthe foros per unit width of arch, Tn the flexural mode the distortion i as ahown in Fig. 714, Note that ‘hi is the fundasnental Mexural mode, which is the only mode of signif Mast reuiatant Design 3 cance in the seaponse due to Uhe antumed flerural mode losding (Pi. 7.1). "Ror this mode the natural period may be computed aa that for 8 beam having w span qual to Ar, o half Us arch ae, modified bya fattor to take into account the lateral deotion of the erown. The bean rntutl period forthe eave of hinged arch supports may be defined by the ‘piel expression re (hot 500 000%. + 0.915) here dis the efetive depth, and , the ster rato inthe tension fae of the crow section. "This exertion is comistent. with the approximate Values of effective moment of inertia fr reinforced conrete wections weed Dreviously (See. 5.60).""The modilying fasta for translation ofthe crown fs approximately Gay 18 aay = Ad therefore the approximate natural period of the flexural moe is eneat (as) T= GIA = 500 000 + OTE ‘hero both and dare i inchee Tn the lesuralmode loud-tine Function Fig. 7-12) the re tine 1/2 1s geoerlly small compared with 7, and may be ignore. Furthermore, we may ceplice the decaying drag eect hy an equivalent strsight Hine (aeeted 0 a to be compatible with the Une of asim reponse a Seo. 729), wo that the total load maybe ropreented by to triangle, ss in Fig. 745. Having accomplihed this simplilstion, inelastic ‘eaponse may be determined by the use of Eg. 6.18), which combince the elects of two triangular functions. Bt Introduction to Structurl Dynamies Aoieaan ana a x ‘The locural resistance ofthe arch may, ike the natural pti, be eed ‘upon n beam of span Ar, medied to ta into account tesnaation ofthe arch crown. If the ach has iaged bases, the restance per unitate length is yiven by Ray = SS Le/A Ca e/a here ty i tho ultimate beading strength ofthe onerete ers ection The eft of axial compreasion on bending scegth i sigafiant dyin most cass, ells in an inreaso of fexural restos. The relationship between ultimate bending strength and compression is well known al ‘an interstioneurve for one eet of paraineer ie shown in Fig 716. For thie igure 1 has boen aueumed thatthe curve for the given dynatnie ‘material propartice is the same ar that for the coreeponding atic ropertiog er = 4,00 pie, ~ 40,000 pai. "The approximate methods of analysis outlined above sre now applied tothe following example. We desire to detarsine the maximim Aerurel response interna ofthe ductility ratio » of the einforeed eouerete arch ‘shown in Fig 7.17, whih i aubjcted to a peak overpressire of 50 pei from a L-S(E weapon. Design would consist ofa seis of such analyses for various wetion properties converging on those which rent in 8 Aes a0) rieoxe 7.17 Bape, Rented corte tat By Bq, (78), the arch compression per inch of width PB 50 x 30 12 = 18,000 Ibn, ‘The ultimate compressive strength for the given parameters is Pe = O85, + 18014) De = (085 X 52004 18 001 x 52,000)88, = 176,000 iyi, 2 ‘Therefore F = 0.02 Using the interaction cor. se obtain Wig. 7 R, oo 1.08 where Ray tthe desural ristance for Ps = 0, By Eq, (76), the peak vale of ferural lod is a= (05 +8) po = tom The hk! vaya on by Ha. fpn\ wm (142) = snd ree e128) Bo, = 00m we Teton to Fig 72, we nd hatte given ovrpran & ‘gre 00 Ua the sone Pek pe ree (a) in 40 psi. From Fig. 73, we detormine the duration ofthe dysamse reared to be3.25 ne. ‘Thus thelial value of the dyzamie-presare 204 Intructon to Stracturat Dynamlee ome 7.8 Baume, Flere dy odin for voting 138) Spats 80 taking C, at 04. Based on the sbove data and the appropriate decay curve of Fig. 7b, the complete laine fueton fr the flexural mode Sas shown in Fig. 7.18 The bending resetance ofthe cross seston without axial compression by the equation given in Fig. 716, with d = 30 in, i 440,000 livin. per Inch of arch width. By Bq (710), the correponding flexural resistance a = BHD, 7) X 3008 SFP 1b was found previoualy that, bocause of P, thi is increased by 1.64, and ‘therfore the actual rsistance i Ray = 83. 164 = 186 psi ‘As formulated bere, the reitanoe i given in terms of external presture. “Evaluating Eq (7.9), weablain the natural period of the exural mode, Otis Ue/2) X 300 gs) wn = ae ™ ape x DONT + OTT ~ 04 At this point wo must emimate the effective duration ofthe dynamic: pressure loud component (A/)paCe. It is expect that the maximum lt-retant econ 386 response will dour in the vicinity of ty = 341, and on this basis tis ‘tiated that a proper valu of eetive duration, tr woul he 0.5 eee ig. 718) ‘We nov determine the maximum responte by the approstateetation tn (B),00+(B),ow =1 ‘where the fin term relatos to the trang defined by Bye ~ (A/e}PuCe Sod ly, ad the seoond term to that defined by (A/c ad tes Vor the current problem we bave the fllowing data ), (e) ote res a9 rn gst antnr pain, ae See een oamicangsurmcreaa of a/P, corresponding to that wand the spproprite l/h eae lations are given in the following table: dreamed | ex | 4nd | walkers | Ova 2 [ts apparent that Ba. (6.18) is ated by wx vale aight Tne han 4. In other words, the maximum deletion of the arch in the Bexural mode is about fou times that corresponding tothe formation of platic hinges t or neer the quarter ponte ofthe uch, or very fat aches may be neenary to oonsider bukling due tothe compression mode loading However, ia most cates, flexure ie the important consideration, and the compresive fore not large enough to ee an untable ennditon, If the arch were a rib eopporting« eyindial surface the above pro- cure would be modified nan obvious manner to account forthe neeaee In load relative tothe ib width ‘The foregoing procedure is spproxinata In several remects. If the analyst desire a mere presse elation, or ifthe reaponse completely lai, s numerical method of analyeis should be used. This ean bo 288 Introduction to Strueture Dynami sccomplithed using only the system parameter computed shove and the ‘ondimensonal equation of motion given in Sc. 280. 1 Fi Biter 0 where = y/ys foun, GG) = lad-time notion for exural mode ‘The preceding equation wpplice in the lati range only, and beyond the clasts Init it should be changed to 1 B Bit sO ‘The maximum value of» obtained ia by definition, yf, in ition, itis dasired to take into aecount the variation in Pe and the conseroeat ‘eet on Fy, the above equations may be rewritten as 1 $e=s®) casio range ty Ra = and ett =) panic range where «is v/vay and ya i the flexural mode deflection due to the static Applestion of Fy. In cach step of the numerical analyis a nthe ast ssuation may be determined forthe value of P. ~ pr orouting at that 1 Relnlrced Concrete Sperial Dome ‘Spherical domes may be trestd in manner similar to thet given for arohes. Tn this eas, however, the to-aled leriral mode loading dows ‘ot produce bending, since it resisted by membrane stress “The natural peciad in the compraron mode may be derived folowing the procure given sbove for ares, Noting thatthe radial defection for aspherical shell under uniform premure i pe Yap. O° where ie Pion rai, we fi that the marl prio i approinatly Srl by = ay where the mdiusin feet. ‘The natura period inthe exural mode may be taken approximatly a the sane as that for the compression rode ‘The natural periods fora dome are extremely shor, and for the pressure levels (4 < 100 pai) and weapon yaks (> 0.1 MT) conadered bere, Moct-reiatant Devon 207 the rise mes for both modal lod (Fig. 7.12) are never approsibly les than the periods. ‘Therefore the djnamie inereae inthe load effect is reserally mall. Furthermore, the decay of the peak loads is rately slow, which indeutes that the roquired strength fs nt very seative to the dsign

You might also like